Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 16, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2007 > DecemberChristianity Today, December, 2007  |   |  
GOOD QUESTION
Hour of Decision
"How can I know I'm a Christian if I can't remember when I first responded to the gospel?"



ADVERTISEMENT

My favorite question to ask Christians is how they came to trust in Christ. The answers I've heard testify to the diverse experiences God uses to bring people into a relationship with himself. Most commonly, people say they trusted him as a child at camp or at Sunday school or while praying with a parent. They often follow with something like, "But my faith really became my own when I was a junior in high school."

How are we to understand this variety of experiences and the apparent two-stage process many seem to undergo in arriving at saving faith?

The term saved is popularly used to refer to regeneration and justification. But when the Bible uses the word salvation in a spiritual sense, it describes the broad range of God's activity in rescuing people from sin and restoring them to a right relationship with himself. Salvation in the Bible thus has past, present, and future tenses. A believer has been saved from the guilt of sin (justification, see Eph. 2:8), is being saved from the power of sin (sanctification, see 1 Cor. 1:18), and will be saved from the judgment and presence of sin (glorification, see Acts 15:11).

While the subjective experience of being saved may look very different from person to person, the objective state of being saved is definite and absolute. From God's perspective, there is a definitive point in time when those who have trusted in Christ pass from death into life (1 John 3:14).

Whether or not one can remember the moment of spiritual rebirth, it is a miracle that initiates a number of new realities. Through the work of the Holy Spirit in regeneration, the spiritually dead person is made alive in Christ (Titus 3:5). The convert's filthy rags of self-righteousness have been traded for the perfect righteousness of Christ (Phil. 3:8-9). He or she can cease striving to be justified, resting instead in the finished work of Christ (Phil. 2:8-9). As Paul writes, "There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus" (Rom. 8:1). The believer has "crossed over from death to life" (John 5:24), which means the person can "have confidence on the day of judgment" (1 John 4:17).

Much of American Protestantism has been influenced by revivalism, which places great emphasis on "making a decision for Christ" in a public, definitive way. These "moments of decision" often become the crucial evidence that one is saved. Other Protestant traditions, less influenced by revivalism (including some Reformed and Lutheran churches), may be content to leave the conversion experience unclearly identified, putting the focus on identification with the church. Both of these traditions have benefits, as well as potential problems.

The decision approach rightly emphasizes the need for a personal commitment to Jesus Christ and the idea that regeneration takes place at a specific time. The potential downside is that this view can lead to a simplistic, human-centered understanding of being saved, where one depends too heavily on the specific act of trusting Christ as the primary evidence of conversion. As a result, one can doubt the "decision" was real, leading to numerous journeys down the aisle (just in case). Also, one can depend on the walk down the aisle alone, even in the absence of spiritual fruit.

On the other hand, Reformed traditions appreciate the sovereignty of God and the role of the church in the salvation process. Yet they can leave conversion so vague that the need for personal trust in Christ and a changed life is neglected.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 43 comments.See all comments
ChuckRockjr   Posted: December 31, 2007 3:05 AM
I agree with Bob, the explanation in the article clearly conflicts with scripture and the convictions of the early christians (Justin Matyr, tertulain, etc). In my reading of scripture it seems clear that faith, confession, and repentance are all required, however, forgiveness takes place at baptism. We will continue to grow in our faith, confession and repentance after baptism, but evidence of these must have manifested prior to baptism for us to have accepted God's offer of salvation on his terms, as opposed to our own. I have a degree in business and have been a christian for 12 years (reborn 3-19-95), and have led small group bible discussions in my home. I have to confess that I am regularly confounded by the teaching of those who have degrees in theology.

The G   Posted: December 27, 2007 9:45 AM
For 1500 years immersion was the point of salvation according to Acts 2:38; Romans 6; Colossians 2:12; 2 Peter 3:21. It is the place where God does HIS work as He has said and promised. Even Luther defended this. It wasn't until Zwingli came along that this change and Calvinists bought into it. Sprinkling babies is not baptism and can never be by virtual that then meaning of the word immersion, to sink as a ship--with the idea of death. The sinner's prayer is a man made invention --started by Billy Sunday and made popular by Billy Graham, but it's not God's Word. The book of Acts is full of examples where those who wanted to be Christians were immersed. Let's return to God's pattern and end the confusion. Calvinists won't because they believe one has to be regenerated first by God's tyrannical choice. And only then you can believe. They dominate the media.

Monte   Posted: December 27, 2007 6:49 PM
I must respectfully disagree with what Robert has written. First of all, "belief" for many people is not New Testament faith. As a pastor, I talk with many people who "believe" in Jesus but refuse to follow him when His word contradicts their lifestyle and yet they vehemently defend their faith in Christ. Second, Jesus teaching in John 3 that we must be born again points to a decisive moment. I like the way the Thoennes put it, that regeneration is at a particular point in time from God's perspective. We just may be completely aware of that moment from a human perspective. Emphasizing a "moment of decision" to the point that it distorts or cheapens faith is what is dangerous. And while I respect The G's desire to be ruled intirely by the NT, there is not one passage of Scripture that teaches baptismal regeneration.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Secretary Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com