Culture
Review

Puns and Pettiness in ‘The Promised Land’

The YouTube mockumentary works best when it pulls laughs directly from Exodus.

A film still from The Promised Land.
Christianity Today November 10, 2025
© 2025 Milk & Honey Holdings, LLC. All rights reserved.

The character-based drama of The Chosen, the Tolkienesque “fantasy” of House of David, the modern dystopia of the Book of Acts series Testament—playing with genre is a hallmark of this current wave of Bible TV shows.

Now we can add The Promised Land—a mockumentary about Moses leading the Israelites—to the mix. On paper (or parchment), this approach might seem counterintuitive, even offensive. Aren’t there supposed to be majestic pillars of cloud and fire? Don’t the Israelites hear the voice of God? Don’t a lot of people die? Is this really the sort of story we should be making jokes about?

Valid concerns, all. But when the show’s pilot came out last year, you could see what writer-director Mitch Hudson and his team were after. The Moses of the Bible spent a lot of time in the holy, no-sandals-allowed presence of God, yes. But he was also a deeply fallible man who had to deal with the petty complaints of his fellow Israelites. Within that first episode, Moses (Wasim No’mani) is overworked and worn-out until his father-in-law Jethro (Tucker Smallwood) takes him aside and advises him to get some assistants. It’s precisely the sort of workplace arrangement that lends itself to Office-style humor.

Meanwhile, Moses’ bubbly wife Zipporah (Tryphena Wade) keeps getting on the nerves of his prickly big sister Miriam (Shereen Khan). Both story lines take their cue from the Bible—Exodus 18:13–26 and Numbers 12:1, respectively. Maybe there was always latent humor there, just waiting to be staged.

The pilot was a successful-enough proof of concept that five more episodes resulted, and season 1 is now available on The Promised Land’s YouTube channel. Its results are encouraging, if a bit uneven.

Episode 2 gets off to a strong start, taking place during the days the Israelites spent at Mount Sinai before God gave them the Law (Ex. 19). Moses, following Jethro’s advice, assigns different men to lead groups of various sizes. His proud cousin Korah (Brad Culver) grumbles that he got one of the smaller, “stupider” groups.

Moses tells the Israelites to consecrate themselves and asks Joshua (Artoun Nazareth) to make sure no animal or human sets foot on the mountain. Moses then tries to enjoy some “time off.” But his wandering around the camp leaves him worrying that his people skills aren’t as good as, say, Aaron’s (Majed Sayess). (This, too, is drawn from the Bible, which says Aaron was better at public speaking than Moses; see Ex. 4:13–16.)

The show is at its best when it riffs on brief passages like the ones that inspired this episode. The fact that Moses gave different men varying levels of authority is mentioned almost in passing in Scripture. But how did those men respond to their statuses? With jealousy? Ambition? Korah gives us one answer as he tries to prove he’s the best leader of all, whipping his men into shape through nonstop exercise. Meanwhile, Joshua guards the mountain for days, fighting off sleepiness and cheeky, boundary-testing youths.

The series also introduces some extrabiblical story lines, such as Miriam’s efforts to create a meeting tent for the women. The Bible says very little about Miriam compared to her brothers, and fittingly, the Miriam of the series is frustrated that the men of the camp are constantly overlooking her. (She perks up when she thinks Moses says he’s putting “her” in charge while he’s away. It turns out he’s actually referring to a man named Hur; see Ex. 24:14.)

Promised Land’s skillful riffing on the biblical text continues in episode 3, which takes place almost entirely during the 40 days Moses spent on Mount Sinai before receiving the tablets (Ex. 24–32). Most movies jump to the end of that period, when the Israelites gave up and started worshiping the golden calf. But the episode, lingering on those weeks from the people’s perspective, really makes you feel the passage of time as the Israelites squabble and Aaron feels his authority crumbling. When they demand that he craft a new god for them, his capitulation makes sad sense.

But then the Israelites worship the calf, and Moses shows up, horrified at what they’ve done—and the series can’t quite hide from the seriousness of their offense. It does downplay their punishment: The plague that strikes them (32:35) makes them itch, nothing more. Moses’s declaration that they should drink the golden calf (v. 20) plays more like a rhetorical outburst than a compulsory command. And there is no reference at all to the fact that Moses told the Levites to slaughter thousands of their fellow Israelites (vv. 25–29). The episode’s events open a rift between Moses and the people, especially Aaron. Over the next episode or so, the show sometimes forgets how to be funny.

Which is not to say that it stops working entirely. A subplot featuring a craftsman reluctant to build the tabernacle ends on a poignant note. There are positive lessons to learn as Moses and Aaron reconcile. But there’s often a tonal mismatch. The show starts operating like a drama—then Miriam and Zipporah put on false beards so they can sneak into an all-male covenant-study session, and things start to get wacky again. Promised Land could use more out-there moments like this. It tends to be more quietly amusing than laugh-out-loud funny and relies too much on characters looking at the camera as a visual punch line.

Bible nerds will enjoy some of the deep cuts here even as they find quibbles to nitpick. If you’re like me, your eyes lit up when Nahshon (Kamyar Jahan)—an ancestor of King David’s (Ruth 4:20–22)—was introduced as the leader of the tribe of Judah (Num. 2:3). Then you wondered why the show neglected to mention that Nahshon was Aaron’s brother-in-law (Ex. 6:23).

The Promised Land also makes some more obscure biblical details memorable, such as when Oholiab (Ash Kahn)—a specialist in yarn and linen (38:23)—asks everyone to call him “Oho.” (“Oho!”) That’s one name no one who’s seen this show will ever get wrong on Bible-trivia night again.

Season 1 ends with the completion of the tabernacle and the ordination of Aaron as high priest. In just six episodes, it takes the viewer all the way through the second half of Exodus and into the Book of Leviticus. Hudson has said he wants to shoot 40 episodes overall, but there are less than two books of the Bible to go before the Israelites finish their wandering (not counting Deuteronomy, which is basically a recap). So the show is going to have to slow the pace if it wants to make the remaining story last that long.

That could work in The Promised Land’s favor. As noted, the series is at its best when it teases out the implications of seemingly minor passages, and there is plenty of material to work with. You could easily imagine entire episodes that focus on specific laws, like the ones that distinguish between clean and unclean animals (no flying insects unless they have jointed legs, Lev. 11:20–23) or the ones that describe how to, um, go to the bathroom (Deut. 23:12–14). Good thing Season Two—to be filmed in Morocco—is already in the works.

Peter T. Chattaway is a film critic with a special interest in Bible movies.

News

Christian Brides Don’t Need to Wear White

How Scripture offers grace in wedding planning.

A paper doll wedding dress with different colors on it.
Christianity Today November 10, 2025
Illustration by Kate Petrik / Source Images: WikiMedia Commons

The Bulletin and Bible teacher Jen Wilkin respond to a recent article from The New York Times linking American wedding traditions with unhealthy Christian purity culture. 

This conversation is edited and condensed from a discussion that appeared in episode 217 of The Bulletin. Listen to the whole conversation here.

Queen Victoria started the tradition of wearing a white gown when she married Prince Albert in 1840. Writer Gina Ryder argues that argues that purity culture lingers in this tradition that modern women find unnecessarily binding. What is purity culture, and how does it show up in American Christian church culture?

Jen Wilkin: Purity culture goes way back, but its modern, popular conception arose in the 1990s. We started to hear that if you kept yourself pure until marriage, then your marriage was going to be perfect. We heard that a woman’s purity was like a source of value. That’s an ancient idea, but it came forward into modern times in the form of things like the purity ring that made it seem as though you’re married before you’re married. These ideas were intended to allow you to enter into marriage as pure as possible so that your marriage could be as successful as possible.

The hope was that the guys would also get on board, but there was more messaging for women. I grew up with four brothers who would not report having heard as much messaging as we girls got.

Mike Cosper: Religious conservatives want to challenge their young people to avoid sex until marriage for good reason. Scripture affirms the value of abstinence. But the messaging can be very confusing. 

A decade ago, I was sitting with evangelical leaders my age, and the subject of purity culture came up. Everybody told stories about how their youth groups said that sex was filthy, dirty, and nasty—so save it for the one you love. When they got married, they struggled to figure out how to make sex into something that was intimate and satisfying. In the middle of this conversation, an older pastor stopped us at one point and said, “Yeah, but remember: Abstinence is a good thing.” 

