Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 8, 2012

Home > 2007 > July (Web-only)Christianity Today, July (Web-only), 2007
Speaking Out
What Would Jonathan Edwards Say About Harry Potter?
How the preacher responded to pop culture's version of transcendence.




ADVERTISEMENT

[WARNING: SOME PLOT SPOILERS.]

So there we have it. The most engrossing imaginative world created at the start of the 21st century is essentially pagan. Don't get me wrong—I like the Harry Potter series. I've read all of the books. And I'm sure Jonathan Edwards would have done so, too.

Edwards was acutely aware of the cultural movements of his time. He said in "Some Thoughts Concerning the Revival" that he made it his practice to take light from wherever it came. Of course, reading John Locke and the like is not quite like reading books designed (originally) for children.

It's hard to imagine that Edwards would have remained ignorant about what has become such a powerful phenomenon of our time. He immersed himself in the cutting-edge Enlightenment thinking of his age, and his book list and letters reveal a breadth of reading anything but narrow. No doubt Edwards would have mined the Harry Potter series for insights into the predominant spiritual atmosphere in which we live.

Edwards neither ignored nor capitulated to the Enlightenment's materialistic/mechanistic view of life and the universe. Instead he "re-formed" the Enlightenment on specifically biblical terms and constructed intellectual bridges to cultural attitudes, along which the orthodox gospel could more readily transverse.

Or you could imagine his engagement with Enlightenment thinking as sending Trojan horses full of gospel truths into contemporary minds. He carefully used "sense," "idea" and "light"—Enlightenment buzzwords—in sermons and his more erudite works, and he invested those terms with biblical material and content.

The latest and last of Rowling's Potter series (though she leaves it tantalizingly open to sequels, despite her reported refusal to contemplate future work—perhaps not Potter, but maybe a return to Hogwarts?) is all about death. In case the title didn't make that clear ("the Deathly Hallows"), the frontispiece has two quotations referring to death. There is a sense in which the whole seven-volume series has been about death.

Even Dumbledore (beware: spoiler) seems to have tinkered with the less-than-salutary sides of this fascination. Also, there's Voldemort, with his evil determination to avoid death at the cost of others' lives, and Harry, dear Harry, who with his purity and bravery manages to cheat death again and again, even finding himself at one point in a sort of cosmic waiting room with the dead Dumbledore.

What does this tell us, Edwards would have wondered. He would have discovered that we live in an age that is fascinated by the transcendent—and the paranormal—but that, while intrigued, is totally confused about that realm.

Edwards would have seen that the essential question of spirituality—What happens when I die?—is a great vacuum that culture is looking to fill. The series also tells us—and this no less important—that if Rowling's world is expertly reflecting the light our world can shed on these matters, true understanding is at a pretty low level.

That doesn't mean I shouldn't read it. Nor does it mean that Edwards would disapprove of us learning from it (light from wherever it comes), but (borrowing from more recent intellectual heroes like Lewis or Tolkien) it does mean that if the world's imagination is captured by Potter-esque versions of the afterlife and the transcendent—a less-than-Christian way of looking at the world—we have work to do. The imagination is a hairbreadth away from the soul.

I believe Edwards would also look from Potter to us and say, "Who's going to tell a more compelling story that sheds true gospel light on the transcendent?"

Josh Moody (PhD, Cambridge University) is senior pastor of Trinity Baptist Church in Newhaven, CT, associate fellow of Jonathan Edwards College, Yale University, and the author of The God-Centered Life: Insights from Jonathan Edwards for Today.



Related Elsewhere:

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows is available from Amazon.com and other retailers.

For more articles on previous Harry Potter books and movies, see our full coverage area.

Christian History and Biography has an issue on Jonathan Edwards.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 52 comments

Jane Gallagher

August 06, 2007  2:06pm

Wow, now I remember why I'm an atheist. This is insane. Both sides of this argument are reading way too much into it.

Anonymous

August 06, 2007  2:00pm

I would like this article more I think were it not written from the pseudo-perspective of Jonathan Edwards. There is simply no way of telling what a deceased person from a completely different historical context would think about a modern phenomenon, and frankly, I think it's a bit presumptuous to assume that we can predict his opinion. I do, however, appreciate reading an analysis of Harry Potter that manages not to condemn the books at face value. For the most part, the critics of the books I have read which condemn the series as unholy obviously have not read the books to begin with. But honestly, I am tempted to think that any serious spiritual analysis of Harry Potter is reading a bit much into a children's book.

T.J.

August 03, 2007  4:49pm

The controversy swirling around HP lies at the root of the problem with the church in America. We want to justify why we do things (and watch things and read things) we KNOW we shouldn't. We have PASTORS currently preaching from SPiderman movies, 1st , 2nd and 3rd Shrek, The Matrix, Harry Potter...people are not reading GOD'S WORD...they are going to the movies and then the PASTORS STRIVE to come up with a spiritual message. It's quite sickening. Now if anyone reads their bible, YOU KNOW THAT RIGHT AFTER SAUL WENT TO THE WITCH OF ENDOR FOR DIRECTION......HE dies..........THAT IS WHERE DEALING WITH THE DARKNESS PUTS YOU....IN THE GRAVE....> death permeates the potter books.....witchcraft and wizardry is the foundation of the whole series..... how can a loving CHristian parent open their kids up to satanic nonsense......WE KNOW ABOUT THE SUPERNATURAL...OUR GOD IS SUPERNATURAL.....and if we are walking with Him....we should see the supernatural/miracles in our lives. I do.

M Elward

August 02, 2007  4:49pm

I am saddened and annoyed that you presume that Jonathan Edwards would have liked and condoned Harry Potter. He would have known scriptures and obeyed it. We are told plainly not to have anything to do with witches, wizards, sorcery or any such thing, and however you try to pretty them up, they are an abomination in the sight of Almighty God. Magic is an evil force in the world and belongs to the Devil. Harry Potter captures the imagination, but my main quarrel with it is that it makes out that some wizards are good, which is in total contradicaion to the word of God, ther is no such thing as good witches, they have their power from the Devil. I I

Matt

August 02, 2007  10:42am

In response to Sanctimonious: there is only one sentence in this entire article that references Homer, and that merely references a well-known symbol to make a point. In what way does referencing the Trojan Horse automatically mean that the author supports or agrees with Odysseus' lifestyle? Whenever you reference the Bible, are you saying that you support David's murder of Uriah, or Solomon's life of sin with his wives? How about Cain's murder of Abel, or Satan's pride? Your comment was unnecessarily vituperative and completely devoid of understanding.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com