If there's one thing we evangelicals are good at creating, it's a backlash. When the culture starts going crazy, we react. That's not a bad thing—in fact, resisting and challenging the troubling dimensions of mainstream culture is what we are supposed to do. But sometimes our reactions are so extreme that they become a problem themselves.
I believe we are seeing such a backlash now regarding marriage. As Western society attempts to redefine marriage as whatever anyone wants it to mean, according to the whim of the moment, many Christians are fighting to preserve what we believe is a God-ordained institution, and to promote lasting, healthy traditional marriages. That's exactly as it should be.
The problem arises when we make marriage sound like it is only an institution. Certain influential Christians seem to promote a vision of marriage as a duty—and little else.
In her book Get Married, for example, Candice Watters recalls "… sitting in class learning about all the ways our country was slipping from its constitutional foundations. And in a moment of exasperation, I raised my hand and called out, 'So what's the solution?' … Dr. Hubert Morken didn't disappoint. He looked at me with a twinkle in his eye and let his grenade fly: 'Get married, make babies, and do government. That's how we win.' "
In other words, lie back and think of America. Just go out and get married. And if you're not in love, get over it and get married anyway.
- Author and psychologist Stephen Simpson, quoted at Crosswalk.com, argues, "Falling in love before you got married or engaged was a twentieth-century concept." Really? Jacob and Rachel lived in the 20th century? Song of Solomon was written in the 20th century? And Romeo and Juliet and Jane Eyre? Simpson is trying to make a point about how much our romantic ideas and practices have changed, but such a sweeping statement only causes confusion instead of clearing it up.