Leaders Issue 'A Call of Christian Conscience'
Christian leaders reaffirmed their conservative stances on abortion, same-sex marriage, and religious liberty with a 4,700-word declaration released Friday.
Signed initially by 125 evangelical, Catholic, and Orthodox leaders, the Manhattan Declaration calls Christians to adhere to three primary convictions, even if this requires civil disobedience. Charles Colson, who helped draft the declaration, said the statement brings Christian leaders together on the issues of abortion, marriage, and religious freedom in the face of growing pressure.
"There are three issues that are foundational to a Christian perspective and society," Colson told Christianity Today. "It was important for us to ground all of our moral concerns in the three foundational truths."
Christian leaders realized they needed to come together and reaffirm their positions as a group, Princeton University professor Robert George said.
"We have all three levels of government committed to pro-choice views," George said. "[President] Obama has pledged he'll expand access to abortion, the Congress is now firmly in the hands of those who support legal abortion, and then of course in the Supreme Court there is still a 5-to-4 majority in favor of constitutional rights to abortion."
President Obama has also pledged to abolish the Defense of Marriage Act, and in his first year in office, he signed a bill expanding the federal hate crimes law to include homosexuality and lifted bans on the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.
Drafters of the declaration met informally last January with about 150 Christians concerned with biblical orthodoxy. The statement was completed in September and signed over the last few weeks.
"We are Christians who have joined together across historic lines of ecclesial differences to affirm our right — and, more importantly, to embrace our obligation — to speak and act in defense of these truths," the declaration states. "We pledge to each other, and to our fellow believers, that no power on earth, be it cultural or political, will intimidate us into silence or acquiescence."
George and Colson said other issues more recently embraced by Christians — such as care for the environment — are secondary to the Big Three of abortion, traditional marriage, and religious freedom.
"What's different about these areas is that they're foundational," George said. "They are basic principles as Christians understand them."
Signers include Jim Daly, president of Focus on the Family, and Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. Names of Sojourners founder Jim Wallis and California megachurch pastor Rick Warren do not appear on the list of signers, but their spokespeople said they were out of the country on Friday. Florida megachurch pastor Joel Hunter was also absent from the list, but he was out of the office and did not return requests for comment on Friday.
On Tuesday, U.S. Catholic Bishops announced a new document emphasizing that marriage is an institution that can't be defined by the state.
Catholic leaders wanted to focus their message on marriage, explaining it as a natural partnership that existed before the Bible was written, George said.
"For the first time in history, we're talking about redefining marriage," he said. "So the bishops now in this new challenge are making the point that marriage is not something the state creates. Not only does marriage predate the state, marriage predates the church."
Copyright © 2009 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 127 comments
See all comments
David Hardy
And so it grows....To "Christian Lawyer".... Once again, when you are definitively proven wrong... This is just flatly wrong... You completely misunderstand the law... your willingness to disavow what you said in printed word is staggering. And your (mis)understanding of basic legal principles is boundless -- pretty much as messed up as your failure to understand the basic concept of "precedent" last year. No, no, no! The first part of this is false and the second part is just ludicrous....That's sheer idiocy.... That's willful blindness.... If you were really all about "Truth," I should think you'd stick to actual facts, rather than fantasy.... Actually, I just quoted what you said....
David Hardy
To "Christian Lawyer".... Once again, when you are definitively proven wrong... This is just flatly wrong... You completely misunderstand the law... No, no, no! The first part of this is false and the second part is just ludicrous....That's sheer idiocy.... That's willful blindness.... If you were really all about "Truth," I should think you'd stick to actual facts, rather than fantasy.... Actually, I just quoted what you said....
Truthmeister
In reference to my commentary CL said: "what you alleged was that there was no spate of crime that precipitated the hate crimes bills in the first place." That's ABSOLUTE GARBAGE. CL, if you had any shame you would be ashamed for stating such a lie and apologize. Obviously, something precipitated the legislation. I'm thinking of the Mathew Shepard "hate crime" (which may NOT have been a hate crime). What I said was that hate crime legislation was not necessary and may even be detrimental. In reference to the 1st amendment CL said: "It doesn't have anything to do with prohibiting or criminalizing the conduct of individuals." My comment related to the fact that the courts have interpreted the 1st amendment to have restrictions. Ergo, the 1st amendment has been interpreted to not be absolute (i.e., it has implied prohibitions). And you seriously want people to believe you are a credible lawyer?? Give it up. Go on over to Daily Kos and joust with your ideological kindred.