Related articles and links |  1 of 2

When Film Forum surveys the reactions of Christian films critics each week, the reviewers rarely find consensus. More often than not, the disagreements stem from different ideas of what movies are: Art? Entertainment? Education? In my conversations with eight critics last year, I asked them what distinctions they drew between each category; their answers offered a glimpse into the varied expectations a person might hold walking into a movie theater.

For Josh Spencerof StrangerThingsMagazine, the distinction between art, entertainment, and education is determined solely in "the eye of the beholder. It's all subjective. One person's entertainment is another's art is another's education." Michael Elliott of Crosswalk.com placed the distinction at the other end of the artist/consumer relationship: "It is a matter of intent. Education should instruct. Entertainment should please. Art should inspire." Elliott says filmmakers should try to integrate these ideals: "The film that encompasses all three categories is worthy of praise."

Jeffrey Overstreetof Looking Closeragrees with Elliott—to a point. While he likes to find all three components in a film, he believes that education and entertainment are more accurately labeled by-products of good art. "Art is primarily one person's exploration of something," says Overstreet. "It invites others to explore and to find the same insights, sometimes to discover greater or altogether different insights. Art doesn't aim to teach, but experiencing it can be educational. [Likewise,] entertainment is not a primary focus—it's a by-product. Something is entertaining because it is, in some way, good at something. Art can be entertainment. But so can sports. Circus performers. Magicians. Even television commercials."

Sarah Barnettof Culture@Homerejects the labels altogether, saying they've been corrupted by Western culture to the point of meaninglessness. "Unfortunately, 'entertainment' has lost its real meaning and has come to mean escapism. Once upon a time, entertainment was more about switching one's mind on than switching it off. … In the same way, education no longer suggests mental stimulation or the enabling of minds to develop and think for themselves. Education is more about disseminating information which is intended to be accepted. … So it has fallen to art to pick up the roles shed by entertainment and education. Art, which is frequently criticized as being inaccessible, is left to dazzle, to provoke and to stimulate. Unfortunately, it is rarely thanked."

Doug Cummingsof Movies and Ministryalso believes art has been given power by shifts in Western culture, and suggest that the church harness it for worship and witness. "The great Swedish filmmaker Ingmar Bergman once wrote [that] 'art lost its significance to life when it separated itself from worship.' … I think good art can point people toward God in appreciation of Truth and Beauty. I think it's the task of Christian artists to 'offer their bodies as living sacrifices' in the creation of art through worship and it's the church's task to let them do it. … We don't need to get bogged down in power struggles, financial interests, and church business models in order to control culture. The church can produce and appreciate art through worship in ways that informs and inspires the culture around us."

However, it's the culture-shaping power of movies that most bothers Thomas A. Carderof the Childcare Action Project. "There is no vehicle of imparting information as consistent throughout the land as a movie. Even classroom programs vary from state to state, from city to city. Movies do not. The vulgarities in a movie are the same from Seattle to Miami." Carder says movies entertain and educate, but don't fulfill the objectives of entertainment or education. "Entertainment/art ceases to be art and education ceases to be education when they present aberrant behavioral templates, foul imagery and carnal knowledge to our kids. … Disguising sinful behavior in a theme or plot does not excuse the sinful behavior of either the one who is drawing pleasure from the sinful display or the practitioners demonstrating the sinful behavior."

next page... |  1 of 2

January (Web-only) 2001, Vol. 45