Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
July 9, 2009
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2007 > MayChristianity Today, May, 2007  |   |  
Bookmark and Author Q&A
Francis Schaeffer, the Pastor-Evangelist
Bryan A. Follis on his book, Truth with Love.



ADVERTISEMENT

Truth with Love: The Apologetics of Francis Schaeffer
Bryan A. Follis • Crossway • 208 pages • $15.99

Bryan A. Follis says an examination of Francis Schaeffer's books and his relationships at L'Abri reveals—contrary to his reputation—that Schaeffer was concerned about both truth and love. Follis quotes Schaeffer's remark that people must come to "understand that the gospel is truth … on the basis of good and sufficient reason," and also traces Schaeffer's emphasis on love to his 1951 "spiritual crisis" (involving dissatisfaction with his fundamentalist roots in the Bible Presbyterian Church).



Follis, rector of All Saints' Church, Belfast, Northern Ireland, zealously defends Schaeffer against the charge, leveled by Clark Pinnock and others, of overemphasizing reason. However, his rebuttal is clouded by inadequate definition of their critique.

Follis also resists Thomas V. Morris's contention that Schaeffer doesn't provide evidence adequate to support his claim that Christianity must be true. Morris objects to the must on the grounds that Schaeffer's arguments don't rule out all alternatives to Christianity. He thinks Schaeffer's arguments would be stronger if they instead demonstrated the possibility or plausibility of Christianity relative to other possible explanations of human experience.

Still, this book is valuable insofar as it shows the importance of Schaeffer's contributions despite the limitations of his methods and arguments. It would have been more effective if the author (who was brought back to Christ through a Schaeffer film series) had been more willing to acknowledge Schaeffer's shortcomings.

James E. Taylor; Professor of Philosophy, Westmont College

* * *

Q&A: Bryan A. Follis
Interview by Susan Wunderink

What made you write this book?

I had an interest in Francis Schaeffer for many years, going back to the time I was a university undergraduate. Initially, his apologetics drew me in. At this time, 20 years after his death, I thought maybe it was time for an evaluation and a look at both his apologetics and his spirituality.

How would you describe Schaeffer as a person? If we met him, what would he seem like to us?

Probably a bit strange. The knickers, goatee beard. A pretty intense individual, but an extremely caring individual. What I find fascinating is that when Schaeffer made it big in the 1970s and early 80s, when he was speaking in conferences of 5,000 and 7,000 people, his old slogan of "there are no little people, no little places" still rang true for him. So on one occasion, he was missing for a seminar. They couldn't find him, and they tracked back his movements to find Francis and Edith Schaeffer sharing with a chambermaid, sort of one of the junior staff at the hotel. Not an important person. But to him she was important, and I think that was part of the key to the man's success. People mattered. He was a kind, generally compassionate man, and his apologetics were a means of trying to reach people. They weren't simply a professional ministry tool. They flowed from his love for Christ and his real love for people.

What was Schaeffer's approach to truth?

Schaeffer himself came from a nominally Christian home. His family were blue-collar folk who had very nominal faith. He, actually an agnostic, came to faith when he was 18 through reading the Bible and comparing it with Greek philosophy. He became an evangelical Christian, but in later life, he became quite disillusioned through a spiritual crisis in his mid-30s at the lack of the truth being lived out. He looked around him at the fundamentalist movement, and people around him were arguing very strongly for evangelical biblical truth, against modernists, against liberals. Ends [were used] to justify the means—a complete lack of love. [The experience] brought him in a spiritual crisis back to the Bible and back to Christ working though the trustworthiness of Scripture and a renewed experience of Christ. His truth and love were both located in the personhood of Jesus Christ and then seeing this truth in Christ, the revelation of Scripture corresponding to reality. He took a look around the created order: It matches God's Word, and God's Word matches the creation, and he saw the two at work together.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 6 comments.See all comments
mk   Posted: May 24, 2007 8:35 AM
Reviewers sometimes fall into the trap of reviewing a book as if it were supposed to meet their expectations of the subject rather than the book that is actually written. I'm afraid that Mr. Taylor does that in his comment: "It would have been more effective if the author (who was brought back to Christ through a Schaeffer film series) had been more willing to acknowledge Schaeffer's shortcomings." To criticize the book for failing to address the "limitations of his [Schaeffer's] methods and arguments" or to cite a theological weathervane like Clark Pinnock --the intellectual antithesis of Schaeffer-- as an authority on the deficiency of Schaeffer's thinking reveals the reviewer's own deeply flawed thinking. As an opinion piece from a partisan perspective, it's adequate; as a review for a general readership, it's terrible.

Ron Kubsch   Posted: May 24, 2007 12:15 AM
Yes Robert, it is necessary to read primary sources. In the matter of Kierkegaard it is essential to read Kierkegaard (and Hegel). I have read most of the books of Kierkegaard including his diaries (and the important new biography of Joakim Garff). Again: Schaeffers later understanding of Kierkegaard is quite adequate. Kierkegaard’s subjective understanding of truth was a source of inspiration for Heidegger, Camus, Brunner, Bultmann, Niebuhr and Barth.

Robert   Posted: May 23, 2007 12:25 PM
Why should anyone be required to read a little known secondary source in German when you can read the primary source material in English. As a young man I read all of Schaeffer's books not realizing that he relied on anecdote and other people's understanding of the philosophical works he criticized (something that became painfully obvious when I read the primary source materials that he critiqued). Schaeffer's early works God Who Is There, Escape From Reason and He is There and He is Not Silent, rather than his later works are quite helpful in their call for believers to resist compartmentalizing their lives, but as philosophical works they are completely deficent, unannotated (as I recall there is not a single footnote in these 3 volumes) and unfortunately reduce the Christian faith to a set of propositional truths (extracted from their narrative context as if the Christian faith were simply a philosophical position rather than a dynamic relationship with a living God) to believe.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Church Office Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com