Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
February 11, 2012

Home > 2010 > July (Web-only)Christianity Today, July (Web-only), 2010
SoulWork
Divine Drama Queen
But I'd secretly rather have a God who is a non-anxious presence.




Columnist's Note: You came here looking for a column I wrote called “The Divine Drama Queen.” The purpose of the column was to suggest how passionately God cares about us, and to what extremes he will go to secure a relationship with us. Because the Bible uses such dramatic image in conveying these truths, I used dramatic human examples and hyperbole to reinforce the biblical point. While most readers understood what I was driving at, some did not. Worse, some have been offended by the column, feeling I have denigrated the holiness of God.

This is troubling on two accounts. Those familiar with my writing know that the holiness of God is one of my themes—this is a significant element in my Jesus Mean and Wild and especially in A Great and Terrible Love. And those who know me personally understand that, while I'm not adverse to challenging and provoking, I take no pleasure in offending the very readers I'm trying to persuade or edify.

Enough readers have missed the point of this column to suggest that it is not doing what I intended it to do. Thus I have taken it down. If you are nonetheless interested in reading the original, you can write me at Christianity Today, 465 Gundersen Dr., Carol Stream, Il, 60188, and I'll be happy to send you a copy.

Mark Galli is senior managing editor of Christianity Today. He is author of Jesus Mean and Wild: The Unexpected Love of an Untamable God (Baker).


Related Elsewhere:

Previous SoulWork columns include:

The God Who Became Blood | What my dysfunctional prostate taught me about Jesus. (June 24, 2010)
The Lord Who Acts Like It | Where did we get the idea that the church should be a place that makes people feel comfortable? (June 10, 2010)
Judgment in the Gulf | Woes and blessings of the oil spill. (June 1, 2010)




Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 127 comments

lom m

July 29, 2010  3:30am

I guess another way of putting my case is simply this: there's no way any God of mine could be like the Old Testament one. I see not a shred of morality in that guy. But that's okay - the God I have still remains. He still survives in the trust department. Sometimes the greatest danger for Christians is actually reading the Old Testament. It's what I did.

lom m

July 29, 2010  2:52am

Sorry – my bad. True it is you didn’t say it. I said it. And that’s because I am. (Shocked that is). Thanks for your comments. And I of course go along with you to the extent that the conflict is sad. And it’s perhaps even sadder for the non-believer to see because if even the believers can’t get it together what hope for them? I’m sorry it made you feel further away from God. I think (at least this was how I read it) it was an attempt to explain all the difficult aspects of the Old Testament God in a way we could at least get to grips with. It tried to make him out to be just that little more human so we could feel a little more closer. And all that ... It seems to have done the opposite for you. For me the Old Testament God is already all too human. I need him to be a little more moral ...

Ralph Gaily

July 26, 2010  5:04pm

Where is the mysterious Mr. Galli who started all this? Or is he hiding behind some false name in the blog? Come on Mark.... get on board ....or have you jumped ship? Ralph Gaily

Lee V

July 26, 2010  7:15am

Yes, I AM sad. (I'm not sure I said shocking agression. I've unfortunately seen worse in church circles.) I think it's ok to be sad about sad things though. It's sad when relationships are broken, when people are hurt or hurting one another. The conflict itself is, I think, going to happen because we ARE human and we don't know or understand everything. The conflict is not the sad thing, it's how we treat one another in the midst of it. I'm sad because reading this article hit me in a way that I felt less trusting (and therefore, farther away) from God. And because I can't sit down and have a conversation with the author to find out what he was really thinking and trying to communicate, I am just left with it. I'm sad because I go to church and read magazines such as this in hopes that I will learn how to relate with others in more loving, honest, healthy ways. And I'm not seeing alot of good examples of conflict resolution or restorative relating. With prayers for God's mercy.

lom m

July 26, 2010  6:48am

Why no. But that’s said from your point of view. Others here very obviously beg to differ. And from my outsider’s perspective it all feels a bit of a mess. Division AND aggression. Christianity seems just a little too humanly sourced (emotionally) for me – too many Christians I come into contact with a little too angry. And I find that confusing. I have nothing against Paul – I never knew the guy. “Believe it or not, love is at the foundation of all this” Sorry to stress the point but family or not, no, I didn’t experience the love. Thanks for your comments though.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper

Books & Culture
Christianity Today
Church Law & Tax Report
Church Finance Today
Leadership Journal
Men of Integrity
Kyria.com
ChristianityTodayLibrary.com
PreachingToday.com