Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
November 9, 2009
Free Newsletters:
RSS Feeds | Audio | Twitter

Home > 2009 > March (Web-only)Christianity Today, March (Web-only), 2009  |   |  
Does Faith Prolong Suffering for Cancer Patients?
A new study suggests that cancer patients who are religious are more likely to seek measures that attempt to prolong life.



ADVERTISEMENT

Two years ago, Kevin Brumett was diagnosed with lung cancer. He was 29, and had never smoked in his life. After an initial round of successful treatment, the cancer has since spread to his brain.

Still, Brumett is determined to fight the disease, and says God is on his side every step of the way. He hopes his fight can help others who share his condition.

"It's not right that people get cancer," says Brumett, from Newton, Mass. "God is giving me the strength to fight this as hard and as long as I possibly can."

Cancer fighters such as Brumett, who employ faith in their battle against the deadly disease, are often able to adjust psychologically to a serious illness, according to several studies. But new research suggests they may also be more likely to exacerbate their own suffering in the final days of life and to leave behind caregivers who have a hard time adjusting to bereavement.

A recent study in the Journal of the American Medical Association finds that cancer patients who use "positive religious coping," or collaborating with God to overcome illness, are more likely to seek heroic measures in an attempt to prolong life. These religious patients were three times more likely to opt for mechanical ventilation and other intensive procedures in their last week of life.

Researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston had thought that religious patients would opt for more aggressive care at the end of life, but were nonetheless a bit surprised by the results.

Because religious patients often trust in God's sovereignty and an afterlife, "one might expect them to be more accepting of death and let nature take its course at the end of life, rather than pursuing very aggressive treatments," said Dr. Andrea Phelps, lead author on the study and senior medical resident at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital in Boston. Such a view, she said, reflects a commonly held assumption about how religious patients approach the prospect of imminent death.

But, Phelps added, a few reasons might help explain why religious cancer patients commonly opt for aggressive care in their final days. Among the possibilities:

—faith leads to optimism, even when a prognosis is bleak;

—faith gives purpose to suffering, and in turn helps patients muster stamina for invasive treatments;

—beliefs about sanctity of life may give rise to a quest to prolong life at almost any cost.

"We were concerned" by the study's findings, Phelps said. "We are worried because aggressive care, at least among cancer patients, is a difficult and burdensome treatment that medically doesn't usually provide a whole lot of benefit."

To be sure, not everyone who looks to God for help in battling cancer is determined to prolong life even at great cost. Tad Woodhull, a 75-year-old boat dealer in Owls Head, Maine, believes "God has protected me for some reason" in two bouts with cancer over the past 25 years. But he also watched his brother endure a "miserable" final six months in aggressively battling lung cancer, and has resolved not to experience the same.

"I would go with faith rather than put myself and my family through a version of hell," says Woodhull, an Episcopalian. In a late stage and bleak situation, he said he'd decline invasive medical options and instead trust God with his soul.

For many, leaning on God involves enduring optional treatments that take a weighty toll.

Bill Wilson of Flattop Mountain, Tenn., has felt "God had something more for me to do" since he was diagnosed with stomach cancer in 2005, according to an open letter from his wife, Nancye Wilson. Since chemotherapy treatments began, they've experienced "a life that we in our wildest nightmares couldn't have imagined."

share this pageshare this page



E-mail this pageWrite CTPrint this articlePost a comment





  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

[Reader Reviews]
Average User Rating: 

Displaying 1 - 3 of 12 comments.See all comments
Glenn Penner   Posted: April 02, 2009 1:51 PM
As someone who is actually dying of cancer, I have chosen the route of giving instructions not to not to resuscitate me should my heart stop or put me on a ventilator if I should stop breathing, or to put me on artificial life support due to medical circumstances related to my cancer. It was (and is) not an easy decision but I think it is the right one. For the Christian, life is more than life. Of course, I would love to do more, especially as I love my ministry to persecuted Christians around the world (I am CEO of The Voice of the Martyrs in Canada) but I also think that this ministry has also helped prepare me for my own path of suffering; a path that has only deepened my walk with God.

donna guzman   Posted: March 30, 2009 4:01 PM
I don't understand 'heroic' measures at all, except perhaps for a child. If a person really and truly believes in God, why would you want to prolong this life instead of accepting the reality of a terminal disease? I've gone through this 3 times with different family members and nothing good really ever comes of heroic measures, maybe a few months extra to lay in a bed and be very sick, and where is the joy in that for the caregivers and family. What kind of 'testimony' is it when we do everything possible NOT to be with the Lord? I wonder a lot about this subject and the experiences I've had. And I agree that the financial cost can keep a lot of others from getting even basic care.

M   Posted: March 27, 2009 2:46 PM
Colson's comments against the JAMA study misunderstand the data. First, if 14% of religious copers are seeking aggressive care at the end of life, this is a sizable and large population of people -- in the millions. This is not a statistical blip. Second, the JAMA study only follows three measures in the last week of life (death in an ICU, CPR, ventilation). But what happens when the measures are expanded to 2-4 weeks or 2-3 months? What happens when you expand definitions of "heroic" to include receiving chemo, etc.? That 14% is going to vastly increase to 30%+. Imagine 30% of Christians who are terminally ill and still receiving aggressive care at EOL -- it is troublesome and requires a major response from church leaders.

The allotted time for commenting has ended.

sponsors 








[Browse More Christianity Today]

Search






















Search by Name
Or use Advanced Search to search by program, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!

Search by:





Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Outcomes
Kyria.com
Your Church
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com