Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 9, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2008 |  
House
| posted 11/07/2008




House

Our rating: 2 Stars - Fair

Your rating:  

MPAA rating: Not Rated
(for some violence and terror)

Genre: Thriller

Theater release:
November 07, 2008
by Roadside Attractions

Directed by: Robby Henson

Runtime: 1 hour 41 minutes

Cast: Reynaldo Rosales (Jack Singleton), Heidi Dippold (Stephanie Singleton), J.P. Davis (Randy Messarue), Julie Ann Emery (Leslie Taylor), Officer Lawdale (Michael Madsen)

Related: Talk About It/Family Corner


Director Robby Henson has scored the Christian thriller hat trick: he's now adapted three supernatural suspense novels in just three years. He started with The Visitation by Frank Peretti and then turned to Ted Dekker's Thr3e. And so, it makes sense that his third would be House, a tag-team work by Peretti and Dekker.

When the novel House released, I was curious about the brainchild of two of Christian publishing's bestselling novelists. I'd enjoyed some work by each author; knowing their strengths, I figured they'd knock the trapped-in-a-house-with-a-killer story out of the park. Not so much. Actually, I really disliked the book. However, I kept thinking: But as a movie, this could be pretty good. The book possessed good tension and eerie scenes that, if stripped of extraneous, heavy-handed narration, could make for a fast and intense ride.

Reynaldo Rosales (left) as Jack, Michael Madsen as Officer Lawdale
Reynaldo Rosales (left) as Jack, Michael Madsen as Officer Lawdale

So, I was glad when I heard about the film version. And I do like it better than the book (although that may not say much). It's not the scary horror film I thought it could be—or that I think the studio is trying to sell it as—but House has some real strengths. It does share some of the problems plaguing both of Hensons' critically-panned Christian films—but all three have consistently improved and House is clearly the best.

Like the book, the movie centers on troubled married couple Jack (Reynaldo Rosales) and Stephanie (Heidi Dippold) as they are on their way to see a marriage counselor. They get lost and end up stranded in the middle of nowhere. Luckily, they stumble on an old inn where they meet more stranded travelers, Randy (J.P. Davis) and Leslie (Julie Ann Emery). Things get weird when they meet the family that runs the place—three odd hillbilly characters who constantly point out that their visitors are sinners with evil hearts. Things get worse when a killer known only as the Tin Man shows up traps them all in the hotel with the frightening message that at dawn he'll kill them—unless the group provides one dead body first.

Obviously, the film is about the sinfulness of our hearts and a big reminder that the wages of sin are always death. Someone has to die for each of these traveler's sins. But will the Tin Man really spare them if they deliver the body of one of the house's other sinners?

Allana Bale as Susan, apparently in serious need of some sunshine
Allana Bale as Susan, apparently in serious need of some sunshine

That's a very promising Christian film premise. But like the book, the promise is marred in the execution. The camera work, set design, special effects, and look are pretty top-notch—a real improvement on a lot of movies by Christian filmmakers. And the acting, especially by Rosales as Jack, is solid (with the caveat that most of the film requires them to just run around and look scared). But missteps overshadow the pluses.

For starters, the film doesn't achieve the horror or creep factor it could have—or that the trailer seems to promise—mainly because of strange stylistic choices. Henson employs a lot of MTVish fast-forward and quick-cut devices that make it very hard for the terror to settle over the viewer. Think about classic horror films like The Shining or the original Halloween. They weren't flashy or in-your-face. These films subtly and slowly created the scare tactics, or let the terror linger menacingly around the next corner. That is not allowed here. Case in point: There's a dining room scene that could have been skin-crawlingly eerie as the weird host family batters their guests with questions like, "You gonna violate your woman in my house?" But instead of letting the viewer soak up the sinister awkwardness, the camera never stops moving, 45 things are happening at once, and quick cuts break up the frenetic scene to the point that I couldn't feel the scene simply because I couldn't catch up with it.

Some could say that truly scary movies and clean Christian films are dichotomies. I don't agree. You don't have to be gory or sexualized or evil to be scary. Two modern examples of popular, but bloodless, atmospheric creepers would be 1999's Sixth Sense and 2001's The Others. Both were PG-13 films that delivered legitimate scares while creating eerie tension (especially The Others). In addition, The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005, PG-13), which conveyed strong spiritual ideas and was directed by a believer, was often downright frightening. Unfortunately, Henson's supernatural thrillers—and House with its potential to be a true scary flick—don't achieve these quality levels.




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

John Hale   Posted: August 18, 2009 3:31 PM
Not rated
This film did nothing to further "Christian" filmmaking." SyFy's Saturday night potboilers are more entertaining. As to any spiritual value, it was buried in the dankness and gore of this film. And besides, ending with the evil protagonists of the House looking out the windows for their next victims didn't exactly leave one feeling that good has triumphed.

Matthew   Posted: April 11, 2009 2:41 AM
I think one mans conviction is another mans conviction! To me i really don't think it matters, we have blocked our self's away from it so much that we have forgotten that there is a supernatural world out there, for this reason, it is why Ted Dekker wrights his book, we need to grasp the reality of the supernatural and if it is through movies we see it, then watch them!!! I think we as Christians should stop being ostrich's and hiding from all "evil", because that is why none Christians don't want to be Christian! God is bigger than ANYTHING!!!

ZiL   Posted: April 03, 2009 9:50 PM
I feel as a Christian, we should not expose ourselves to movies that portray violence and terror. Philippians 4:7-9 states that we should keep our thoughts Pure. I am not to sure at all if Christ my Savior would be sitting next to me in the cinema as I watch this movie and open my mind to scenes of terror and violence. Please pray for protection against an evil foothold before you watch this movie. God bless you all. ZiL

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com