Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 16, 2012

Home > 2010 > February (Web-Only)Christianity Today, February (Web-Only), 2010
Political Advocacy Tracker
Health Care Reform's Final Round?
Sojourners and Evangelicals for Social Action fight for "health care justice"; other groups urge starting over. Plus, conservatives grow frustrated by libertarians and coddlers of killer whales.




Political Advocacy Tracker is a roundup of what Christian activist organizations have been talking about over the last week.

Bipartisan Brawl

The President and congressional leaders met Thursday for a "bipartisan" health care summit. Democrats said reform could not wait any longer; Republicans wanted to start over and move incrementally. Political advocacy groups jumped into the fray, often echoing partisan talking points.

Sojourners and Evangelicals for Social Action joined other religious groups in sending an open letter to President Obama. The letter was included in an advertisement in the Washington political newspaper The Hill.

"As people of faith, we envision a society where every person is afforded health, wholeness and human dignity. … Let us not delay health care justice any longer," admonished the signatories.

Jim Wallis, president of Sojourners, repeated the call for action on his God's Politics blog. "Inaction on health care is not an option; too many lives depend on it," said Wallis.

"People of faith won't give up, and they're going to keep galvanizing around the urgent need for reform that makes quality healthcare accessible and affordable for all American families," added Dan Nejfelt of Faith in Public Life. "There's too much at stake to let this opportunity slip away."

Other advocacy groups sided with the Republican call to scrap Obama's plan and begin anew.

"It's time to start over and adhere to time-tested American convictions: The Constitution matters, market-based changes work, big government is dangerous and inefficient—and the bedrock belief in the right to life is something that must never be bartered away," said Rob Schwarzwalder of the Family Research Council (FRC) in an article in Roll Call.

Andrea Lafferty, executive director of the Traditional Values Coalition, reiterated a similar call to begin anew. "Republicans should continue to insist on a clean slate and a fresh start," Lafferty said before the summit. "The bipartisan summit should begin with a new proposal which helps the uninsured but doesn't destroy a health system which is working for 8 out of 10 Americans."

Erica Wanis of the Center for a Just Society warned against assuming that the federal government was the only solution for health care problems. "Action for action's sake is not a wise course of action, particularly when it's virtually guaranteed that the involvement of big government is guaranteed to make things exponentially worse," said Wanis.

The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC) issued a point-by-point critique of the President's health care proposal. The ERLC was pleased that the plan does not propose a "public option" and includes consumer protections. The ERLC objected to much of the proposal, but emphasized that the most important point was the proposal's lack of an explicit ban on abortion funding.

FRC president Tony Perkins agreed: "The President missed his opportunity to adopt the most popular piece of reform, Rep. Bart Stupak's (D-Mich.) outright ban on government-funded abortion."

What is next for health care reform? Mike Allen of Politico reported that Democrats viewed the summit as evidence of gridlock. They have already decided to push forward with the President's plan. This will likely be done through the use of reconciliation, a Senate parliamentary procedure that cannot be filibustered.

Ashley Horne of Focus on the Family Action predicted this outcome during Focus Action's weekly webcast. "At the same that the Democrats and that the President are calling for bipartisanship, they're also in the back rooms, and really publicly, kind of saying 'we're going to use reconciliation … we're going to use this process and ram it through anyway,'" said Horne.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 16 comments

David Lemont

March 03, 2010  12:27pm

Funny thing that evangelicals have no problem with the US funding Israel's Socialized medicine but we can't do the same for our people. It strikes me as odd.

Michael Bushilla

March 02, 2010  4:14pm

What is needed is concerned Americans to STORM Washington with the pen (writing congress). The power of the pen always worked in the past to sway the servants of America to do what is not only right but ethical to keep our elected official accountable. www.stormcards.net

health reform

March 01, 2010  4:06pm

As Christians we should certainly be bothered that some have inadequate access to healthcare in the U.S. However we must consider the drawbacks to government involvement in healthcare. I have extended family in Canada who have received excellent care there, but sometimes also face daunting wait times for routine procedures / consultations. I am currently studying in Ireland, a country with significant government involvement in healthcare (though with private options also). I have been here only a short time and could provide examples of extensive wait times in this country as well. There are pragmatic solutions to the healthcare dilemma, if our our representatives / senators would but leave ideology behind.

disinterested

March 01, 2010  1:56pm

I'm a born in Canada Canadian with an American wife. We lost 2 people close to us with brain cancer..The Canadian victim, a close friend, received every care possible plus home care and hospice care and when he died after a great fight there were no bills waiting for his family. My American example also died of brain cancer but received reluctant care after desperately trying and eventually finding a surgeon and then follow up care. He also died but left behind untold medical bills for his family. Both men were self employed, educated, wonderful Christian men who lost their fight with cancer. Which one's care best exemplifies a Christian nation?

Chuck

March 01, 2010  10:00am

I am one of many American who believes that our current health care system works pretty well for most but nonetheless needs significant reform is certain key areas in order to serve everyone. IMO it is the cost of our system that is unsustainable. We somehow need to address this but the thought of further government involvement is a frightening prospect to me. I am not anti-government but I see no way that this will be a good thing if congress passes the plan currently under consideration.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



When the Unsinkable Sank

When the Unsinkable Sank

Leadership lessons from the deck of Titanic

Faith that Sticks

Faith that Sticks

Intergenerational connections and parental involvement give kids a faith that lasts beyond high school.

more | current issue

Small Groups

Let God's Love Overflow

Small groups can serve...

Kyria

Sloth

One of the "seven deadly...

Preaching Today

The Spiritual Importance of Becoming an ...

Key issues to address...

Building Church Leaders

Dealing with the Big Questions

Allow interns opportunities...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper