Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 8, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > Movies > Reviews > 2009 |  
Knowing
| posted 3/20/2009




Knowing

Our rating: 3 Stars - Good

Your rating:  

MPAA rating: PG-13
(for disaster sequences, disturbing images and brief strong language)

Genre: Science Fiction

Theater release:
March 20, 2009
by Summit Entertainment

Directed by: Alex Proyas

Runtime: 2 hours 2 minutes

Cast: Nicolas Cage (John Koestler), Chandler Canterbury (Caleb Koestler), Rose Byrne (Diana Wayland), Lara Robinson (Lucinda Embry / Abby Wayland), Ben Mendelsohn (Phil Beckman), Nadia Townsend (Grace Koestler), D.G. Maloney (The Stranger), Alan Hopgood (Rev. Koestler)

Related: Talk About It/Family Corner


If you've seen any of the trailers, then you'll probably have a good idea what to expect from the first hour or so of Knowing, the latest mind-bending bit of speculative fiction from Alex Proyas (Dark City, I Robot). But even that first hour has its surprises, and after that, the film veers in directions that go far beyond anything you might have expected—directions that will be all the more awe-inspiring the less you know going into the theater.

Don't worry, though, this review shall not divulge the movie's deeper secrets. And thankfully, there is still a fair bit to chew on even without those later revelations, so let's dig in.

Nicolas Cage as John Koestler
Nicolas Cage as John Koestler

The story begins in 1959, with a teacher asking her class to draw some pictures of the future for a time capsule that will be opened in 50 years. However, one of the students, Lucinda Embry (Lara Robinson), does not draw a picture; instead, she scribbles out a series of numbers, and she still has a few digits to go when the teacher snatches the paper out of her hand. The movie then jumps ahead to 2009 and introduces us to astrophysicist John Koestler (Nicolas Cage) and his young son Caleb (Chandler Canterbury), the latter of whom is given Lucinda's mysterious paper when the time capsule is opened right on schedule.

John dismisses the paper at first, but something about the numbers catches his eye—a little too easily, perhaps—and within minutes he realizes that the paper seems to predict not only the date of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but also how many people were killed. John then Googles the other numbers and discovers that Lucinda's paper seems to predict all the major disasters, both natural and man-made, that have taken place over the past 50 years. And, uh-oh, the paper also indicates that there are three more disasters yet to come.

John and son Caleb (Chandler Canterbury)
John and son Caleb (Chandler Canterbury)

This poses a bit of a worldview crisis for John, who was earlier seen discussing the subject of "randomness" versus "determinism" with one of his classes. Is it purely random that the Earth happens to be the exact distance from the Sun that it needs to be in order for life to grow and thrive here? Or is it a sign of some sort of deeper, grander design (and if so, whose)? Some might argue that these questions would be more appropriate to a philosophy class than a science class, perse, but the students ask John what he believes anyway, and he replies that life has "no grand purpose," adding, sadly: "I think s--- just happens."

So what is he to make of this seemingly prophetic paper, scrawled out by a little girl half a century ago? Does it show evidence of an underlying order, even when that order expresses itself in the form of sudden death for tens or hundreds or thousands of people at a time? And is it significant in any way that John's own wife died in one of these disasters a few years earlier, or that John no longer believes in heaven like his son does?

Those who remember M. Night Shyamalan's Signs might be thinking that this scenario, of a widowed father who has lost his faith but is now confronted with evidence of a deeper meaning to this life, sounds awfully familiar. And they would not be far wrong—especially when we learn that, while John himself was never a pastor, it turns out that he is the son of a pastor. And that is only one of the curiously spiritual hints that the movie drops along the way; at the ceremony where the time capsule is hoisted out of the ground, the secular school choir sings, of all things, "This little light of mine, I'm going to let it shine."

Diana (Rose Byrne) tries to help John figure it all out
Diana (Rose Byrne) tries to help John figure it all out

Meanwhile, John tries to figure out what to do about the numbers—and about the eerie, pale-faced, blonde-haired men in dark clothes who have begun lurking outside his house and giving smooth black stones to his son Caleb. Fearing for his son's life, John tracks down Lucinda's daughter Diana (Rose Byrne) and granddaughter Abby (Lara Robinson again) in a bid to see if they can shed any light on the late Lucinda's prophecies: what they mean, where they came from, and whether there are any more of them out there.




E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 71 comments.See all comments
Jeremiah Liang   Posted: October 13, 2009 8:15 PM
Not rated
Everything about the movie appears to be in ryhme with the endtimes themes of disaster - man made and natural. However, the menacing figures of the stange men, who later revealed themselves to be aliens at the end of the film, does convince me that these are not angels. Remember that Satan is an angel of light and there are various interpretations of the Bible that indicate in the the endtimes, the world will witness deceiving spirits disguised as angels (false Christs, prophets working signs and wonders). The biggest clue why the aliens are not from God or benign is that they would not take Koestler/Cage with them, only the special children. Which benign God would forsake his creation, whether adult, child, gifted or non-gifted? On its merit as a movie, I think it is quite exciting. My 5-yr old son saw it and I had to explain what was in line and what was out of line with Biblical truth.

Shuron   Posted: August 01, 2009 4:00 PM
I wanted to comment on the contrast between God and aliens too. It seems as if the movie wants us to believe aliens are in fact angels. When I read the Bible angels just appear, they don't need ships, why decieve? The earlier commentors may want to refer to the Nephilim spoke of in Gen 6:4-8 and read of the great deception that will decieve many. Rev 3:10 & Rev 19:20. There are also great reads on this subject by: Lynn A. Marzulli, and Melanie Wells. I can't help myself I work for the library. I was a bit confused about Nick's character when he went to help the survivors of the plane crash it was a bit unbelievable, he was just a professor at MIT not first response. Also on the train he looked to be the sole survivor with the lady he covered. It reminded me of the movie unbreakable with Bruce Willis. Thanks for this forum

Barb   Posted: July 30, 2009 3:11 AM
Wow. These comments are amazingly diverse. It shocks me that some of them advocate, "if you're a christian you shouldn't see this movie". I think William has it right. The whisperers were angels not aliens. This doesn't blast the creation story but encourages belief in a creator. Life isn't random. There is purpose and there is an end. Just because it didn't play out like the Left Behind series doesn't mean it didn't use the Bible as a resource. When you view this movie and consider the whisperers as angels, the redemption between Nicolas Cage's character and his father/family/death of wife, the letting go of his son, his revelation that the universe isn't random but determined...I'm impressed that this is a Hollywood movie. I fail to see the demonic here. But at the same time, for simply viewing it as a movie: it's long, some bad acting and the music was overly dramatic.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search

























Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com