Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 9, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2007 > March (Web-only)Christianity Today, March (Web-only), 2007  |   |  
Weblog: Pastors Off the Hook in Sex Cases
Earl Paulk case dropped, Lonnie Latham not guilty, Md. pastor gets mistrial. Plus: Calling Akinola out on Nigeria's anti-gay law, W&M's cross returns, Jars of Clay's un-Dixie Chicks moment, and other stories from online sources around the world.



ADVERTISEMENT

1. Accusers lose in sexual misconduct cases against prominent pastors
Several sexual misconduct cases we've been watching ended this week—all in favor of the accused pastors. In a surprising turn, Mona Brewer and her husband dropped their sexual misconduct suit against Atlanta megachurch pastor Earl Paulk. "We were having difficulty even at this point getting witnesses to speak out against the acts of Bishop Paulk and the church," their lawyer told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "Sometimes you just have to do this." The trial was to begin April 2.

In another prominent case, Lonnie Latham, who was pastor of South Tulsa Baptist Church and a former member of the Southern Baptist Convention's executive committee before his arrest on a misdemeanor charge of lewdness, was found not guilty. Latham had been accused of inviting an undercover male police officer to engage in oral sex. His lawyer appealed to Lawrence v. Texas, a Supreme Court decision throwing out Texas's anti-sodomy law, saying, "If it's not illegal to engage in that conduct, then it shouldn't be illegal to talk about it." The judge did not rule on the constitutionality of Oklahoma's anti-lewdness law.

And finally, Gerald Griffith is not a name that many evangelicals know, but the pastor and founder of Baltimore's Redemption Christian Fellowship Church apparently has an international following. He has also been charged with sexually abusing three different teenagers during counseling sessions. The first of his trials was declared a mistrial Tuesday when one of the witnesses referred to another of the cases. A deacon at the church was acquitted in November in a separate abuse case.

2. Time's David van Biema: What does Akinola really think about Nigeria's anti-gay bill?

Apparently as part of Time's retooling, David van Biema has been doing a bit more opinion writing lately. This week, he calls Church of Nigeria head Peter Akinola to take a stance on his country's anti-homosexuality bill. Homosexuality is already illegal in Nigeria, but this bill would put a five-year prison term on anyone who:

  • "goes through the ceremony of marriage with a person of the same sex,"

  • "performs, witnesses, aids, or abets the ceremony of same-sex marriage" (including clergy)

  • or "is involved in the registration of gay clubs, societies, and organizations, sustenance, procession or meetings, publicity and public show of same-sex amorous relationship directly or indirectly in public and in private."

"Akinola either needs to publicly renounce, in strong terms, his early support of the bill's punitive clauses and to amplify the rather tepid concern he later expressed about them, or else he needs to explain why he's not doing so to the dozen or so churches in Virginia whose congregants were largely ignorant of the legislation when they voted to join Akinola's archdiocese in December," van Biema writes.

Many commenters on the conservative Anglican blogs accuse van Biema of a kind of neo-colonialism. One writes, "Too bad that these folks who call for this don't really care about Nigeria or they would understand the context of this law, instead of imposing American cultural thinking onto this country. And we wonder why internationals despise Americans so much. We think the entire world revolves around us—and so it does."

3. William and Mary puts the cross back in Wren Chapel
It's under a glass case away from the altar, so it won't hurt anybody. A disclaimer plaque explaining the college's historical Anglican roots (it's now a public university) will help reassure anyone who thinks it might actually mean something to the institution in this day and age.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 9 comments.See all comments
lensterling   Posted: March 18, 2007 7:33 PM
As far as the issue with Jars of Clay goes, the group must revisit their calling. Is it to spread the gospel of Jesus the Messiah, his death and resurrection to allow us to be saved from our sinful nature or is it to become involved in political activism? Young evangelicals sometimes find much difficulty in separating the two. Maybe Jars of Clay and the rest of us could benefit this; if you had a moment in time when you could tell the world anything you wanted to…and had an audience to present the message to…what would you say to them? Ideally, most believers would answer, “I would tell them about the saving power of Jesus Christ and provide them the opportunity to accept this priceless undeserved gift”. The truth is that we are not guaranteed tomorrow here on earth. We never know when that last chance to lead someone to the Lord is. We are the last chance many people have to hear the gospel! Jars of Clay, you have that moment to lead many lost people to the Lord…take it!

katie   Posted: March 14, 2007 7:53 PM
shame on you for your namecalling! jars isn't chicken, they've been honest with their fans about their believes before, i think it is more a matter or right timing. but you, man, you didn't act in a christlike way AT all

Fortunato   Posted: March 13, 2007 1:28 PM
It's a shame that Jars of Clay doesn't feel secure enough to share their real feelings with their brothers and sisters in Christ. It's also a shame that the Christian music industry (not just the corporations, but the private stories... AND the buying public) is polarized enough and unwilling to entertain contrasting points of view enough that Christians feel insecure about sharing the truth that they feel God has given them. Perhaps Ted Olsen's question came off poorly... but it's one we should be asking, if simply to remove obstacles to the Church's unity as the body of Christ. (It's also a shame that we've got a few trolls on here, trying to stir up controversy and dissent.)

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com