Adamant on Adam
Bruce Waltke built a national reputation teaching the Old Testament at Reformed Theological Seminary (RTS) for more than 20 years. But in March, when he seemed to challenge evangelicals in a video interview to consider the possibility of evolution or risk being seen as a "cult," Waltke's scholarly life exploded.
Seminary administrators asked Waltke to have the video removed from the website of BioLogos, a nonprofit promoting the integration of Christianity and science. Waltke promptly did so, but the video already had kicked up controversy. In early April, the renowned scholar resigned from RTS's Orlando campus.
Waltke's video addressed the barriers evangelicals face in considering the possibility of evolution, a process he believes is guided and sustained by God. Waltke said that "if the data is overwhelmingly in favor of evolution, to deny that reality will make us a cult … some odd group that is not really interacting with the world."
According to RTS interim president Michael Milton, Waltke's resignation was accepted because of his "mainline evolutionary" views and "uncharitable and surely regrettable characterizations" of those who disagree with his biblical interpretation.
Waltke said he does not fault RTS—which still praises his scholarship—and that he resigned willingly. But he also does not regret stirring up controversy about an important issue.
"I see it as Providence," said Waltke, who has been hired by Knox Theological Seminary. "I'm very glad the discussion has come to the fore."
Tensions continue between Christian scholars and their institutions over how to present the findings of science while upholding theological convictions.
Westmont College biblical scholar Tremper Longman III was disinvited last year from further adjunct teaching at RTS due to questioning in a video whether Adam was a historical person. Biologist Richard Colling resigned last year from Olivet Nazarene University amid ongoing controversy over Random Designer, his 2004 book which was banned from Olivet classrooms for arguing that God is behind evolution.
"The general constituency of the evangelical community is lagging way behind the teachers at its own colleges and universities," said Howard Van Till, a retired astronomy professor at Calvin College who survived an inquiry into his views on evolution and Scripture in the 1980s.
The Internet has needlessly inflamed conflicts that used to be handled internally, said William Ringenberg, a Taylor University historian of Christian colleges.
"Issues and controversies will sometimes be almost created by the process," Ringenberg said.
Such dustups pressure institutions "heavily dependent upon public reputation," he added. Theologians take greater risks than scientists in terms of how quickly a school's constituents are "going to be alarmed or pass judgment."
BioLogos itself is bringing the issue to the fore, says John Walton, a Wheaton College professor of Old Testament and author of 2009's The Lost World of Genesis One.
"People have to start declaring what they may have just kept to themselves before," Walton said.
RTS faculty have some leeway in how they teach creation, but Scripture gets the last word, Milton said. It is vital that evangelical schools clearly place science "under the banner of Scripture" so that other biblical teachings are not compromised, he said.
"Science is on a journey; revelation is a destination," he added. "We begin and end with revelation at RTS."
Walton hopes the debate pushes Christians to find common ground. "We have to start thinking more about values that we must affirm—biblical values—rather than conclusions [about how God created]."
Update: Waltke responded to this article in the August issue of Christianity Today.
Copyright © 2010 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
Related Elsewhere:
Christianity Todayfirst covered Bruce Waltke's resignation on Liveblog.
Previous CT stories on science and evolution include:
Darwin Divides | Christian college professors split on Texas science standards. (March 3, 2009)
The Evolution of Darwin | The scientist's problem with God did not spring from his theory. (January 22, 2009)
At Origins' Margins | Michael Behe wonders how much Darwinism can really explain. (March 27, 2008)
Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 100 comments
See all comments
Milton TN
GodslionX3, really, now, take some deep breaths and calm down. Jesus was and is the Lion of Judah. The position has been filled for all eternity and God is not taking applications for it. Also, you must stop calling people fools, even when they do or say foolish things, as do we all sometimes, even you and I. Jesus had a solemn warning about calling people fools and condemning them to hell. The oft-misused passage "Judge not, lest ye be judged" refers not to exercising discernment and rebuking a fellow believer, but to condenming someone to hell, which I recall you having done in some of your comments. That is God's judgment alone. As for calling people fools, read Matthew 5:22. Jesus had a stern warning about that.
Milton TN
One does not have to believe in a 6 X 24 hr. creation or a young (6,000 yrs.) earth to believe creationism and reject macro-evolution. Answers in Genesis does indeed refute the claims of evolution, especially re: millions/billions of years being necessary or even able to produce life out of inamimate matter or new species or genus of life, as well as making what was for me the crucial point in rejecting my previous belief in evolution: that evolution requires a cruel God who allowed untold millions of creatures to die before sin had entered the world. For evolutionists. I have 2 questions. 1, Which came first, the chicken or the egg? (Seriously!) 2, How did the first mammal born to reptile or avian parents survive infancy being unable to nurse from its mother? If you can give a logically coherent, serious answer (flippant answers remove you and your position from serious consideration) then I and possibly others will take your objections more seriously.
Tom Smith
Each church or school has a right and a responsibility to set the standards for the institution. If someone finds fault with those standards, he should leave and find a church or school that holds to his beliefs. This is the way honorable men and women respond to the rules set by an institution which attempts to apply God's standards. Working in he area of science, I have observed that science is distorted to promote evolution. Some Christians fall for the hype of evolution and think they must alter scripture to align with evolution. This is bad both for the Church and for science in general. Science is pushed forward on faith more than on science.