Jump directly to the content
Jump directly to the content
Zoning the Land for the Glory of God: A Developer's Lament

Zoning the Land for the Glory of God: A Developer's Lament

With the current land-use patterns in the U.S., seeking biblical justice is near impossible.

To participate in segregation or not.

To settle for "marginal" when excellence could be achieved.

These are some of my internal struggles.

What I'm referring to is my growing discontentment with the land-use patterns and decision making so often used in the United States. For the past 13 years, I have been employed by a large homebuilder in the Southeast and done everything from manage residential construction to oversee the purchase of property for development. My eye is trained on our physical environment and places—the realm in which we carry out our daily lives.

Have you ever wondered why our physical environment (roads, buildings, cities, suburbs, and rural areas) has developed the way it has? The use of most pieces of property is governed by rules known as "zoning." Zoning laws are usually localized and specific regulations that describe what is legal to do with one's land. For instance, a retail store owner often needs public zoning approval prior to building a new shop on a vacant corner. Regulations can be so detailed that homeowners might even be demanded to notify the neighborhood and hold community meetings to gain public approval of the color, material and architectural style of a front porch renovation if their house is located in an area designated as a historic district.

In the state of Virginia, where I live, zoning is managed by two rules: (1) a comprehensive plan that must by law be reviewed and updated regularly in a process that involves the community; and (2) the Board and Council members who are called to determine if a project meets the comprehensive plan and ultimately to determine if it will be developed. There are as many local zoning nuances as there are jurisdictions across the country.

Thinking strategically about how we use the land is both wise and biblically supported in the Genesis cultural mandate. Land-use planning prompts the careful use of resources, summons public input in growth decisions, anticipates future infrastructure needs like drinking water and sewer systems, plans transportation, helps use taxpayer dollars in a cost-effective way, and shapes the physical environment where people live. But like anything, the tool is not the trouble, but its misuse.

In the region where I work, I've noticed that these planning processes are increasingly used to quietly segregate people into socioeconomic and racial buckets—all in the name of "orderly development" consistent with the comprehensive plan. For example, in one recent zoning case, a locality determined that a property was suitable for residential development, but that new homes must have a minimum of 2,800 square feet, use costly brick construction and front facades, have irrigated lawns, hold two-car garages, and be built on no less than quarter-acre lots. From a builder's perspective, I know that the cost of simply building a home with these features will exclude many in the community who are not able to support the attached mortgage. This is a convenient and quiet way to perpetuate segregation and to drive the poor away. In fact, a locality could establish a comprehensive plan that not only segregates people within its borders but functionally pushes a class of people outside of its borders over time. That's not a great way to care for the least of these—the poor, the widow, the fatherless and the alien, as we are encouraged to do throughout Scripture.

Further, why are landowners forced by zoning to use property for a single purpose? Why are so many commercial shopping centers vacant wastelands of parking from 8pm to 8am? When the Lord asked us in Genesis 1:28 to steward the earth, did he really envision sprawling and separated uses in the manner we have crafted in the West for the past 60 years? How can we glorify our Creator in the stewardship of his creation? Another silent group that needs an advocate is our children who will need to deal with an ailing infrastructure. Our desire to segregate leaves a staggering infrastructure maintenance burden on the next generation.

I should emphasize that there is no "one size fits all" answer for land use decisions. In the best case, such decisions are conversations between all affected parties. But while there is no "right" answer to land use, there are certainly ways that zoning laws further injustice, deter mercy, and discourage community instead of foster it.

But what can I do? I have influence within my organization but certainly not enough to change the charter from maximizing shareholder value to seeking justice. And besides, if our group doesn't build in the ways required by the zoning, someone else will, and the pattern will continue. Is it not enough to act with integrity, make a living, and follow the rules? As a Jesus follower who filters life through the truth contained in Scripture, this presents tension for me on a variety of levels.

