Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 9, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2007 > JulyChristianity Today, July, 2007  |   |  
It's Not About the Crusades
The clash with Islam is over new global realities.



ADVERTISEMENT

Lamin Sanneh is a rarity. A native of Gambia, West Africa, he grew up in a Muslim home. As a teenager, Sanneh decided to convert to Christianity. Ironically, the liberal Methodist missionary to whom he announced his decision reacted with embarrassment, not joy, and asked the young man to reconsider. Sanneh did reconsider, felt "inexorably driven" to the gospel, and talked the missionary into baptizing him.

To compound the ironies, Sanneh proceeded to earn a doctorate in Islamic history even as he studied Christian theology. Throughout his spiritual pilgrimage, he maintained close ties with his Muslim family. A professor first at Harvard, then at Yale, Sanneh brings singular qualifications to interfaith dialogue between Christians and Muslims.

Sanneh speaks openly about the guilt complex of the West. Like the Methodist missionary, some Western Christians feel embarrassed when they encounter converts from Asia or Africa. "But when I have repeated for them my personal obstacles in joining the church, making it clear that I was in no way pressured into doing so, they have seemed gratefully unburdened of a sense of guilt."

In Europe, Sanneh senses a lingering guilt complex over colonialism. Strangely enough, he points out, from the Muslim perspective "colonialism did more to aid Islam than all jihads put together." Queen Victoria's representatives in Africa saw local imams and muftis as a socially stabilizing force and built up their power, even to the extent of passing laws against conversion to Christianity. In countries such as Nigeria, Muslims protested the British withdrawal and granting of independence.

In addition, Western Christians feel deep guilt over the Crusades, even though, as Sanneh says, Arab historians give the Crusades (which they refer to as the wars with the Franks) little notice. These incursions, mostly rebuffed by the Muslims, pale in comparison to the Mongol invasion under Genghis Khan.

Sanneh urges Western Christians to move beyond the guilt of the past. The global picture has changed, after all. Although the worldwide percentage of Christians has declined only slightly, from 35 percent in 1800 to 33 percent today, the geographical shift has been immense. While Christianity lost 800 million adherents in the 20th century—mostly in Europe and the former Soviet Union—explosive growth in places like Africa and China replaced them. (Sanneh acknowledges that this explosive growth occurred only after colonialism ended.)

Seventy-five thousand people a day become Christians, according to some estimates, and two-thirds of them live in Africa. These buoyant new believers do not carry around burdens of history such as the Crusades and the Inquisition. They experience the gospel as Good News and celebrate it in new and creative forms.

At the same time, Christians in Africa and Asia are confronting a newly resurgent and sometimes militant Islam. Repulsed by the decadence and rampant secularism of the West, Muslims have their own evangelistic agenda. In places like Iran, Egypt, and Palestine, moderates who once dreamed of modern, secular states are losing out to religious zealots who want to impose a harsh version of Shari'ah law. Only God can legislate, they say; religious leaders act as God's deputies in ordering society according to Qur'anic principles. In some Islamic nations, "crimes" such as conversion to Christianity or teaching evolution are capital offenses.

When he addresses Muslims, Sanneh cautions them to consider lessons learned by the medieval Christian church. Ally religion too closely to the state, and you open your faith to corruption and abuse of power. Christian experiments with church-state blending, whether in Geneva under Calvin, Britain under Cromwell, or Spain and Latin America under the Inquisition, may have worked for a time but inevitably provoked a backlash. In fundamentalist Iran, a similar backlash is already in motion. As one concerned Iranian intellectual told a visiting Harvard professor, "These young people may be lost to Islam forever. … They follow the conventions of Islamic dress and custom, because they are required to do so by law, but inside their hearts are hollow and cynical. We are losing an entire generation of unbelievers in our zeal to force conformity."





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 9 comments.See all comments
Robert Copeland   Posted: July 19, 2007 3:16 PM
Yancey is a fine writer and a thought-provoking one. I don't always agree with his conclusions, but I always respect what he says. That's why I was surprised at his approval of Sanneh's statement about "Christian experiments with church-state blending." Calvin was always simply the pastor of the largest church in town; he certainly did not control the city government; rather, he worked to extricate the church from control by the city council. His leadership in the church and in public affairs was by moral suasion, not coercion or intimidation. (It was the city council who burned Servetus, and Calvin was unable to persuade them of a less cruel death.) Cromwell controlled the machinery of state, but not the Church. Indeed, to name all three in the same sentence is a breath-taking display of either ignorance or malice. Either alternative is unworthy of Mr. Yancey or of CT.

dickhugie   Posted: July 19, 2007 4:40 PM
I recently had the opportunity to hear Dr. Sanneh speak on this and other items related to the world wide Christian movement and ater reading Mr. Yancey's article I thought his comments were relevant to the world we live in. We in America need to get more focused on what is happening in the church in the rest of the world rather than just in America.

DADorman   Posted: July 19, 2007 11:46 AM
It is a good thing to try and understand the Middle East in terms of present-day realities, and resist projecting paradigms from the past--"the guilt of the past." But we do need to examine "the guilt of the present," namely, why militant Islam has been so successful at resurrecting the Crusades paradigm as a hermeneutic of the present global situation. If it's not the Crusades, it must be something, probably the cultural imperialism that in others' eyes (and in some of our own) seems to promise only corruption and decay. Strange that you should let pass Sanneh's comments on "experiments" to blend church and state. Calvin in Geneva fought the particlar fight of separating the church's consistitory from the town government, and fostered the separation of church and government that allowed the Reformed movement so much lattitude in accomodation elsewhere. And Cromwell was the ONLY British ruler since Henry VIII until the present NOT to claim the role of head of the Church!

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Marriage Partnership
Men of Integrity
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com