Democrats Seek Extreme Makeover

Pro-lifers want to slash nation’s abortion rate.

Pro-life Democrats working to reduce the nation’s abortion rate say it’s time Democrats helped women find alternatives to abortion.

“A lot of people think the Democratic Party is the party of abortion on demand. We need to change that,” said Kristen Day, executive director of the Washington, D.C.-based Democrats for Life of America (dfla). In April the group launched the “95-10 Initiative,” a legislative effort to reduce the number of abortions by 95 percent in 10 years. There are about 1.3 million abortions nationwide annually, according to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood affiliate.

“Through this initiative we’re showing that we care about women, babies, and human life,” Day said.

Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Ohio, plans to introduce a version of the initiative this summer. Among its objectives are making adoption tax credits permanent, providing federal grants to colleges and universities to support pregnant women, mandating insurance coverage of certain contraceptives, and requiring federally funded women’s health centers to provide information on adoptions and on abortion, including its negative side effects. It also would increase funding for the federal nutrition program Women, Infants, and Children.

The effort, he said, is designed to allow both parties to work together to offer the kind of hopeful support and alternatives struggling pregnant women need to take care of their babies.

But some Republicans are not convinced.

“There are certainly provisions in this bill I would not consider to be pro-life at all,” said a Republican senatorial aide who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Unfortunately, some of these measures would be difficult to support.” These include funding sex education in schools and requiring insurance providers to cover FDA-approved contraceptives.

An aide to Ryan said such coverage would not include “abortion pill” RU-486 or any other abortion-inducing drug.

DFLA estimates 40 percent of Democrats are pro-life. National party leaders have signaled a new willingness to talk about pro-life issues in the wake of the November elections.

Day said, “I think there’s been a tremendous turnaround as far as a willingness to include pro-lifers in the party.”

Copyright © 2005 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere:

Last year, CT interviewed Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life.

Democrats for Life has more information about the 95-10 Initiative.

More on abortion from our Politics & Law page includes:

How Serious Are Democrats? | Making abortion rare will take more than words. A Christianity Today editorial (March 16, 2005)

Medical-Record War Heats Up | Two Kansas abortion clinics refuse to comply with court order. (April 19, 2005)

Jim Wallis: ‘I See Genuine Soul-Searching Among Democrats’ | Evangelical activist says it’s time to find common ground on abortion and other issues. (Feb. 11, 2005)

Evangelicals’ Political Power: From Question Mark to Exclamation Mark | Activists say same-sex marriage ban, abortion limits, and judicial appointments top agenda. (Nov. 04, 2004)

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Our Latest

So What If the Bible Doesn’t Mention Embryo Screening?

Silence from Scripture on new technologies and the ethical questions they raise is no excuse for silence from the church.

The Chinese Evangelicals Turning to Orthodoxy

Yinxuan Huang

More believers from China and Taiwan are finding Eastern Christianity appealing. I sought to uncover why.

Archaeology in the City of David Yields New Treasures

Gordon Govier

Controversial excavation in Jerusalem reveals new links to the biblical record.

News

Displaced Ukrainian Pastor Ministers to the War’s Lost Teens

“Almost everybody has lost somebody, and quite a few people have lost very much.”

Public Theology Project

Why Christians Ignore What the Bible Says About Immigrants

Believers can disagree on migration policies—but the Word of God should shape how we minister to vulnerable people.

Review

Apologetics Can Be a Balm—or Bludgeon

Daryn Henry

A new history of American apologetics from Daniel K. Williams offers careful detail, worthwhile lessons, and an ambitious, sprawling, rollicking narrative.

Hold the Phone?

Anna Mares

Faced with encouragement to lessen technology use, younger Christians with far-flung families wonder how to stay connected.

Norman Podhoretz Leaves a Legacy of Political Principle

Michael Cosper

The Jewish intellectual upheld the Judeo-Christian tradition.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube