Jump directly to the content

Feature

Augustine's Origin of Species

How the great theologian might weigh in on the Darwin debate.

This year marks the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin's birth and the 150th of the publication of his On the Origin of Species. For some, such as Richard Dawkins, Darwinism has been elevated from a provisional scientific theory to a worldview—an outlook on reality that excludes God, firmly and permanently. Others have reacted strongly against the high priests of secularism. Atheism, they argue, simply uses such scientific theories as weapons in its protracted war against religion.

They also fear that biblical interpretation is simply being accommodated to fit contemporary scientific theories. Surely, they argue, the Creation narratives in Genesis are meant to be taken literally, as historical accounts of what actually happened. Isn't that what Christians have always done? Many evangelicals fear that innovators and modernizers are abandoning the long Christian tradition of faithful biblical exegesis. They say the church has always treated the Creation accounts as straightforward histories of how everything came into being. The authority and clarity of Scripture—themes that are rightly cherished by evangelicals—seem to be at stake.

These are important concerns, and the Darwin anniversaries invite us to look to church history to understand how our spiritual forebears dealt with similar issues.

Letting Scripture Speak

North African bishop Augustine of Hippo (354–430) had no skin in the game concerning the current origins controversies. He interpreted Scripture a thousand years before the Scientific Revolution, and 1,500 before Darwin's Origin of Species. Augustine didn't "accommodate" or "compromise" his biblical interpretation to fit new scientific theories. The important thing was to let Scripture speak for itself.

Augustine wrestled with Genesis 1–2 throughout his career. There are at least four points in his writings at which he attempts to develop a detailed, systematic account of how these chapters are to be understood. Each is subtly different. Here I shall consider Augustine's The Literal Meaning of Genesis, which was written between 401 and 415. Augustine intended this to be a "literal" commentary (meaning "in the sense intended by the author").

Augustine draws out the following core themes: God brought everything into existence in a single moment of creation. Yet the created order is not static. God endowed it with the capacity to develop. Augustine uses the image of a dormant seed to help his readers grasp this point. God creates seeds, which will grow and develop at the right time. Using more technical language, Augustine asks his readers to think of the created order as containing divinely embedded causalities that emerge or evolve at a later stage. Yet Augustine has no time for any notion of random or arbitrary changes within creation. The development of God's creation is always subject to God's sovereign providence. The God who planted the seeds at the moment of creation also governs and directs the time and place of their growth.

Augustine argues that the first Genesis Creation account (1:1–2:3) cannot be interpreted in isolation, but must be set alongside the second Genesis Creation account (2:4–25), as well as every other statement about the Creation found in Scripture. For example, Augustine suggests that Psalm 33:6–9 speaks of an instantaneous creation of the world through God's creative Word, while John 5:17 points to a God who is still active within creation.

Further, he argues that a close reading of Genesis 2:4 has the following meaning: "When day was made, God made heaven and earth and every green thing of the field." This leads him to conclude that the six days of Creation are not chronological. Rather, they are a way of categorizing God's work of creation. God created the world in an instant but continues to develop and mold it, even to the present day.


More from Christianity Today
A Fractured and Beautiful Faith

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith

How songwriter Audrey Assad transcended "positive and encouraging" to create music for the church.
A Terrifying Grace

A Terrifying Grace

Why God’s omniscience is good news for us.

Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

What to watch this weekend (hint: don't make a huge mistake).
Can a Christian Family Ever Be Too Big?

Can a Christian Family Ever Be Too Big?

Experts weigh in.
Get Instant Access
Christianity Today Magazine
Subscribe now for a year (10 issues) at $24.95 for print, iPad, and instant web access.

International Orders

Comments

Displaying 1–3 of 69 comments

sfg

May 21, 2009  4:51pm

Prof McGrath, I feel the need to point out that your use of the word 'random' as a 'lawless process' is very different from the very specific definition of the word that scientists use. In science and specifically in my field of statistics, random is defined as a "circumstance or event that is described by a probability distribution (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition). A probability distribution describes the range of possible outcomes that a circumstance or event can attain and the probability that a any given outcome or subset of outcomes will occur. So in the scientific sense an event that is random is unpredictable (as you assert yourself), but if it's probability distribution is known, it's possible to quantify the amount of unpredictability. Surely with your background in molecular biophysics you were taught this. Why do you feel the need to play with semantics regarding the word 'random'?

Rocket

May 20, 2009  6:57am

A sensible and fine article. The prophecy of Augustine that believers will be regarded with scorn by intelligent non believers if they insist on an overly 'literal' interpretation of Genesis, HAS ALREADY COME TRUE. The propaganda of so so called "Creationists" has, in my country (Australia) led to a common and widespread justification of unbelief. Students refuse to consider the claims of Christ on their lives, not because they cannot believe in a Creator, but because they think that in becoming a believer they have also to become a mindless 'creationist'. So they justify their unbelief, using a false theory of creation. The Church should be firmer on this issue and clearly identify Creationism as a heresy. Firstly, because it deliberately misinterprets the beginning of Genesis as prose not poetry (as the author intended), and, secondly because it ignores the vast scientific evidence that Creation itself has always been creative itself. To be blunt: Creationists are Flatearthers.

Redfox

May 19, 2009  9:46am

A reality that must be faced – if Christianity cannot co-exist with science Christianity will disappear. No dark threats warning against the shaky ground of compromise, no amount of fervourant hope, no thundering from the pulpit and no amount of self-delusion will protect Christianity from extinction. Only a clear understanding that the bible is not a scientific text book written to explain ‘how things work’, and rather that the bible is a record of man’s attempts to understand and meet God (and the reverse) will achieve this. If we seek to uphold the bible by defending every ‘jot and tittle’ we will fail to defend the whole also. I cannot get beyond the first few chapters of Genesis without realizing that a literal meaning is not intended, I am surprised that many Christians do not see the ambiguity, and more amazingly call those who do not agree ‘atheist’. Believing in Jesus Christ as savior does not require a complete understanding of the relationship between the bible and science.

See All 69 Comments
You must be a Christianity Today subscriber to post comments
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
Login
or
Subscribe
or
Register

Don't Miss

Rob Bell's 'Ginormous' Mirror

Rob Bell's 'Ginormous' Mirror

To read his book is to read about our fascination with ourselves.
Losing my Edge

Losing my Edge

When your initial enthusiasm fades, you need a plan if you're going to bring your best to your calling

War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

more | current issue

Today's Christian Woman

Ministering to Military Families

Ministering to Military Families

Five tangible ways to...

Books & Culture

A Measure of Forgiveness

A Measure of Forgiveness

Memories of a British...

Small Groups

Conflict in Small Groups

Conflict in Small Groups

Work through conflict...

Out of Ur

Review: Missio Alliance Gathering 2013

Review: Missio Alliance Gathering 2013

Reflections on mission...

Facebook

CT eBooks & Bible Studies


Shopping