The Wrong Way to Go

Washington State is on the verge of becoming the first political entity in the world legally to protect doctors who perform active euthanasia. Initiative 119 is favored to win the November 5 ballot, as public sentiment puts on the law books what legislators have been either too wise or too timid to enact.

A number of factors conspire to make this time in American history ripe for such an event. First, several well-publicized hard cases, such as the visible anguish of Nancy Cruzan’s family, the sensational debate over Janet Adkins’s use of the Kevorkian suicide machine, and the appearance on the best-seller lists of Final Exit, by Derek Humphrey of the Hemlock Society, have riveted public attention.

Second, the rising cost of medical care continues to pinch both public and private budgets. The technology and lengthy hospital stays that keep people alive give visions of bankruptcy to families and legislators alike.

Third, the celebration of autonomous individualism, the proabortionists’ cherished theme, is being played in a higher key. “It’s my body and I’ll abort that fetal tissue if I want to,” has become “It’s my body and I’ll die if I want to.” We say, “I don’t want to be a burden.” But this may betray not consideration for others so much as our anger at feeling disconnected.

Fourth, our culture of comfort seems without a clue as to what to do with pain and suffering when cure and analgesia fail. Cut from its biblical roots, our society seems pain-illiterate, unable to read the handwriting of either God or nature in the experience of anguish.

These factors make this an optimal moment for the legalization of euthanasia. But Initiative 119 should be resisted as bad law. For example, it fails to set up any regulatory procedure to review the process by which patients request and doctors perform euthanasia. If this initiative passes, physicians will be more carefully reviewed when they perform simple appendectomies than when they kill their patients. The initiative also fails to provide for hard cases—neither Janet Adkins nor Nancy Cruzan could expect “aid-in-dying” under this law because the proposed “safeguards” require that one be mentally competent and expected to die within six months.

But if it is bad law, Initiative 119 is worse morality. The myth of personal autonomy is illusory. No one, as Scripture says, lives to himself; no one dies to himself (Rom. 14:7). Instead of seeking legal protection for euthanasia, we would do better as a society to develop our present resources. The hospice movement, for example, needs volunteers, money, and facilities to provide a less costly and more caring context for dying. And there is room for better use of our present knowledge in managing and eliminating pain. If we put our energies into these approaches, we may discover once again that we are all connected and that agony can have meaning.

There has got to be a better way, socially and personally, for us to approach the difficult end of a life. Washington Initiative 119 is not it.

By David Neff.

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Our Latest

News

Ghana May Elect Its First Muslim President. Its Christian Majority Is Torn.

Church leaders weigh competency and faith background as the West African nation heads to the polls.

Shamanism in Indonesia

Can Christians practice ‘white knowledge’ to heal the sick and exorcize demons?

Shamanism in Japan

Christians in the country view pastors’ benedictions as powerful spiritual mantras.

Shamanism in Taiwan

In a land teeming with ghosts, is there room for the Holy Spirit to work?

Shamanism in Vietnam

Folk religion has shaped believers’ perceptions of God as a genie in a lamp.

Shamanism in the Philippines

Filipinos’ desire to connect with the supernatural shouldn’t be eradicated, but transformed and redirected toward Christ.

Shamanism in South Korea

Why Christians in the country hold onto trees while praying outdoors.

Shamanism in Thailand

When guardian spirits disrupt river baptisms, how can believers respond?

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube