Pastors

The Spiritual Life Check-up

Discovering spiritual illness must precede the cure.

How do you identify the spiritual needs of people? Do you wait until tragedy strikes and then give counsel? Do you hope that the sermon and education program will cover the bases? Do you try to keep in touch with every person through visitation?

When I started at my church seven years ago, forty people attended worship. I could visit every home at least once a month, visit shut-ins every week, and follow up visitors within the first week. Pastoral care was immediate and fulfilling.

But then things began to change. More people started attending worship, more weekday ministries were added, and a building program was begun. In short, the church came alive. Along with the excitement of growth came a growing sense of frustration. I didn’t have enough time to do pastoral care the way I knew it should be done.

Since I’d once tasted the sweetness of pastoral care, the in-depth, unhurried equipping ministry of the pastorate, all the other things I did in the church seemed shallow and unsatisfying. I discovered that my deepest desire was to provide spiritual care. My ministry gift was to mend brokenness and help people become whole.

But could I do that in the modern, chief-executive-officer pastorate to which we are all sentenced? It takes time to oversee staff, property, and programs. Those cannot be neglected. Further, could any one person really pastor a group of 300 or more?

Pastoring takes time with individuals. What could I reasonably expect of myself, remembering family and my own spiritual growth? I could just try to keep the fires out, responding only to the immediate and urgent. Or I could forget pastoral care and focus on the pulpit ministry. But if I really dealt with the reality that spiritual care takes time, would that mean I must forget study and preparation and give myself to the people?

I still struggle with this. I suppose I always will. But I am getting a handle on some of it, and I present the following idea simply as a help to anyone who would like to use it.

First, I came to grip with some realities. I asked my congregation to provide an administrator to care for property and programs. They agreed. And since the size of the congregation made it difficult for one person to provide all the personal contact needed, we began a Bible Study Training Group to train leaders in the art of leading small home Bible studies.

But that still left me with the desire to do in-depth spiritual care of my people. I thought how useful it would be if people made an appointment with me to talk only about their spiritual lives-not about marriage, children, or current crises, but the current state of their spiritual health.

The idea of health made me think of doctors’ checkups. You don’t go in and tell the doctor what’s wrong and how to treat you. You go in, have some lab work done, and then let the doctor listen, poke, and probe. Then he gives his counsel.

When I compared that with my own approaches to spiritual care of my people, I realized how infrequently I probed into some of the most important questions of spiritual life:

their personal time with God;

their struggles with temptation;

their dependence on money and possessions;

their gifts and whether our church was utilizing them.

Did my people understand my role in their life-that a pastor is not a free psychologist but a spiritual shepherd responsible for them before God? I knew part of the problem was how difficult it is for people to express themselves. And the inexpressible nature of one’s own spiritual walk makes this doubly difficult. Would the analogy of a checkup help?

As my thoughts began to jell, I began to write. I ended up with “A Confidential Spiritual-Life Checkup.” I decided to request an appointment with my people. The purpose of the appointment would be to talk over their spiritual lives. To prepare for this appointment, each individual was asked to do some “lab work.”

As you read the instrument, you will see how I’ve taken the basic functions of blood within the human body and made them analogous to the nurturing, cleansing, helping, and serving aspects of spiritual living. I end the lab report with two questions about tired blood due to imbalanced diet or imbalanced lifestyle, giving a more expanded explanation of my goal in each person’s life.

I had the instrument printed and, during a series on body life three years ago, distributed to my people.

That first spring, I had conversations with some of my people that I had never had in all our years together. It changed my relationship to them in many ways, enhancing the level of sharing and understanding my kind of help. It was beautiful-and it was effective for many.

After about six weeks of seeing persons every day, the appointments slowed down, and I sat down to tally the responses. About 30 percent of my people had come to see me. Many others said they were filling out the lab report, but by the end of summer, all appointments ended.

At first I was disappointed. But then as I reflected, I identified several dynamics at work:

1. Some people never have physical checkups either. I don’t know whether they are afraid they will find out something, or whether they figure that as long as they aren’t in pain they’re not going to worry. Perhaps some people don’t want to know what needs to be changed so they won’t be held accountable. Whatever the reason, some people avoid all checkups.

2. Several people mentioned to me that they wanted to get it all together before they came in. I took that to mean that as they did their lab work, they recognized their areas of need and didn’t really need for me to voice them, or perhaps were even too embarrassed to reveal them.

3. I have not established a pastoral relationship with all my people. I am the preacher to some, the reverend to others, and to still others, I am probably just a nice guy. But there has never been a trust relationship that could carry the weight of such a checkup.

4. Last, and I suspect one of the largest groups, are people who think it is a great idea but just never quite get around to the checkup. They procrastinate.

Over the last three years, I have distributed this instrument to the entire congregation two times. Both times I got about a 30 percent response of people actually going through the appointment. I estimate that 50 or 60 percent actually have done the lab work. The remainder do nothing with it.

For the ones who do use it, it seems to help. And for me as a pastor, there are few experiences as meaningful and fulfilling as pastoring a person through a spiritual-life checkup.

Dennis L. Wayman is pastor of the Free Methodist Church of Santa Barbara, California.

Permission is hereby granted to reproduce the following three pages for use in your local church. Alterations are also permissible. For wider use, please contact LEADERSHIP for authorization.

* * *

A CONFIDENTIAL SPIRITUAL-LIFE CHECKUP

As your pastor, I am responsible for your spiritual health in much the same way as your doctor is responsible for your physical health. Both of us must be allowed the privilege of helping you. Often, unless a disease so overcomes us that our doctor or pastor is made painfully aware of it, there is no regular time when I can sit down with you and discuss the health of your spiritual life.

Therefore I am requesting an appointment with you. I am requesting that you do the following “lab work” not as a test, but as a tool for diagnosis, so that we might know your “blood count” and decide together on a proper diet and exercise program that will bring about your best spiritual health.

Since pastors (or doctors) can help only if we allow them, this is entirely voluntary, but I am suggesting that you:

1. Set aside an hour of uninterrupted time in which to thoughtfully answer these questions.

2. Keep your answers only to yourself, to be shared with me and God alone.

3. Make an appointment with me for a one-hour spiritual check-up.

4. Get your “lab work” answers to me a week in advance for my preparation.

5. Prayerfully and openly meet with me, trusting God to use this experience for you.

I. Blood Type: Are you now a Christian? _____ Comment on your answer:

Have you been baptized? _____ When? __________ Where?

II. Red Blood Cells (oxygen carriers that prevent anemia)

A. Devotional life

1. How meaningful is Sunday morning worship to you?

2. How meaningful is private worship to you?

3. Do you feel you are becoming more acquainted with God? _____ In what ways?

4. Is meditation a part of your spiritual walk? _____ Describe:

B. Intellectual life

1. Are your doubts and questions being answered? _____ If yes, how?

2. Do you feel you know the Bible? _____ What help do you need?

3. Do you understand basic concepts of theology-justification, regeneration, sanctification, gifts of the Spirit, etc.? _____ What help do you need?

4. In what areas of intellectual life (explaining your faith; theology; practical applications; Bible knowledge; body life; etc.) are you strong, and in which are you weak?

III. White Blood Cells (disease fighters for inner spiritual cleansing and renewing)

A. Do you feel you are a more accepting, forgiving, loving person than you have been?

Expand:

B. Do you feel you are stronger against temptations (to be impatient, angry, greedy, lustful, etc.)?

Expand:

C. Do you feel your self-esteem is healthy? _____

Expand:

D. Do you see yourself becoming more pure in motive, thoughts, and lifestyle?

Expand:

E. Do you find yourself usually encouraging others or competing with others?

Expand:

F. Do you occasionally tear another person down in jest or anger?

What triggers this?

G. How is the Holy Spirit helping you become whole?

IV. Platelets (blood clotters that stanch the wounds of living in a hurting world)

A. Have you found someone to help bear the burdens of life?

Expand:

B. Do you find you can share your inner joys, hopes, and dreams?

Expand:

C. When someone in jest or in anger tears you down, how do you handle it?

D. When you fail, what happens within you?

E. When you succeed, what happens within you?

V. Blood Pressure (hypertension and exercise)

A. Are you able to turn your finances over to God and tithe, trusting him to supply?

Expand:

B. Are you able to turn your vocation over to God to use you how and where he wants?

Expand:

C. Are you learning to let go of the desire for things?

Expand:

D. Are you able to exercise your gifts within the body of Christ?

What do you see as your gift(s)?

E. Are you able to explain to others in the community why you are a Christian?

Any problems here?

F. How much are you concerned for those who are less fortunate, wanting to share with them the gospel and the helping hand?

G. How concerned are you with injustices and other social evils?

VI. Tired Blood (from imbalanced spiritual diet)

A. Is you life balanced? How do you deal with pressure? Do you have regular time for family, recreation, personal growth, etc.?

B. Do you feel you have a balance of worship, study, and service to stay in shape?

Expand:

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Shepards Who Have Stayed

Leadership Forum

What does it take to minister effectively to one congregation for thirty years? Are there secrets that could enable thousands of pastors to dismiss forever the thought of packing up and moving on? How can lay leaders stop worrying about the next pulpit vacancy?

To discuss these questions, LEADERSHIP brought together four veterans who have served their present congregations for twenty-seven, twenty-nine, thirty-one, and forty-one years respectively:

Bartlett Hess, pastor of Ward Presbyterian Church, Livonia, Michigan, since 1956.

Jacob Eppinga, pastor of LaGrave Avenue Christian Reformed Church, Grand Rapids, Michigan, since 1954.

C. Philip Hinerman, pastor of Park Avenue United Methodist Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, since 1952.

Wendell Boyer, soon-to-retire pastor of People’s Church in Beloit, Wisconsin, where he began in 1942.

Leadership: When you came to your current pastorate-who was president of the United States, and what kind of car were you driving?

Bartlett Hess: Eisenhower was president, and we arrived in a 1950 Chevrolet.

Jake Eppinga: Eisenhower . . . and we came in a green ’47 Studebaker. The first week I was there, I had the funeral of a rather well-to-do person, which meant the procession to the cemetery was mostly Cadillacs. We got about three blocks from the church when my old Studebaker, right behind the hearse, died. We had to push it into a side street and then continue. So my beginning at this church was hardly impressive.

Phil Hinerman: I’ve always driven Chevys, and in those days I could trade for a new one for $1,600. When I arrived in Minneapolis in the summer of 1952. Harry Truman was still in office.

Wendell Boyer: I came to Beloit on June 29, 1942, driving a ’41 Studebaker, what we called a “double-date coupe,” Franklin D. Roosevelt was in the White House, and the war was going badly for the Allies.

We had thirty-five people the first Sunday in a two-story rented building. On Sunday mornings we could use the whole place, but on Sunday evenings they often rented out the ground level to other groups, particularly for dances. There were big, wide heating ducts that came up through the floor . . . I must be the only preacher who’s ever given an invitation to the strains of “Let Me Call You Sweetheart.”

To start our building fund, we tried to raise $18.75 each week to buy a war bond until we were ready to use the money.

Leadership: Fascinating. What would you say are the benefits of long-term ministry in a place? What happens now that could never have happened in your first five years at the church?

Hess: New ventures come easier because of the pastor’s long track record. We’re now preparing to start our second branch church, and people have caught the vision-whereas when I first came to Detroit, I could only persuade the session to buy the land where our church now stands by saying, “My wife and I will forgo the manse you promised.” We had to continue with four children in a small, one-bathroom house in order to get the church to look to the future.

Boyer: The bankers warm up to you the longer you stay. When we tried to borrow $30,000 for that first building, we had real problems especially being an independent church, with no denominational backing. Since then, we’ve been through five building programs, and the bankers now say, “Whatever you need, just let us know.” That’s because we’ve always paid off our loans early. One of them asked me if we had a lot of tithers in our church. When I said yes, he replied, “That’s a program you can’t beat. It’s very effective.”

Eppinga: The longer I stay, the better I understand the people. I’m now baptizing children whose grandparents I married. I understand the students in my catechism classes better as I see their family roots showing through.

Another thing: somewhere along the line I’ve acquired a greater freedom to just be myself. New pastors are on their best behavior for a while, but as the years go by, you let down the facade, and people become your family.

It’s getting harder and harder to bury people now-they’re my brothers, my sisters.

Leadership: How long does it take a congregation and a pastor to get comfortable with each other? Five years? Seven years?

Eppinga: So much depends on the personalities involved. At first I didn’t rock the boat at all, but I suppose I started moving around with a bit more authority in about five years.

Boyer: For me, things began to jell after about ten years, when we moved into our new building. You have to pastor ten years or so before you really enjoy it. Only then do you begin to know your people: which ones need their hands held through a crisis, which ones will come through it on their own, and so forth.

Hess: On the other hand, sometimes you make a lot of dust in the beginning if you and the church have an advance understanding. When I was called to Cicero, Illinois, early in my ministry, I said, “I can’t come unless there are some radical changes.” The youth program had been nothing but Sunday evening dances; the women’s program was all bazaars and suppers; there was no clear presentation of the gospel. The congregation re-voted to accept my program, and we had no problem. But ordinarily, you don’t sweep in like that.

Leadership: Are there signs that indicate you’ve won your spurs and now you can move ahead with changes?

Hinerman: I don’t know, because my case was unusual. As a Southerner, I felt a lot of Scandinavian restraint when I went to Minnesota. I don’t know whether the problem was mine or theirs, but I would preach my great, powerful sermons, and nobody told me how great and powerful they were. Then came the death of my first wife. When I lived through that and didn’t collapse, something changed. From then on I felt more wanted, more accepted, more appreciated.

I had been at Park Avenue five years by that time, which was already a full term by Methodist standards. But we were just beginning to hit our stride, so I stayed . . . never expecting to remain this long, of course.

Eppinga: In my first church, when I went to buy Communion wine at the age of twenty-four, the storekeeper wouldn’t sell it to me. I said, “I’m the pastor of the church down the street.”

He looked at me and said in a tired voice, “I thought I’d heard all the excuses, but this is the worst!” (Laughter)

When I came to my present church, I was thirty-five but looked much younger, and the median age of the congregation was fairly high. I’m sure it was a good five years before anyone in a discussion said, “Well, what does dominie (pastor) think?”

Leadership: Bartlett, you were forty-five when you came to Ward Church. Did acceptance come more quickly as a result?

Hess: Not necessarily, because I followed Evan Welsh-a tremendous, lovable pastor. I remember a full twelve years after I came: some people would still greet me at the door and say, “That was a good sermon, Dr. Welsh.” And he’d been there only nine years.

But by then most of the people had made the switch. They would say, “Dr. Welsh came when we needed him, and now you have come when we need you.”

Hinerman: When I came to Park Avenue, a predecessor who had led the church for forty-two years was still living across the street. I was the fourth man in ten years to try and follow that act. It wasn’t easy.

Those of us who stay a long time have to think about this dynamic, too: someday somebody is going to have to follow us.

Eppinga: I had a very respected predecessor, too, who moved only about five miles away. So for the first two years we shared a lot of funerals. But we had a good relationship.

I remember one lady in the congregation who was one of his most fervent fans. She would shake my hand every Sunday but say nothing. Finally after five years or so she volunteered her first comment: “You’re getting better.” (Laughter)

Hinerman: Bishop Colaw was pastor of Hyde Park Church in Cincinnati for eighteen years before his election, and he used to tell about one man who never accepted him, fought everything he proposed, never had a good word for anything. But on the farewell Sunday, as a long line of people were coming up to say good-bye, many of them weeping, here was this fellow. He took Bishop Colaw by the hand, looked him straight in the eye, and said: “Don’t sing so loud when you’re standing near the mike!”

Leadership: Some denominations have legislated terms of service. How does this affect the dynamics of pastoral tenure?

Hinerman: The Methodist tradition is four years in one place, particularly in the South. It goes back to Francis Asbury and the early circuit riders who spent six weeks or six months building a church and then moved on. After a while, preachers stayed a whole year, and then, two years. By the turn of this century, that had evolved into four-year appointments.

It still prevails under certain bishops, who enforce it selectively. It’s called a “connectional itinerant system,” which in reality means “Keep your bags packed, and never unpack your books.”

Leadership: Are there weaknesses to such a system, and if so, what?

Hinerman: I’ll try to be candid-yes, there are. You never solve the problems. The chance to grow, to work through hostilities, to reconcile is forfeited. The local committee votes on the pastor every year if it wishes, and if the vote is no, then they go to the district superintendent and tell him how bad things are, how greatly they need a change. Over time, a small coterie, a power clique begins to rule that congregation, killing the preacher whenever the preacher doesn’t suit their fancy. It’s so sad.

Eppinga: It’s interesting to hear you say that, Phil, because in the Reformed tradition we have no such mechanism, and many wish we did. I wrote an article not long ago for our church paper saying I favored the bishop system, provided I could be the bishop. (Laughter) But we do have many ministers who wish they could move; the only way is by getting a call from another church, and they’re frustrated. There’s no one to move them.

We’ve always had a high view of calling, but I can’t believe some of the changes in the last ten years. Now congregations are actually advertising for ministers in the denominational paper-something that would have been highly frowned upon in the past. We’ve also had a rule that no one should be called to another church during the first two years in a charge. That’s also being forgotten occasionally.

Hess: In Presbyterianism, the life pastorate was certainly the old Scottish tradition. When the minister was installed, they used to say he was “married to the kirk,” which meant that only under the most unusual circumstances would he ever move to another parish. Times have altered that as well.

Leadership: Give us an independent-church perspective, Wendell.

Boyer: Well, when we started writing our constitution in Beloit, I wanted so much to be fair with the congregation that I insisted on an every-year vote on the pastor. We followed that for eighteen or twenty years, until the official board finally did away with it.

By then I wasn’t sure it was such a good idea. I remember the one year there were four votes against me-that was the “worst” it ever got-I spent the whole next year wondering in the back of my mind, Who are those four? I worried about that for twelve months. But the next year, all the same people were at the business meeting, and they approved me unanimously. That taught me a lesson: if someone gets a little unhappy with you over some circumstance, they’ll vote against you-but it doesn’t mean total alienation. I had done a lot of worrying for nothing.

Leadership: How have we gotten to the place in America where the pastorate is generally assumed to be only a four-to-six year thing? When you ask P.K.s where they grew up, they often just smile and say, “My father was a pastor”-that says it all.

Hess: The population as a whole is moving more often. We’re in a shifting society, with family life changing, more and more singles, and all the rest-which means the church must change to minister to real needs. If it won’t, for whatever reason, either congregational or ministerial, then voices will begin to say, “We need a change in leadership.”

In many congregations, morale is low. In some, there’s also division over theology or other matters. People have so many problems in their everyday lives that when they come to church, they don’t want to face still more problems. It’s just easier to try a new pastor.

Leadership: How have you four been able to stay so long? What has kept you fresh over the years, flexible to the times?

Boyer: Perhaps I’ve been fortunate, but from that first day in 1942 until I announced my resignation a couple of months ago, I have felt all the way that I was in the center of the Lord’s will. Beloit has been my town; it’s where the Lord wanted me to invest my life. The church has been happy and growing steadily, and now at the age of sixty-nine, I’ve said to myself, What better time to step down than when no one has suggested it?

One thing that has kept us on track has been our decision, from the very first, to make missions number one. We made “Tithes” the second listing on our offering envelopes so we could give “Missions” top billing. I remember the time we didn’t even have a building of our own, and there was a challenge to build a church in Cuba. We shelved our building program and spent the next year paying for that mission church. The amazing thing was that whereas we had projected ten years to complete our own building, we occupied it a year and a half later. This kind of emphasis has kept both me and the congregation alive and stretching.

Hinerman: Wendell, how large is People’s Church now?

Boyer: On Sunday morning, we’ll have about 600 in two services. This is in a town of about 35,000 people.

Leadership: How about the rest of you? What is the secret of freshness?

Eppinga: To be honest, I think the first building program at LaGrave Avenue sapped some of my freshness. I was going to so many committee meetings I didn’t have enough time to read, study, and pray. If you spread yourself too thin, it will eventually show up in the sermons. And the discerning listeners will sense it.

Even Spurgeon couldn’t just stand up and shake it out of his sleeve.

I remember that in my first charge, I felt completely preached out after six months. I’d already covered the whole Bible-what else was left? Now that I see retirement on the horizon, I wonder how I’m going to find time to say everything I want to say. The feeling is exactly opposite from the beginning.

But in between, there have been dry spots. I’ve felt more imaginative and productive at some times than others, and part of that relates to how much I was trying to keep my finger in everything.

Leadership: Is there a trap here, that the more one’s ministry is blessed and the larger the church grows, the more administration is required . . . which eats away at what caused the growth in the first place?

Boyer: Usually what happens is that growth comes as you get older and more experienced-but less energetic. It’s too bad growth can’t happen when you’re younger, before you get weary.

A. W. Tozer once said it’s almost impossible to be a good preacher and a good pastor. You have to choose between the two. That’s debatable, I suppose, but I know that had it not been for certain men in my congregation who carried the ball on the building programs, I wouldn’t have lasted forty-one years.

Eppinga: In another sense, though, the pastoring work feeds the sermon preparation. You face the needs out there, you work with people’s hurts, and then you try to preach to those needs.

Leadership: Your church’s summer brochure, Phil, looks like a whirlwind of activity. And you’ve done this kind of thing for ten years or more. Does it exhaust you?

Hinerman: Well, when you’re in the inner city as we are, you don’t dare take a vacation in the summer. June, July, and August are when we really make it happen, because that’s when the neighborhood is in turmoil and all the sociological and domestic problems boil to the surface. We go for seventy straight days with about forty people on the payroll, trained to do everything from sports clinics to canoe trips to backyard clubs.

But obviously, I don’t do it all. I oversee it, like a chairman of the board.

Freshness depends on whether you want to stay fresh. After all, we all have the same number of hours to work with. Underneath all my activism, I’m really a pietist. The quest for freshness, to me, means getting up at five every morning and spending two hours cultivating the inner life before I go down to the church. The rest of the day may be a blur of administration, counseling, and all the rest, but I can discipline the day if I discipline when I get up.

Leadership: What do you do in those two hours?

Hinerman: Drink enough coffee to make sure I’m awake, and then get into Bible study and waiting before God. The interior life is of the essence for me; I can’t function without it.

The two-hour slot is a devotional/creative package; I don’t try to separate my own growth from sermon preparation here. I pray, I study, I write sermons, I prepare myself for the totality of ministry.

Hess: I once heard E. Stanley Jones say, “Most of us are half-full vessels trying to run over.”

Eppinga: I admire your discipline, Phil, and would only add that other people can do the same thing at night. My most productive time, for example, is between eight and one in the morning, when the telephone quiets down and I can concentrate on the Word.

Another key to freshness is the stimulation of conferences. Part of my longevity, I’m sure, is due to the fact that after the first seven years, the church gave me a six-month sabbatical, which I spent at Union Seminary in Virginia. Seven years later they sent me to Cambridge, England, where I wrote a book and recharged my batteries.

Congregations must realize that ministers cannot go nonstop. I met a colleague from Iowa at a conference once who had had to ask his consistory twice for permission to attend. They had finally said, “OK, you may go, but we expect you back here in the pulpit on Sunday.” So there he was in Grand Rapids, Michigan, sitting up nights in the hotel room working on a sermon. I was angry. That’s why we have so many people leaving the ministry.

Hess: For me, expository preaching has been a well of freshness. I determined from the beginning to expound the Word verse by verse, section by section, and I find it feeds my soul as well as builds people up in the faith. It also saves me the wondering of what to preach about.

Another thing is wide reading. I’ve read both The Christian Century and Christianity Today from the start as well as a spectrum of current books and various magazines.

Eppinga: I agree with your point about expository preaching; it keeps you fresh and also keeps you close to the Word. Sometimes I look back at “the barrel”-my sermons from the past, especially the first five years-and say, “Oh, no! I preached that?”

It is true that some of the great sermons of history were topical-Thomas Chalmers’s “The Expulsive Power of a New Affection,” for example, or some of Jonathan Edwards’s masterpieces. But that is not the way for the long term.

Preaching at summer Bible conferences has been invigorating for me, too. It has reminded me of the church universal, which I need.

Hess: Sometimes we pastors simply push our program, our ideas too hard. I remember back in Cicero coming home from a terrible session meeting, and the Lord saying to me, “Bart-this is not the way you are to do my work.” About that time Norman Grubb came to our church, and his message on the surrender of the will-“Not I, but Christ”-spoke deeply to me. I learned to go and apologize to people for pressing too much.

I can’t say I’ve always stayed in this place of surrender, but I know what it is, just like a musician knows when he’s on pitch and when he’s not. When I exert too much effort of the flesh, I’m in trouble. When I stand aside and let God work, things go entirely differently.

As someone recently wrote in The Presbyterian Journal, Jesus didn’t say, “I will build your church” or even “You will build my church.” He said, “I will build my church.”

Leadership: Over the years, how seriously have you thought about relocating?

Boyer: I’ve always known I was supposed to be in Beloit. Once I was invited to a church of 800 when we were running only about 75. But after I spoke there on a Sunday, I still knew in my heart that God wanted me to stay put.

Eppinga: I’ve been tempted many times-usually after coming back from a visit to a mission field.

I’ve also had a running fantasy of being a small-town pastor . . . sitting on a park bench with folks . . . going down Main Street in the mornings, stopping in at the stores to say good morning, knowing everyone in the village. … Something about that attracts me.

But when the Lord places you somewhere, you have to go to work there and ignore the grass on the other side of the fence. This is “where it’s at.” This is where, in his providence, he keeps challenging you.

I’m not saying it is wrong to move. I believe the Lord has all kinds of ministers-some starters, some relievers, some sprinters, some milers. So the right length for one is not necessarily the right length for another. But all of us have to meet the challenge where we are instead of leaving it unresolved.

Hess: In my first church out of seminary (it’s now extinct, so I can tell this story!), I never saw such a collection of difficult people. (The man who followed me, in fact, finally called the session together and gave one woman a letter of transfer addressed “To any evangelical church” because she’d been such a problem.) I wanted to get away every day, I think.

About then I read an article about a minister who badly wanted to leave his church. But the Lord showed him that what was needed was not a new church, but rather a minister with a new attitude in the old church.

At that point, I was being considered for an executive position. We waited eagerly for the letter to arrive. Finally it came . . . informing me that I was too conservative theologically for the situation. My wife and I knelt down at our secondhand sofa that day and said, “Lord, if you want us to stay here all our ministry, we’ll stay. Our future is in your hands.”

Immediately, that little church began to blossom. The whole experience was invaluable to my entire ministry.

Eppinga: I stayed at my second charge only two years. I left because I felt we were not quite right for each other. Maybe I was wrong to leave. It is a good church, but I thought they would be better served by a different type of minister.

The short pastorate was right for me in that situation, I believe. And it didn’t mean I was a quitter. I went to the next church . . . and have now stayed almost thirty years.

Leadership: How have you handled the times when people have given subtle (or not-so-subtle) hints that maybe you ought to be moving along now? How have you responded to those who were upset with you?

Hess: If you feel the Lord wants you to stay, you ignore the hints and you keep treating the people kindly. I had a wonderful experience just yesterday: a woman who had given me all kinds of trouble and had gone elsewhere came back to say, “We want to join your church again.” Consistent love and kindness paid off.

Boyer: I learned early in my ministry never to answer a nasty letter with a nasty letter. Some of the best people in my church today are those who once thought I should have left town, and said so. I never quit loving them and always left the door open for them to return.

I’ve preached from the pulpit that for those of us beyond the Cross, there may be differences, but these are family matters. We can talk about them, work them through-but we forgive and forget in the end, because we’re family.

Hinerman: My experience is quite different from the two of you, because I’ve been in a thirty-year fight to stay alive in the inner city-and have lost about 3,000 members along the way! The neighborhood was changing even before I arrived, but there were no blacks in the membership, and as an old Southern boy, I knew that wasn’t Christian. One of the first questions I raised was “Will it be all right if your pastors bring into membership anyone who has faith in Jesus Christ?” The debate went on till midnight, because they knew exactly what the code language meant.

The curious thing is that race was never mentioned. There are no racists in Minnesota, you see; this is the land of Hubert Humphrey. I’d grown up next to people who were rednecks and proud of it, but the denial of racist feelings even as church members exited for the suburbs was new to me. Over the first twenty years, we basically lost my entire generation, the forty-to-sixty crowd. Some of them would have moved out anyway, but my ministry at Park Avenue didn’t help to hold them.

What were the reasons given? Well, they didn’t like this program or that program; they didn’t appreciate the way so-and-so was leading. The youth program has been the bane of my existence, because it reflects the neighborhood-about fifty/fifty black and white. So if you had three or four daughters, you really didn’t want to raise them in Park Avenue United Methodist Church. People would never come up to me and say, “I don’t want my daughters growing up here”-they’d say instead, “That’s a lousy youth pastor you’ve got, and if you don’t get him out of here, we’re going to move, and we’ll be taking our money with us.”

There has never been a move to oust me personally. But the pursuit of my conviction that the church ought to reflect the demographics of the neighborhood has been one unbelievable fight.

Leadership: How have you survived? Why have you stuck it out for thirty-one years?

Hinerman: Well, sometimes I just say I’ve stayed because the bishop can’t find anybody else to go to Park Avenue. When I plead with him for relief, he says, “Well, stay one more year,” because he doesn’t want to move me and have me wreck some other good Methodist church somewhere.

Seriously, in the midst of all the pain, there has been the joy of seeing a truly multiracial church come into existence. We had 700 people there yesterday, 70 percent of them under thirty-five. We’re just shoving the doors out trying to accommodate Christian education. The church experts have looked at us and said, “You can’t be doing this. You don’t fulfill any of the guidelines for church growth-no parking, no homogeneity. This is impossible.” The fun is trying to grow where you’re not supposed to. It’s exciting to have 1,500 to 2,000 people out on our black top in the summertime for a weeklong festival. It’s fun to try to be the church in the middle of the world.

One of the neat things about this ordeal has been that we’ve kept getting a new congregation. When Bruce Larson asked the rector of Church of the Redeemer in Houston why he had to stay twenty years before renewal took place, the man said, “I had to stay long enough to get rid of everyone who didn’t want renewal.” That’s a lesson for many churches. Most of us come out of seminary geared to holding the faithful at all costs; nobody ever tells us that sometimes it’s important to lose some people before an awakening can occur.

Hess: That’s true. Many people subconsciously prefer a church of a certain size, and so as a church grows, their ceiling is gradually passed. Sometimes people leave for the wrong motives, but sometimes they really need to move on for their own spiritual benefit.

Eppinga: I haven’t faced the racial problem, but I, like the rest of you, have stayed long enough in one place to live through a social revolution. When the disestablishmentarians began taking over in the late sixties and early seventies, wanting to scrap the monologic sermon, wanting to sit in circles on the floor with a guitar-that was a rough time in my ministry. No one actually asked me to leave, but I’m sure some thought it would be a good idea.

I’d never thought of myself as rigid. In our circles, I was known as a progressive. And suddenly, I was a conservative. It wasn’t I who had changed, but rather the context. I tried not to be rigid, to allow some of these things and still keep the church on an even keel.

Leadership: What are the dangers of staying at one church a long time?

Hess: If the minister goes dead, then the congregation dies, and the longer the minister coasts toward retirement, the lower the church drops. To me, that’s dishonest.

Every year my session appeals to the presbytery, “Even though Bart is past seventy, we’d like to have him continue his ministry.” But when I see that the Lord is not continuing to bless, then I’m going to retire.

Eppinga: Yes, it’s easy to grow comfortable and coast. It’s also easy to identify more and more, as the years go by, with a certain clique. You have to remember you’re the pastor of everyone, not just the kindred spirits.

Another danger lies in coming to think it’s your church. People sometimes look at the Roman Catholic steeple on the other end of our block and say, “That’s Saint Andrew’s,” and then look at our tower and say, “That’s Saint Jacob’s.” But it really isn’t.

There are a lot of long pastorates these days that are really personality cults. In fact, one of the greatest dangers of a long pastorate is pride. When you’ve lasted in a church for a while, and things are going well, the Devil loves to heap up the credit in your direction. He wants you to forget that even Jesus did not come to be served, but to serve. If you’re a proud pastor, you’re a contradiction in terms.

Hinerman: If you stay long enough, you become the resident historian, don’t you?

Eppinga: Yes. For example, when the board is contemplating something, it’s a temptation for me to say, “No, that’s not the way we did it fifteen years ago. … ” Sometimes you have to be silent and let them work through a problem all over again.

It’s a funny feeling: our treasurer was once my catechumen. I used to make him get in line; now he signs my checks. I have to constantly adjust to changes like this.

Leadership: Can you have personal friends in a congregation and remain long?

Boyer: When I started the church, I told the people I would not be able to make personal friends in the congregation. We would gladly be their guests for dinner or any kind of event, and we have. But we’ve refrained from taking the initiative-having them over to our house and so forth.

This has made for a lonely life sometimes, especially after church on Sunday night when you’d just like someone to be with. But the congregation has never been able to say, “Well, so-and-so is his buddy.” Still, there’s a warmth in the church; visitors often comment on it.

Hinerman: I probably agree with your goal but have taken the opposite route to get there. My dearest personal friends are at Park Avenue. My staff is closer to me than anyone in this world except my own flesh. I’ll socialize with parishioners like crazy and even call them at two in the morning if I need help.

