Franklin Graham: What's the Fuss About?
President-elect Barack Obama chose California megachurch pastor Rick Warren to give the invocation at the January 20 inauguration, igniting fury from same-sex marriage advocates and progressives.
Obama and Warren both defended their decisions to reach across the aisle, even though the future president and megachurch pastor. Evangelist Franklin Graham was in the hot seat once after he prayed in Jesus' name at President Bush's inauguration in 2001. He spoke with Christianity Today about his reaction to Obama's decision and his advice for Warren.
Were you surprised that Obama chose Rick Warren to give the invocation at his inauguration?
No, not at all. Rick Warren had invited President-elect Obama two years ago to his AIDS forum, and, of course, he held the unofficial debate at his church with Obama and Sen. McCain. Rick demonstrated to Obama that he's a friend, but at the same time, he's not going to change his convictions. I think he's a natural and many people will appreciate Rick Warren being there. I think he's a great choice. He's a Southern Baptist. He believes the Bible the way I believe it.
Rick Warren seems to be taking criticism from both sides, from same-sex marriage advocates and from evangelicals who say he should not pray at Obama's inauguration. You filled this role at President Bush's inauguration in 2001, and your father has also played this role. Did you face the same challenges?
President Bush was sued because I prayed in the name of Jesus. Eventually that suit was thrown out. But any time you take a stand for Christ, it's going to be controversial. Rick Warren is a man of God. He is a preacher of the gospel of Jesus Christ. The people on the far left hate God, they hate his standards, and hate the name of his son. The people on the left are not going to support any relationship with people on the other side. Barack Obama has shown he's going to reach across these boundaries. He is including evangelicals at his inauguration, but I don't know if he'll include them in his administration. Time will tell. But Rick Warren will have Obama's ear on important issues.
Does Warren's acceptance of the invitation give an implicit nod to Obama's administration?
I don't agree with everything that George Bush has done. I don't agree with everything he believes. When I accepted the invitation, it didn't mean I agreed with President Bush. I was there to talk to God, to lead the nation in a prayer for our president. We're called in Scripture to pray for those in leadership. For anybody to be upset at Rick Warren for offering a prayer to almighty God, asking God to give wisdom and guidance to the Obama administration, is ludicrous.
The criticism directed at Warren has been targeted at his stance against same-sex marriage. Should evangelicals take such a public stance against it?
It is scriptural. Rick Warren or Franklin Graham or any other preacher of the gospel has no choice but to warn people of what God says. Any type of sexual relations outside of marriage between a man and a woman is a sin against God. It's very serious. God is going to judge sin, and Rick Warren is taking a stand against gay marriage. He was absolutely right, because that's God's position.
I just know what Rick Warren believes, that homosexuality is a sin, and it's a sin against God. God forgives sin. For God to forgive sin, the sinner has to repent and turn from their sin, acknowledge Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, and follow him in obedience. A person can't say, "I'm going to follow Jesus and sin"; he can't do that. God will forgive a homosexual and all of us as sinners. Franklin Graham is a sinner, but I've asked God for forgiveness, and I've turned away from it. When I do sin, I have to ask God for forgiveness and that he will cleanse me.
Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness
Starting a Dialogue with Hip-Hop
The Latest in Movie News, June 17, 2013
It's the Thoughts That Count
(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Newsletters
Google
Comments
Displaying 1–3 of 28 comments
See all comments
Dmarie65
The woman caught in adultery was saved from death as Jesus asked those ready to stone her, "you without sin throw the first stone" as you know the onlookers cast down their stones and walked away. The key words Jesus spoken to this woman were"Go and sin no more. That messagae has not changed, Jesus tells us when we come into a relationshipo with Him to SIN NO MORE! gay's and lesbians are people often wounded, in childhood, they turn from the pain and anger of their sexual abuse and try to create a "love" relationship because by nature they have been so hurt they can't bear a true relationship. I say what Jesus said. Acknowledge your pain and the sins committed against you, but SIN NO MORE. Jesus came to save us from our sins, not to leave us bound by them. Jesus said "If you love me then obey me"! wHEN WE TRULY lOVE THE lORD WE WILL OBEY hIM AND NOT SEEK TO CHANGE hIS hOLY WORD TO MEET OUR OWN LUSTFUL DESIRES.
Duane in North Carolina
Perhaps MJ does love Jesus but does not hold to the teachings of Jesus and his followers, nor respects or honors Old Testament teaching, to which the biblical Christian church honors as the Word of God. The Jewish religion also recognizes the homosexual act as sin. Not everything biblically hangs off the sin of homosexuallity, but it is a sin amongst others. I am guessing but MJ probably has a heart to love, just like Jesus does, but is confused by including the acceptance of a lifestyle of sin. Yes, we shouldn't cast the sinner aside and only hang with "the righteous!" Christ said he didn't come for the righteous but he never accepted the sin or he came to die for nothing. I want to love and hope to grow more loving, but I don't want to start to believe a lie as if it were the truth because society says I am hateful and is accepting this into the mainstream. The truth biblically states this is a sin and living a lifestyle of sin does seperate you from God. Not my words!
Steve Skeete
I agree with Franklin Graham: any union not between a man and a woman is unscriptural. The apostle Paul says that in order to avoid fornication "every man should have his own "wife" and every woman should have her own "husband". If same sex individuals want to get "married" that is their business, but let them leave the Bible out of it, the only "support" they will get from the Bible is the one they concoct. And if the worst thing that can be said against Rick Warren is that he is against homosexual "marriage", then I say good for him, because so are all those who are willing to allow the Bible to say what it means and not what they would like it to mean. My word to those who support homosexuality is that you do not need the Chrisian Bible to give your belief respectability, because there is nothing respectable about it. And another thing, what if were true that heterosexuals had made a mess of marriage? Exactly how will homosexual "marriage" clean up the mess?