Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
May 13, 2008
Free E-mail Newsletters:
RSS Feed | More Feeds | RSS Help

Home > 2008 > April (Web-only)Christianity Today, April (Web-only), 2008  |   |  
REVIEW
Colson the Catechist
A culture warrior sets out to explain Christianity's essential doctrines.



ADVERTISEMENT
The Faith: Given Once, For All: What Christians Believe, Why They Believe It, and Why It Matters
By Charles Colson and Harold Fickett
Zondervan, February 2008
240 pp., $18.99

Most Christians in the West lack the doctrinal and theological tools with which to stand fast in the onslaught of two hostile forces: Western secularism and Islamofascism. So say Charles Colson and his frequent coauthor Harold Fickett in The Faith, a book that celebrates the Christian faith's essential doctrines, beliefs held by Christians "everywhere, always, by all." Colson and Fickett believe that Christians are living in a unique time of special opposition: "Western culture is doing everything in its power to shut the door" by which humans pass from darkness to light. Only a robust reaffirmation of the essentials of Christian doctrine, they say, will provide a firm foundation for political and social engagement.

The first half of The Faith emphasizes what Christians believe about God, namely the reasons for his existence, his self-revelation to human beings, his triune nature, and the actions he has taken to defeat evil. The second half focuses on how our beliefs about God influence our beliefs about everything else, with Colson and Fickett articulating the Christian understanding of saving faith, reconciliation and forgiveness, the mission and nature of the church, sanctity of life, and so on. The result is a winning combination of Christian apologetics and Christian doctrine — a manifesto for looking at the world in a distinctly Christian way.

The authors not only see assaults on Christianity as external; they also warn against movements from within the church that they believe could undermine Christianity. Although they admit that much of the Emergent movement's protest of contemporary evangelicalism is on target, the authors critique what they see as the movement's prescription: a rejection of absolute truth. This, they say, will inevitably lead to idolatry. In attempting to maintain the propositional nature of Christianity's truth claims, however, Colson and Fickett define the Bible as "revealed propositional truth," which seems to relegate all truth to propositions and leaves little room for the narrative nature of Scripture.

It's ironic that Colson and Fickett argue for truth as propositional above all else, because what sets this book apart from other doctrinal primers, like C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity or N. T. Wright's Simply Christian, is its emphasis on stories. The Faith is moved along by stories more than by systematic theology (though there's plenty of the latter in the book as well). Colson and Fickett bring together stories of courage and martyrdom from the annals of Christian history as well as riveting accounts of personal transformation from Colson's Prison Fellowship ministry. The contemporary stories help readers see what the Christian life looks like today. The ancient stories remind us that we are not the first generation of Christians to live this way.

The stories aren't just inspirational. They're informative. The chapter on the Trinity, for example, begins by presenting Muslim evangelists who focus their efforts on convincing college-aged Christians to doubt the doctrine.

Like Mere Christianity and Simply Christian, The Faith is ecumenical, celebrating the tenets of Christian orthodoxy affirmed in the ecumenical creeds of the early church and accepted by all Christians today.

Such an outlook is evidenced by the book's inclusion of several quotes from the official statements of Evangelicals and Catholics Together, an ecumenical initiative to which Colson has contributed. The upside of Colson's involvement with ECT is that he is deeply committed to pursuing unity with other Christians. The downside is that he tends to overstate ECT's ecumenical implications, suggesting there is broad agreement between Catholics and Protestants, when in fact, the joint statements do not reflect the official positions of the Roman Catholic Church or the major Protestant denominations.





E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 11 comments.See all comments
Chuck   Posted: April 08, 2008 10:10 PM
Satan delights in division. Anything that fights division and seeks to unify Christians with the sum and substance of the faith cannot be a bad premise. What we share as Christians is more than the points on which we differ. And the points we share are far more important than the areas of difference. Any book which helps to make that clear cannot be bad. Colson may be a bit moe enaging for the average Christian than Wright. The book that gets read is the most effective.

Robert   Posted: April 09, 2008 9:14 AM
Barclay - the ironic aspect of your comment isn't your thought I'm angry (amusing pseudo psychoanalyst), but that you seem to think that whether I have written a book, or host a media show, is relevant to my critique. This is strictly an ad hominem argument. My point is that: Colson is not a theologian; he doesn't have the skill to intelligently interact with the biblical texts in their original language; he doesn't he have a firm grasp of Christian history or the history of theology; he seems unaware that the battles once fought against secularism and modernity are over, having been replaced by a post-modernity that is not hostile per se to the metaphysical; and that Islamofascism is something that the neocons made up, does not exist, has no creed, tenets, or over arching philosophy. Colson is given to the polemic. To my knowledge, Ficket is a novelist of sorts and former pastor, not a theologian. The real question is when you could read Wright, why bother with Colson. Nuff Said!

Ephrem Hagos   Posted: April 15, 2008 7:30 AM
There is nothing whatsoever about Christianity which is true, or good, or beneficial for the world without firsthand knowledge of Jesus Christ as provided for in His ministry. This is the central focus of the new covenant as divinely committed (Jer. 31: 31-34), taught throughout in Discipleship Training and confirmed appropriately at Jesus' death on the cross (Matt. 26: 26-29). This can be verified in the end chapters of the four Gospels by one eye-witness (John), one trained but scared disciple(Matthew) and two reporters (Mark and Luke). More than any outside influence, what is undermining Christianity is its own great, obvious omission and literal consequence of the Parable of the Weeds (Matt. 13: 24-30). If we search the Scriptures for the hard evidence of the identity of Jesus Christ, "Christianity" will begin to make real sense. If not, it will continue to prove more and more worthless!!!!!!!!!

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search





















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christian History & Biography
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Ignite Your Faith
Leadership Journal
Marriage Partnership
Men of Integrity
Today's Christian
Today's Christian Woman
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com