Hess: I’m glad you mentioned staff closeness. It’s sad when a church and a pastorate is built at the expense of staff relationships. It ought not to be as Phillips Brooks (the Episcopal bishop who wrote “O Little Town of Bethlehem”) once said when a woman asked him how to become a good Christian. He replied, “Believe in Christ, be confirmed, be faithful in attending worship, reading your Bible, praying-and find out as little as possible about the inner workings of the church.”

Leadership: What would you four like to say to young pastors just starting their careers?

Hess: Work as if everything depended on you, and trust as if everything depended on the Lord.

Eppinga: Despite what you may have heard about the glories of specialization, there is no more satisfying work than the parish ministry. Parish pastors are getting to be like general practitioners in medicine-an endangered species. But there is marvelous variety and challenge in serving the local church. I’m sorry I’m not twenty years old; I’d love to start all over again.

My second word would be enthusiasm. On one of my sabbaticals, I sat down one night and read Paul’s writings straight through, from Romans to Philemon. It was so intriguing I did it again the next night. I kept it up for two weeks. His personality began to come alive, and I noticed something: Paul never writes with moderation. He’s about the most enthusiastic fellow you can find. When he wants to describe Christ’s power, he calls it dunamis. When in Philippians 3 he describes what he gave up to follow Christ, his language becomes downright crude. “Nothing can separate us from the love of Christ,” he says in Romans 8, and he’s off into an extravaganza of comparisons. You almost feel like saying, “Take it easy, Paul-you’re going to have a heart attack.”

We need enthusiastic people in the ministry today, good replacements for those of us who are soon tiring out.

Boyer: I would ask young pastors to realize how much we Christians need each other. I would urge them to preach and teach a family spirit of loving and praying for one another’s hurts. More than at any time in my ministry I sense the need to rejoice with the joyful and weep with the distressed.

Hinerman: I think we need to caution seminarians, however. We’re not always honest about what the pastorate is really like. I say to young people, “Don’t even think about going into the ministry if you can get out of it. It’s the worst job in America, the most overtrained and underpaid professional group there is. The only rewards you get are internalized, at least during the early years.”

Don’t misunderstand me-I’m happy in my work, especially now that I’m reaping a harvest I never expected. And I pray that some young men and women will find the ministry unavoidable. But I want them to have a sense of “Woe is me if I preach not the gospel” burning inside to carry them through.

Leadership: Now let’s turn the clock forward a dozen years or so. What would you like to say to the mid-thirties pastor-let’s say a man with a wife and two children in school, who’s now in his third parish, and he’s feeling like it’s time to move, and his wife is saying, “Oh, please, not again.” How would you counsel him?

Hess: My father was a man like that; we moved every eighteen months, it seemed. My mother said he was an evangelist in the pastorate. In his case, it was legitimate. The Lord had called him to do certain things in a series of churches.

But there are many who keep running from themselves and their problems, and they really should come to terms.

Boyer: A lot of times something happens in a church that involves maybe five people-and the pastor assumes the whole congregation is against him, so he takes off. The whole congregation doesn’t feel that way at all. A conflict with even ten out of a hundred is not impossible to overcome; in the next church there might be twenty.

You don’t help anything by moving in such cases; instead, you must get on your face before God and work through the problem. You talk with the persons involved, pray with them, reconcile if possible, and keep ministering regardless.

Eppinga: We have a new mentoring system in our denomination that assigns seminary graduates going into parish ministry to older, experienced ministers who meet with them monthly. We hope this will stem the dropout rate we’ve been seeing in recent years.

The fellow who is burned out at thirty or thirty-five perhaps needs the same kind of help. Sometimes you can be so despondent you can’t even pray. You need a friend in the ministry to guide you through, help you think straight, and seek God’s direction for your life.

To my shame, I must say I’ve been so busy I’ve often failed to notice someone who was struggling, and all of a sudden, I hear he’s out of the ministry. I should have talked with him.

It’s a two-way street: the young pastors should seek help when they need it, and the rest of us should keep our eyes open.

Leadership: What has changed during your years in the ministry and what has remained the same?

Eppinga: Ever since I was ordained, the world has been going downhill, and I hope there’s no connection! (Laughter)

Hess: I’m seeing the unsaved come to church like never in the past. A man sitting by my wife in a Sunday evening service not long ago said, “I can’t believe I’m here. I’m an alcoholic; I lost my job as well as my family; I was in a tavern when I heard about Single Point” (our ministry to singles) “and so I came. Then I tried the church services, came to know the Lord, and now my whole life is changed. I’m even working again.”

In years past we were scared to death of singles groups, forgetting how our Lord associated with all types of people. I’ve never seen such spiritual hunger as there is today. People are looking for answers to their needs, and the Word of God is the only thing that will satisfy them.

We hold a divorce recovery workshop three times a year, and over 200 people show up-90 percent of whom I’ve never seen before. They’re bleeding, they’re hurting. The Sunday morning singles class runs up to 400.

Boyer: A lot of churches have come and gone in our town over the years. But among the survivors, closer fellowship has come as we’ve worked on joint projects. We’ve held a united county crusade thirty-one years in a row, for example. This morning, two busloads of teenagers from not only our church but the Congregational church around the corner left for camp.

The youth music has created some problems at times, but I see the young people there in church every Sunday morning and Sunday night, and I’m encouraged overall. More of them are going to Christian colleges than in the past. They’re very serious about doing something significant with their lives-often, missionary work.

Hinerman: Paul Rees’s book Don’t Sleep through the Revolution was to me a powerful word to the church. At first we tried to ignore the social upheaval that began in the sixties; we hoped it would go away. Only belatedly have we faced into it.

And we’re still the most racist institution in America. This is one of the most tragic failures of Christendom. The judgment of God is going to shake us eventually for playing games while the revolution roars on.

Leadership: How has your attitude toward that failure changed over the years? Are you angrier now, or less angry?

Hinerman: I don’t know. I’m just a journeyman pastor who works every day in the trenches. People say to me, “What’s your five-year plan?” I say, “Hey, we were torched three times in one year-I don’t have any five-year plan.” I’m just trying to survive and grow in the midst of difficulty, and I hope others will join me in that pursuit.

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

LEADERSHIP BIBLIOGRAPHY

Since the 1977 release of Gail Sheehy’s book Passages, people are aware of the phases of adult life. The pastor’s life also has its phases. The following books deal with various stages of the ministry.

Arnold, Oren. Guide Yourself through Old Age. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1976. Step-by-step help to making the most of the senior years.

Bolles, Richard Nelson. The Three Boxes of Life. Berkeley, Calif.: Ten Speed Press, 1978. Making the transition from one stage of life to another without getting boxed in.

Brister, C. W., James L. Cooper, and J. David Fite. Beginning Your Ministry. Nashville: Abingdon, 1981. Designed to help new pastors with the adjustments and tensions.

Calian, Carnegie Samuel. Today’s Pastor in Tomorrow’s World. Philadelphia: Westminster, 1982. How pastors can adapt themselves and their ministries to changing times.

Carlson, Dwight L. Run and Not Be Weary. Old Tappan, N.J.: Revell, 1974. Helpful reading for the rundown leader who wants to quit and move on to greener grass.

Clifford, Paul Rowntree. The Pastoral Calling. Great Neck, N.Y.: Channel 1961. One of the few books available on the subject of the initial call to ministry.

Clinebell, Howard J. Growth Counseling for Mid-Years Couples. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977. Thought-provoking for the middle-aged minister and spouse to read together.

Conway, Jim. Men in Mid-Life Crisis. Elgin, Ill.: Cook, 1978. A Christian perspective on issues facing men aged thirty-five to sixty.

Engstrom, Ted. The Pursuit of Excellence. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1982. Overview of the process of being all God wants us to be. Especially useful in rebounding from failure.

Gillaspie, Gerald Whiteman. The Restless Pastor. Chicago: Moody, 1974. The pros and cons of longevity, when to resign, and how to start fresh.

Green, Michael. Called to Serve. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1981. A frank discussion of the servant orientation needed for effective church ministry.

Grider, Edgar M. Can I Make It One More Year? Atlanta: Knox, 1980. A penetrating look at the issues that make ministers want to leave their churches.

Hahn, Celia A. The Minister Is Leaving. New York: Seabury, 1974. The effect of pastoral termination upon the parish and the minister.

Harris, John C. The Minister Looks for a Job. Washington: Alban Institute, 1977. Covers the special factors a pastor must take into account in a job search.

Kemper, Robert G. Beginning a New Pastorate. Nashville: Abingdon, 1978. Discusses termination from one pastorate and the interviewing, candidating, deciding, and planning involved in starting a new one.

Kirk, Richard J. The Pastor and Church Face Retirement. Washington: Alban Institute, 1979. Planning for the final passage out of full-time ministry.

Miller, Arthur F. and Ralph T. Mattson, eds. The Truth about You. Old Tappan, N.J.: Revell, 1977. “What you should be doing with your life.” Helpful resource regarding career changes.

Ortlund, Raymond C. Intersections. Waco, Texas: Word, 1979. Meeting Christ at all of life’s junctions.

Oswald, Roy M. The Pastor as Newcomer. Washington: Alban Institute, 1977. Discusses the stages of enthusiasm, frustration, and stability experienced by pastor and parish.

Paul, Cecil R. Passages of a Pastor. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981. “Coping with yourself and God’s people” from initial ministry to retirement.

Ragsdale, Ray W. The Mid-Life Crisis of a Minister. Waco, Texas: Word, 1978. Covers stages of various crises with a positive emphasis on making the most of the middle years.

Rand, William J. Jr. The Probationers Handbook. Burlingame, Calif.: Burlingame Press, 1981. Forty-eight questions often asked by United Methodist ministers in their first appointments.

Sanford, John A. Ministry Burnout. New York: Paulist, 1982. Help for the minister who feels ready to wear out.

Segler, Franklin M. Alive and Past Sixty-Five. Nashville: Broadman, 1975. Aging as it confronts the church.

Sheehy, Gail. Passages. New York: Bantam, 1977. The popular work on predictable crises of the adult life.

Smith, Oswald J. The Man God Uses. London: Marshall, Morgan, and Scott, 1932. A classic regarding the call to the Christian ministry.

Tournier, Paul. The Adventure of Living. New York: Harper & Row, 1976. Perspectives on facing challenges of life directed by God.

Tournier, Paul. Learn to Grow Old. New York: Harper & Row, 1973. A candid look at the ways to age with grace.

Whiston, Lionel A. Enjoy the Journey. Waco, Texas: Word, 1972. Learning to live life to the fullest amid all its transitions.

Zeluff, Daniel. There’s Algae in the Baptismal ‘Fount.’ Nashville: Abingdon, 1978. A counselor of pastors identifies and discusses the most common syndromes that discourage ministers.

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Double-Digit Churches

The unique struggles and joys of pastoring a congregation of less than a hundred.

Pastoring a small church, like driving a subcompact, can make you feel inferior.

You’re buffeted by passing eighteen-wheelers, the turbulence making control difficult. Luxury cars cut you off, and their drivers never look back. You feel fragile, unnoticed, insignificant-until you start looking around. Then you realize how many smaller models there are. They’re everywhere.

Small churches, too, are actually a majority. Well over half the churches in the United States are ecclesiastical subcompacts. Of United Methodist churches, 69 percent have an average Sunday morning attendance of less than 100. The Assemblies of God, perhaps the fastest growing denomination, reports a full 70 percent of their churches with membership of less than 100. Southern Baptists report that 59 percent of their churches have a Sunday school enrollment of less than 150.

Despite lip service to “small is beautiful,” the unique struggles and joys of small-church ministry don’t get much attention. Larger churches often claim that they “maintain the small-church feel,” and they’re referring, of course, to a warm sense of belonging, intimacy, and acceptance. Is that an accurate picture? Or a stereotype?

What are the things small-church pastors think about?

LEADERSHIP assigned assistant editor Marshall Shelley to find out. Initial contacts came from the LEADERSHIP subscription list, but as Marshall phoned readers to ask, “What small churches in your area are doing a good job?” the list quickly grew. Then Marshall and his wife, Susan, spent ten days in New York and Vermont visiting a dozen of the pastors recommended. Each of the churches has an average attendance of less than one hundred.

Here’s his report.

Garden City, New York, has one problem other cities wish they had. It’s rich. But that doesn’t make pastoring any easier for George Vanderpoel. His congregation, The Church in the Garden, faces a situation familiar to many small churches in far less affluent areas-it has been unable to grow. During the twelve years Vanderpoel, a retired Navy chaplain, has been with the Long Island congregation, Sunday morning attendance has held steady around thirty.

In some ways, Garden City’s wealth adds to the problem. According to a national women’s magazine, Garden City is among the ten most desirable places to live in the United States. Only two streets are zoned commercial. The rest are tree-lined parkways that shelter the manicured lawns and $150,000 homes of executives and academics who ride the Long Island Railroad to their offices in Brooklyn or Manhattan.

These sociological realities make church growth an uphill battle. Outreach is difficult in an affluent area. People tend to protect their privacy. Bank presidents don’t throw block parties. Door-to-door visitation is outright intrusion.

“The only people our members know are their business contacts,” said Vanderpoel. “And these contacts are made downtown-they don’t live anywhere near Garden City. And people involved in these kinds of professions don’t chat with neighbors over the back fence.”

Garden City’s population is aging, its homes priced out of reach for young families. Most of the houses that are sold are going to Italian Catholics and Jews moving away from New York City.

“A few years ago we subscribed to the list of new mortgage buyers in town,” said Vanderpoel, as we sat in the study/family room of the parsonage, sipping his homemade fruit punch. “We sent a letter to each new resident and followed that up with a phone call. That gained us no new members. But I did get a call from one of the rabbis in town saying that one of his new members had gotten our letter, and he thought it was such a good idea he wanted to borrow our list. So for the next several months, we shared the cost of the list. Eventually we pulled out because the list simply wasn’t fruitful.”

The Church in the Garden was begun in 1946, when members of the American Baptist national office, then in Brooklyn, decided Garden City needed a Baptist church, despite the largely Catholic population. The church has never been large.

When visitors do drop in, they see thirty adults, no children, and no program for young people. This usually means that young families, when they do come, come only once.

“We have a number of visitors,” said Vanderpoel, “But most come looking for a full program. Singles expect a lot of other singles; we have three. Young families expect age-graded classes. In this sense, the Sunday school movement has performed a disservice. Now everyone assumes that a fully age-graded family ministry is an essential for a church. Less and less emphasis has been put on the public worship of God, and instead people are intent on meeting social needs and educating their children.

“If the people who visited our church and went elsewhere just for that reason-I’m not talking about those who left because they couldn’t stand my preaching or something else-if those who left simply because of our size had stayed, our membership would have mushroomed.”

Achieving that critical mass necessary for growth has yet to happen at The Church in the Garden, and the vicious cycle of being unable to grow because the church is too small is a frustration.

“I’d say the key to the survival of this congregation is attracting lapsed Catholics,” said Vanderpoel. “Many are unhappy with the Catholic church over such issues as divorce and birth control. If we could get five families from a Catholic background, we’d get a bunch more because they’re around. Getting those first five, however, is tough. But if we don’t, I don’t know how long the church will survive. … “

What keeps a pastor motivated in a church that hasn’t reached critical mass, that’s hanging on for survival? What keeps him going when for twelve years there’s been no numerical growth?

“I’m a Calvinist,” says Vanderpoel. “I believe in God’s sovereignty and that I must wait on the Lord. I must faithfully teach the Word until he brings the increase.

“But on a more human level, I remind myself that good things happen in small groups. In 1943 I was student body president at Westminster Seminary when, because of the war, we had only twenty-one students. It seemed like an insignificant number for a seminary. Yet I was personally tutored by such professors as John Murray; I gained things in a class of five that you can’t get in larger classes. I saw how Westminster hung on and now is recognized as one of the leading seminaries in the country. I’m committed to small-group ministry; I’m obligated to personally tutor those who want to learn, just as I was tutored.

“More important, you never know who you’ll touch, even in a small ministry. As a Navy chaplain, I was on Okinawa in 1957 ministering to the Third Marine Division. Our week-night Bible study of Romans had maybe fifteen regular attenders. It didn’t seem like much, but one of them was a fellow named Charles Swindoll. Recently I heard Swindoll say over the radio that it was a Bible study in Romans while he was in the Marines where he first sensed a call to the ministry. You never know what God will do-even in a small group.”

* * *

Four hours north of New York City on Interstate 87-the “Northway,” as residents call it-is the town of Glens Falls, named for a picturesque waterfall on the Hudson River. It’s also the site of Cooper’s Cave, a location made famous in James Fenimore Cooper’s Last of the Mohicans. Just over the ridge is Lake George, 32 miles long and still boasting water clean enough to drink.

Like many rural counties throughout the nation, Warren County is depressed, hit by unemployment, but Glens Falls itself has remained largely unaffected. Its retirees still venture to Florida in the winter, and the pulp mills along the Hudson still roll out products for giants like Scott and International paper companies.

When Dick Bird accepted the pastorate of Bay Road United Presbyterian Church, five miles north of Glens Falls, he and his wife, Shirley, knew the people would be like folks in other small churches-slow to change, fearful of anything drastically new.

Two years ago, Bay Road had twenty-one active members when the Birds were called.

“Basically it was one extended family,” said Dick. “Everyone seemed to be related, at least by marriage. We knew that an influx of new people would be a major adjustment.”

Dick had been minister of Christian education at another church in Glens Falls and left following a transition of senior pastors. He and Shirley opened a Christian counseling practice in Glens Falls and continued to lead small-group Bible study and prayer cells until the call came from Bay Road.

“We were careful not to try to pull people away from the church where we’d been previously,” said Bird. “I wouldn’t want to do that, but at the same time, Shirley and I were realistic enough to know that some of the people from our small groups would wind up following us to the new church.”

Any small church can find new members threatening, especially when people have become used to a comfortable routine. Some people choose a small church precisely because of its smallness, its familiarity, its steady rhythms. Dick and Shirley, who earn pocket change by selling cabbages and tomatoes from their garden to a local deli, realized some careful cultivation would be needed to prepare the Bay Road soil for potential growth. Even though members might think they’re welcoming visitors, the slightest hesitation, any subconscious reluctance will be communicated, and newcomers will know they’re not really wanted.

“From our counseling background,” said Dick, who still sees clients since he’s only three-quarter time at the church, “we knew that any change can be traumatic. Not recognizing all the faces at the worship service-having to learn new names-can be frustrating. Knowing everyone at the coffee hour is a different experience from being jammed elbow-to-elbow with newcomers.

“With twenty people who are family, you know what to talk about. There’s a sense of belonging. As new people come in, suddenly you have to start from ground zero in your conversations. That can be threatening for people unaccustomed to making friends quickly.”

Even before they accepted the call, Dick and Shirley began preparing the people at Bay Road for these changes at least intellectually. They asked, more than once and in as many ways as they could think of, “Are you ready to have new people join this church?” The people agreed that, yes, they were ready; they wanted to grow.

“Of course,” said Dick, “knowing intellectually that you’re ready and being ready emotionally are two different things.”

That’s why Dick and Shirley began taking some low-key, practical steps as soon as the new faces began to appear.

Their large home became an open house where they frequently would have small groups of people over for meals-two or three of the original congregation together with two or three newcomers.

“Mixing them in our home gave us a head start toward blending at church,” said Shirley.

In individual conversations, Dick and Shirley also tried to engender an appreciation for the “other” group.

“With the people from our small group, we’d point out that the folks at Bay Road haven’t had the same opportunity to meet lots of new people. We were sure to express how grateful we were that they’d invited us to come to Bay Road,” said Dick.

“On the other hand, with the original Bay Road folks, we made sure to affirm their history, to point out how we appreciated their strong Sunday school program, for instance, and how it was great to be able to build on a solid foundation.”

Publicly, the Birds haven’t made an issue of the changing makeup of the congregation: no sermons on integrating the two groups, no prayer-requests for unity, no pleas from the pulpit to beware of cliquishness. What they have done is more subtle: each Sunday morning includes time when Dick asks, “Are there any joys you have to share?”

As people tell about the excitement of Grandma’s visit or the birth of a niece, there’s a growing acceptance of one another as individuals.

No, the struggle to adjust hasn’t been easy, nor is it over after two years.

“Back before we came, the weekly offering was about $8,” said Shirley. “And the Women’s Association would have a monthly project to raise funds to keep the church open. Now that we have seventy members and a $30,000 budget, the Women’s Association is feeling left out.”

Dick admits the church still has traces of being “closed in on ourselves.” People are still uneasy about evangelism or giving to overseas missions.

Recently the Birds’ son David, who is preparing to work with Wycliffe Bible Translators, wanted to go door-to-door, inviting people in the community to the church. When the idea was presented to the session, it was turned down.

“People felt that ‘we know our neighbors, and they know the churches,’ ” said Dick. “They didn’t want to be associated with the Mormons or Jehovah’s Witnesses. So we backed off on this approach.”

Instead, the church does visit new residents and take food to needy families contacted through a woman member who works in the school district. And recently the church voted to support Youth for Christ, a development Bird sees as a major step forward.

“I pray we will dream God’s dream for us, both individually and as a church. He didn’t create us to be comfortable, but to love people,” said Dick. “Part of counseling, as I see it, is to get people into a healing community. That’s my goal for our body-to be a healing community, and the church has all the resources to be exactly that.”

* * *

Pastors of large churches sometimes long for the simple joys of a small church-knowing everyone by name, dealing with individuals instead of committees, not having a complex budget, and on and on.

Those “simple joys” nearly caused Dennis Marquardt a breakdown. Yes, there are advantages to small-church ministry, but the hidden pressures can be devastating. The worst is over for Marquardt now; he no longer spends hours wondering if he should leave the ministry, but he still endures a migraine headache that hasn’t let up in four years.

In 1978 Marquardt was youth pastor of the 700-member Assembly of God in Arlington, Virginia, when he began thinking about planting a new church. Two young couples from his ministry were moving to Vermont to work in an IBM plant near Burlington. Since they would be eighteen miles from the nearest Assembly of God, they asked Dennis and Bevie Jo Marquardt if they would help them start a church closer to home. After consulting with the denomination’s Northern New England District, the Marquardts agreed.

“We left the security of the large church without really knowing what we were getting in for,” said Marquardt. “But we knew we’d have to live by faith.”

Together with the denomination, the core group decided to plant the church in Vergennes, twenty miles south of Burlington, an area dotted with dairy farms and roadside stands selling pure Vermont maple syrup.

Vergennes claims the title of “smallest city in America”-1.8 square miles-a distinction earned largely because the dreams of Vermont’s legendary hero Ethan Allen never materialized. Allen envisioned a bustling metropolis on the shores of Lake Champlain and established the city charter in 1788. The metropolis (“Thank heaven,” say the locals) never came about.

Now the city of 2,300 is home for Simmons Precision, which makes instrument panels for the Defense Department, and Kennedy Brothers wood products, a regular stop for the busloads of tourists heading to the Green Mountains.

The slower pace of the small city, however, didn’t translate into time to relax. If anything, the deliberate nature of Vermonters made Marquardt’s work harder.

When Dennis, Bevie Jo, and two-year-old Christel arrived in Vergennes with their U-Haul in October, 1978, they stayed with the Adamses, one of the two couples who’d urged them to come, for two months until they found a house.

While they were still house hunting, another young couple from Arlington, Steve and Helen Markiss, decided they too would move to Vermont to help plant the new church. Steve, a carpenter, figured he could find enough work to live on. So for over a month, three families-the Adamses, the Markisses, and the Marquardts-lived under one roof amid two truckloads of boxes.

“We were sure the Vermonters suspected we were a cult,” said Marquardt. “Here we were, nine people with Virginia license plates, two of us with beards, trying to start a church.”

Early in November, Marquardt secured permission to use Vergennes Elementary School for Sunday services. Even though the school board charged nothing, the new congregation voted to pay $25 a month for use of the building.

Services began the Sunday after Thanksgiving, with three locals attending besides the nine transplanted Virginians. Within nine months the church grew to thirty-five, slipped down to eighteen after a year and a half, and by March, 1983, had reached fifty. The uncertainty about attendance was a constant source of stress.

“You always worry about someone not showing up,” said Marquardt. “If the person responsible for the nursery suddenly isn’t in the mood to come, you’re stuck. That’s a problem in a small church we never had to face in Arlington.

“Our spirits rode up and down with the weekly attendance. I know you’re not supposed to be numbers conscious, but numbers do represent people. And when we were ministering to people, we felt our sacrifice was paying off; when no one was there, I wondered if it all was a waste and asked myself where I would go after I failed here.”

The sheer number of details that fall on a pastor in a small church also began to weigh on him.

“All I wanted to do was teach and preach (and play the piano if I couldn’t find anyone else),” said Marquardt. “But I continually had to decide on things like what to use for a pulpit, who had the songbooks, how many chairs to set up-would forty be too many or not enough?-and who would lead what.”

Finances were another source of tension. The denominational district set Marquardt’s salary at $100 a week plus whatever the church could do. As a step of faith the initial three couples pledged to give an additional $100 a week.

“Amazingly enough,” said Marquardt, “they never missed a check. But, of course, I didn’t know if the money would be there or not. There were times when I had to calm Bevie Jo’s fears about our personal finances. It began to get me down.

“Even my sermon preparation was suffering,” he said. “When you go from preaching to seven hundred, as I’d done in Virginia, to preaching to seven, you wonder if the hours of study are worth it. And when four or five daydream through the service, your motivation vanishes.”

The following year a glimmer of hope appeared. At the town’s ecumenical Good Friday service, Dennis was asked to speak. “That invitation gave us our public acceptance,” said Marquardt. “With the other clergy in town accepting me, people finally realized we weren’t a cult. But we still didn’t have a building of our own, and among Vermonters, a church without a building is suspect. People keep wondering, How long will these guys be around? I knew we wouldn’t grow much larger until we had a building to show we were permanent.”

A few months later, Dennis began to get headaches. Soon they were an everyday occurrence. Doctors treated him for allergies and hay fever, without success. Dennis compensated by working harder, not taking a vacation, and using powerful prescription pain pills to control the headaches, up to twenty-four pills a day.

“One day the pharmacist handed me my pills and said, ‘Reverend, if you took this bottle out on the street, you could be a rich man.’ I told him, ‘Don’t worry, I need these things.’ “

Eventually, with the help of the denomination, the church was able to buy ten acres north of Vergennes, and with much of the labor provided by members, the Assembly of God Christian Center began worshiping in its own building in March, 1983. Attendance quickly rose to ninety, then one hundred. But Dennis Marquardt was exhausted.

In May, he finally checked into a headache clinic in Boston that specialized in undiagnosed causes. It wasn’t long before they identified the problem as emotional burnout.

“I’d been sweeping the floor, typing bulletins, cutting stencils, everything-it was easier to do them myself than to try to get someone else to do them. Plus I was internalizing the people problems I dealt with-there really weren’t other ministers around for me to open up to,” he said.

At that point, the congregation held a business meeting without Marquardt present. As one of the elders there said, “We’ve got to do something for our pastor. We’ve got to get him well.”

That was when the people took virtually full responsibility for administering the church ministries. “Essentially they freed me to do nothing but prepare sermons,” said Marquardt. “It’s been healthy not only for me, but for the church, too. Now the elders are doing a good job of leading worship, and when our family vacations this summer, they’ll preach, too.”

The headache remains, though he’s down from twenty-four to six pills a day. “I’m learning to live with the headache and not let it affect me,” he says. “I don’t remember what normal feels like. But the five years of building this church have been worth it all. At last, now I’m able to sit back and begin to enjoy the fruit of all that labor.”

* * *

Appearances in Woodstock, Vermont, can be deceiving. It looks like a Currier and Ives woodcut come to life. The classic New England atmosphere in the mountain town is no accident; the town fathers work hard to maintain its quaint brick shops with the small signs outside done in gold-leaf British pub lettering. Its covered bridges are authentic, dating back to days when their builders worried about skittish horses refusing to cross rickety open bridges.

Though the town caters to tourists, no garish billboards assault your eyes with directions to the nearest miniature golf course or trinket shop.

No, the town square is reserved, dignified, aloof. An outsider naturally assumes the people are stereo-typically New Englandish also-just as reserved and aloof as the eighteenth-century brick. But David Waugh has found that reserved exteriors often house people eager to be loved. People have responded to his warm, unassuming ministry.

Waugh’s church, Woodstock Baptist Fellowship, meets just west of town in a renovated Grange hall, where eighty to one hundred people attend each Sunday. The congregation includes dairy farmers, shopkeepers, young people working summer jobs at Woodstock Inn to support their winter ski habit, and men released from the nearby state correctional facility.

“Recently we had a guest speaker who preached on the need to love the unlovely,” said Waugh. “He didn’t know our congregation very well, and he asked rhetorically, ‘What would you do if a convicted rapist or murderer visited this service?’ What he didn’t know was that he had both sitting in the pews before him. They’d been given passes to attend regularly.”

Like the tidy looks of Woodstock, the makeup of Waugh’s congregation is no accident. Waugh consciously works to create an atmosphere where everyone, no matter how unlikely a churchgoer, can feel welcome. His effort requires a different set of tools than most pastors use.

“One of the unique features of small-town ministry is that you’re called not just for spiritual needs,” he said. As he spoke he brushed his hair into place after taking off his motorcycle helmet. He’d loaned his car to college students working with the community’s youth for the summer, and now he was commuting on two wheels between church and home. “I’ve been called to help shingle a roof, to dig up a septic tank, and to watch someone’s kids while Mom’s in labor. Preacher-boys who don’t get their hands dirty will never make it in a small town.”

While doing visitation, Waugh has found himself walking through manure on a dairy farm and wrestling with pipes, wrenches, and clogged drains in someone’s kitchen. It’s his style of pastoring.

“Even in a small town, people are busy,” he said. “They can’t just stop what they’re doing to talk to the preacher. So when I arrive, I tell people not to stop what they’re doing. I’ll help.”

That means that Waugh’s wardrobe isn’t all coat and tie. If he’s visiting someone in town, he’ll wear his tie, but if he’s seeing a farmer, he wears jeans so he can be ready to pick up a hoe, paintbrush, or help with the milking machine.

David’s wife, Becky, enjoys telling about the day he was leaving home dressed in blue jeans, sport coat, and tie. “What are you doing?” she asked. His reply: “Today I’m prepared for anything.”

His car, when not loaned out, always carries overalls, a spare shirt, old shoes, a hammer, and a carpenter’s apron.

“One of the greatest compliments I ever heard a pastor receive was given to a seminary prof of mine down in Kentucky,” Waugh said. “A farmer in his congregation described him by saying, ‘He doesn’t mind getting manure on his shoes.’ He knew what it took in a small town.”

Waugh’s commitment to identify with people has at times been stretched, but it has proven effective.

For instance, one Sunday, Charles and Gretchen visited the church. They were unmarried, cohabitating, working together as masseur and masseuse, and after recently moving to Woodstock were “just trying out every church in town.” Charles, a former lawyer, had given up law because “I was a defense attorney and I kept getting guilty people off.” He’d worked as a truck driver before meeting Gretchen and learning to give massages.

When Waugh visited Charles after their second time at Woodstock Baptist, Charles asked if he’d ever had a deep muscle massage.

“No, but I’d like to sometime.”

“How about right now?”

“Are you serious?” Waugh said, suddenly wondering if his commitment to identify was really so necessary after all. “Aw, you don’t have your equipment here at home, and I wouldn’t want you to open your shop.”

“No problem at all,” said Charles, as he quickly unfolded a portable table.

“I suppose I’ll have to take off my shirt?” Waugh asked tentatively.

“You’ll have to take off more than that,” said Charles, handing him a towel.

As Waugh recalled the episode, he said, “Here I was, wearing nothing but a towel, in the house of a stranger as he pounded and prodded my back. All I could think was What do you say to a naked preacher? It’s amazing what a person has to do in evangelism.”

Charles and Gretchen kept coming to Woodstock Baptist Fellowship, eventually committed themselves to Christ, and asked to be baptized.

“At that point, I knew it was time to confront them about their living arrangement. So we talked about it for several months. A year later I married them in their cabbage patch, and subsequently they were baptized and joined the church.”

Charles and Gretchen are now part of a group from Woodstock Baptist that’s launching a satellite church in Bridgewater Center, eight miles west.

“Small towns require a patient ministry,” said Waugh. “It takes time to get through to people, and even then, sometimes the only way you can get through is by letting them see that just because you’re a pastor, you’re really no different than they are.”

* * *

Fifteen years ago, Dean Ryder’s shoulder-length hair, beads, and sandals made him an unlikely prospect to pastor a small country church. They certainly set him apart from the clean-shaven majority at Denver Conservative Baptist Seminary.

In the years during and after seminary, Ryder directed Help House, an inner-city facility for runaways, delinquents, and those with drug problems. It was a ministry of continual crisis counseling, irregular hours, and constant financial worries.

“Many times we’d empty our pockets of change to see if we had enough to buy a package of spaghetti,” said Ryder. But he preferred the direct caring ministry to what he considered a more insulated ministry in the church.

When The Denver Post ran a feature on the halfway house, Ryder’s picture appeared above the caption “I would feel confined as a pastor.”

For the past eight years, however, Dean has been serving First Baptist Church in Newfane, New York, a community of fruit growers and small manufacturers forty-five minutes north of Buffalo.

His appearance has changed-somewhat. The hair is shorter, and the beads are gone, but the beard remains.

His attitude toward the church has changed, too, but his direct caring ministry has not. In fact, the same caring skills he developed in the halfway house have helped overcome a problem haunting many small churches: bad memories.

Memories linger in a small church. That fact is an advantage when the history is pleasant, and the recollections of births, baptisms, and special events help bond members together. But if the past has been rocky, history can be divisive and memories destructive.

“When I first came to Newfane,” said Ryder, “it seemed like every conversation included something about ‘those people who left.’ They spoke as if it happened last month. A group had split off and started another church-but it was twenty years ago!”

Ryder decided to concentrate his ministry on caring and finding creative ways to meet needs, not concentrating on past hurts. The effort has taken time, but it’s worked.

“It’s been a couple years since I’ve heard anything disparaging about the other church,” said Ryder. As attendance has gradually increased from thirty-five to nearly eighty, those who felt deserted and rejected have been able to erase their resentment.

What happened? Much of it, to be sure, is Ryder’s personality. He enjoys trying something new and doesn’t mind when people laugh at him.

“I try to preach a couple of first-person sermons each year, dressed as a character from the Bible. But I may not have the nerve again after last time,” he says with a grin.

In his last pulpit appearance in costume, the heavy-set Ryder entered the sanctuary as King Herod. A little girl, seeing the bearded man with robe and crown, whispered to her mother in a voice that carried throughout the small sanctuary: “Look, Mommy, it’s the Burger King!”

“We just about had to end the service right there,” said Ryder. But the laughter helps create an atmosphere where malignant memories can be replaced by healthy ones.

Ryder also takes advantage of the small-town opportunities. He coaches a boys’ baseball team each summer and serves as chaplain at Boy Scout camp each year. He and the other five pastors in town arranged with Newfane Intercommunity Hospital to get the name and religious background of every person who’s admitted, and they make sure everyone is visited. He invests time in individuals.

“There’s more program at a large church,” said Ryder. “But there’s more pastoring at a small church.”

Ryder’s pastoral style is patient, unhurried. One woman asked Ryder to talk with her husband. “He needs to go to the doctor for his prostate problem, but he pretends there’s nothing wrong,” she said.

Ryder dropped by that week and eventually turned the conversation around to Ray’s health.

“When’s the last time you went to the doctor, Ray?”

Ray admitted it had been years and agreed he ought to set an appointment. But a week later, when Ryder checked, Ray hadn’t called. Ryder gave him another chance, but when Ray still didn’t act, Ryder found out the doctor’s name, made an appointment, and arranged a time when Ray could come right in, rather than enduring a long sit in the waiting room. Then Ryder called Ray.

“I happened to be in the doctor’s office,” he said. “And I set up an appointment for you. And don’t worry, he’ll see you as soon as you arrive.”

The day of the appointment, Ryder stopped by Ray’s home to make sure he kept the appointment. Ray had his suitcase packed; he knew the condition was serious. Ryder drove him to the hospital. Within a week Ray had surgery, and the problem was taken care of.

“In a large church, I wouldn’t have time to invest in individuals like that,” said Ryder. “But in a small church I can, and that kind of caring is contagious.

Recently we had a man hospitalized, and he got 125 cards from our church! Some people sent three or four. He was overwhelmed.”

Despite his earlier feelings, Ryder has not found the pastorate confining. “I spend three nights a week with my family and go to Scout camp with my son. With a small church, it’s easier to keep those family priorities straight.

“I couldn’t be happier than I am here,” he said. “You couldn’t get me to take a larger church with all the hassles. The only way I’d pastor a large church is if First Baptist grows into one.”

Reflections

These are only five stories of small churches. They could be multiplied thousands of times, for they represent some of the struggles faced by little churches everywhere.

But many stories remain untold. Many questions remain unanswered, such as these asked by other small-church pastors:

“How can you have a youth ministry when there are only three teens in the church?”

“What can you do when everyone in the church works for the same company-some in management, some in labor-and the union calls a strike? Suddenly company tensions become church tensions.”

“What does evangelism mean in a small town where everyone knows everyone else, and people have pretty much made up their minds about spiritual things?”

“In the last five years, my district superintendent has spent exactly an hour and a half with me. Where can I go for guidance with pastoral problems?”

“How do you handle one stubborn individual when he makes up 5 percent of the congregation?”

One pastor enjoys reciting a line from Alan Redpath. He says it gives him the strength to go on. “If you’re a Christian pastor, you’re always in a crisis-either in the middle of one, coming out of one, or going into one.”

No, discouragement and problems aren’t unique to small churches even though they seem to arrive there frequently. Time and time again, however, after reviewing the troubles of the church, the pastor would look at me, smile, and say, “But you know, I love these people. We may not have a youth ministry, but I went to Carla’s volleyball game last week, and I’m taking the two junior high guys camping next week. Sure small churches have problems, but you’ll never get away from those. I belong here. I wouldn’t want to be anywhere else.”

A week after returning from the Northeast, Susan and I survived a hit-and-run accident that totaled our Datsun 210. At fifty miles an hour, we hit the rear of a pickup truck that had run a stop sign and sped directly into our path. The engine of our little 210 collapsed like an accordion, but the windshield didn’t shatter, nor was the passenger compartment penetrated. We walked away unhurt except for Susan’s bruised knees.

That experience, and the experiences of the previous week, taught us something about both small cars and small churches. They may not get much respect from the bigger models, but they manage to fit in all the necessary equipment. In a collision-whether fender to fender or person to person-they sustain a lot of damage, but the pounding can be survived. I’m impressed with their durability. Both small cars and small churches are here to stay.

Marshall Shelley is assistant editor of LEADERSHIP.

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Some Quiet Confessions about Quiet Time

A young pastor owns up to the realities of personal devotion, and explores for solutions.

Parishioners would never dream it, but there is a segment of the ecclesiastical nobility-myself included-for whom personal worship (a.k.a. “devotions,” “quiet time,” “QT”) has been a struggle. First, it’s finding the minutes. Those phone calls in the morning always seem to foul up your communion with God. Or maybe it’s the kids. Or the sweet smell of coffee wafting from the kitchen.

Next, there’s how long you spend. Reading about John Wesley awakening at 4 A.M. and praying for two hours is exhilarating, but it nearly wipes you out. As holy as David Brainerd was, you get a bit tired of him lying in the snow, praying for six hours, and getting up wet. Not from the snow, though. From the sweat.

Once QT gets a beachhead in your life, it’s the lightning bolts of guilt that shoot through you every time you miss. Remember the day you cracked up the car? What was the first thing you muttered? “Why didn’t I have my prayer time this morning?”

Then there are the dry periods. The Bible puts you right out. You kneel by the couch and promptly fall asleep as you mumble, “And bless the deacons and the trustees and Luke Skywalker. … “

Finally, there’s simply sticking with it, through sick and sin. You try it with the television on. With the television off. At home. At your office. Under the beech trees in the park. In bed. Out of bed. You go for a week straight and don’t miss once. The next week you miss seven for seven.

Believe me, I’ve been there. I’ve been lectured to, preached at, cajoled, and excoriated. I have also lectured to, preached at, cajoled, and excoriated others about having a personal life of devotion.

Please understand at the outset that I do not write to put anyone into another guilt epoch. However, I would like to discuss some basic principles about personal worship and then speak rather specifically about ways I’ve implemented them in my life. The goal is to help pastors become consistent and make devotions enjoyable, not annoying.

Some Basic Principles

Let me begin by saying that I know of no verses in Scripture that command us to have devotions … la the twentieth-century American recipes. We have, unfortunately, separated life into various boxes: “devotions,” “church,” “family,” and so on. I suspect devotions are more a matter of lifestyle than a five- to fifty-minute bracket of time in which we follow some quickie scheme, deliver to the Lord a few spiritual creme donuts, and figure we’ve properly induced him to bless us for the day. With that in mind, consider these principles.

First, men and women of God have always sought quiet, deep communion with God at regular times and places. The sons of Korah wrote, “In the morning my prayer comes before you” (Ps. 88:13). David also said, “Morning by morning, O Lord, you hear my voice; morning by morning I lay my requests before you and wait in expectation” (Ps. 5:3). Daniel had the habit of praying three times a day with his windows open (Dan. 6:10), and Jesus appears to have gone out regularly in the mornings to commune with his Father (Mark 1:35).

It was taking time to commune with God that made these spiritual giants. They prayed regularly, sometimes for long periods, sometimes for short. But they prayed and studied just the same.

The biographies of people God has used in history hold few common elements in terms of evangelistic methods, preaching styles, or church growth principles. But one thread runs throughout: they all prayed; they all studied the Word for their own edification; they all sought God with fervor and fire. They were fulfillments of Psalm 42:1 “As the deer pants for streams of water, so my soul pants for you, O God.” Read a book like Dick Eastman’s No Easy Road, and you can’t help but catch the vision. He speaks of John “Praying” Hyde, whose heart was twisted out of its cavity because of his soul-wrenching hours in intercession. Samuel Rutherford rose at 3 A.M. to pray. John Welch of Scotland remarked that a day was ill-spent if he did not commit eight to ten hours to communion with God.

These kinds of stories both thrill and devastate me as a struggling pastor. But I have to ask myself the question: Are all the activities that scream for my time and attention in twentieth-century America really essential? Am I missing the burning bush for trying to keep the lawn cut? There must be priorities in our lives, and one of them ought to be heart-to-heart communion with God. God moved through these men to move the world. Perhaps the lack of spiritual power for many of us is not a lack of books, principles, or exhortations but a lack of keeping this one priority.

Second, while there is nothing more spiritual about having longer devotions, and nothing less spiritual about short devotions, there is much to be said for a balance of both. I’ve read about Martin Luther saying, “I have so much to do today I will have to spend the first three hours in prayer, or the Devil will get the victory.” I am not sure whether such stories are preachers’ illustrations or whether I am totally carnal. But the idea of three or more straight hours in prayer every morning bowls me over. Yet, I have to ask myself: Do I ever spend lengthy times in prayer, personal study, and communion?

We can get into such a groove of slicing out twenty minutes a day for prayer and Bible reading that we begin to think it’s enough. Especially if the church is growing and everyone is happy. Yet, Jesus prayed a whole night before he chose the twelve disciples. Shouldn’t we consider that big decisions call for big prayer? Such things must also be planned and made a priority.

Still, the primary consideration is an overall walk with God. It is not the quantity of nouns and verbs thrust into the Lord’s ears that counts. Much of my own time in prayer is between activities-in bathrooms, on walks, while driving. I believe those prayers are just as important, fervent, and effective as those with folded hands and closed eyes on my knees in a preaching robe.

Third, the Bible does not legislate any set patterns for devotions. Each individual makes up his own. But again there must be a balance of both planned and spontaneous worship. I have met those who scorned anyone who woke up at the same time and went through the same routine each day. I have also met those who ridiculed people who always “wing it,” taking their communion with the Lord in snips and snaps.

A real friendship with God involves both. Can you imagine a friendship made up of a fifteen-minute shot each morning, from 6:45 to 7:00, in which I say, “Sit down, friend-I’m gonna talk to you now and ask you to bless me.” In the same way I can’t believe the Lord relishes a daily queue of ACTS-users (ACTS = Adore, Confess, Thank, Supplicate). While it’s a nice acrostic, I always imagine someone coming to the Lord and saying, “Well, I’ve adored you for thirty seconds-now here’s some confession.” What if the Lord suddenly booms, “Look, kid, you better hit me with another thirty seconds of adoration. I’ve had a bad night.” It’s a little like using a quickie evangelistic method on people. They begin to feel like slot machines.

At the same time, I have found that all spontaneity and no planning makes Jack a disorganized boy. There must be a plan to follow even when we don’t feel like it. Having certain patterns in my life of Bible study, Bible memory, and prayer is an anchor that holds me in the harbor while at the same time giving me just enough play in the line to move about on the breezes of the Spirit.

Fourth, a devotional life ought to involve Bible reading, prayer, Bible memorization, study, singing, and worship, but not necessarily in that order, every day, or at the same time every day. No pastor can question the need to store up God’s Word in his heart (Col. 3:16). There can be no argument about spending time in prayer (1 Thess. 5:17) or Bible study (2 Tim. 2:15). All these ingredients should be abundantly apparent.

However, I am not sure one has to be doing these things every day, in the same amount, at the same times, with the same fervor and determination. Certainly it is wise to schedule time for them. That’s the only way they will get done. But if devotions become a chore, we are in danger of becoming legalists rather than lovers. If we feel guilty because we “missed,” are we genuinely guilty or just putting ourselves on?

Our worship must be from the heart. But it must also be structured, intelligent, and consistent.

Cracking the Devotional Padlock

Every pastor is pressed for time. If you aren’t, maybe you’re not pastoring. Still, how can a minister have a guilt-free personal walk with God, live a Spirit-filled life, and continue to grow?

Here are some past and present ways I have found to bring satisfaction, joy, and love into my own relationship with the Lord.

Let’s start with prayer. I have at times spent several hours in prayer, alone and with others. In general, though, I find it hard to kneel that long. Prayer can be particularly life-giving and refreshing as well as effective in the following environments:

While walking. On my feet I think of things that don’t normally occur to me in a closed room. There is an “on-the-road-with-him” quality that I love.

Furthermore, I meet people on the way. This provides a break in prayer (if I need it) and often leads to witnessing opportunities. I can also pray for people I pass along the way, for homes, streets, and businesses I would miss in the quiet of my study.

There is also time to meditate. I carry a memory pack of cards to use in learning new Scriptures. I discuss them with the Lord, and it seems he fills my mind with his thoughts. Many times problems have been solved, sermons hatched, and processes begun on such prayer excursions.

In addition, they give me much-needed exercise, a change of pace, a breath of fresh air, and contact with nature. It is easier to worship and adore the Lord when I’m beholding his beautiful creation instead of a hot room. Thus, I plan much of my prayer time for my daily walk.

While driving. This again is a rich time to be mined for prayer and meditation. I have to travel anyway, so why not make the most of it?

During dead time. Dead time is standing in lines, walking from place to place, in the bathtub, washing dishes, cooking, falling to sleep. All those periods of useless time become moments when we can talk to the Lord. Why not plan to use dead time for this purpose?

Scheduled time. Any person who knows the Lord knows that prayer is an essential as well as an elixir. That’s why I must plan for long periods of prayer, whether I feel like it or not. I find that if I plan to pray with another person for an extended period, it gets done. Not only do we gain a blessing together, but the Lord works mightily through it.

Other occasions. One of the perennial bugaboos in a pastor’s life is all the people who solicit your prayers. Whenever someone greets me at the church door with a request for prayer, I always nod and assure them I will. Then I promptly forget about it until they tell me how God answered, and I feel guilty for not playing a part.

What’s the answer? If I can remember the request just until a break occurs (often, right after the solicitation), I can pray on the spot. Stonewall Jackson, they say, had the habit of praying every time he sealed a letter, began a meal, met a friend, or issued an order. Quickly asking the Lord to work in such situations is useful.

A prayer file. One of the greatest tools I have ever used is a simple prayer filing system using three-by-five cards. I put each request on a card and file it under one of several headings: Non-Christians, Members of the Church, Family, Personal, Missions, World, United States, etc. When I go for my prayer walk, for a drive, or just to pray in my office, I often pull out those cards and pray through them. When an answer comes, I record it on the card and file it away in “Answered Prayers.” A great joy is to pull this file out and review what the Lord has done.

Bible Study

A second area is Bible reading and study. I do not regard myself as too “spiritual” to use a devotional aid. Timeless Insights, published by Walk Thru the Bible Ministries, takes you through the New Testament in a year’s time and includes quotes from the greats in every reading. The Daily Walk goes through the whole Bible in a year and includes an outline of the passage, several insights and highlights on the passage, and some ideas about application. Both are excellent tools.

Another method I’ve used with great effect is to read the same passage for a week straight. (Some even suggest doing this for a whole month.) I have worked out a schedule of reading six to eight chapters a day for a week that covers the whole New Testament and the Minor Prophets in a year’s time. Thus I read through these books seven times each year.

Our Daily Bread is an excellent source not only of insight but of sermon illustrations. I read one whole volume at a time and cut out the material I want to use in sermons, filing it away on three-by-five cards.

Beyond reading, though, comes meditation. This can be done on walks, while driving, and during dead time as well, but it should also be planned. I once heard Henry Brandt say he schedules time just to “sit and stare.” Often I plan to spend a whole two-hour walk meditating on a passage I am studying for sermon preparation.

I had professors in seminary who warned against using sermon preparation as devotional time. I still can’t understand such thinking. If a sermon is meant to meet others’ needs, why not your own? All heavy study should include personal nourishment as much as any purely “devotional time.”

