Past Imperfect
John Stott: The Man Who Wouldn't Be Bishop
John R. W. Stott, a key architect of 20th-century evangelicalism, turns 90 on April 27. Mark your calendar to thank God that day for the man known around the world as "Uncle John."
Stott's friends have geared up for the event by sharing their memories in two book projects. Curiously, InterVarsity Press asked me—not in any way a Stott expert—to write the foreword for the U.S. editions of both books.
February 2010 saw the publication of Basic Christian: The Inside Story of John Stott. Historian Roger Steer collected anecdotes from dozens of colleagues and friends and wove them into an engaging narrative.
March 2011 will see the U.K. publication of another exercise in recollection, a book that was Stott's own idea. Langham Partnership international director Christopher Wright says Stott "felt a more personal picture could be painted by those who knew him more intimately over the years—and he insisted" it should show "warts and all." Stott asked Wright to solicit the contributions and said "he did not wish to read any of the contributions himself, in order that people should feel free to speak the truth as they saw it." Stott also asked that the book not be published until after his death, but his publisher insisted on preparing it for his 90th birthday. Unfortunately, U.S. readers must wait until the fall for Portraits of a Radical Disciple, as the American edition will be called.
As I read the manuscripts for these books, one thing—or more precisely, one pair of things—struck me repeatedly: Stott's discernment and discipline. John Stott's enormous influence on evangelicalism, in England, America, and around the globe, was possible because he prayerfully discerned what God wanted him to do (and not to do), and then he focused on those things (and disciplined himself not to do many other good things).
I saw this focus in a minor way when I came to Christianity Today nearly 26 years ago. Stott was one of CT's contributing editors, and so, when we wanted a biblically wise perspective on homosexuality, CT's executive editor suggested that I ask him to write it for us. Stott's reply came back in the negative. He was kind but unequivocal: No, he would not write for CT, because he had decided to focus all his writing energies on completing the Bible Speaks Today series. However, yes, CT was welcome to adapt whatever he had already written. Stott's generosity enabled us to adapt a fine article from one of his books.
David Gitari, the now-retired Anglican archbishop of Kenya, experienced Stott's focus in a more puzzling way. In Portraits of a Radical Disciple, Gitari tells of his days as a theology student at Tyndale Hall, Bristol. Stott invited him to stay in his London rectory (nicknamed "The Wreckage" or "The Stottery" by some). "I was at the Stottery for one full month, and to my surprise I met my host only once!" Gitari writes. Stott rose early, breakfasted alone, then went about his pastoral duties or locked himself in his study.
"I had to make an appointment to see him over breakfast during that one month," Gitari continues. "It was amazing to me as an African that I could stay in a friend's house for a whole month and be able to see him only once and that by appointment!"
The cultural chasm between Nairobi and No. 12 Weymouth Street has been fixed in Gitari's mind for 45 years. But over those years, Stott has become increasingly beloved by Gitari and many others in the developing world. Stott has often focused his laser-like attention on projects that bless the church in those regions, whether building ministers' libraries, educating indigenous scholars, or ensuring that majority-world voices are heard at global gatherings.
Past Imperfect
- Jesus' Elevator Speech
- Who Defines Doctrine?
- Misreading the Magnificat
- Downton Abbey's Real Legacy
- The Hymns That Haunt Us
La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012
The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Dave N.
If this writing is characteristic of what's in the foreword of the book, I won't be buying it. I can see why Stott refused to write for CT.
ladylorraine t
This article is missing key details--very general and vague I'm afraid. Nothing about his chaplaincy to the royal household, etc. It seems to me John Stott was cut from the same cloth as joint legacy-holders such as Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Bishop George Bell and these characters, as well as myriad others, have been written about in ways capturing our hearts, imaginations and motivations. (Thank you, Eric Metaxas!) I should think Mr. Stott's legacy is no less full of the cost of discipleship: the amore of the ages.
John Young
David I can't tell you enough how much I appreciate your personal angle on John Stoudt's remarkable story. I'm also glad at a time when the guys on the front page of everything tend to be the young guys who are the future, that we are also acknowledging and perhaps introducing to many details of a life well lived who is still teaching from years of faithful service.