Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 12, 2012

Home > 2009 > January (Web-only)Christianity Today, January (Web-only), 2009
Richard John Neuhaus: Witness to Truth
A First Things junior fellow remembers the man whose life was spent 'witnessing to the truth.'




I was a high-school kid when I first "met" Father Richard John Neuhaus. I can never remember how I came across the website of First Things, but when I did, it was like a light switch had been turned on in my head. Here was an entire cosmos of Christian thought and tradition, with worlds upon worlds contained in the hallways it pointed me down. I spent countless nights poring over issues, drinking it all in like water in a desert. At the time, I probably didn't understand half of it, but that didn't matter — the depth and breadth of the Christian tradition in those pages, the sheer excitement of thinking through the adventure of the gospel — I knew I had found something that was worth a lifetime. And I very well remember thinking: Wouldn't it be something to write this stuff myself someday?

Three years later, that is exactly where I ended up: working and writing at First Things as a junior fellow. I was in charge of compiling Father Neuhaus's monthly column, "The Public Square," and pretty soon was drafted into covering the Anglican beat for the website as well. Every evening, the editors gathered for prayer at 338 E 19th St., and each Friday night was dinner at Father Neuhaus's apartment. His apartment was something of a revolving door of old friends: Avery Cardinal Dulles, George Weigel, Robert Louis Wilken, Michael Novak — the list goes on.

Board meetings and gatherings of Evangelicals and Catholics Together brought even more friends and comrades-in-arms, such as Chuck Colson, Robert George, Mary Ann Glendon, David Novak, David Bentley Hart, and Robert Jenson. Every so often, I had to pinch myself: I'm a farm kid from North Dakota. What the heck am I doing here?

But Father Neuhaus was unfailingly generous, to me and everyone around him. He spent hours listening carefully to my undoubtedly half-baked apologias for Anglicanism, answering my long list of questions (theological, political, personal — you name it), patiently working with my writing, giving advice, praying with me, and generally being a good guy.

People sometimes forget that before he was a writer and a national figure, Father Neuhaus was a pastor. First Things was a ministry of love for him.

He was a man who had the ears of Presidents, professors, and popes. But he also had time for me. I don't know if I was ever able to tell him how much his encouragement and example meant to me, but it meant the world.

It's hard to know where to begin talking about Father Neuhaus's accomplishments.

For one thing, he brought people together that few others could. Evangelicals and Catholics Together was only one in a long string of discussion groups he led throughout his career. The conversation that centered on First Things was, in large part, a fruit of his many friendships and endless intellectual zeal. I learned from him that sharp disagreement did not preclude friendship; for him, it was simply the respect due to the truth. He once told me that his friendship with Stanley Hauerwas consisted of a "30-year argument." Although the disagreement was at times very sharp, he never seemed to consider it as anything less than a respectful argument between friends.

Of course, Father Neuhaus was well known for his rapier wit and criticism. When I asked him about it once, thinking that a particular instance of it was going a bit far, he explained, "Sometimes, people just aren't aware of the nonsense they are spouting. And I see it as my job to point it out to them." His point, as I understood, was that some "arguments" can really only be responded to with satire.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 12 comments

John Paul

January 13, 2009  7:00pm

As a theologically educated Evangelical who bacame Catholic, I can see that there is so much ignorance as to the source, ancientness, and reasons for Catholic beliefs. If Catholics are not Christians, then there weren't any Christians for centuries. Catholics teach what they do because they are dedicated to preserving the original deposit of Faith and understanding its implications. To reject a doctrinal idea because it cannot be found in one's narrow interpretation of Scripture is one thing. To say that Christians who embrace historical orthodox Christianity are not even Christians is quite another. So many Evangelicals let their traditions blind them to the truth. What a shame. Fr. Neuhaus did much to try to open up dialogue on these issues so that the ignorance could cease. If one wants to understand Catholicism, do not trust ex-Catholics and Protestant books to explain it. Go to good sources. See what the early Fathers taught, etc.

Eddie Settles

January 13, 2009  6:16pm

As a deeply committed evangelical Protestant all my life I find Father Neuhaus' essay on why he went to Rome very, very attractive. If Jesus did truly call us all to be one (and I'm sure He did), then Richard John Neuhaus is one who spent his life seeking that unity in our Lord. May God be good to him.

Maryann

January 13, 2009  5:15pm

How unfortunate that Eric and Rev. are so filled with hatred, condemnation and judgement about a branch of Christianity that they obviously know nothing about. The Catholic liturgy is scripture from start to finish (attend one if you dare) with nearly every word taken from the Word of God. They spew misinformation, but then so do many of my fellow Catholics, and in doing so, both accomplish very little other than to show ignorance and intolerance. Catholicism embraces faith and reason and many deviations are personal failures, not Church doctrine. We all will be judged by the light that we are given, and thank God for that. There are a lot of dim Christian bulbs out there and that includes all denominations.

Rev. D. Philip Veitch

January 13, 2009  2:36pm

Theologically, the ECT dialogue is a vocal, substantial, and unfortunate expression of the weakening of evangelicalism. Serious Romanist thinkers could not follow Neuhaus's dubious effort. Serious and educated Protestant Churchmen--Lutheran, Reformed, Presbyterian, Confessional Anglican, Reformed Baptist--could follow Neuhaus's surreptitious efforts to forge a theological coalition. Jim Packer erred. Bill Bright did not have a Reformational Gospel. Pat Robertson, while a marvellous organizer, is an illiterate, theologically. Same for Chuck Colson. The Roman Gospel is another gospel for those with eyes to read Romans and Galatians carefully. The Roman practices of invocation of the saints, Requiem Masses for the dead to mitigate Purgatory time, sacerdotal magic in seven sacraments, the supremacistic verison of Petrine supremacy, pilgrimmages, pardons, relics, indulgences, the treasury of merit, baptismal regeneration, etc., ARE standard Roman teachings. False.

J F Norris

January 13, 2009  9:50am

OK without mentioning any (user)names here who left the door open long enough to let the Fundy blow in?

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com