Bible Memory

I am appalled at the number of “men of God” who spend no time memorizing Bible passages, from verses to whole books. In my own life, the primary motivation came when a friend introduced me to a system for retaining the verses I’d memorized. It is easy to use and not at all time-consuming. I can presently keep nearly 2,500 verses memorized (wording and reference) with only fifteen minutes of review a day.

Most adults think memorizing Scripture is terribly hard. However, books by Jerry Lucas and Harry Lorayne such as The Memory Book give anyone quick insight into the easy way to memorize. They provide all kinds of association and numerical devices that take the pain out of Bible memory.

Other Disciplines

Singing. Devotional time, for me, was dry until I began singing regularly. A person can memorize many hymns just by singing several each day during a devotional period.

Listening to tapes. I subscribe to several tape libraries that provide rich spiritual meat for digesting while driving and elsewhere. This is a great source of edification, illustrations, and helpful sermon notes.

Devotional books, biographies, and general spiritual reading. At times I have included in my devotional habits the reading of books on prayer, preaching, and worship-usually, one chapter a day. This can also be done with books of sermons. (A friend of mine in seminary even read Robertson’s Grammar of the Greek New Testament during his personal worship time. Now that was devotion.)

Exploring God’s creation with a devotional purpose. It isn’t impossible to have your devotions by going to the zoo, an art museum, aquarium, or some beauty spot. This appeals to our spiritual nature and can enhance the moment of worship.

Communing with the Lord is a constantly growing, challenging, fulfilling aspect of Christian ministry. It is really what our lives are all about. Find a vacant life, and you’ll usually discover one who has put God on a back lot. But if the devotional life is a priority, he will gladly fill everything else with blessing.

Mark Littleton is pastor of Berea Baptist Church, Glen Burnie, Maryland.

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

The Wilderness of the Candidate

The dangers of stones and pinnacles en route to a pastorate.

It’s a good thing Jesus didn’t have to candidate for the position of Messiah.

Being in all points tempted like as we are, however, he faced a comparable situation. He came out of seminary (so to speak) with a mighty flourish, a commencement ceremony at the river Jordan crowned by a Voice from heaven that announced to all gathered relatives, friends, and future parishioners, “This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased.” An impressive start.

Then came Satan’s design to challenge and undermine everything God had said about Jesus. Had our Lord bought into the alternatives presented, he would have ceased to fulfill his calling.

When a seminary says, “These are our children, whom we certify; with them we are well pleased,” it waves farewell to what it firmly believes is the new pastoral leadership of the church. Quickly following or even overlapping this event, however, is another that contrasts sharply. It is the process of candidating . . . the minister’s temptation.

And unlike Jesus, most of us have to go through the wilderness more than once as the years of our ministry progress.

Pastors on Parade

The specifics of the process vary from denomination to denomination, but the goal is the same: connect a person with a church, get a job (shanana), fill a position. The temptations are manifold while this is taking place. The minister is usually in a precarious financial situation; funds are low and the future uncharted. Understandably, he wants some kind of security.

Hence, the great temptation of the candidate: to sell himself to the prospective buyer (congregation). As resumes are filled out and interviews are held, the urge to unleash the phantoms of style and image and first impression nudges aside the substance of the candidate. In short, the integrity of God’s call and leadership in his life is vitiated, sometimes even eclipsed.

I know of at least one seminary in my denomination that holds special dossier-writing classes for its seniors. Students are cautioned to keep the language vague enough to appeal to as many churches as possible-something very important when just beginning a ministry. You can get more specific about yourself and what you believe later on when you have proved yourself out on the field. The placement office of that same institution has kept a map with little flags stuck into it each time a student lands a job. Sometimes the flags are annotated with who was at that church last and where he or she was able to go from there, the proximity of golf courses to the church office, and other such vital information.

Pastors are no different from anyone else; they are sinners too. When a sinner doesn’t know where he is going and is fatigued over where he has been, a spiritual crisis is likely to develop. But there are other reasons for this wilderness, not related to the individual candidate, and much harder to deal with. They have to do with the shape the church has taken in North American history, all flowing out of the concept of a “free” church.

The Making of Our Wilderness

In his book The Lively Experiment, church historian Sidney Mead has written a brilliant essay on the impact of American denominationalism. Something happened here in the early years of this nation that had not happened for more than a thousand years of European church history: the concept of “free” churches became dominant in religious life. No church would be established by the state. No church or governing body would prevent the establishment or spread of any other churches.

The church was to be “free,” and with that concept-which was in itself revolutionary-came an even more revolutionary idea. The power of any church could no longer rest on its authority or on coercion. The power of a church came now from its ability to persuade its members. Protestant churches in the United States as well as Canada thus became voluntary associations of individuals. The glue that held them together, and still holds them together, is what Mead calls the principle of “voluntaryism.” It is the ideology that people should come together independent of civil power and independent of each other, freely giving their consent to submit to the authority of the church. Moreover, consent is not given once for all. It must be won by the church and its leaders again and again.

This is the crucial point to grasp. If leadership in “free” churches comes from the power of persuasion, then whatever else pastors or denominational leaders may be able to do, they must be able to persuade, to be politicians.

This explains more than anything I can think of the preponderance of evangelical demagogues and showmen. From the beginnings of our history, we have insisted that our leaders be men of the people. Sometimes that has been good, as in an Abraham Lincoln or a Dwight L. Moody. But often it has encouraged the likes of those whose names escape me at the moment.

Voluntaryism has also tended to breed mediocrity in church leaders. To lead, they must be tuned in to the people they would lead. Of course, any leader should. The problem is they must be so in touch with the people that they cannot risk being too brilliant or creative or innovative. Otherwise they may be perceived as too removed and too unlike their constituencies, which spells certain death for a leader in the egalitarian, voluntaryistic North American church. When Gerald Ford took office, he told us in a speech that what we were getting was “a Ford, not a Lincoln.” I will leave it to historians and political scientists to determine whether or not he delivered on his promise of mediocrity. But I will venture to state that churches generally prefer Fords.

Candidates know all these things and more when they seek positions in churches. Even if they cannot articulate it, they know they have to woo the committee. They sense that if they are successful, they will have to continue to woo the people in order to stay. That bit of realpolitik doesn’t render leadership with integrity impossible. It just makes it very difficult, perhaps overwhelmingly so, for many pastors, especially the young.

A Few Remedies

What can we do about this? I don’t have many proposals. Perhaps we could learn something from those traditions that place recent seminary graduates according to the decision of a bishop or other ruling body rather than having them candidate. As one Episcopal bishop put it, at least they get the message that they are servants of the Church of Jesus Christ, not this or that particular church-or worst of all, their own career ambitions.

We could also look a little more critically at what our history has meant for us, especially we evangelicals who have been so profoundly influenced by the “free” church ideology. If we were more aware of the sins endemic to our particular way of doing things, we might be more specific in our prayers for grace to overcome those sins.

That is the issue, is it not, even for us pastoral veterans, who are often worn out, depressed, confused, and facing the dark night of the soul? We are never exempt from the temptation to make our congregations a clientele. We never rise above the urge to twist our calling into a career. Whatever our system or tradition, it cannot save us from our sin. Only Jesus can, and we must repent of our evil ways and believe the gospel every day of our lives.

Ben Patterson is pastor of Irvine Presbyterian Church, Irvine, California.

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

When the Pastor Gets Fired

What was once unthinkable is becoming more frequent. Why? And how can it be forestalled?

1. A seminary graduate, eager to do well, finds himself ejected from a pastorate after two years. His next job: driving a milk truck.

The major conflict had been between him and a prominent layman who held a high denominational position, the de facto leader of the church. “It had to do with philosophy of ministry and openness to new ideas,” says the former pastor. “Younger families wanted some contemporary music, and he said my generation didn’t know what good music was.

“The conversation got to the point where he said I was the most stubborn person he had ever seen. I told him I thought he fit the description. ‘Well, you wouldn’t respect me if I weren’t,’ he said. I replied I hoped it was reciprocal.”

Other confrontations centered around whether this new congregation should have a full traditional program. The pastor was more interested in doing things to reach the community than in attending all the business sessions of the national conference. In fact, he had even left a district conference session early one Saturday afternoon to come home.

He attempted to resolve the conflict by talking about the differences, but later he said he knew his departure was inevitable. The lay leadership met in secret session, and the night before the pastor and his wife were to leave for vacation, the board requested their resignation.

The result was a gradual personality change in this pastor. He turned from a fun-loving person to being edgy and defensive. “If I felt my ideas or authority were resisted, I would react more quickly with forcefulness. I’m generally pretty easygoing and can roll with the punches, but that ability diminished as the tension and stress grew.”

Though this couple have confessed their hurt and bitterness to the Lord, there is still a trace of resentment because “our friends in leadership never stood beside us.” They have read Psalm 37 many times, trying to regain their confidence that God is sovereign and in control.

2. He was a young but highly successful pastor. At twenty-six he had assumed a church of two thousand members when the senior pastor became ill. He had prestige and growing influence in the denomination. By his own admission he was “out classed, with no experience and full of pride.”

His heady rise led to an extramarital affair with a deacon’s wife, which lasted two years. Although the evidence was circumstantial, it was enough, and the deacons asked him to resign. He denied the whole matter.

Panic struck him, for he knew he didn’t have any marketable job skills. All contacts led to “nothing available.” He had been given three months’ severance pay with three months to move from the parsonage, but he had five children.

In the nick of time an offer came from a small church in another state. Eager to vindicate himself, he accepted. He told no one about the past and hoped it was buried.

Fifteen months later, he stepped into the pulpit one Sunday morning and found a petition for his resignation signed by 350 people. He was shattered. With hindsight he says, “It was a group of carnal sheep with a carnal shepherd trying to run the church like a Rotary Club.”

Forty of the congregation asked him to be pastor of the new church they were forming. For six months he wrestled with the matter and thought of suicide. He had plummeted from a large, prestigious congregation to forty dissidents.

A spiritual catharsis came through a personal and dynamic encounter with the Holy Spirit. “I emerged from that a different creature. It was the greatest thing to happen to me and was the making of a minister. It freed me to be honest with my wife and my church.” That group of forty has now become twenty-five hundred.

3. It started out as a normal deacons’ meeting. Then someone cleared his throat and said, “Ah, pastor, while you were on vacation, some of us had a meeting. Some people are saying they are not getting fed spiritually. Our church finances are down, and our attendance isn’t what it should be. We feel some changes need to be made. Pastor, we-ah-feel we need a change in pastors. We would like for you to look for another church and be out of the parsonage in no more than three months.”

The pastor had been in the ministry more than twenty years. This was a church of 140 members. Some other churches in the area were experiencing rapid growth. The chairman of deacons was a former insurance agent, had served as interim pastor, and was also chairman of the finance and the building and grounds committees.

Although the church held a congregational form of government, the deacons never brought the issue to the congregation. The pastor contacted denominational officials, who offered their assistance, but the deacons rejected any outside influence as unnecessary

He had received some warning statements such as, “As soon as I get back on the deacon board, you’re gonna be gone.” The pastor had not taken the comments seriously, because the deacons had fired the previous pastor, causing much dissension in the church. “I didn’t think they’d do it again,” he says. But they did.

He still struggles with his damaged self-esteem. Anger and bitterness have caused him to want not only to leave the ministry but to cast the whole church aside. “I said, ‘Listen, God, my parents sacrificed to send me through college and seminary. I’ve worked hard to please and serve you. Is this the thanks I get? What are you doing? Why me?’ “

He sent his resume to the denominational leadership for a new placement. Friends tried to make some contacts. Nothing broke. Finally he turned to the secular field, which proved just as fruitless. “Every time the telephone rang, I jumped. I almost grabbed the mail from the postman. As the day of salary termination grew near, I lost interest in everything: the news, football, even food. I snapped at my wife. I felt sorry for myself.”

God graciously led him to another church where he and his wife are getting pieced together again as people and as God’s servants.

A Volatile Time

Literally hundreds of ministers of all denominations are currently going through the emotionally and spiritually wrenching experience of being fired. Some, it must be admitted, are being removed for sexual immorality, heresy, or financial transgression. Many others, however-a rising proportion-are being dumped for things called “incompetence” or “ineffectiveness.”

Common factors include:

1. Secret meetings by the ruling body.

2. A sense of betrayal. People the pastor has considered personal friends are party to the dismissal without attempting to sit down and talk as brothers in Christ.

3. No outside, impartial, third-party mediator to help the two sides understand each other. The prevailing idea is that the pastor is the most easily dispensed with, and if he is gone maybe the other problems will go away, too. (This appears to be a myth. More often than not, the church falters spiritually and numerically. Often one firing is prelude to another.)

4. Low self-esteem. Most pastors are self-critical and tend to demand more of themselves than they realistically should. Being fired only accentuates a negative trait.

A business editor who lost his job wrote in the July, 1979, issue of Folio, “The waiting is undoubtedly the most depressing part of any job hunt. After a while, you’ve exhausted what you usefully can do. So you sleep late, don’t shave, wander around the house and feel progressively more sorry for yourself. The odd jobs that you’ve never had time to do, you now have time for. But mysteriously, they still don’t get done! Each day of your unemployment, the old American work ethic nags you a little more as you realize you’re no longer a part of the economic mainstream. But each day, with enforced inactivity, your desire to work again gets progressively weaker.”

5. Panic. Pastors have little time to make a move they hadn’t expected. Bills have to be paid, housing found, food and clothing purchased. And few have resources to fall back on.

The current swell in pastoral firings is perhaps an unforeseen fallout from the renaissance of the laity we have seen in the last twenty-five years. I began my ministry in the late fifties, about the time we were discovering that lay people were more than ecclesiastical errand boys who ushered, gave money, and served on such “vital” groups as the centennial celebration committee.

Somehow the pastor’s place was devalued along the way, to the point that now we see pastors being sized up and judged almost as ruthlessly as plant superintendents and baseball managers. After all, the church needs to be businesslike-or does it? How does the drive to root out ineptness fit with the call to be a divine institution, indeed the family of God, with a God-ordained leadership? Should modern management be brought into the church en toto, or must it undergo some adjustments? These are questions for every pastor, lay leader, seminary professor, and denominational executive to ponder.

To Fire or Not to Fire

Modern church constitutions give the bishop, presbytery, congregation, or governing board the power to remove a pastor. When should they use it?

First, some Scripture. In the Old Testament, idolatry was punishable either with the death penalty or one of three forms of excommunication (being cut off, cursed, or separated from the nation). The same was true of contempt for Yahweh, sexual offenses (bestiality, adultery, incest, homosexuality-Lev. 20:10-18), violation of worship rituals such as Sabbath breaking, and social crimes (murder, an incorrigible child, kidnaping-Exod. 21:12-17).

In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul addresses the problem of incest and instructs the congregation to withdraw Christian fellowship from the offender. Beginning in verse 9, he broadens this discipline to include the professing Christian who is sexually immoral, greedy, an idolater, slanderer, drunkard, or swindler. Quoting Moses, Paul says such people are to be expelled.

On the basis of these passages, it is proper to dismiss a pastor for doctrinal deviations from orthodox Christianity as defined in official statements and creeds. Sexual immorality is also a proper cause, but such allegations, as in doctrinal matters, must be verified in writing by a minimum of two eyewitnesses (see 1 Tim. 5:19) to protect the pastor from a frame-up. Unethical behavior such as theft is another cause for dismissal.

However, those who are strong are exhorted always to seek to restore the weak (Gal. 6:1). When lay or ecclesiastical leadership confront a pastor, they should always keep the goal of redemption in view. God is not glorified by simply cutting a person off without providing opportunities for spiritual restoration. David’s confrontation by Nathan is the clearest illustration, for David kept his leadership in spite of his sins.

It is also proper to pursue a pastoral change-not really a “firing”-if the relationship is not working out. If congregation-wide dissatisfaction is evidenced by declining attendance or offerings or negative comments, the ruling authority needs to work sensitively with the pastor to obtain a relocation. More often than not, it is no one’s “fault.” It is only a mismatch, and the pastor should feel neither guilty nor a failure.

Members of a congregation should also remember God has given them direct access to lay their burdens before him. If more lay leadership prayed more, there would be fewer firings. God knows how to move his people!

A pastor should not be fired if he is in a political conflict with a wealthy or prestigious board member or group who feel they know more about churchmanship than the pastor. It is better for the church if the lay people resign, or even leave, than for the pastor to be forced out to coddle the power-oriented. Pastors should not be dismissed if the objective evidences of conversions, numerical growth, and enthusiasm indicate the blessing of God. Nor should a pastor be fired if he is faithful to the Scriptures in preaching.

As one pastor put it, “It is legitimate for a board member to feel a pastor’s ministry is over and to say so. It becomes wrong when all the person sees is the bad and gets together a group of allies who exert their power and authority. Dishonorable actions can cause a church to lose the blessing of God.”

