Q&A: Hugh Hewitt
Conservative blogger, political analyst, and radio talk show host Hugh Hewitt just wrote A Mormon in the White House? (Regnery). The book urges Christians not to reject former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney as a presidential candidate for theological reasons. Senior associate editor Stan Guthrie spoke with Hewitt.
Why shouldn't Christians oppose Mitt Romney because of his Mormonism?
Because the civic religion in America is founded very much on the Constitution's Article Six premise that there is no religious test. That was to act as a formal impediment to state action and to foster an attitude of Americans—that we love religious liberty, that we are defenders of religious tolerance.
Would any theological beliefs be disqualifying?
Not a theological belief. But if a theological belief resulted in a political position, it could. For example, if a Raelian believed that we needed to embrace cloning, I would say, "I can't vote for you because you're in favor of cloning."
What role should faith play in a President performing his or her duties?
I want a person of great values. Romney and John McCain and Rudy Giuliani all have some values with which I agree. They also have some positions with which I don't agree. So I look at what they are going to do in office. What are they going to try to implement in terms of the war or judicial appointments? Their personal faith would almost not enter into that conversation about qualifications for office.
I value President Bush's faith. I think that's made him quite a good leader, given him strength, courage, and determination in the face of tremendous obstacles. But Lincoln was a "right strawy" theologian and our greatest President. I'm not looking for a pastor. I'm looking for a President.
What ...
This article is currently available to CT subscribers only.
To continue reading:
or
The Latest in Movie News, May 23, 2013
God Among the Roma
Grieving with the Good Friday God
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Newsletters
Google
Comments
Displaying 1–3 of 75 comments
See all comments
Frank in Phoenix
Guthrie asks, "What is the key political issue for Christians between now and 2008?" Hewitt responds, "The war has to be the first issue for everyone involved in politics, not just Christians." Amen! Which is why — as a Christian conservative who opposed the war in Iraq before it began — I will support the only conservative candidate who also opposes it (and does so on constitutional grounds): Texas Rep. Ron Paul. (Incidentally, Rep. Paul officially announced his candidacy today. See RonPaulExplore.com.)
Eichendorff
In answer to FromNorthCarolina, there will be no adverse social or political consequences of a successful Romney candidacy. Such consequences exist only in your bigoted imagination. The legitimacy of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints depends neither on Mitt Romney’s political success nor on the irrelevant views of Protestant theologians. The only legitimacy that matters, or the Church cares about, comes from God, and the Church has had that from the instant it came into existence. The Church will continue to grow and flourish regardless of anything the Protestant world has to say about it, for the simple reason that it is sustained by the power of God.
FromNorthCarolina
Evangelicals have to be concerned about the potentially adverse political and social consequences of a successful Romney candidacy. If Romney comes near to gaining the White House, he will add huge legitimacy to Mormonism, a religion that is contrary to Historic Christianity and a threat to the Gospel. Theologians such as R.C. Sproul, A. N. Martin and R. Zacharias have long contended that Mormonism is a cult and a system of belief that is at radical variance with the biblical faith. Of course, our nation's presidency isn't a theological office. That's is important to keep in mind. Even so, Christians should always be wary of indirectly promoting an anti-Christian belief system.