Related articles and links |  1 of 2

Two separate legal actions in the narco-trafficking case of Peruvian evangelical David de Vinatea have in effect ended his chances of gaining justice through Peru's legal system, say advocates for the imprisoned army colonel.

A coalition of Christian groups—who believe de Vinatea is an innocent victim of corruption—plans to take de Vinatea's case to the Inter-American Human Rights Court in Costa Rica and to the United Nations. They will also ask government officials in the United States and Europe, as well as other human rights groups, to join in supporting the case, said Richard Luna, director of Open Doors Latin America.

Peru's Supreme Court declared de Vinatea's complaint "unfounded" that he had been sentenced on the testimony of a single witness. The witness, convicted narco-trafficker Abelardo Cachique Rivera, later recanted his statements, saying that an official of the national terrorism police, or Dincote, had threatened him with a stiff prison sentence if he didn't implicate de Vinatea.

De Vinatea's lawyer, Juan Arturo Moscoso Alvarino, received the Supreme Court's decision January 17, but the ruling was dated January 10, the day he argued the case.

The court's written ruling gave no reasons for upholding de Vinatea's conviction. Luna said he suspects it was because Cachique Rivera's retraction had already been presented in lower courts during former President Alberto Fujimori's administration. For the Supreme Court to rule against a lower court decision, its judges must agree that the evidence presented is new—even though legal and human rights observers widely agree that the National Intelligence Service, influenced by drug-trafficking interests, largely controlled the courts under the now-disgraced and exiled Fujimori-Montesinos regime.

"The court did the Pontius Pilate thing—washed its hands from truth and justice in this case, which is why we're going to proceed," Luna said. "The Peruvian justice system will need to respond and be held accountable."

In a separate action, de Vinatea received an eight-year reduction of his 16-year prison sentence offered by Peru's justice minister, according to a Peruvian congressman who brokered the commutation. Minister of Justice Fernando Olivera's deal would mean de Vinatea would have to accept guilt for crimes he says he didn't commit and spend another year and a half in prison.

"Colonel de Vinatea called me saying he was in disagreement with the offer, saying he is innocent and [time yet to serve] was excessive and that it should be less," said Congressman Walter Alejos, an evangelical Christian and member of President Alejandro Toledo's Peru Possible party. Alejos, who is also vice-president of Peru's congressional Human Rights Commission, had pushed Olivera to consider granting the commutation, which, according to Alejos, Toledo signed on January 14.

"Such a commutation, I believe, is made in goodwill as a favor to him from by the government, which has made a good decision to commute his sentence," Alejos said. "The previous government was totally adverse to Colonel de Vinatea. We don't have room to suggest less time for the [remaining] sentence."

The family is eagerly awaiting the recording and publication of the commutation according to Peruvian law, so they can choose their best legal option in their six-year struggle for justice.

"I believe that before God, he is innocent," Alejos said. "But unfortunately, the laws and how they have been manipulated in Peru still haven't changed. We can't hope for quick, just answers. The process of moralizing in Peru isn't fast. It's slow."

next page... |  1 of 2

share this page

January (Web-only) 2002, Vol. 46