Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > 2011 > JuneChristianity Today, June, 2011
Inside CT
Adam, Where Are You?
It's time for a difficult, grace-filled family meeting.




Between evangelicals' passion for adoption and other changing family dynamics, we probably all know someone who has been part of a particular difficult conversation: the man known for years as Dad is not, in fact, the biological father.

Those conversations are often full of grace and love and can end in greater intimacy. But they're also usually fraught with pain and difficult questions: What does this mean? Where do I come from? Who am I?

The recent reshaping of the creation-evolution debate is causing similar discomfort for those of us who emphasize the authority and infallibility of Scripture. Scientists in genomic demography and other fields—as well as their Christian popularizers in groups like the BioLogos Foundation—are essentially sitting us down to have "the talk": Adam, the man you've called your father all these years, isn't who you think he is, they explain.

Few debates in our world have been as impassioned and emotional as those over creation. But now we're not just talking about dating rocks and interpreting fossils. We're talking about family. Nor is the discussion between those who think the Bible's account of creation, fall, and redemption is important and those who find it irrelevant. This is a family meeting.

That is one of the reasons we're covering the discussion multiple times in this issue. First, we wanted our cover story to be the most straightforward, non-partisan report on the de-bate possible. Richard Ostling was our immediate pick. Christianity Today's news editor in the 1960s, Ostling went on to spend nearly three decades with Time magazine and another with the Associated Press. He is universally acclaimed as one of the top religion journalists of our age. We were thrilled when he said yes.

We are a magazine that prides itself on such trustworthy, balanced reporting (for another example that is also somewhat uncomfortable, see "Fleecing the Faithful—Again," which will be posted online at a future date). But we also know our readers want to know where we stand as a magazine. For that, read our editorial on page 61.

As you'll see in the editorial, we find the discussion about the historicity of Adam difficult and, yes, a little painful. But we are also glad to see it happening: We welcome the opportunity to once again ask with wonder, "Where do I come from? Who am I?"—perhaps chiefly because it reminds us of the answer: We have been adopted by a loving Father.

Next month: Focus on the Family's big shift after Dobson, Tim Stafford's account of revival in India, John Witte's take on democracy through Christ the King, and New York City's Christian gardening movement.


Related Elsewhere:

See our cover story on "The Search for the Historical Adam." Check back for more articles from the June issue.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 11 comments

Ken Silva

June 06, 2011  5:44pm

"Truth should not threaten believers wherever it is uncovered, be that in the fields of Science or elsewhere." However, science hasn't discovered evolution or proven any great age of the universe: http://tiny.cc/oglab

Chuck Oliver

June 05, 2011  10:10pm

Thanks for the discussion but I'm concerned with the comment that the two camps are those who think the Bible's account "is important and those who find it irrelevant". I find the Bible's accounts to be terribly important and relevant but I also recognize that truth is not only found in historical facts. I'm glad my faith is based on the life, death and resurrection of Jesus the Christ -- the only historical fact that is necessary to believe.

Ms Muse

June 05, 2011  9:45pm

@Mark - where in the Bible does it say the earth is 6000 years old? @Bob - if "truths" revealed from "created order" contradict the Bible, those "truths" are not truth. I am very concerned that we are trading the truths of Scripture for a lie in order to make God/Christ/Christianity more palatable.

Mark Ketchum

June 05, 2011  7:28am

My only problem is why so much argument on the age of the earth? The Bible clearly tells us about 6000 years ago... why are the Christians arguing this? God is not a god of confusion. Even Jesus speaks of Adam... not of man who came into being 100,000's of years ago. I guess most Christians don't read the Bible.

Bob Robinson

June 04, 2011  4:35pm

Since God speaks to from the creation, the truths we're uncovering are to be received with gratitude. The two 'book's (Scripture and the created order) come from the same Hand. Christians once insisted the Bible taught that the sun revolved around the earth; now we know better. The same is happening with our new understanding of human origins.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Facing Fears

Facing Fears

Max Lucado employs preaching to overcome fear.

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper