Guest / Limited Access /

Claiming that Google has willfully ignored its trademark rights, Jews for Jesus (JFJ) filed a lawsuit against the internet megafirm on December 21. A non-JFJ blog called jewsforjesus.blogspot.com, hosted by a Google subsidiary, posts highly critical comments about JFJ. The blog's author lists himself as "Whistle Blower," but provides no other identification.

"We have no problem with criticism," said Susan Perlman, associate executive director of JFJ. "Just do it under a name that's not confusing to the public."

In its complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court in New York, Jews for Jesus claims that this Web address (URL) dilutes its trademark and could confuse people who believe that JFJ authorizes the site.

Google, which declined repeated CT requests for comment, had sent an e-mail to JFJ's attorney, suggesting the group work out its difficulties with the still-anonymous "Whistle Blower." (The blogger did not respond to an e-mail from CT.)

JFJ has gone to court once before in a Web-related case. The evangelistic ministry won a 1998 verdict against an Orthodox Jew who established a www.jews-for-jesus.org website that linked to "anti-missionary" material. But experts note that the 1998 case involved a "top-level" Web domain. The Blogspot domain in the current lawsuit is a "third-level subdomain," which may not be protected under laws against "cybersquatting."

No trial date has been set. Dawn Eden, who writes the weekly Blog On! column for the New York Daily News, says it's unclear how the courts would rule, but it's not surprising that the group would ask for its name back.

"The rule bloggers go by is that you don't 'steal' another person's name as the main URL for a blog," Eden said. "However, if you are commenting about that ...

Subscriber access only You have reached the end of this Article Preview

To continue reading, subscribe now. Subscribers have full digital access.

From Issue:
Read These NextSee Our Latest
RecommendedMark Driscoll Addresses Crude Comments Made Trolling as 'William Wallace II'
Mark Driscoll Addresses Crude Comments Made Trolling as 'William Wallace II'
Mars Hill pastor says 14-year-old posts were 'plain wrong' and he 'remain[s] embarrassed,' but 'I have changed.'
TrendingMark Driscoll Resigns from Mars Hill
Mark Driscoll Resigns from Mars Hill
"I do not want to be the source of anything that might detract from our church’s mission."
Editor's PickA Word Can Be Worth a Thousand Pictures
A Word Can Be Worth a Thousand Pictures
Why the pulpit—and not the screen—still belongs at the center of our churches.
Comments
Christianity Today
Domain Game: Can Jews for Jesus Win Its Google Suit?
hide thisMarch March

In the Magazine

March 2006

To continue reading, subscribe now for full print and digital access.