The Justification Debate: A Primer
The Gospel
Piper: The heart of the gospel is the good news that Christ died for our sins and was raised from the dead. What makes this good news is that Christ's death accomplished a perfect righteousness before God and suffered a perfect condemnation from God, both of which are counted as ours through faith alone, so that we have eternal life with God in the new heavens and the new earth.
Wright: The gospel is the royal announcement that the crucified and risen Jesus, who died for our sins and rose again according to the Scriptures, has been enthroned as the true Lord of the world. When this gospel is preached, God calls people to salvation, out of sheer grace, leading them to repentance and faith in Jesus Christ as the risen Lord.
How This Happens
Piper: By faith we are united with Christ Jesus so that in union with him, his perfect righteousness and punishment are counted as ours (imputed to us). In this way, perfection is provided, sin is forgiven, wrath is removed, and God is totally for us. Thus, Christ alone is the basis of our justification, and the faith that unites us to him is the means or instrument of our justification. Trusting in Christ as Savior, Lord, and Supreme Treasure of our lives produces the fruit of love, or it is dead.
Wright: God himself, in the person of Jesus Christ (the faithful Israelite), has come, allowing the continuation of his plan to rescue human beings, and, through them, the world. The Messiah represents his people, standing in for them, taking upon himself the death that they deserved. God justifies (declares righteous) all those who are "in Christ," so that the vindication of Jesus upon his resurrection becomes the vindication of all those who trust in him. Justification refers to God's declaration of who is in the covenant (this worldwide family of Abraham through whom God's purposes can now be extended into the wider world) and is made on the basis of faith in Jesus Christ alone, not the "works of the Law" (i.e., badges of ethnic identity that once kept Jews and Gentiles apart).
Future Justification
Piper: Present justification is based on the substitutionary work of Christ alone, enjoyed in union with him through faith alone. Future justification is the open confirmation and declaration that in Christ Jesus we are perfectly blameless before God. This final judgment accords with our works. That is, the fruit of the Holy Spirit in our lives will be brought forward as the evidence and confirmation of true faith and union with Christ. Without that validating transformation, there will be no future salvation.
Wright: Present justification is the announcement issued on the basis of faith and faith alone of who is part of the covenant family of God. The present verdict gives the assurance that the verdict announced on the Last Day will match it; the Holy Spirit gives the power through which that future verdict, when given, will be seen to be in accordance with the life that the believer has then lived.
Copyright © 2009 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
Related Elsewhere:
The article was posted today with Not an Academic Question.
The Future of Justification: A Response to N.T. Wright and Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision are available at ChristianBook.com and other book retailers.
Previous Christianity Today articles on the topic of justification include:
Christ Alone | Why indulgences are still a bad idea. (June 1, 2009)
It's Not Broke, So Fix It | New EFCA statement of faith clarifies positions on controversial doctrines. (July 14, 2008)
What Did Paul Really Mean? | 'New perspective' scholars argue that we need, well, a new perspective on justification by faith. (August 10, 2007)
Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 36 comments
See all comments
G P
I haven't read either of the author's works, I'm afraid, but based on this synopsis of their arguments I don't understand what the discrepancy is. I see both sides as complimentary rather than contradictory: different Scriptures are referenced on each side, and they don't seem to be explicitly antagonizing one another. Perhaps this article is an over-simplification of the issues or the perspectives of each author, but I can't see what the debate is over. Can anyone explain this to me?
Daniel
Dave N. - Where is this "misunderstanding" of the 1st Century Jews that Piper has? Could you please elaborate?
Dave N.
Very helpful summary. It seems were Piper gets off track is in his misunderstanding of 1st Cen. Judaism. On the other hand, Wright seems to have a very clear understanding of the letter to the Galatians--at least from what we are provided here.