The court's action was particularly galling because the IRS and Saddleback Community Church pastor Rick Warren had largely settled their differences and both agreed that the exemption was constitutional. Nevertheless, the court asked University of Southern California law professor Erwin Chemerinsky to write a brief on the deduction's constitutionality.
Congress didn't care much about Chemerinsky's interpretation, and instead passed a law quickly and unanimously clarifying the tax code on the issue.
With the new law in place, the IRS and Warren asked the court to dismiss the case. But having been drawn into the case, Chemerinsky didn't want to let go. He filed an opposition to the dismissal, then filed a motion to intervene as a private taxpayer.
But there's an ominous line in the dismissal: "Neither the voluntary dismissal here nor the passage of the Clergy Housing Allowance Clarification Act resolves the constitutionality of [clergy housing allowances]. Because Prof. Chemerinsky may raise this issue through a separate lawsuit, our denial of intervention will not impair his ability to protect his interest as a taxpayer."
In other words, it sounds like Warren may be heading back to court.
Temple wall may fall, say Israelis A 35-foot bulge in a wall at the Temple Mount is about to collapse, say Israeli archaeologists and leaders. "There ...
1
You have reached the end of this Article Preview
To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.
Civil disobedience, conscientious objection, and what to make of believers defying the government.
Three evangelicals wrestle with faithful witness in conversations with Muslims.Português
A historian’s “intentionally provocative” account of religious liberty in America leaves too little room for claims of conscientious dissent.