But maybe this is what Daniel felt in his early service to Nebuchadnezzar, or Moses in the house of Pharaoh. It was in those times that both were prepared and equipped to take the steps God had ordained "at the right time" to pursue change and systemic justice. Micah 6:8 calls us to love mercy, pursue justice and to walk humbly with our God. I feel that often love, justice and mercy are available in small bites but that addressing systematic injustices requires time and preparation.

Working in the light of this has been a journey. I have gained a reputation as a man of integrity in the local real-estate community, and have done my best to influence company decisions. But at the end of the day, a for-profit construction company is in the business of providing a salable product to a customer, not community building. I am ready for another way. A way forward in real estate that blends financial return with kingdom returns. A way that listens to the needs of those who are not heard. What is my next step to pursue market based development that promotes justice and mercy? Psalm 24:1 reminds that "the earth is the Lord's and everything in it, the world and all who live in it." I will steward and be a co-creator in light of this truth and in a manner worthy of the One who created me. That is my goal.

Rob Lanphear is a land manager in Richmond, Virginia, where he attends Third Presbyterian Church.

    How One Artist Turns Skid Row into Sacred Streets

    How One Artist Turns Skid Row into Sacred Streets

    An interview with Los Angeles's Jason Leith about his new installation that features portraits of the homeless.
    A California Climber Takes Up the Trafficking Fight

    A California Climber Takes Up the Trafficking Fight

    Betty Ann Boeving thinks the key to ending trafficking is to focus locally.
    Forging the Future with the Tip of a Pen

    Forging the Future with the Tip of a Pen

    How Jake Weidmann, one of 11 master penmen in the world, uses ink to link the past and future.
    Why Tim Keller Wants You to Stay in That Job You Hate

    Why Tim Keller Wants You to Stay in That Job You Hate

    The Redeemer pastor explains how he ministers to laypeople facing career confusion.

    Comments

    Displaying 1–5 of 7 comments

    Henry Kent-smith

    April 17, 2012  7:13pm

    Rob, your article is so very true, not just Richmond but throughout America. As a transplanted Richmonder practicing land use law in New Jersey, I fight the pernicious effects of exclusionary zoning every working day. God calls us to be good and faithful stewards and servants. Unfortunately the land use process is a theater of division, of "us v them" and NIMBYism that strives to exclude, rather than build means to include. Fighting the machine of local zoning requires a great deal of spiritual replenishment. I too would welcome the chance to meet and talk. Hopefullly the good Lord will inspire a few new ideas!!

    Derek C

    April 03, 2012  3:40pm

    Thanks for the work, Rob. @Roger - don't toss baby out with the bathwater. Zoning keeps strip clubs from being located near schools. As I understood it (could be wrong though...), I think Jacobs was advocating for integrated planning (intentional and thoughtful) that develops a community (see, life and death of great american cities). Even as cities change, she would have wanted it controlled to some extent so as to prevent decay (juxtaposed against transition). She also had something to say about people and their attitudes, but that's another discussion.

    Chris

    March 31, 2012  2:20pm

    Rob- Very well written. I share your concern for what we are doing to Richmond and really this country overall. A fun read on how we got into the situation we are in is James Kunstler's "The Geography of Nowhere" The problem is easy to diagnose if you are paying attention as you are. The solution is hard to see.

    Mark Larson

    March 29, 2012  4:26pm

    Rob - another short book you might read is "Green Like God". It discusses a Christian's responsibility to be a steward of this planet. How we use land is an important part of our stewardship.

    Andrew Moore

    March 29, 2012  9:05am

    Rob - thanks for the thoughtful analysis of residential zoning. I completely agree with your identification of the moral and social justice implications of land use patterns. I also think that the typical suburban development pattern is directly contributes to spiritual decline due to its inherent counter-community divisiveness. Let's have a cup of coffee sometime and chat.

    Add your comment *

    1000 character limit

    * Comments may be edited for tone and clarity.

    SUPPORT THIS IS OUR CITY

    Make a contribution to help support the This Is Our City project and the nonprofit ministry Christianity Today.Learn more ...