Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
February 10, 2010
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2008 > AugustChristianity Today, August, 2008  |   |  
Reading in Good Faith
The Shack is a tale of tragedy redeemed, not a theological treatise.



ADVERTISEMENT

Exclusive for CT Online readers: Download chapter one of The Shack by William P. Young, free from Oasis Audio and powered by Audible.com.

Over the past year, word-of-mouth sales of William P. Young's The Shack have made it a feel-good story of the publishing world. As of this writing, the book with an initial $300 marketing budget sits atop The New York Times list of paperback trade fiction titles. The story behind its publication and success is, by everyone's account, remarkable.

But the story between its covers has elicited strong reaction, ranging from effusive praise to trenchant critiques labeling it theologically "dangerous" and "subversive." The bulk of The Shack consists of conversations between a beat-down, middle-aged adult male named Mack(enzie) and three figures who represent the Trinity: a large African American woman named Papa, a Jewish laborer named Jesus, and an ethereal Asian woman named Sarayu (Sanskrit for "wind"). The conversations take place in a remote shack in eastern Oregon, the exact spot of the greatest tragedy in Mack's life. The "great sadness" brought on by this event still blankets Mack's existence when he receives a mysterious invitation to return there.

The Shack's most prominent critics see troubling theological claims inherent in the story. Some argue, for example, that its Trinity is modalistic, others that the book is anti-church.

If charitably conducted, this type of conversation can be helpful. Theologians' sensibilities are fine-tuned by close listening, especially to works that don't always strike the right note. Christian orthodoxy was born of attention to small but crucial differences, yea, even jots and tittles.

Yet in order to give a work a fair hearing, we have an obligation to engage it on its own terms. A "good faith" reading of The Shack involves, among other things, attending to Young's reasons for writing, his intended audience, and its particular literary form.

Young says he wrote the book at his wife's prodding, to explain his 11-year journey of healing with God to their six children. The "shack" in Young's story represents deep personal wounds, both suffered and inflicted. The book is spiritual autobiography (in one web interview, Young says Mack is "basically me") cast in an alternative world, an imaginative attempt to condense 11 years into a weekend of conversations. These are words offered by a 53-year-old father to his children, a fictionalized tale of his relationship with God mended in deep darkness.

Therefore, it's tricky to speak definitively of The Shack's theology. Young could have written a theological treatise, a spiritual memoir, or even a long poem. Instead, he wrote what he calls a "parable" (not an allegory). That should give readers pause about confidently reading off a systematic theology from the book.

Don't get me wrong; The Shack clearly does theological work. The dialogue between Mack and the trinity of figures is bold and brutally honest, and Young's willingness to put certain statements in the mouth of God mark him as audacious (and some would say foolish). Theologically attuned readers of all confessional stripes are likely to find themselves cringing on occasion.

Still, as the back cover of the book clearly indicates, The Shack is mostly a story of a soul wrestling with a perennial human question: Where is God in a world so filled with unspeakable pain? In navigating this question, Young takes on a host of common—and he believes mistaken—beliefs about God's nature and character, human agency and suffering, and salvation. The responses he offers are a mixed bag—some spot on and freshly articulated, others disputed and unoriginal, and others—well, they'll make you cringe.

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 29 comments.See all comments
Kevin   Posted: July 17, 2008 10:06 AM
The author pictures the Father bearing crucifixion scars as well as being incarnated in tandem with the Holy Spirit. Not only so, but he pontificates that Jesus has never drawn upon His nature as God to do anything. Of course those who have read the Bible even once will immediately recognize the falsity of that statement, particularly with respect to the resurrection of Jesus Christ. The author also has Jesus - the Jew with the big nose - declaring "I am not a Christian and I have no desire to make them" - and the them is Buddhists, Mormons, Muslims, etc. - "Christians." Indeed, Young describes Christians as religious fanatics and part of a sinful world system. Of course in sharp distinction the followers of Christ adopted the word "Christian" in the midst of suffering and persecution. You can see examples of that in the Book of Acts written by Luke or by Peter, such as 1 Peter 4:16.

merry   Posted: July 15, 2008 11:22 AM
I thought the book was very moving and gave a person pause to think about his own faith, look at the world we live in, and God's instruction for us to love one another. If everyone would have this kind of love, what a wonderful world we would live in. I guess now we just have to wait for God's kingdom for that kind of love, or do we?............

Cody   Posted: July 15, 2008 11:08 AM
You must read wind blown medias defense of the shack titled "Is The Shack Heresy" in it you will find that the Authors wrote everything they know about God in it and the writing of the book actually helped shape the theology of all three involved. So yes this book can be used to test the theology of the Authors and publishers.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com