In the church, we’re in a long moment of reactivity to the purity culture that a lot of us who are in our 40s and older grew up with. However, there’s actually something valuable at the heart of purity culture, which is that sex is a sacred bond between a husband and a wife and something that should be saved for marriage.

Russell Moore: It’s kind of like dealing with the word legalism. When somebody uses the word legalism, you have to stop and make sure that you’re actually talking about the same thing, because for some people, obedience is legalism. 

Sometimes when people say purity culture, what they mean is the very basic concept that in the early church in Acts 15, one of the few messages given to the new Gentile believers is abstain from sexual immorality, defined as it is in Scripture.

When we come to purity-culture language, we need to stop and figure out what we’re talking about. Purity culture can be anything from father-daughter dances, where a girl commits to allowing her dad to surveil her phone until she’s 35, all the way over to a desire to flee sexual immorality, which is what the Scripture says. We have to understand what we’re talking about before we go forward.

Wilkin: The purity culture of my youth occurred at the cusp of what became a tsunami of the sexual revolution and the rise of birth control. It was grappling with the early stages of what we would now call hookup culture and trying to come up with a solution. I don’t think the implications of what was going to happen were clear at that time.

Purity culture tried to talk about sexuality in way that was spiritual in nature and more than just “Hey, don’t get pregnant.” It was well intended, but it ended up communicating things that were unintentional as well.

Cosper: Look at teen-pregnancy rates in the 1970s and the 1980s, and consider that in light of the AIDS crisis in the 1980s. This sexually transmitted disease had emerged that was new and scary. For a long time, HIV/AIDS was fatal; there was no real treatment. Purity culture also emerges from that. It carried with it a desire to protect young people from teen pregnancy and dying of AIDS.

How do the symbols of weddings in American culture relate? The bride wearing white, the veiled bride, the father giving away the bride—are these Christian ideas? Cultural ones? Are they a mix of both?

Wilkin: I think it’s a mix. My kids are the age where I’m going to a lot of weddings, and I do not find that there are endless discussions about whether the bride should wear white.

Not only that, but because of social media, brides are wearing white to the bridal shower. They’re wearing it to the rehearsal dinner. There’s even a catch phrase: “the little white dress.” I would argue that our wedding traditions, Christian and non-Christian, are being shaped more by Instagram and celebrities than they are by any throwback idea of what a white dress means.

For many people, wedding planning is “choose your own adventure.” Their officiant is a friend who gets licensed online to do the wedding. The wedding party chooses whatever dress they want. These days we’ve lost any sense of liturgy, I would argue, other than a cultural liturgy in the wedding space. The true officiants are the wedding planner, the photographer, and the DJ. 

That doesn’t mean that there aren’t women in more conservative circles who are giving this thought, but it’s been a long time since I’ve talked to a bride who was agonizing over the color of her dress.

Moore: Literally the most controversial thing I ever say—and there’s a lot of things I’ve said that are controversial—is to tell couples that they can’t write their own vows

I say this because the wedding vows aren’t all about the couple. The entire community is pledging to help you to keep these vows. This isn’t just an expression of your love for each other. If you don’t have that kind of intentionality from the church, then a wedding planner runs the service. Incidentally, the same thing happens at the end of life: Often a funeral director runs the service.

Many women bring complex stories to their weddings—abuse, abandonment, sexual pain. These symbols or traditions can really complicate that. How could a Christian view of marriage dismantle some of these complications?

Wilkin: I feel a particular tenderness toward the woman who has suffered abuse. Many women don’t even realize that their “sexual status” when they’re coming into marriage really wasn’t determined by them but some guy who was overly aggressive. They think it’s a transgression of their own.

Contemporary church life sometimes complicates this, because it’s one thing if you’re in a relatively small church where everybody knows you and you don’t have to explain these things. People love you. They care about you. 

So often, though, that’s not the case in our churches today. We move around from church to church. A lot of people aren’t at the same church for a long period of time. Their list of wedding guests is curated from people they’ve only known for a few years. The nature of the gathering itself is not one of people saying, “We know you. We love you, and we’re here to support you.” It’s more a party where you invite people who are significant now. 

We need to be okay with less Instagram perfect and more real community. If you have the people there who know you and love you, that has to be enough for you. This is important from a theological standpoint. Your identity is not just one day but many days. The people who know and love you the most are the ones who can help you move forward in your engagement, on your wedding day, and thereafter.

Cosper: When I would officiate weddings, I would encourage engaged couples to make a list of the people they could call when marriage got really hard. Those are the people who help you keep your vows. 

The modern wedding has become a performative ritual. What can we capture on camera? What can we post on social media? What can we frame and stick up around the house? Instead, a Christian wedding emphasizes, before God and man, a promise to one another. You want the people around you who are going to be able to help you keep that promise through thick and thin.

Moore: In the traditional English wedding ceremony, it says, If anyone has objection to why this man and this woman should not be married, let him speak now or forever hold his peace. No one actually ever expects anyone to say anything, unless it’s in a cheesy romantic comedy where the old boyfriend stands up and says, “I still love you. Come off with me.” 

That phrase is there because the wedding is about the entire community pledging to support—hold accountable—the couple and help them keep their vows. If you have this sense that this ought to be your perfect day and anything that goes wrong is devastating, that’s a really culturally malformed way to begin a marriage.

Wilkin: So much of this has to do with the way that we think about family in general and the way we think about what it is to be a successful adult. We have told our children that the more successful you are, the farther you will live from us and the less contact you’ll have with us after you leave the home. That rolls down into weddings. A wedding becomes a sending off instead of joining in to something that’s bigger than you, that’s been around before you and will be around after you. Realistically, your actual family and your church family are the ones who are going to be there for you for the long haul. The wedding isn’t a moment in time; it’s a piece of something bigger.

Scripture tells us that Christian marriage is meant to image the marriage of Christ and church. For the bride or the groom who has apprehensions about symbolically wearing white, about bringing baggage into a new marriage, what does this picture offer as a promise?

Moore: Revelation 20 depicts the new Jerusalem coming down as a bride out of heaven. In Scripture, Christ clothes that bride in fine linen, but not as a way of marking the significance of the purity of the bride. It is the marriage itself making that reality. So if you want to wear white, wear white. The important thing is that you are committing to make your marriage reflect in a little, broken kind of way that one-flesh union of Christ in his church and the gospel.

News
Excerpt

Apologetics After Christendom

How to share your faith in a “spiritual but not religious” world.

Cityscape with St. Paul's Cathedral, London.

St. Pauls Cathedral, in London

Christianity Today November 10, 2025
Image credit: Jonathan Chng / Unsplash / Edits by CT

How do we translate the gospel for a culture without a common spiritual language? What does evangelism look like in a post-Christian world? Christians who want to share their faith often wrestle with questions like these, doubtful that apologetic methods of the past can assist them as they proclaim the good news of Jesus in the present day.

The Bulletin sat down with Collin Hansen, editor in chief of The Gospel Coalition and coeditor with Skyler R. Flowers and Ivan Mesa of the new book The Gospel After Christendom, to talk about cultural apologetics: what it is, how it addresses the complexities of our modern world, and how the timeless message of Jesus can meet the spiritual longings our friends and neighbors carry.  Listen to the whole conversation in episode 222. Here are edited excerpts.

Many of us grew up with the apologetics of Josh McDowell’s Evidence That Demands a Verdict and Lee Strobel’s The Case for Christ. What is cultural apologetics, and how is it similar to or different from these arguments for Christian faith?

All apologetics help non-Christians to confront and believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ, as well as answer objections to the faith. 

Cultural apologetics differs in that it’s more experiential. For example, while I get questions about the truth of Christianity, which still ultimately matters to us as Christians, more often now the questions I get about Christianity are cultural. Is Christianity good? Is it beautiful? What difference does this make? People want to see—not less than our proclamation of Christ, but an embodied witness, practicing faith to address those goodness and beauty questions. 

Classic, ecclesial apologetics still has its place.No one is going to come to believe in Jesus Christ just because they watch our behavior. Ultimately, they’re going to be confronted with the truth: their sin and Christ’s offer of grace, salvation, and eternal life. Cultural apologetics clarifies the offense of the gospel by clearing out the obstructions that inhibit people from encountering those direct claims. We’re still coming back to the same basic question: “Is this true?” 

