Jump directly to the content

books

BooksReviews, Interviews, News, Commentaries, Excerpts, My Top 5 Books, Wilson's Bookmarks, Book Awards

Shedding Light on The Dark Tower

A C.S. Lewis mystery is solved.

Alastair Fowler, Regius Professor Emeritus of Rhetoric and English Literature at the University of Edinburgh, may have inadvertently settled the biggest Christian literary scandal of the last 50 years.

In 1988, Kathryn Lindskoog accused Walter Hooper, who was briefly C. S. Lewis's secretary and later a trustee of his literary estate, of forging a number of manuscripts that he attributed to Lewis, in particular The Dark Tower, an unfinished science-fiction novel.

"If Lindskoog is wrong," said Don King, author of C. S. Lewis, Poet, "[then] Lewis wrote some pieces that were stillborn at best or just plain bad at worst. If she is right, then someone is a forger." Indeed, Lindskoog's allegations raised doubts about anything ascribed to Lewis but not published in his lifetime.

The History of a Mystery

In 1966, Hooper announced the existence of The Dark Tower in the preface to Of Other Worlds. He had rescued the unfinished science fiction novel in early 1964, he said, along with several other unpublished manuscripts. They'd been in a pile of Lewis's old papers that Lewis's brother and their gardener were burning a few months after Lewis had died. In 1974, Roger Lancelyn Green included a synopsis of The Dark Tower in the Lewis biography he wrote with Hooper. In 1977, Hooper published The Dark Tower in a collection of Lewis fiction that included another manuscript he'd also saved from the fire, "The Man Born Blind."

For years, Walter Hooper said, he and Lindskoog carried on a very friendly correspondence. But "then in 1978," Hooper related, "she wrote critically of me in a magazine article to which Owen Barfield responded. After that, she became quite bitter. She accused me of taking the money from the sale of the film rights to the animated ...

Article Preview

This article is currently available to CT subscribers only.

To continue reading:
LoginorSubscribe

From Issue:
February 2007, Vol. 51, No. 2
More from Christianity Today

The Latest in Movie News, June 17, 2013

Box office returns, Shrek on your TV, casting news, and Russell Crowe.
It's the Thoughts That Count

It's the Thoughts That Count

Why Christians can't be careless about the consumption of popular culture.
A Better World For Kids

A Better World For Kids

Economist Charles Kenny offers a contrarian take on global poverty.
Why World Relief's Jenny Yang Feared Speaking on Immigration

Why World Relief's Jenny Yang Feared Speaking on Immigration

The 33-year-old daughter of immigrants has become a leading voice behind the Evangelical Immigration Table.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 22 comments

Jason Pratt

February 12, 2007  3:02pm

I wouldn't call it "settled" exactly. What Professor Poe dosen't mention (perhaps because he isn't aware of it), is that Kathryn didn't consider a mere argument from silence to be her strongest evidence (or even particularly strong evidence at all.) She believed Walter Hooper's own provenance trail, as described by himself in various public accounts, to be highly problematic. It was this which originally set her on the hunt, after a mere initial curiosity about the material; and it is this she primarily focuses on in her books.

Michael Covington

February 10, 2007  9:15pm

As a computational linguist, I don't trust Morton's cusum analysis. It's one thing to show that the style varies from text to text; it's quite another to conclude that the variation is due to a different author. Besides, why shouldn't Lewis's style be different when he's having trouble than when he's writing successfully? If nothing else, the aborted fragments would never be reworked by the author to perfect the style. Having said that, until I read about Fowler's evidence, I sat on the fence regarding the controversy about The Dark Tower. Something is badly wrong with it. But if nothing else, it pokes some well-deserved fun at the architecture of the Cambridge University Library, whose shadow I (literally) lived in for a year as a graduate student.

Kelly

February 07, 2007  9:02pm

I do believe, after reading several books by the same author from more than one author, that you can have a great writer write something really bad once in awhile. More power to the ones who recognize it before it gets published! As for Ms. Lindskoog's time spent trying to prove Mr Lewis didn't write it, think what could have been there for us to read had she spent the same amount of time writing something worth reading!

See All 22 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

Want to Change the World? Sponsor a Child

A top economist shares the astounding news about that little picture hanging on our refrigerator.
7 Men: And the Secret of Their Greatness

7 Men: And the Secret of Their Greatness

A conversation with Eric Metaxas

Writing for the Reader

Writing for the Reader

A conversation with Victor LaValle

more | current issue

Books & Culture

Writing for the Reader

Writing for the Reader

A conversation with ...

Today's Christian Woman

Kirk Cameron: Love is Worth Fighting For

Kirk Cameron: Love is Worth Fighting For...

The 1990s teen heartthrob...

Out of Ur

Tweeting the (other) SBC

Tweeting the (other) SBC

Oh be careful little...

Gifted For Leadership Blog

Habits of the Heart, Part 1

Habits of the Heart, Part 1

Why routine spiritual...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping