Dobson, Others Seek Ouster of NAE Vice President
More than two dozen evangelical leaders are seeking the ouster of the Rev. Richard Cizik from the National Association of Evangelicals because of his "relentless campaign" against global warming.
In a March 1 letter to L. Roy Taylor, chairman of the NAE Board, Focus on the Family Chairman James Dobson and others said the NAE vice president's activism on global warming is "a threat to the unity and integrity" of the organization.
"The issue that is dividing and demoralizing the NAE and its leaders is related to global warming," wrote the leaders, none of whom are members of the association. "If he cannot be trusted to articulate the views of American evangelicals on environmental issues, then we respectfully suggest that he be encouraged to resign his position with the NAE."
Taylor could not be reached immediately for comment. Cizik said, "I have no intention of resigning." The NAE's interim president, Leith Anderson, said Friday he expects the board to stand by Cizik, who directs the NAE's Washington office.
"I'm supportive of Rich Cizik," Anderson said. "I think that he is highly respected in Washington and is a forthright spokesman for creation care and that's good."
When read a list of the signatories, Anderson said, "We would normally look to our own constituency and not to those who have chosen not to be members of the NAE for counsel."
The letter comes as some leading conservative Christians have been vocal in their criticisms and doubts about global warming, arguing against leading scientists who say global warming is human-induced, and saying the issue is not an appropriate focus for evangelicals.
"I am today raising a flag of opposition to this alarmism about global warming and urging all believers to refuse to be duped by these 'earthism' worshippers," the Rev. Jerry Falwell said in a Feb. 25 sermon on "The Myth of Global Warming" at his Lynchburg, Va., church.
Earlier in February, World magazine founder Joel Belz wrote in an essay in his conservative Christian weekly that "Cizik has made it way too easy for the public to conclude that his own views are also the views of the NAE."
Cizik said he is addressing issues included in the NAE's vision statement, including support of the traditional family, sanctity of human life, religious freedom and care for creation.
Cizik considers his attention to the environment to be part of a "biblical mandate" he follows as a Christian and NAE staffer, but said the association has not reached a consensus on global warming.
"There are people who, because of my views on climate change, which are very mainstream, want to pin a label of being a political liberal on me, which, of course, is not true," he said.
The letter's signers, who included American Family Association Chairman Don Wildmon and Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, charged that Cizik has a "preoccupation" with climate concerns. Referring to a January USA Today article on evangelical identity, they said, "We believe that some of that misunderstanding about evangelicalism and its 'conservative views on politics, economics, and biblical morality' can be laid at Richard Cizik's door."
Copyright © 2007 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
Related Elsewhere:
Focus on the Family sent out its call for the NAE to restrain Cizik as a special alert. The letter from Dobson and others is available at the Focus website.
Christianity Today's earlier coverage of global warming includes news articles and opinion pieces.

Grieving with the Good Friday God
La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 148 comments
See all comments
skippy
This is in response to joymar's comments. Care of human destiny is directly dependant on care of the environment. Once you start destroying key elements of the food chain you threaten ALL LIFE on this planet. Apparently biology wasn't taught at your high school. Oh thats right scince is evil and the work of satan!!!!!!!!! MY bad
Jim Coons
How can it be unbiblical to promote environmental health (unless we are claiming to "save the planet”?) Too many Christians have too much time on their hands. Come down to Central America and pitch in along side the poor and unsaved population. Then you will see how esoteric this fight really is. I am embarassed
Rimerague
Maybe this has already been brought up in someone else's comment; as believers in the Savior and Lord of all nations, we should be concerned about anything that effects our brothers and sisters anywhere on this planet. Whether one believes specifically in the issues of global warming or not, there is abundant evidence that the way we carry on our lives here in America, the things we do to support and maintain and ensure our way of life, has had and continues to have a detrimental effect on the environment and therefore the lives of people all around the globe. None of us lives independently of our environment, though in the States we have attempted to live that way. But our greed (which is idolatry) dramatically effects others. We are only now beginning to be concerned because all of this may now be coming home to roost. It is about time we articulate and follow a biblical view of these things, to seek what pleases God, instead of just trying to keep a lifestyle. See Rev. 11:18