Some more abstract, rational thinkers change their minds, which leads to the life of faith. However, the vast majority of us are more concrete, intuitive thinkers. Often cultural apologetics helps adjust people’s intuitions before their head will ultimately follow their heart.

In an “after Christendom” world, our communities don’t share biblical literacy as a common language. Increasingly, we can’t even presume that we share a common moral vision. How do we start conversations about the gospel in a landscape like this? 

Christians often mistakenly think that we are the only moral people and that others are amoral or immoral. But we still live in a highly moralistic time. All of us are the inheritors of Christendom, informed by different versions or aspects of Christianity. This creates competing moral visions. 

Because of this, people need to see, first, that they hold many assumptions about the good life and morality, and those are probably significantly shaped by Christianity. This is the first step because often people imagine themselves to be morally superior if they’re not Christians. To them, being a Christian means you support all sorts of horrible things, especially related to sexuality and issues deep in history. 

After that, you can ask, “What are we aiming for? What is going to produce the good life?” We call this subversive fulfillment: “Will your moral vision produce the results that you seek?” You’re not even bringing up Christianity yet. You’re just trying to help a person consider the implications and outcomes of their own views. As they try to reconcile their desires with their reality, you can show them how Christ fulfills their deepest longings. 

Of course, Christ is also a confrontation of their deepest rebellion; but, first and foremost, we are all made in the image of God. Cultural apologetics recognizes this. A person always has a strange mixture of good aspirations imprinted on their heart and bad manifestations and disordered loves. 

I’d like to do a little case study here to see how this works. Let’s take this hypothetical example:

On the sidelines at my kids’ soccer game, a woman leans over and says, “You know, I’m disappointed to see the Dobbs decision and the fall of abortion rights in this country.” What would it look like, in that moment, for me to contend for the truth, goodness, and beauty of Christianity in the way that you describe? 

I don’t want to go past the obvious—just stating that you disagree. Because of how we ideologically sort, we assume that we want to be around people who are like us. We don’t know if we feel safe living around people who disagree with us on things that we deeply value. That’s both a conservative and liberal mentality. Being able to disagree and explain in a respectful manner is perfectly on the table now.

Tim Keller said that we are affirmed in our individual identity by what our community supports. We’re not just doing whatever we want. We may have impulses in multiple directions. Because of this, we want to excavate to the bottom of the belief. 

When it comes to abortion rights, it would usually be a mistake to suppose that this parent on the sideline explicitly supports the murder of babies. That’s clearly a major part of the package, but usually underneath this belief is a vision of autonomy and freedom. They believe that children are a burden, one of the most constraining things that you could ever experience in life. Therefore, the goal of the good life is to free yourself from all expectations and constraints. 

Since you’re at that soccer game for your kids, you can engage this belief directly: “Isn’t it interesting that the way we actually experience the good life is through our care and love for others? We find our greatest joy, hope, and meaning when we are giving of ourselves to others. 

“Isn’t it interesting that, at the same time you know your greatest love is on that soccer field, you still believe on some level that the essence of life is being freed from love, which is an obligation to others? Those things don’t seem to go together.” 

Conversations like this help people see the stories they live by and invite thoughtful reflection. 

What is the role of spiritual formation as it relates to this apologetic work? 

You can’t give what you don’t have, right? If people look at Christians and see an overwhelming anxiety about the state of the world, if they see anger about people who don’t agree with us, if they see fear about where things are going or who’s in charge— I don’t know how we’re supposed to project any kind of trust or belief in a sovereign God who works all things to his glory and for our good. 

Likewise, if we seek to assimilate people into that anger and fear on either side of the political spectrum, to offer a Christian version of that, that isn’t typified by Scripture’s examples and certainly not by our Savior himself, who died for nobody but his enemies.

Spiritual formation has to start by becoming that nonanxious presence in the Lord, empowered by the Holy Spirit, living according to the objective facts of the finished work of Christ. We do this so that there’s a center to us and a mind that will not be swayed when we’re engaging in day-to-day life, political conversations, or confrontations. Our hearts will not be dismayed because Christ says, I’ll be with you always, to the end of the age. This is necessary for an effective apologist and anyone who wants to meet people in the instability of our culture. 

You’ve said that the stories we tell become the values that we live by. What is a story you think Christians need to tell our culture gently, perhaps, but influentially to reshape it for the common good? 

Carl Henry, Christianity Today’s first editor, wrote The Uneasy Conscience of Modern Fundamentalism in 1947. In it, he asks, Are any of our problems new? Henry wrote this at the dawn of the atomic age. Maybe to a degree, he said. But is anything really new here? 

Of course, there are waves that go up and down. The wind blows in different directions. The Spirit sends revival in one place or another. That’s very true. But overall, Scripture’s pretty normalizing. It tells us what to expect. 

Jesus told us, In this world of much tribulation, take heart. I draw comfort from knowing that Jesus said those words before the Cross, when his disciples did not know what the future held. John is wondering, Jesus, you say, “I have overcome the world.” How have you overcome a world that puts you to death?

That is the ultimate norm to us: that the worst thing that can happen to us is that we can die. And yet Christ has solved that problem through his own resurrection. That great hope guides us as Christians and compels us to share it with others. The same old story is the same Good News.

News

Malaysian Court Vindicates Family of Abducted Pastor

A judge finds authorities complicit in Raymond Koh’s disappearance, granting millions in damages and ordering a new investigation.

The Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex in Malaysia.

The Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex in Malaysia.

Christianity Today November 7, 2025
WikiMedia Commons

Susanna Liew hasn’t seen her husband, Malaysian pastor Raymond Koh, in eight years. She has spent the past five years in a legal battle over his abduction, which authorities failed to investigate thoroughly.

This week, Malaysia finally acknowledged what she had suspected all along. In a high court ruling issued Wednesday, a judge found sufficient evidence that the government and police played a role in Koh’s 2017 disappearance. The verdict granted Koh’s family a total of over 37 million Malaysian ringgit (RM; $8.8 million USD).

The outcome was “unbelievable,” Liew, 69, said, after years of advocating and rallying Christians on her husband’s behalf. “It’s like God-answered prayer … beyond what we can imagine or think, a reflection of God’s faithfulness to his servant.”

The high court concluded that Koh’s kidnappers acted in a “sophisticated manner” that suggested institutional involvement. The judge also ordered the state to reopen the investigation into Koh’s disappearance and report their progress to the attorney general every two months. 

God’s presence was “so evident” during the trial, said Jerald Gomez, the family’s lawyer. “The police could not hide what they had done. Truly with God anything is possible.”

A report issued by the Human Rights Commission Malaysia (known as SUHAKAM) in 2019 similarly found that the 62-year-old pastor did not go voluntarily when his car was boxed in by three black SUVs and masked men hauled him into the back of a vehicle on February 13, 2017. The commission suggested that agents from the Special Branch in Kuala Lumpur, the intelligence and security agency of the Malaysian police, enforced the abduction.

That night, when Koh didn’t show up for a meeting, Liew panicked and went to the police to file a missing person report. Instead, officers interrogated her for five hours about Koh’s ministry activities and whether he proselytized Muslims.

Since then, Liew has fought for truth and justice in her husband’s case, including filing a lawsuit against police and the government in 2020. Though CCTV footage from nearby homes captured the abduction, the government “suppressed evidence, concealed information, and misdirected investigations.” Koh has not been seen since.

The night before the verdict, Liew couldn’t sleep. She felt overwhelmed when she saw around 100 people show up at the courtroom early—some she knew, and others were strangers who had been praying for the Kohs—in the gallery. Some even had to sit on the floor.

“I really felt surrounded by prayers of the saints,” Liew told CT. 

At 5 p.m. on Wednesday, Koh’s family got a glimpse of the justice they had been praying for. When the court ruled in Liew’s favor, people in the gallery applauded. The judge did not stop them. 

The judge continued reading the verdict for two hours, including ordering the government and police to give the Koh family RM 10,000 a day ($2,400 USD) from the date of Koh’s abduction to the day he is found, amounting to more than RM 31 million ($7.6 million). 

The money, which along with other damages totals $8.8 million, would be deposited into a trust fund for her husband because the judge does not consider Koh dead, Liew said. 

“We are overjoyed and thankful to God that we have an honest and fair judgment,” Liew said, reading a statement to the press outside the court. “Though this will not bring pastor Raymond back, it is somewhat a vindication and closure for the family of pastor Raymond Koh.” 

The Malaysian attorney general’s chamber announced plans to appeal the November 5 court verdict.

Liew hopes the ruling continues to exert pressure on officials to provide answers to Koh’s whereabouts. “Right now we don’t know anything—where he is, is he alive, is he dead?” 

Koh, who came to faith at a Christian concert in Singapore in the 1970s, had a long ministry career in Muslim-majority Malaysia. The Evangelical Free Church pastor started the nongovernmental organization Harapan Komuniti to shelter people with HIV, support single mothers, and meet the needs of the most vulnerable.

Prior to his abduction, the country’s Islamic authorities had investigated Harapan Komuniti for attempting to convert Muslims, which is illegal. Although the government dropped the allegations, Koh bore the weight of the accusations and even received two bullets in the mail. 

Koh was experiencing a “spiritual awakening” in the days before he was abducted, Liew said in a recent Voice of the Martyrs (VOM) USA interview. He took prayer walks around the neighborhood and seemed to be filled with an urgency to share the gospel, she said. 

When their three children were younger, the Kohs talked with them about the risks of their father being arrested or jailed. The family prayed and cried together, which “prepared us for any eventuality,” Liew told VOM. 

Tan Soo-Inn, a Malaysian-born preacher in Singapore, met Koh when he was a pastor in Penang in the ’80s. When he heard the news of Liew’s victory in court, Tan didn’t give himself permission to rejoice initially. “The news looked too good to be true,” he said. 

But as reality sank in, he thanked God for his mercy and answered prayers. He thought of Isaiah 1:17: “Learn to do right; seek justice. Defend the oppressed. Take up the cause of the fatherless; plead the case of the widow.”

Some may criticize the Malaysian court for awarding an excessive amount of money to the Kohs, Tan said. But he found the judge’s verdict crucial because it called out the government and police’s failure in Koh’s kidnapping. “It is hard to believe that no one knows what happened to Pastor Raymond,” he said.

The family has sought to forgive the perpetrators of Koh’s abduction. Liew bought a fruit basket for the person who allegedly led the operation to kidnap her husband when she learned that he was in hospital recovering from liver cancer, she revealed in the VOM USA interview. 

“In my heart I felt peace because I obeyed the Lord. I have done what God asked me to do,” she said. “I have forgiven even my enemy.”

News

When God Closes a Church, He Opens Another?

US evangelicals are buying up shuttered Catholic properties.

Christianity Today November 7, 2025

More than 70 years ago, when St. Jude Catholic Parish was established in Joliet, Illinois, the community boasted a robust manufacturing sector with Caterpillar, Texaco, and US Steel among the big companies with plants in or near the gritty far-southwest suburb of Chicago.

But just as that area’s industry has since faded, Joliet’s Catholic congregations have also declined. Last year, the local bishop merged St. Jude into several other parishes, closed the sanctuary, and sold the property.

Buying the church structure and adjacent buildings, nearly eight acres in total: a growing evangelical congregation affiliated with the Assemblies of God. Victory City Church, based in another part of Joliet, purchased the old St. Jude complex for $1.75 million.

“That facility will help us continue in our growth,” said Rusty Railey, who copastors Victory City with his wife, Victoria. The Catholic property proved a more cost-effective option than planned expansion at its current location. “I just look at it as the kindness of the Lord to give it to us and keep it as a church.”

As the Roman Catholic Church shutters parishes in places contending with fewer people in the pews and priests in the pulpits—along with the financial toll of the abuse crisis—it’s often other religious groups who buy and lease the sites.

Local Catholic leaders tend to be grateful that others can use the space for worship and service. But it’s not always a smooth transition. Evangelical churches without experience with bigger facilities may not be ready for the upkeep. And local Catholic parishioners may feel the emotional sting of seeing their former sacred spaces dismantled and reused by other traditions.

At the new Victory City campus, there’s not only the sanctuary but also former school buildings, a gym, a rectory, and a chapel that the former Catholic congregation used for Eucharistic adoration. The church plans to hold worship at the new site early next year and later open an elementary school and possibly a 24-hour prayer space in the chapel.

These changes “just fit more into our mission approach to the city,” Railey said.

Closures and mergers of Catholic sites have ramped up in areas including the Midwest and Northeast, often as part of organized downsizing initiatives by church leadership, sometimes in tandem with bankruptcy filings. At last count, more than 40 Catholic dioceses and religious orders have sought bankruptcy protection, with 13 of those cases pending.

“As we all are aware, many things have changed in the last 50 to 60 years,” wrote Joliet area’s Catholic bishop, Ronald Hicks, to his flock during a “targeted restructuring” that wasn’t among the bankruptcies.

“We have significantly less vocations to the priesthood, our active priests are aging, and our beautiful churches that were built with labors of love and much financial sacrifice are in need of significant repairs, largely due to prolonged deferred maintenance.”

With church attendance dropping across the US, it’s not just Catholic churches that are closing and leaving behind buildings, which are sometimes turned into trendy condos or affordable housing. By some estimates, a record-high 15,000 churches could shut their doors this year.

Real estate broker Matt Messier, whose company Foundry Commercial has sold around 3,000 churches over the last 50 years, estimates that more than half of church properties—whether Catholic or mainline Protestant—get bought by a fellow faith group.

“There’s a lot of churches out there that are renting, so when a [church] building becomes available, they’re looking for that,” said Messier.

Even if evangelical Protestant congregations aren’t looking for high-church sanctuaries with steeples and stained glass, “There’s that functionality … the zoning’s in place. … There’ve been some very, very nice fits.”

An ongoing study on Chicago churches by the University of Notre Dame researchers found the same. “The most common reuse of dedicated church buildings—not only Catholic church buildings—is reuse for another church,” said program director Maddy Johnson.

In Bellwood, a western suburb of Chicago, some members of St. Simeon Catholic Church struggled with seeing their building closed within the last few years and then sold, said Rick Gonzalez. With his wife, Angela, Gonzalez helms the International Christian Fellowship church that bought the St. Simeon site within the past few years for about $1.35 million.

“We did our best with the congregants who were having a hard time,” Gonzalez said. His Pentecostal, nondenominational congregation has a half-dozen sites across Chicagoland. “We welcomed them into the building and reassured them it’ll remain a church.”

A rounded church building with stained glass widows.
The former St. Simeon Catholic Church in Bellwood, Illinois.

Named for the French crusader and monarch of the 13th century, St. Louis the King Catholic Parish was founded in the 1920s in Detroit. Nearly a century later, with the Polish community it’d long served fading away, the parish closed and the church was sold in 2016.

New Greater Zion Hill Missionary Baptist Church, led by pastor Eddie J. Patterson, bought the property. The growing congregation had been renting a smaller place and wanted its own space for its 350 members.

The parish property included a church building, rectory, gym, fellowship room, and commercial kitchen. The school once affiliated with St. Louis the King had already been torn down.

Patterson said what attracted his congregation to the property was “just the beauty of it.” And “they gave a really good deal. … I think it was about $400,000.”

New Greater Zion Hill moved in in 2016. A statue of St. Louis remains on the exterior of the sanctuary, but the Baptist church replaced the crucifix on the interior back wall with a lighted cross.

There have been a few maintenance issues with the property, but nothing major. The church renovated bathrooms to widen stalls and add urinals. With three boilers to supply the buildings, Patterson had to find reliable contractors who could service the campus-wide system. They’re considering a split system that could be more cost-effective for Michigan winters.

“To be honest with you, I was really impressed with how the church was kept,” Patterson said. “This building was built in 1959.”

Another striking church building—featuring Roman columns and a towering steeple—sits along a roadway named for the architect Frank Lloyd Wright in Lakeland, Florida.

For years, the church belonged to a Catholic elementary school called St. Joseph Academy, which closed during the pandemic and was sold to nearby Florida Southern College. Though Florida Southern is affiliated with the United Methodist Church, it now leases the church to an evangelical congregation called City Central Church, founded by former megachurch pastor Jay Dennis.

Dennis retired in 2017 from the First Baptist Church at the Mall in Florida, but after a few years, he said he felt God calling him back into ministry. The Lakeland property became available, and Dennis launched a new congregation there starting in 2021, said associate pastor Lonnie Lawson.

“That building became available in the right timing, in the right ways, and it just worked,” Lawson said. “I would say ‘hand of God’ for sure.”

The congregation started with around 120 to 130 people, and “four years into it, we might be 300, 350 now, so we’re a growing church,” he said, adding that before the church was Catholic, it’d begun as a Baptist worship site in the 1960s.

In Pittsburgh, St. Elizabeth Catholic Church began in 1895 as the first Slovak parish in the city. The church building, still standing in an area known as the Strip District, was built in 1908. It closed in the 1990s amid a merger and was eventually sold, according to an online history.

The initial buyer turned it into a nightclub branded with religious imagery called Sanctuary. It was later renamed Altar Bar, which offered live shows.

On the left: Altar Bar in Pittsburgh, which was formerly St. Elizabeth Catholic Parish. On the right: Altar Bar after being renovated into a campus of Orchard Hill Church.
On the left: Altar Bar in Pittsburgh, which was formerly St. Elizabeth Catholic Parish.
On the right: Altar Bar after being renovated into a campus of Orchard Hill Church.

Once that venue shut down in 2016, multisite Orchard Hill Church bought the building and reverted it back into a Christian worship venue that, after renovations, opened in 2019.

“We’d been looking kind of all over downtown,” said Kurt Bjorklund, senior pastor of the growing evangelical congregation. “One guy in our church called me and said, ‘I know this guy and he’s probably interested in selling,’ and we made a deal without it ever going to market.”

The Altar Bar owner, a Catholic who died earlier this year, “liked the idea of it going back to a church,” Bjorklund said. The neighborhood could be described these days as hipster, and Orchard Hill sees its Strip District campus as one with “primarily a young crowd in age and in heart.”

Not every former Catholic property sale has worked out. Some that were sold proved too costly for the groups or congregations that bought them, and buildings turned into white elephants. Roofs, furnaces, and other upkeep expenses can price congregations out of buildings.

A century-old Gothic church on Chicago’s South Side is one example. Built for a mostly German Catholic parish and initially called St. Martin de Tours, it sold to an evangelical congregation in the 1990s but has been closed since 2017. It now sits rotting, with visible holes in the windows and roof and nuisance calls to the police.

Sometimes, Christian groups buying Catholic sites “are not very large” and not “capable of caring for the properties, then they take them and they fall to pieces,” said Brody Hale, a Massachusetts attorney who has helped Catholic parishioners navigate church bureaucracy to appeal parish closings by local bishops.

And not everyone is happy when Catholic buildings are closed or sold, even if they end up retaining their purpose as a worship site. Parishioners with strong emotional, historical, and spiritual ties to a church mourn the closures and can be disappointed to see their sacred space used by what some consider a rival or even heretical group.

“Catholic bishops are required to protect former Catholic worship sites from what canon law calls ‘sordid use,’” said Notre Dame’s Johnson. “In addition, recent Vatican guidance has encouraged, where possible, proactively finding mission-aligned reuses. What this means for non-Catholic religious reuse of former Catholic sites is a point of debate.”

In the Buffalo, New York, area, a grassroots group called Save Our Buffalo Churches has fought efforts to close Catholic churches. As Catholic leaders continue to shed properties amid bankruptcy proceedings fueled by sex abuse claims, advocates argue that “once a church building is consecrated, the intent is for it to go ‘in perpetuity’ and not be deconsecrated ‘willy-nilly.’”

Mary Pruski, a local parishioner with Save Our Buffalo Churches, knows of no Catholic buildings sold to evangelical congregations. “We certainly wouldn’t mind,” she said. “And some of the disenfranchised Catholics might show up there too.”

Greg Tucker, a spokesman for the Buffalo diocese, said its reorganization has resulted in “many significant changes, most notably the merger, consolidation, and closure of certain parishes” and their sale to other faith groups, including Christians and Muslims. Last year, a press release from the diocese indicated it would have 78 fewer worship sites after mergers and closures.

One major sale involved Christ the King Seminary, a former priest-training ground, which went to the World Mission Society Church of God, a Korean religious organization considered an unorthodox sect by Protestant Christians.

In Canada, a former parish, Mary Queen of the World, became a new location for Calvary Baptist Church.

The Catholic Archdiocese of St. John’s has also been selling properties to satisfy settlements over widespread sexual abuse at a former orphanage called Mount Cashel, among other settings, said Canadian attorney Geoff Budden, whose law firm represents more than 200 of the 350 claimants.

The available parish “presented an opportunity” for the Baptists and for ecumenism, as the pastor of the new site allowed a food pantry run by a Catholic social service agency to remain.

In parts of the South and Southwest, where evangelicals have long had a strong presence, a different problem has emerged: accommodating the growth of Catholic communities, sometimes ethnic churches serving congregants of Asian and African descent, beyond the surge in Latino Catholic immigrants.

Outside Dallas, a Catholic parish serving Vietnamese worshipers recently built a new sanctuary on property bought some years ago from a Church of Christ congregation, according to Danny Muzyka, president and founder of Texas-based Church Realty.

“We’re hunting now for a Ugandan Catholic church in the Fort Worth diocese looking to buy a building,” Muzyka said, adding that the growth of such ethnic congregations is “primarily a function of immigration.”

In Atlanta, Catholic leaders have “opened many very large parishes in the suburbs, and some of these parishes have struggled to have parking lots large enough to fit the number of Catholics wishing to attend their weekend liturgies,” according to a report published in Theology Today in 2021.

The researchers, who include a Jesuit priest affiliated with Georgetown University, concluded: “As parts of the South struggle to provide enough infrastructure to accommodate the influx of parishioners, parts of the Northeast and Midwest find themselves with a surplus of buildings in areas that no longer have enough parishioners to keep them open.”

In Muzyka’s experience, of the church properties being sold, whether Catholic or Protestant, “maybe 30 percent of them are a change of use, meaning the church completely goes away.”

Robert Herguth is a writer based in Chicago and an investigative reporter at the Chicago Sun-Times

History

Why CT Was Skeptical of Cold War Calls for Peace

In 1959, evangelicals looked to political leaders to hold up America’s great spiritual heritage as responses to the Soviet Union divided Christians.

A CT magazine cover from 1959 and a photo of Khrushchev.
Christianity Today November 7, 2025
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Getty

The great ideological conflict of the Cold War can feel abstract from the vantage point of history. In 1950s America, however, the threat of Communism loomed large. And Americans got the opportunity to hear directly from the world’s top Communist in 1959 when Soviet Union Prime Minister Nikita Khrushchev came to the US

CT paid attention—and noticed one American leader who highlighted the spiritual deficit of Communist ideology. 

Minutes after his silvery TU-114 appeared on the blue Maryland horizon, Khrushchev—one of the most celebrated international visitors since the Queen of Sheba—was reflecting his high priority for economics. … 

“It is true that you are richer than we are at present,” the Red leader told a state dinner in the White House the same evening. “But then tomorrow we will be as rich as you are, and the day after tomorrow we will be even richer.” 

The next 12 days bore out clearly what his first utterances hinted at: that Khrushchev was toeing the Marxist line which merges the dialectic with economic determinism as the comprehensive key to reality.

Preoccupation with economics characterized Khrushchev’s entire tour of the United States. … 

Khrushchev viewed little during his stay that was distinctively Christian or that would underscore America’s great spiritual heritage. … It was left to Eisenhower to salvage something for the cause of Christian witness, and many clergymen feel his deeds on the final day of Khrushchev’s stay represented the most devout gesture during his entire term of office. Eisenhower not only broke into top-level talks with Khrushchev to attend a Sunday morning worship service, but invited the Red leader to accompany him. Khrushchev declined, explaining that an acceptance would shock the Russian people. But the impact of the President’s spiritual priorities was firmly registered.

Some Americans wanted to defuse the conflict with the Soviet Union, arguing that political leaders should go to great lengths to prevent the possibility of nuclear war. CT countered with a word of caution: Christians should understand that the biblical idea of peace is not the same as the vision that politicians promised.

The potentials of destruction in nuclear warfare are such that there is a crescendo of demand for some type of organization or machinery that will insure peace in our time.

But these appeals for peace on the part of political and ecclesiastical leaders involve considerations which few people are prepared to face.

Peace is not something that man can will for himself. It is a God-conferred blessing based upon obedience to God-ordained moral laws. Man cannot defy these laws and claim the blessings of peace. …

Part of man’s confusion today is due to his failure to understand what peace really means. The average person of the world desires peace only so he may continue, unharmed and uninterrupted, in serving the devil.

Our Lord made it plain that the peace of which he spoke had little in common with that concept of peace held by the world. He affirmed that he had come not to bring peace but a sword and that the peace he gives is foreign to, cannot be understood by, nor conferred at the behest of the world. And an understanding of this is possible only to those who are taught by the Holy Spirit.

People might feel like the advent of the atomic bomb, the Cold War, and the Space Race changed everything, but humanity’s spiritual needs are the same in every age. A Fuller Theological Seminary professor argued that was why evangelicals should not pursue peace at any price

It is a fundamental of biblical anthropology that “there is no peace … to the wicked” (Isa. 48:22; 57:21).

It is utter folly to talk about the possibility of world peace when such lawlessness as we now see on this earth prevails. How can one talk of world peace when one third of the entire population of the globe has succumbed to the cruel, God-defying system of Marxian communism? … There is no more possibility for this earth to have peace when it wars against God, than it is for the human soul to have peace when it is at war with God. 

The best way to respond to Communism became a fault line in American religion. CT reported on emerging divisions and potential Protestant realignment. 

The National Council of Churches urged churches to study its recommendations of U. S. recognition and U. N. admission of Red China. Cleveland delegates could hardly have suspected that their proposals would lead, in some quarters, rather to a study of the NCC and the question of its value to the churches. Some church bodies have decided that they did not require a year’s study before making a pronouncement on the Red China issue. The American Baptist Convention, meeting June 4–9 in Des Moines, Iowa, was one of these.

Indeed, this lively issue provided the only extended debate of the sessions. After a number of staccato-like two-minute speeches, with delegates still wishing to speak, the convention voted narrowly, 245 to 234, in support of U. S. policy which denies diplomatic recognition to Red China and opposes its admission to the United Nations.

Evangelicals were also concerned about developments in contemporary capitalism, however. New research in marketing and advertising raised fear of subliminal messages and psychological manipulation. CT reminded readers that the gospel shouldn’t be packaged and sold like another product. 

The use of guise and disguise in contemporary advertising is also provoking a long look at the religious use of persuasive techniques seeking the spiritual commitment of the masses. … In The Hidden Persuaders—a book now in its third or fourth printing, with built-in reader appeals of its own, and publisher’s advertisements alert to motivational devices—Vance Packard causticly indicts this “engineering of consent.” Packard touches the pulpit only in a passing way; neither the term “religion” nor “church” is found in his index. But what he says inevitably raises questions about the field of religious promotion. …

Without special lighting, microphones, and other electronic gadgets, many a pulpiteer today would feel quite cheated, and even lost. Perhaps, right there, is an occasion of stumbling. Do we perchance rely on gadgets more than on spiritual factors for effective proclamation? … 

The work of the Holy Spirit remains the one indispensable factor in our effective presentation of the Gospel. The test of a “good commercial”—does it hurry a potential buyer to a sales transaction?—cannot therefore be pressed. Preaching is a hopeless pursuit apart from the life-giving power of the Divine Spirit. The outpouring and programming of the Spirit are entrusted neither to advertising agencies nor to church publicity clinics nor to ministers who have read Dale Carnegie. Christian virtues like love, joy, peace, gentleness, and faithfulness simply cannot be verbalized into Christian experience. Preaching reaches for genuine spiritual decision, and this cannot be engineered. … 

The Gospel stands—once for all given to the saints. Only the package dare be changed, yet never by way of concealing the content.

Technological progress also raised new ethical issues. A Catholic statement condemning birth control occasioned reflection on the morality of contraception

The declaration was only a logical extension of Catholicism’s well-known stand against use of contraceptives. But timed for release on Thanksgiving morning, the 1,516-word statement (formulated a week earlier at the 41st annual meeting of U. S. Catholic bishops) won headlines across the country.

Within hours birth control had become a major U. S. controversy which soon took a political turn. Senator John F. Kennedy, leading Catholic presidential aspirant, said he thought it would be a “mistake” for the United States to advocate birth control in under-developed countries. President Eisenhower said this would never happen while he is in office.

Reaction from Protestant quarters found a division of opinion on the morality of birth control itself.

Among evangelicals, the hullabaloo perhaps served to crystallize some convictions. Prodded by controversy, many went anew to the Bible for a re-examination of views on the legitimacy of sex severed from its procreative role.

Despite some sympathy for Catholic teaching on contraception, CT expressed concern about the church’s interest in political influence. Looking ahead to Democratic Sen. John F. Kennedy’s possible presidential campaign, a Methodist minister argued that Catholic involvement in America politics was changing quickly.

The penchant of the Roman Catholic for politics is well known. It extends both to laymen and clerics. The nexus of many a municipal political machine has been a close liaison between parish priest and diocesan bishop, on the one hand, and the boss, on the other. New York City, Boston, and Chicago offer ready examples. In New York City where 80 per cent of the Catholics regularly vote the Democratic ticket, no Protestant would have a chance to be mayor. …

On the national scene Roman Catholic political power is a formidable front unparalleled by organized Protestantism. The Catholic role has been that of king maker rather than king. While there has been an unwritten rule that the presidential nominee of the Democratic party must not be Catholic, there has been an equally prevailing rule that the chairman of the national committee must always be Catholic.

Now the Catholic genius for politics is taking a new direction. It turns from king-maker to king. It would like, perhaps, to achieve in the nation what it has already achieved in New York, Boston, and Chicago. It is challenging the prevailing rule (disastrously disregarded once) that no major party nominee can be of Roman Catholic faith. A groundswell within this communion advocates abandonment of the traditional taboo. This sentiment converges on Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts, whose assets in seeking the Democratic nomination are his youthful charm and his father’s unlimited financial resources.

Turning to Protestantism, CT noted increasing debates about women’s ordination in 1959. The growing discussions seemed to skip important questions, though. 

It is quite understandable that this question of feminine ordination to church offices should have arisen in our modern era. Feminism, or the modern theory of “women’s rights,” has impressed us so thoroughly with what women have been able to accomplish, that one is likely to feel boorish if he obstructs the modern advance. In fact, one feels that there is a kind of inevitability about opening offices to women. … 

Few people have inquired whether feminine elders and ministers would not be something different from feminine doctors and lawyers. The assumption is that if women have achieved success and status in secular professions, why should they not have the same opportunities in the church? There is a curious reasoning process here that involves two fundamental fallacies: first, that everything included in the modern feminist movement is unquestionably good (“Give the little woman credit for anything she can get, man”), and second, that our modern day demands that we think like modern men. … 

There is general agreement that churches ought to be governed in thought and practice by the teaching of the Word of God. This means that there must be no easy capitulation to modern ways of thinking simply because they are modern. Rather, we should endeavor to determine God’s will and way. 

Editors also returned the critical question of Scripture and its inspiration.

The doctrine of inspiration continues to be in many ways the critical issue underlying all other issues in the Church today. A variety of statements vie with one another for assent. Labels are often attached to those who have no desire to follow any particular school. Judgments are passed in terms of traditional or less traditional alignments. Yet behind all other problems, concerns, or assessments, the primary question is still, as always, that of the biblical teaching itself. What are, in fact, the essential demands of the Bible with regard to its own inspiration? What are the basic factors without which no doctrine can claim to stand by the biblical and apostolic norm to which all attempted theological statements must be subject?

News

After Hurricane Melissa, Jamaican Baptists Look to Rebuild from the Ruins

Churches step in as shelters, aid sites, and sources of hope after the island’s strongest storm.

Flooded roads and damaged houses visible from a drone.

Jamaica begins recovery efforts after Hurricane Melissa.

Christianity Today November 6, 2025
Rob Witzel / Courtesy of Send Relief

A map hangs in the office of the Jamaica Baptist Union, with colored thumbtacks marking each of its 340 member churches: white for those that remained intact, yellow for those that suffered damage, and red for buildings hit hard or destroyed by Hurricane Melissa.

The red and yellow dots follow the path of the Category 5 storm that barreled across the island last week, ripping off corrugated steel roofs, uprooting palm trees, soaking homes, and forcing the church network into action.

Pauline Dawkins-Cole cried driving through her home parish of Saint Elizabeth, Jamaica, once a place “thriving with life.” The hurricane left homes and buildings crushed, including churches where her father used to preach. “We don’t even understand how to process this,” the 66-year-old said.

In the early days of recovery, Baptist union leaders sent WhatsApp messages and made phone calls to check in on pastors as they readjust their bearings to communities they barely recognize after the strongest hurricane in their country’s history.

Baptists set up donation accounts and drop-off sites at their Kingston headquarters—spared from the full brunt of the storm—and at three other churches around the island. General secretary Merlyn Hyde Riley fields calls from ministries eager to help, coordinating incoming supplies and volunteers.

“You see all these organizations … but there is no better humanitarian relief organization than the global church,” said Jason Cox, vice president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Send Relief, who traveled to Jamaica the weekend after the hurricane.

Rob Witzel / Courtesy of Send Relief

Across the island nation of 1.9 million Christians, pastors assess building damage, local needs, and their capacity to rally help. In hard-hit areas to the south and west, the devastation was relentless, with up to 90 percent of the population displaced and some completely unreachable.

On Saturday, Riley couldn’t get in touch with the pastor of Sharon Baptist Church in Santa Cruz, a town located on the route between Kingston in the southeast to Black River on the southwest coast. When Cox pulled up to the cream-colored brick church, a patch of its red metal roof peeled back, pastor Jacob Powell was there, sitting in shock and sorrow as he charged his phone in his car.

“The devastation in this area was more than we imagined would have taken place,” he said. “Our churches have been destroyed. … Several of our members who live around here, their homes have been destroyed. … Just so many are suffering at this time.”

In rural areas, communication is a commodity people long for in the wake of a disaster, just like the tarps, food, and water his church plans to distribute from its fellowship hall.

That day, the news hadn’t been good for Powell. Rescuers discovered the body of a woman missing from his congregation who had drowned in the storm. The official death toll climbed to 75 people across the Caribbean.

As Cox and his team traveled with their Starlink unit—which uses the SpaceX satellite to deliver broadband to rural areas—he saw how crucial internet access could be for ministry outreach and aid amid disaster. Partners in Cuba sent a picture of one of 50 new generators Send Relief had shipped ahead of the hurricane: It sat in a sanctuary wrapped in a tangle of phone chargers, each belonging to a church member eager to hear back from loved ones.

Dawkins-Cole met a man who survived the storm and caught a ride to safety in Kingston but still hadn’t heard from anyone in his family back on the other side of the island eight days later. She was in the capital stocking up on supplies for food packages distributed through churches—mostly dry goods like rice, flour, milk powder, ramen—and took his number to help track down his relatives when she returned to Saint Elizabeth Parish this weekend.

Like many Christians on the island, Dawkins-Cole saw God’s providence and mercy in the storm. As she and her relatives deliver supplies to communities in need, she has prayed for revival and renewal, particularly among younger Jamaicans.

A woman in a mask stands in a church sanctuary scooping flour into a bag.Rob Witzel / Courtesy of Send Relief
Volunteers prepare food packages for families affected by Hurricane Melissa.

In the cities, lines snake outside the banks and Western Unions, which ran out of cash at one point, Cox said. Farther out, water, debris, and downed power lines still cover the roads. In some smaller towns, traffic backs up as bulldozers clear the dirt. Rural areas still face the threat of mudslides.

“You always hear people in disaster relief say, ‘I’ve never seen anything like this,’ but I’ve never seen anything like this,” said World Vision’s Mike Bassett, who watched flooded rivers overtake streets and flow through homes in Cambridge, Jamaica, south of Montego Bay.

The hurricane ruined crops and drowned livestock, meaning many farmers lost access to food and income. The storm did its worst in the town of Black River, where Melissa wiped out church after church and home after home and displaced nearly all its residents.

Bassett, national director of domestic humanitarian and emergency affairs at World Vision, worries about all the water. The organization is rushing to provide bottled water and mobile purification units to ensure desperate people don’t drink the unsanitary floodwaters.

At the end of each of day of traveling to deliver supplies and find churches to open as shelters or distribute aid, Bassett lies in bed and decompresses, thinking about the “loss of life, infrastructure, livelihood, and homes” he’s seen. But then God brings to mind the people.

“I’ve been seeing Jesus show up in the kindness of strangers,” he said. “They’re out there helping. They’re still smiling even though their home is damaged or destroyed.”

The Jamaica Baptist Union quickly adopted the tagline “from ruin to renewal” and keeps pointing the 40,000 members of its churches to look beyond the current brokenness to the hope of rebuilding.

Pastor Michael Shim-Hue preached on Sunday at Calvary Baptist Church in downtown Montego Bay, his pulpit lit by the hole the hurricane ripped in the roof of the sanctuary. He thanked God and called on the church to come together, assuring them that God will carry his people along as they recover.

Looking around at destruction everywhere, stores closed, and generators running, people don’t know what their next few days could look like, much less the long path to rebuild.

“The pain is real. It is great. I don’t know when the people will come back to normalcy, don’t know when their lives will be straightened out,” said Powell, standing in the midst of his damaged church compound and wearing a hat that read “Jesus Saves.” “If they don’t get assistance from somewhere, it’s going to take a long time.”

Church Life

When Songs Undermine Orthodoxy

Church songs need to be true, not necessarily catchy.

A music note and a smudged symbol of the Holy Trinity.
Christianity Today November 6, 2025
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Getty


When training preachers, I remind them that terribly delivered sermons do not do any lasting damage. If a message is confusing, badly structured, poorly illustrated, or tedious, it may not be ideal (and it certainly is a missed opportunity), but it is unlikely to do serious harm to listeners. Most people will simply forget it.

The sermons to watch out for, rather, are the ones that are clear, dynamic, funny, vivid, creative, passionately delivered—and wrong. (The internet is full of examples.) Compelling falsehood poses far greater risks to the church than boring truth.

The same is true for songs. In fact, it is probably even more true of songs, because while sermons are delivered once, songs are sung repeatedly—in the church, in the car, in the kitchen, by children and adults alike. Unsingable songs have very low impact. A poorly written poem set to a cloying melody is soon forgotten. But a musically soaring, lyrically fluent, emotionally resonant composition, brilliantly performed in front of a huge crowd and professionally produced, can convey its theology to millions of people. This reverberation is wonderful when its theology is good, as it so often is—but it’s more of a problem when it is not.

I am not talking mainly about the songs that cause all the evangelical kerfuffles. The kerfuffles can be helpful because they cause people to think carefully about whether to use the songs in question. Clearly, pastors and churches have to decide whether they believe that God did not want heaven without us (which I do), or that the love of God is reckless (which I don’t), or that the wrath of God was satisfied at the cross (which I do), or that the earth will soon dissolve like snow (which I don’t).

They must decide whether to avoid popular hymns because of one dubious line (Will Christ really come with shouts of acclamation “to take me home”?), because they have concerns about the church from which the song comes, or because the songwriter later committed egregious sin or apostasy. We can and should debate these matters. Controversy makes us stop and think, which in turn prevents us from swallowing bad theology without realizing it.

The examples I have in mind, however, undercut Trinitarian theology without the singers or even the songwriter realizing it. On several occasions, I have attended events whose leaders, worship team, and delegates are thoroughly orthodox on the Trinity, but a song was introduced with lyrics closer to Oneness theology.

For example, Bethel Music’s “No One Like the Lord” (2025) begins: “There is one on the throne / Jesus, holy.” It continues:
Worthy is the Lamb
Who was slain and seated on the throne …
And the elders, creatures bow,
Giving praise to him and him alone

The song is powerful, sweeping, and melodic. I am confident the songwriters believe in the Trinity and are trying to reference the glory due to God. The problem is that Revelation 4–5 say something quite different. There is indeed one who is seated on the throne, but he is clearly distinct from the Lamb who was slain (5:7). The elders and living creatures bow down and praise the one on the throne as worthy (4:9–11), and they also bow before the Lamb (5:8–14).

But the two persons are not identical. This is vital to our view of God. We do not praise the Lamb “alone”; we praise Father, Son and Spirit. Revelation chapter 5 concludes with all creation saying, “To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb be praise and honor and glory and power forever and ever!” (v. 13, emphasis added). When songs are doing the liturgical heavy lifting—as they often are in low-church evangelicalism—this is a problem.