Both the Old and New Testaments emphasize this concept. God specifically chose Moses to lead Israel out of Egypt into Canaan. That had to be the worst pastorate in history! First Corinthians 10:10 recounts the story, saying, “And do not grumble, as some of them did-and were killed by the destroying angel.” The Greek word for grumble is an onomatopoeia: gogguzo. Their griping sounded like low-sounding gongs all over the camp.

Korah, Dothan, and Abiram “became insolent and rose up against Moses” (Num. 16:1). Their argument sounds strangely contemporary: “The whole community is holy, every one of them, and the Lord is with them. Why then do you set yourselves above the Lord’s assembly?” (Num. 16:3). Soon the ground split apart, swallowing the dissidents and their families, while fire from the Lord consumed their 250 supporters.

Though Saul had lost God’s blessing and was a poor leader, David refused to touch “the Lord’s anointed” (1 Sam. 26:9). Paul appointed church leaders and then wrote, “Now we ask you, brothers, to respect those who work hard among you, who are over you in the Lord and who admonish you. Hold them in the highest regard in love because of their work. Live at peace with each other” (1 Thess. 5:12-13). He later had to be reminded of his own teaching when he called Ananias, the Jewish high priest, a “whitewashed wall” (Acts 23:4). He quickly recanted.

Keys to Prevention

How can pastors and churches avoid the trauma of a forced resignation?

Studies indicate that a pastor’s leadership will be tested within the first eighteen to twenty months. If he attempts to meet that challenge with defensiveness, determined to “win,” the war will ultimately be lost and the pastor will be looking elsewhere for a ministry.

Communication holds not only marriages but also churches together. Pastors need to work at building congregational trust in their integrity and leadership. They must also take the time to build personal relationships with lay leaders.

Actually, good communication begins during the call of the pastor by clarifying expectations. The pastor needs to be honest about strengths and weaknesses, philosophy and strategy of ministry, time usage, spouse’s role in the church, expectations of lay involvement, and other issues. For example, I have made my wife’s role clear to every board. I have also stated that I would not be doing a lot of counseling.

When I candidated at my present church, I asked for time to write.

Likewise, the lay leadership need to tell the pastor their views. If they don’t like or want contemporary music, they should say so. If they like or want contemporary music, they should say so. If they like applause, don’t like pink socks, or want the pastor to visit the hospitalized twice a week, they should make these things clear.

Once the pastor arrives, humility and transparency about thoughts, goals, and feelings go a long way toward preventing church conflicts. When the communication lines are broken, third-party mediation can be a source of help. A local church can bind itself to inviting an impartial panel of outsiders trained in conflict resolution should the need arise. Constitutions and bylaws can require such mediation before a pastor is dismissed.

Churches must exercise care not to elect to the controlling board more than one member of an extended family, or even a group of close friends. Networks exist in all churches, but when a power coalition develops, people can become intoxicated with their own sense of importance and power. This may require a bylaw provision to guide the nominating committee.

If You Must

When a ministry is not fruitful, and personal discussions with a pastor have not yielded the desired results, the leadership should sit down, spell out the continuing problem, and ask the pastor to relocate. Enough time must be allowed to find a new place of ministry or a new vocation. Up to one year should be given. The church isn’t going to fall apart. Rather, God will honor that kind of mature leadership. This is the point where the church should distinctively differ from the business world. It’s not employer-employee, it’s family. The church’s success is not predicated upon business acumen but upon the Lord of the church giving the increase.

If dismissal of the pastor becomes necessary, one church growth authority recommends that lay leaders consider stepping down as well. This may not always be practical, but it does eliminate self-aggrandizement by the laity.

Church people and denominational officers must free themselves from the fear of wealthy laymen who are spiritually immature and prone to use their clout. The church must reject that intimidation.

Pastors going through dismissal proceedings should seek counsel and encouragement from other colleagues within the denomination or outside. As one pastor said, “I found out how much other pastors care. I received moral and prayer support. We’re not as competitive and jealous as some might think.”

Since God has chosen to use adversity to produce maturity and character in those he calls, being fired can yield good fruit. One pastor clarified his desire to be in a country church. Another said his devotional life increased as he grew closer to God and to his wife-the only ones he had to talk with.

A third said that after it was over, he had come to feel a lot better about himself, discovering an area he needed to change. “I need to learn to be more objective about my ideas. When I feel I’m not being heard or am feeling threatened, my voice lowers, and I come across as angry. It appears I’ve lost my cool. I can see that in the discipline of my child as well.” To a fourth, his experiences led him to a new understanding of death to self, and living in the power of the Holy Spirit.

Each of them said firing gave greater sensitivity to others’ suffering. As a result, each sought to extend love and encouragement. “I needed someone to reassure me that I was OK, that God loved me and I wasn’t a failure. I had no one-so now I try to do that for others. The period of struggle can have a happy ending. The Devil’s temptation is to doubt God and to seek revenge. We must be honest before God and go on.”

If you’re called by God to minister, you can’t just jump tracks to another career. You’re addicted. Preaching is fire in your bones that will not be extinguished. If you’re fired, with no place to go, it’s natural to question where God is and what’s wrong with his church. Maybe Moses felt that way as he listened to Korah rant. Jeremiah, while in the pit, had perhaps a few questions of his own as muck oozed between his toes. Regardless, both came to know God more intimately through their experiences, and pastors can do the same today.

But a few precautions by pastor and laity alike, linked with massive doses of thoughtfulness, can avoid the wrenching agony of the firing of a pastor.

* * *

WHAT TO DO IF YOU’RE FIRED

1. Evaluate your life for sin. Are there attitudes, actions, or neglect that need to be confessed to the leadership or even the congregation?

2. Reject the temptation to become bitter. It’s a poison that will only eat away the heart.

3. Draw close to God and receive the comfort and encouragement he provides. Read in the Psalms. Practice John 15 and Philippians 4:6-7.

4. If married, spend time conversing with your spouse. Give your children the facts, but protect them from your hostility. Assure them of God’s fairness and steadfast love.

5. Accept the counsel of colleagues both within your denomination and outside. It may be profitable to go through formal personal and vocational counseling. God may be directing you into another field of work. Don’t stay in the ministry just because you started there or because of family pressures.

6. Update your resume. Include personal data, education with major area, and a summary of work experiences, starting with the most recent. State the cause of leaving each job. In applying for secular work, a skilled consultant can help you identify your most marketable skills.

7. Don’t be too proud to register for government assistance. That’s one reason fellow believers are paying taxes.

8. Work on a constructive, joyful frame of mind. Philippians 4:8 outlines the thoughts to choose. Self-depreciation will only paralyze you and prevent creative thinking and action.

9. Wait patiently for the Lord to direct you. He is your shepherd. He loves you and has promised to meet your needs.

Roy Price is pastor of The Alliance Church, Paradise, California.

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

DANGERS IN ILLUSTRATING SERMONS

The pastor of stern countenance began his sermon by saying solemnly, “I am not here to entertain you with a lot of interesting stories; I am here to preach the Word of God.”

He proved to be prophetic. He was neither entertaining nor interesting. As a matter of fact, he was quite dull. Like so many who lack the imagination to use good illustrations, he condemned their use as a vice, their nonuse as a virtue.

In vilifying the use of stories in preaching, he was unwittingly criticizing a style used most frequently by a well-known itinerate of the first century. Evidently no one ever warned that former carpenter it was a sin to be entertaining and that solemnity was a sign of sanctity. Having never been to seminary, he never mastered alliteration either.

So he resorted to the only style he knew, which was to relate homey, human-interest stories-what we call parables. He told stories about families, farmers, fishermen, and financiers. Some of his stories were quite humorous. There was the one about the fellow who tried to patch his trousers with an unSanforized piece of cloth. The first rain shower proved embarrassing when the patch shrunk and pulled away from the trousers, leaving him exposed to public view. That story must have produced a thoughtful chuckle or two.

On the other hand, some of his stories were rather sad. Did you hear the one about the wealthy farmer whose plans for an early retirement were interrupted by an early funeral?

From that Galilean preacher we learn that telling stories from the pulpit is not a sin to be condemned but an art to be copied. The most effective preachers are those who can communicate truth with a well-chosen illustration.

However, having said this, there needs to be a word of caution. Probably nothing suffers from more abuse than the pulpit story. Certain kinds of stories should be avoided like a hymn with eight verses.

The embellished story. Here the speaker wastes precious minutes giving a lot of irrelevant details. The Master Storyteller never was guilty of this. Every detail of his story had some bearing upon the point he was illustrating. For example, he told about a housewife who had misplaced some money. He described her panic as she turned the house upside-down trying to find it. She carefully swept every nook and cranny, and even lit a candle to illuminate the room. When she finally found it, she was so elated she invited in her neighbors to help celebrate her good fortune.

From some pulpits that same story might have sounded like this: “A woman of my acquaintance, who lived next door to the parsonage, was forever misplacing things. My wife and I got to know her quite well. In fact, our families used to take vacations together. Her children were about the same age as ours, so they got along splendidly. Later this woman became widowed. Her husband died very suddenly of a heart attack. He had been ill for only a short time and had just had a checkup the previous week. Anyway, everyone always laughed at this widow because she was forever misplacing her purse. Well, one day after returning from the grocery store . . .”

The speaker who embellishes a story never seems to get to the point. And if he does, it is lost in the maze of unrelated details. He is usually one who complains about not having enough time to preach.

The superfluous story. This usually occurs when the preacher has just heard a really good story and can’t wait to spring it on his congregation. So somewhere during the message, he manages to work it in. It is a good story but adds nothing. Nevertheless, to ease his conscience, he makes a herculean effort to apply it.

I heard one pastor deliver an excellent discourse on prayer. At the conclusion of his message he exhorted his flock to “get on the ball and start praying.” Then he paused. I had a sinking feeling he was about to tell a joke I had heard making the rounds. He was, and he did.

He went on to say, “That reminds me of a story,” and proceeded to tell about two ants on a golf course, standing idly beside the first tee. A duffer teed up the ball and took three vicious swipes at it, missing the ball entirely but coming perilously close to the ants. Nervously the one ant said to the other, “If we want to get out of this alive, we’d better get on the ball!”

The pastor closed his message by saying weakly, “Like those ants, we need to get on the ball and start praying if we want to survive.” It was an anemic ending to an otherwise excellent message. The story was superfluous.

The egocentric story. Here the preacher, like Narcissus, sees himself in his spiritual pond as a spiritual superstar. His illustrations are usually first-person accounts about his many spiritual triumphs. Like Perry Mason, he never loses. His snappy answers silence doubters. Every person he witnesses to enters the kingdom. Everything he prays about comes to pass. It would be refreshing to hear about the times he was depressed and his faith failed him, or when someone he was trying to lead to Christ got away, or the family he was trying to help fell apart.

It is not wrong to use first-person incidents as illustrations. Indeed, these can be quite helpful. But the speaker must resist the temptation to become the hero of every story.

The specious story. There is nothing wrong with fictitious stories-so long as they are not presented as actual experiences. I heard one pastor tell about an encounter with a member of his church who was inebriated. “Don’t you recognize me, Reverend?” the drunk said. “I’m one of your converts.”

“Of course you are,” the pastor replied. “If you’d been one of the Lord’s converts, you wouldn’t be in that condition.”

It was a clever story. Unfortunately, it can be found in almost any book of sermon illustrations published since the turn of the century. I have heard it told on various occasions about D. L. Moody, Charles Spurgeon, William Biederwolf, and several others. Nothing will destroy confidence in a minister so quickly as hearing fiction presented as fact.

The manipulative story. This is where the speaker manipulates the emotions of the audience to obtain certain results. Sometimes referred to as “tear jerkers,” the tales can be used for such diverse purposes as obtaining decisions for Christ or raising funds.

One radio minister is fond of telling about people who are down to their last penny, but in response to his appeal, they send a sacrificial gift. Miraculously, the next day the giver receives a job promotion and a large raise. Coincidentally, the raise is just large enough to cover the gift.

This kind of emotional manipulation destroys the confidence of a perceptive audience. A moving story is not always an indication of the moving of the Spirit.

Here is a suggested checklist for the pulpit storyteller:

1. Is the story relevant to the point?

2. Does the story contain unnecessary details?

3. Will the story contribute to the overall quality and clarity of the message?

4. What is my motive in telling the story? We need to think twice before saying, “That reminds me of a story.”

-LeRoy Patterson

Stuart, Florida

Retired chaplain, Wheaton College

78 LEADERSHIP Fall 1983

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

PEOPLE IN PRINT

The Pit and the Pastor

Depression by Don Baker and Emery Nester, Multnomah, $9.95

Reviewed by Tom McKee, pastor, Sun River Church, Rancho Cordova, California

“I had visited Ward 7E many times. . . . It resembled most of the psychiatric wards and mental hospitals where I had gone to minister to members of my congregation. … I’ve never felt comfortable with the mentally ill. This time, however, my discomfort had been replaced by fear. … This time I was being led down the silent halls of Ward 7E, not as pastor, but as patient.”

So begins the personal narrative of Don Baker’s depression. His hospital admission, his counseling, his withdrawal, his desire for a God who seemed absent, his fellow sufferers, his family-all are talked about with compelling honesty, which makes it easy to identify with him.

Among the stacks of books on depression, this one is unique. It is not primarily a self-help book or an analysis but the journey of a pastor who is broken and restored. The assurance given Baker by a counselor upon admission-“It may take time, but you will get better”-speaks through the pages of his story.

Baker had to turn to the world of psychiatric medicine, alien turf to most pastors. Co-author Emery Nester, associate professor of psychology at Western Conservative Baptist Seminary in Portland, writes the second half of the book. While Baker helps us understand the feelings of the patient, Nester, who helped counsel Baker, provides the perspective of a trained therapist.

Baker takes us inside the black hole of despair. As he checks into Ward 7E we feel his humiliation when the nurse, a member of his congregation, unthinkingly says, “Pastor, what are you doing here?” We sense his shame in the group therapy sessions-how could he tell them he was a pastor? We feel his fear as he rooms with a man criminally insane, arrested on charges of rape and assault with a deadly weapon. We absorb with him the pain of withdrawal and rejection as his church board votes to let him go, and he is unemployed for the first time in thirty years. What will he do? We sense the feeling of alienation from God as he thinks of suicide. The chapter describing a counselor’s dialogue with him about suicide, forcing him to take this possibility through to its logical extensions, is superb.

In a recent interview, Baker says he struggled in presenting the chapters on hypoglycemia and Satan. He was afraid they would be pulled out of context and made the focus of the book when they are merely ingredients to the whole-but ingredients that cannot be left out. Today Baker is on medication and a careful diet to control the sugar imbalance in his system. He says he has never worked harder and felt less threatened or less harassed by time. The difference is that he now knows what to do about his physical, spiritual, and emotional needs. While he doesn’t want to underemphasize or overemphasize the role of Satan in his life-certainly not to sensationalize this important part of his struggle-he still declares, “I had underrated my enemy. I had ignored the pleas of Scripture.”

After his release from the hospital and a literal mountain-top experience alone at a cabin at Hume Lake, California, Baker was “out of my black hole.” But what next? Surely no church would call a pastor who had spent time in a psychiatric ward. Despite the fact that “I was depressive and . . . could possibly give way again if I became exhausted or was placed under too much stress,” Portland’s historic Hinson Memorial Baptist Church called him and has enjoyed God’s rich blessing during his nine-year ministry there.

The second half of the book is by Emery Nester, who spent approximately one hundred hours with Baker in the evenings after his own regular counseling schedule.

Nester, using illustrations from Baker’s story as well as other case studies, describes the nature of depression. Particularly helpful is a chapter on how to help a family member who is in depression. He urges the family to avoid taking responsibility for the problem but to realize that there are “types of lifestyles in a family that can contribute in a general way to depression.” Included in his list of suggestions is the caution that family members should not try to be therapists. “Be stingy with advice. Offer encouragement by ‘walking with the person.’ ” And if it is clear that the depressed person is not handling his condition, if routine activities have become difficult-then the family should assist in finding professional help.

Other valuable sections include how to help children to be nondepressive, what a depressed person can do to help himself, and common misconceptions of Christians about depression.

Why another book on depression? Baker said he wrote the book to give hope to the depressed and eliminate false impressions about depression. He also wanted to open the doors for the Christian community to admit weakness.

“In the presence of mental illness, we’re all total cripples,” he said. “I had never felt so deserted in all my life. For seven years I had given my time, my energy, my love, and all my abilities to a wonderful church family. And yet in my deepest need, they were unable to respond. Unable-not unwilling. Church families are just like human families. It’s easy to tend to wounds that are visible and pray for ailments that are definable, but mental illness still carries with it the stigma of the Dark Ages. The Christian community really hasn’t advanced very far when it comes to ministering to the depressed.”

Charles and Cynthia Swindoll (Cynthia pens a moving foreword, mentioning her own bout with depression) told him his story was the “best-kept secret in Christendom,” encouraging him to write it.

Depression: Finding Hope and Meaning in Life’s Dark Shadows provides a rainbow of hope for those in despair. Nester points out that in God’s pattern for our lives, everything becomes purposeful and good, moving us toward conformity to the image of Jesus. “The Don Baker of today is not the Don Baker of twenty-five years ago. The four years of depression and despair are part of God’s conforming him to Christ’s image.”

Becoming Bullish on the Family

A New Design for Family Ministry by Dennis B. Guernsey, Cook, $6.95

Reviewed by John F. Anderson, pastor, First Baptist Church, La Crescenta, California

“All things considered, we can be bullish about the family,” writes church lover and critic Dennis Guernsey. His passionate appeal is for the church to become a “family of families.”

Guernsey, associate professor of marriage and family ministries at Fuller Theological Seminary, considers himself called to be a “missionary to the family.” A former pastoral staff member, Guernsey was prompted to write the book after a church leadership retreat, where a pastor friend asked, “Dennis, why such an emphasis and concern about the family? People have been hurting since the Fall. The greater importance to me is God’s institution, the church.” Guernsey feels that attitude is typical of too many church workers today.

The underlying thesis of the book is that the church and the family are God’s two unique and special creations. Therefore, they must do more than tolerate each other. They must work together, with mutual love, knowing that as one flourishes, so will the other.

Of practical help is the author’s fresh thinking about how family relationships change with time. Families, like individuals, pass through stages. Understanding the “family systems” is crucial to effective ministry.

“Only, perhaps, in the case of premarital counseling is the church involved in anticipating the dangers that lie ahead and providing needed information about the future,” writes Guernsey. “But what about the other stages? Who teaches young parents how to survive the intrusion of a squalling infant? … Who prepares parents to handle the storms of adolescence or the uncertainty of midlife? It is this vacuum that provides the church with its most exciting opportunity for ministry today.”

Most materials on family education are written topically, Guernsey points out. “Take the issue of communication. It is usually dealt with across the life cycle even though the communication demands of a couple are different at one stage than another. Or take books on sex. Most are written as if sex in marriage does not change according to how old you are or how long you’ve been married. However, sex in marriage does change. … If we teach without reference to these differences, we are less than effective.”

The book divides family life into three stages: The Beginning Years (between families, neo-marital, neo-parental); The Building Years (young children, first teenager); The Maturing Years (empty nest, retirement). In addition, Guernsey discusses The Single Years (single person, single parent) as a separate category.

How should the church relate to persons in the changing family settings? Guernsey believes the issues can best be addressed by a family-systems approach, which deals with the interaction of a family as a whole rather than focusing upon individual members. Success of the systems approach depends upon getting and processing information.

“Where does the family system learn the functions of both positive and negative feedback? … The same place they learn about their stage in the life cycle, and they must learn it among a caring community which will reassure them when they needlessly panic or confront them when they must change.”

The church is the place. The church is where a large challenge (or burden) is placed. At points I felt the author was asking too much. When personally confronted with the question, “Aren’t you expecting more than the church can deliver?” Guernsey didn’t budge.

“We need an ombudsman for the family in every church,” he said. “The church, as an institution, often acts selfishly for its own interest. We need someone in every church watching family life and reminding the church when it’s wrong. Pastors need to ponder this question: ‘What will God hold me accountable for?’ In the long run, I don’t believe it will be the big, successful program.”

I was pushed back to Guernsey’s image of the church as a “family of families.” In an age of change characterized by individualism, narcissism, and future shock, the church and the family are indeed the hope of the world. “The dreadful lack in the world today is in the area of meaningful and permanent relationships. The world is not only distant from God, it is also a conglomeration of people distant from one another.”

The future can be scary as we see family structures changing, but as Guernsey writes, “The family of the future may well be somewhat unlike the family of the past. The task for the church is … to engage in creative ministry. The family is changing, and change is often hard. But we must remember that it has been in times of change that God has brought about much good.”

It is that note of hope based upon biblical, theological confidence that makes Dennis Guernsey bullish on the family. Not only does the book A New Design for Family Ministry make a more convinced, troubled, and hopeful believer of me, it calls me to respond.

A Calm Word on Spirited Debate

Those Controversial Gifts by George Mallone, InterVarsity, $4.95

Reviewed by Dean Merrill, senior editor, LEADERSHIP

Who writes books on manifestations of the Spirit? (1) Scholars; (2) lay people with a story to tell; (3) Pentecostals.

George Mallone is none of the three. He is rather a working pastor seeking to open the church door to the Spirit’s gifts without having pews and hymnals go flying through the air. A “teaching elder” among the Brethren of British Columbia, Mallone speaks from experience about safely incorporating the gifts into congregational life-not only administration and showing mercy but also prophecy, dreams, visions, healing, and even tongues and interpretation .

“I’m trying to be a sober evangelical who doesn’t exegete like a Pentecostal but is still open to all the gifts,” he says.

Interestingly, it was the 1980 book of another West Coast pastor-John MacArthur’s The Charismatics-that set Mallone to writing. “I felt John was highly unfair in places,” he says, “possibly because he had not seen some of the helpful things I’d been exposed to and the thoughtful people who had challenged my traditions.” He drew up the outline for Those Controversial Gifts and then recruited three like-minded Vancouver pastors to help him write it. (“This book is really a city effort,” he notes.)

The complimentary foreword by Anglican Michael Green is followed by the first chapter asking whether the gifts really did cease at the end of the first century. Mallone’s conclusion: no. His pastoral approach quickly surfaces as he tells about arriving home from a summer holiday and finding charismatic fever among some of his members. “My immediate reaction was to stamp it out as quickly as possible before it spread. I began to notice in the lives of certain people, however, a genuine spiritual renewal. My next step was to attempt to teach rather than to stamp out. But as I began to teach I found that I, as a cessationist, had much to learn also. About that time God sent us a couple from England who had the experience of living in harmony with those who manifested particular gifts as well as those who did not. … We began to grow in love toward one another. It was this love which was able to cast out all fear.”

The subsequent chapters include biblical review as well as practical pastoral strategy. A prophetic “thus saith the Lord” needs to undergo three tests, he says: theological, confessional, and moral. Hence, “prophecies that come through the electronic church are suspect. The viewer simply cannot investigate the character of the person who has spoken. Without a character reference, we are to remain quietly agnostic about what is said.”

In fact, Mallone wonders (citing theologian James Dunn) whether the charisma called “discernment” may not have originally had less to do with demons than with judging prophetic utterances. After prophecy died out in the ancient church, interpreters apparently sought an alternate field of use for the gift and settled on exorcism.

Dreams and visions are welcomed and then safeguarded in chapter three (by John Opmeer). Mallone returns in the next chapter to deal with tongues, “the biggest Christian friendship and oneness buster of the century.” Pentecostals will not like him calling their view (individual tongues as a visible sign of the Spirit’s infilling) “one of the greatest theological tragedies to befall the church.” Yet both he and his wife speak in tongues and have even aided others who longed to do so. A seasoned discussion of both the potential abuses and the benefits is enlightening.

The chapter on healing (by Jeff Kirby) traces Old Testament, New Testament, and church history roots, shows the gift in action today, but is also candid about those left unhealed. “With our practice of the healing ministry, we must build a parallel theology of suffering, not as a place to hide when healing does not come, but as a way of understanding another mode of the work of God in the lives of his people-suffering.”

Paul Stevens then contributes a chapter on “Equipping for Spiritual Gifts.” His methods: exposure to those with experience in the gifts, experimentation in a loving setting under guidance (e.g., house groups), and extension into the world at large. His cheerful philosophy: “Everyone doing anything should get help to do it better.”

Perhaps the best chapter in the book is Mallone’s finale, “From Fear to Faith.” He gently names why we hesitate to embrace the controversial gifts: fear of others, fear of ourselves (“I’m not worthy to be used in this way”), and fear that God might be displeased if we stumble. “Let us put off fear and put on love and exercise the gifts-all of them-with all the diligence and energy God provides.”

Pastors who have felt pushed and prodded by eager charismatics in their congregations will be able to relax with this book even as they absorb its helpful insights. And all Christians who hope for rapprochement between the church’s charismatic and noncharismatic wings will appreciate the light George Mallone and his friends shed on the path.

Making a Rancher Out of a Shepherd

How to Start Lay-Shepherding Ministries by Charles A. Ver Straten, Baker, $4.95

Reviewed by James Berkley, pastor, Dixon Community Church, Dixon, California

Were I a sheep, I would choose Chuck Ver Straten’s flock. Once a Wyoming sheep rancher and now a veteran Baptist pastor of nearly thirty years, Ver Straten personifies the consummate pastor/shepherd. Like the sheep dog, his every instinct is to shepherd his people. He breathes it in conversation and reveals it in his book.

Ver Straten will not be content while any part of his flock suffers. In smaller churches early in his ministry, he felt reasonably able to bind most of the wounds. However, as his flock increased at Mission Hills Church in suburban Denver from a handful to six hundred, problems developed.

“On paper it appeared to be a successful church,” he writes. “As the senior pastor, I was frustrated, overextended, and ready to resign. My greatest strength had proved to be my undoing. God had given me a pastor’s heart to care deeply for people.” Yet Chuck had more people to care for than time to do the caring.

He resolved to work harder, but the harder he worked, the more people brought their needs to his doorstep. Then he added staff. Adding pastors, however, was like extinguishing a fire with gasoline. The staff built programs that attracted yet more people with pastoral needs. What’s a pastor to do?

He found his answer in lay shepherds. This hardly qualifies as original, yet Ver Straten progressed one step beyond most of us: he actually implemented a lay-shepherding program. Most pastors I know succumb to the common wisdom that grumbles, “Every church needs lay shepherding, but nobody can make it work.”

His thin book tells how he pulled it off. In an easy-reading style, Ver Straten walks through his own thought processes and the step-by-step methods of lay-shepherding ministries.

First he outlines his theology, a deeply rooted belief in the ministry of the laity. Although it reads like a dissertation chapter-which it was-it lays a solid footing for his approach.

Second comes the method for choosing lay shepherds. Ver Straten used the board of deacons, capitalizing on their inherent spiritual authority, which allows them to minister more effectively as lay shepherds.

I immediately thought of some deacons I know whose gifts were definitely not evident as shepherds. Were Ver Straten’s deacons a blue ribbon batch? When asked, Ver Straten assured me that he began with typical people. “There was a natural attrition from the boards as people’s terms ended. I had no resignations, but some chose not to be re-elected.” When looking for new deacons, Chuck sought people who were not interested in “running the church in monthly business meetings.” He wanted “people-to-people types-people wanting to grow, people wanting meaningful ministry.”

A prior move that vested church business matters in another body freed the deacons to concentrate on spiritual matters. For churches not so structured, he advises: “If the board is entrenched, I would introduce a new group of lay shepherds. But it is better if they are elected to their spiritual ministries.”

Their shepherding ministries were quite a task, involving weekly training for three years. Ver Straten devotes a considerable portion of the book and appendices to the subject of training. Probably this is where most defunct lay-shepherding programs failed. Ver Straten almost flagged: “In the initial stages of planning the program and writing the training manual, plus preparing lessons for each week’s session, I wondered if I had made a mistake. Adding this expenditure of time and effort to an overextended life appeared to be foolhardy.” However, the wisdom of continuing won out, and the resulting lesson plans benefit us all.

To keep his work from sounding like pure theory, Ver Straten provides a smorgasbord of specific ways his shepherds have ministered. From securing the burglary-plagued home of a single woman to financial counseling to bringing a pot of beans to praying with people, the lay shepherds serve with imagination and love.

One unexpected effect changed Ver Straten’s perspective. He struggled when people began taking their needs to their shepherds and not to him. “The Lord has made me a shepherd!” he moaned. His adjustment to leading the shepherds rather than shepherding the sheep was not easy. He has continued with some front-line pastoral ministry so he isn’t completely removed.

A problem can arise from the success of lay shepherding. Close fellowship can be a formidable nut for an outsider to crack. Shepherding must find ways to include outsiders. Ver Straten is aware of this, and in his present church, Emmanuel Baptist in Mount Vernon, Washington, he is seeing that church attenders are added to the little flocks as soon as possible.

Moreover, lay shepherding cannot take the place of evangelism. “To add evangelism to the work of the lay shepherds is too much,” he cautions.

Within a year at his new church, Ver Straten began a lay-shepherding ministry. A few adjustments for a small-town situation were necessary, but he is using it much as he wrote in the book.

The real test of his ideas, however, was what happened at the old church. After a year without him, the Mission Hills Church has continued to thrive with lay shepherds. The ubiquitous pastor became expendable. Ver Straten concludes: “The Lord has reassigned me. I’ve been given a new job on the same ranch.”

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

FROM THE EDITOR

The small, red brick church sits in a mostly black neighborhood of Evansville Indiana. About 80 percent of the two hundred people attending Grace Lutheran Church are black as well. The only thing black about the Rev. Walter Wangerin is his cassock.

Immediately to the rear of the church sits a matching red brick parish house. The sign above the door reads Office. Two LEADERSHIP editors knock, and Wangerin emerges from a rear office that was obviously once a cozy bedroom. He welcomes us toward the comfortable armchairs across from a desk and a wall full of bookshelves.

After a few moments we ask, “What brought you to this church?”

It’s a natural enough question, one we might ask a pastor in any of a hundred settings. But the question has been at the front of our minds ever since we pulled up and saw that this was hardly a church to grace the front of a Hallmark greeting card.

Walt Wangerin and Grace Lutheran Church appear mismatched. He is better known for his writing than his pastoring. After receiving a Ph.D. in English literature and a divinity degree from Seminex in Saint Louis, he began teaching at the University of Evansville. He’s in demand as a speaker at all kinds of functions in the Evansville area, and he writes a regular column for the local newspaper.

His writing is one of the reasons we came to see him. In 1978 he wrote The Book of the Dun Cow, which won the National Religious Book Award (children’s category) and the American Book Award for best science fiction paperback, among others. He contributes beautifully crafted articles to Christianity Today. Many of his themes are drawn from his pastoral experience. But talk about what he might write for LEADERSHIP is temporarily shelved as we explore his call to ministry.

“I resisted the ministry as a young man,” Wangerin says. “There was no real reason to, I guess. Both my dad and my grandfather were ministers, and I was always interested. But I took up English literature in graduate school and ended up teaching literature and philosophy. That’s when I first got involved with Grace Church.

“It was only then, as I started serving in the fringes of this church, that I began to sense a call to ministry. In a sense, it took the people of this congregation to say, ‘We need you to minister to us.’ Without that personal call, I’d still be teaching literature.

“I wasn’t called to some abstract vocation but to these people. Since then God has made it clear to me that this is where I belong.”

His ordination night-and afterward-are vividly recalled in “The Ordination from Above.”

How does the pastoral call work? It has been on our minds a great deal lately as we’ve selected articles for this issue of LEADERSHIP. Why does someone choose the ministry? Or does someone get chosen for the ministry? If it’s the latter, who does the choosing?

John Calvin recognized two choosers: “The secret call of which every minister is conscious in himself before God, and the external call, which belongs to the public order of the church.”

Both the secret and external calls need to be present in order for a pastorate to work. God chose Jonah and Jeremiah and Paul. But it was the local church that laid hands on Barnabas and Saul and Timothy. The call came from God, but the church blessed the choice. Both God’s voice and the church’s anointing were necessary elements of a life in ministry.

Both elements are required for us to feel right about our vocation. It’s easy to overemphasize one or the other, and something is lost in either case. If God’s voice drowns out the church’s role, we become prophets crying in a wilderness of impersonal preaching. On the other hand, if we let the church alone shape our vision of service, we run the risk of powerless programs and Godless relationships. Only when God and church speak in unison does the full choir of the call sing true.

Obviously, traditional career counseling doesn’t work in the case of the minister. A qualitative difference stands between the ministry and any other job. And that’s what keeps us from feeling trapped and despairing of “making it.”

In Mark 10, when Jesus left Jericho, a blind beggar named Bartimaeus called out, “Jesus, son of David, have mercy on me.” Jesus stopped and called for the man. The Bible tells us he threw off his mantle, ran to Jesus, was made well, and followed our Lord.

When you’re “called” to a secular vocation, you’re given a mantle of authority, a guaranteed salary, and the prospect of fame. When we’re called to Christ’s service, the opposite happens. We throw off whatever mantles we have, give up all our prospects, and follow Christ.

Walt Wangerin has earned the mantles of academic achievement and writing reknown-but he follows Christ by pastoring Grace Lutheran Church in Evansville, Indiana.

Terry Muck is editor of LEADERSHIP

Copyright © 1983 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube