Before the United States Supreme Court handed down the fateful decision that in effect legalized abortion on demand (Roe v. Wade, January 22, 1973; see CHRISTIANITY TODAY, February 16, 1973), opponents of easy abortion had warned that such a decision would be the first step in a far-reaching assault on human life. Not far behind, they said, would be euthanasia (first voluntary and then compulsory), forcible family limitation, and genetic Controls. The pro-abortion forces decried these warnings as unrealistic and hysterical.

Many Christian spokesmen, distracted by the rhetoric of religious liberty surrounding the court’s abortion decision, did not discern the anti-Christian militancy underlying the court’s rejection of our once dominant Judaeo-Christian ethical tradition in favor of “ancient religion.” On the other hand, some virulent anti-Christians recognized it for what it is and exulted (cf. Paul Blanshard and Edd Doerr, “A Glorious Victory,” The Humanist, May/June, 1973). Many discerning Christians, as well as others concerned with the dignity of man as the image-bearer of God, see the handwriting on the wall, and are anguished at the massive substitution of principles from pre-Christian paganism and post-Christian utilitarianism for those of the biblical heritage.

The thinking on abortion by the court’s majority reveals not only ethical and spiritual hollowness but also a lack of realism and reason. Many secular writers have noted this, such as law professor Philip Kurland, who wrote in the University of Chicago Magazine: “[The Supreme Court] has issued decrees but it has not afforded adequate rationales for them; it has attempted to rule by fiat rather than by reason” (July/August, 1973, p. 9). With neither ethics nor ...

Subscriber access only You have reached the end of this Article Preview

To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.

Our digital archives are a work in progress. Let us know if corrections need to be made.