Let me give you another example: “Who Else,” a song by Gateway Music from 2023. “Who else is worthy?” runs the chorus and answers, “There is no one, only you, Jesus.” Admittedly, this could mean that Jesus is the only one worthy to open the scroll in the same chapter (5:9). But the song does not mention this, and in context, it implies that Jesus is the only one worthy of being thanked and lifted up, rather than seeing how much of Scripture induces us to bring thanks to the Father. Without perhaps intending to, these songs typify Oneness theology in a nutshell.

To some this will all sound insufferably pedantic, if not mean. To others it will sound indefensibly sloppy, if not heretical. I hope it is neither. I have no doubt that these songwriters believe in the Trinity. Yet their lyrics unintentionally undercut that belief in ways that will confuse those who sing them. And the more popular the song, the more that matters.

We long to worship God as he has revealed himself to be. There is a beauty to praising the Father through the Son by the Spirit, and both the songs of Revelation and the prayers of the New Testament give us plenty of examples of how to do this well. So whether we are praying or singing, and whether our words are scripted or spontaneous, let us address God in all his Trinitarian splendor.

Andrew Wilson is the teaching pastor at King’s Church London and a columnist for Christianity Today. He’s the author of several books, including Remaking the WorldIncomparable, and God of All Things


News

Europe’s Christian Pacifists Reconsider Peace by Arms

Some once committed to nonviolence see rearmament as a necessary deterrent.

People at a 'Light for Ukraine' vigil in Poland in February 2023.

People at a 'Light for Ukraine' vigil in Poland in February 2023.

Christianity Today November 6, 2025
NurPhoto / Contributor / Getty

Over the last ten centuries, Nikolaikirche—a Protestant church in Eisenach, Germany—has witnessed its share of war and civil strife, dictators and destruction. But this year, in the encroaching darkness of early autumn, its Romanesque stone arches are bathed in candlelight, emanating from stations set up to invite visitors to pause and say a prayer—for peace, for an end to violence, for reconciliation.

The event, held annually in conjunction with the Community of the Cross of Nails and the Coventry Cathedral in England, reminds participants of Jesus’ emphasis on reconciliation and of Christian convictions around finding diplomatic solutions to serious conflicts, said Gabriele Phieler, a pastor and retired superior of a Protestant social welfare organization located next door to the Nikolaikirche.

Questions of war and peace are never easy, especially when European nations are increasing their military capabilities, acquiring more advanced weaponry, and boosting defense spending. In the last month, the continent has witnessed continued and intensified Russian attacks on Ukraine, which have killed civilians and damaged infrastructure. Europe is responding by bolstering its own defenses and considering new, controversial strategies like using frozen Russian assets to fund Ukraine’s military needs.

Given the fear of further Russian aggression, some German Christians want to do more to protect the country. But tonight, as the flicker of flames plays across centuries-old walls where Christians have gathered in times of turmoil and reconciliation alike, Phieler hopes attendees will simply come together to pray and trust in God for peace.

Over their history, European churches have blessed armies and supported wars in the name of God. At the same time, a countertradition of Christian pacifism has persisted. From Anabaptists, Mennonites, and Quakers in the 16th and 17th centuries to the Catholic peace group Pax Christi after World War II, various believers in Europe have argued that following Christ means rejecting violence.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 has brought that tradition under strain. Eastern European nations like Poland, Estonia, or Romania worry about future aggression. The region’s pacifist networks are now urging negotiation and reconciliation while others traditions insist on military support, reviving an old European argument over what Christian peacemaking really looks like.

Public debates reveal a polarized landscape. Initiatives opposing arms shipments to Ukraine, led by figures such as Left populist German politician Sahra Wagenknecht and journalist Alice Schwarzer, draw support from some Christian pacifists.

But others once committed to peace feel Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is prompting Christian pacifists to rethink what it means to pursue peace.

“We are simply faced with naked aggression. There must be some sort of deterrence. To keep the peace, we need security guarantees,” said Christian ethicist Alexander Maßmann.

Through his popular column Evangelisch Kontrovers, Maßmann has acknowledged the harsh realities that challenge idealistic pacifism. Maßmann, who once opposed military buildup, now sees deterrence as a moral necessity. “The international situation is not what we thought it would be,” he said. “We are simply faced with naked aggression.

“To keep the peace, we need security guarantees—and rearmament is helpful in that sense,” Maßmann said.

Looking back in recent decades, Germany’s Protestants, particularly under the leadership of Margot Käßmann, former chair of the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD), had leaned toward a more pacifist stance.

Käßmann advocated for diplomacy and nonviolence, calling for an immediate cease-fire in Ukraine and an end to arms deliveries. She stressed that “God is not a party to war” and warned that growing militarization poses a threat to the future.

Yet in recent years, Russian aggression has prompted some within the church to reconsider. While Käßmann and like-minded voices continue to emphasize restraint, other Protestant leaders argue that refusing military assistance could leave civilians exposed to violence.

This tension illustrates a broader reassessment: Pacifism remains a guiding principle, but some see armed support as a practical necessity at times. The challenge, they say, is balancing historical commitments to peace with urgent demands for protection.

Maßmann points to the 2007 German church memorandum, which neither endorsed categorical pacifism nor unqualified just war theory—it contended instead that “military action can be justified under certain circumstances, yet it remains sinful.” Advocates like Maßmann suggest this approach allows Christians to navigate modern security dilemmas without abandoning a moral commitment to peace.

Across contemporary Europe, citizens find their ethical convictions challenged by geopolitical realities.

Maßmann said people fear that some form of a military-industrial complex might arise, making it harder to bring the long-term view of peace back into the frame and leaving Christians and citizens alike to weigh the costs of both action and inaction.

He worries that Christians could lose sight of their theological foundations. “It would be sobering if we had to surrender to realpolitik,” Maßmann warned. Instead of rejecting all force, he urged pacifists to consider “how we make those things serve peace and law in the longer run.” For now, that might mean choosing rearmament and war.

Even so, Maßmann cautioned against unchecked militarization. “There’s a real danger that a military-industrial complex might arise,” he said. The challenge for Christians, he added, is to keep any buildup under democratic control—and to “keep the vision of peace alive in our debates.”

The German Evangelical Alliance (EAD) has not yet commented on German arms deliveries to Ukraine. In a Q&A on the alliance’s website, its recently appointed political commissioner, Johann Matthies, said though he is personally committed to pacifism, he has never gone so far that he wanted to see the German military disarmed.

Rather, he said the crucial question Christians must ask in a time of rearmament and potential war is whether they themselves will “carry a sword”—either by serving the military or by voting for political platforms that promote rearmament. That question, Matthies said, is a matter of personal conscience. “Everyone must answer this question for themselves in conversation with God.”

While advocating for international diplomacy, Matthies said that failing to do everything possible for Ukraine’s air defense is not only “politically shortsighted,” but also, to Ukrainians under attack, quite “cynical.”

For Micael Grenholm, however, pacifism remains the only biblical—and practical—response to the specter of further European conflict.

A Swedish Pentecostal scholar and peace advocate, Grenholm works with Pentecostals and Charismatics for Peace and Justice, a movement that promotes nonviolence and conscientious objection.

Grenholm’s position stems from Gospel directives to love enemies and turn the other cheek. “I didn’t really argue with the text,” he said. “That’s how I became a pacifist.”

Grenholm said his conviction grew through the study of early Christianity, where figures such as Tertullian, Origen, and Justin Martyr emphasized nonviolence and refusal to join the Roman military. That tradition, he argues, sits alongside contemporary studies that argue violence is costly and nonviolent action is more effective.

Acknowledging the “naked aggression” Maßmann believes demands a response from pacifists, Grenholm also sees a place for noncooperation, sabotage, and other resistance that “doesn’t involve violence against human beings.” A Spanish study documented over 200 examples of nonviolent actions during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that helped slow its progress and prevent an all-out capitulation by Kyiv.

Bolstered by his faith and such studies, Grenholm frames Christian pacifism as a “principled, effective, and Christ‑centered” form of resistance.

“Jesus isn’t telling his followers to give up in the face of oppression or military violence,” he said, “but pointing to another way that is a stronger, more successful force in opposing evil.”

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube