Subscribe to Christianity Today
Subscribe to Christianity Today
Donate to Christianity Today
login | my account
May 26, 2012

Home > 2011 > May (Web-only)Christianity Today, May (Web-only), 2011
The Road to Gay Ordination in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
The denominational battle has been going on for decades. The historical record is much older.




On Tuesday May 10, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) joined a group of mainline churches that has opened the door to gay ordination. The new PC(USA) constitutional change, which has now received the necessary votes, will officially take effect in July and is widely interpreted to allow for gay ordination. The amendment will remove constitutional language that had required clergy to live in "fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman, or chastity in singleness." It appears that regional presbyteries will now have the local option of ordaining practicing homosexuals to Christian ministry. Anticipating this day, 120 PC(USA) congregations have over the last four years departed and affiliated with the Evangelical Presbyterian Church. After Tuesday more Presbyterian congregations are likely to separate. And so the story of Protestant schism continues.

It didn't happen overnight. The new schism over gay ordination is the culmination of three decades of evangelicals battling the progressive tide, arguing that biblical authority is on the line. In the 1970s, Northern Presbyterians (United Presbyterian Church USA) adopted a statement that "self-affirming, practicing homosexuals" are not eligible for ordination to church office. The Southern Presbyterians (Presbyterian Church in the US) adopted a similar policy the next year. These two denominations united in 1983 to form the current PC(USA). After ongoing debates in the '80s on human sexuality, including homosexuality, in 1993 the weary Presbyterians decided to call a three year voting moratorium on issues related to the ordination of gay and lesbian members to church office.

In 1997, conservatives were able to garner enough ecclesiastical strength to push through the "fidelity and chastity" amendment to their constitution as a requirement of ordination to church office. Liberals presented a substitute amendment requiring "fidelity and integrity in marriage or singleness" which deleted references to celibacy or defining marriage as a union of a man and woman. The substitute was defeated in 1998. Again the next year there was a move to delete the "fidelity and chastity" clause in the constitution but it was defeated. In 2001 there was another attempt to remove the "fidelity and chastity" provision but it was once more defeated. It appeared traditional views were holding their ground, though each time the votes got closer as more progressive views were gained traction.

Eventually a 2006 "Peace, Unity and Purity" task force, seeking middle ground in the ongoing homosexual debate, recommended allowing exceptions to the "fidelity and chastity" standard which was endorsed by the church and opening the door to homosexual ordination. Once again, in 2009 Presbyterians declined to modify the constitutional "fidelity and chastity" requirement for ordination, though the margin of victory by traditionalists was smaller than in the past. Finally, the "fidelity and chastity" constitutional language was jettisoned this week by a majority vote of the regional presbyteries. Thus end three decades of a pro-gay agenda relentlessly pressed until at length Presbyterians officially landed in the gay ordination camp with other mainline denominations. The Stated Clerk of the PC(USA) captured the tragedy of it all when he was quoted by the Associated Press as saying about the vote: "Some will rejoice while others will weep."

In many ways, the PC(USA) vote follows a trend in the mainline in recent decades. It started with the United Church of Christ in 1972, when the first openly gay minister was ordained in a Christian church. In 2003, the consecration of a practicing homosexual Episcopal bishop became a lightening rod of evangelical opposition within the worldwide Anglican Communion. After a five-year study, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America at its 2009 national assembly voted to strike existing church policy that had required gay and lesbian clergy to remain celibate. Even autonomous Southern Baptists are not escaping the growing schism across the nation; regional Baptist Associations have removed congregations from association membership due to changing views on homosexuality.





Christianity Today


  


Subscribe to Christianity Today and get 3 free trial issues. No credit card required.

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery. Offer valid in U.S. only.

If you decide you want to keep Christianity Today coming, honor your invoice for just $19.95 and receive nine more issues, a full year in all. If not, simply write "cancel" across the invoice and return it. The three trial issues are yours to keep, regardless.


Click here for international orders2-for-1 Gifts!

Displaying 1–5 of 134 comments

Dan H

May 23, 2011  8:24am

More disinformation from the peanut gallery: "...fundamentalists who don’t care what the Bible really says either." It's not the fundy's who ignore the plain teaching of Scripture - but the prog lib post mods. "Evangelicals in the tradition of Karl Barth, F F Bruce and Francis Schaeffer who are working away within the mainstream denominations to achieve reform based on serious Biblical scholarship." Maybe KB - he's neo-orthodox and has never been well-liked among conservative/traditional evangelicals, but FFB and FS? Baloney alert! And who gives a flying fig about homosexual what John Boswell believed - he's not authoratative, just another deluded academic enamored with his own reputation and a desire to justify his sin. "...Boswell died of complications from AIDS..." What else would you expect him to believe? Der!

Stacy Carey

May 23, 2011  7:41am

Thanks, Alan. I agree the label Evangelical is now confusing. When S. Donald Fortson III refers to 'evangelicals battling the progressive tide', it is the opposite here in Australia also. It is actually the Evangelicals in the tradition of Karl Barth, F F Bruce and Francis Schaeffer who are working away within the mainstream denominations to achieve reform based on serious Biblical scholarship. Sure, they have on side the wishy-washy liberals who don’t care what the Bible teaches, but the resistance is coming from fundamentalists who don’t care what the Bible really says either. I am surprised the author here is so negative about the development within the Presbyterians. And a bit surprised no-one has challenged his ridiculous assertion that 'church history is crystal clear: Homosexual practice has been affirmed nowhere, never, by no one in the history of Christianity.' Um, John Boswell ..? I suspect CT is becoming more a place for sloganeering rather than for serious inquiry. Cheers.

Dan H

May 23, 2011  6:19am

Evangelical means good news. Good news that Jesus is our sacrifice of atonement who takes our sin and puts in right standing before a holy God and gives us new life. II Cor. 5:17 "Therefore, if any man be in Christ he is a new creation, old are passed away behold all things are become new." Homosexual behavior is sin in God's sight. Those churches who bless same sex unions don't have good news - they are peddling the same old bad news that Satan peddled in Genesis 3:1-4 "Now the serpent...said to the woman, "Indeed, has God said, 'You shall not eat from any tree of the garden'?" 2The woman said to the serpent, "...God has said, 'You shall not eat from it or touch it, or you will die.'" 4The serpent said to the woman, "You surely will not die!" Satan lied to Eve, and he's lying to you, too.

Alan Austin

May 23, 2011  2:21am

Dear Stacy, All marriages are civil here in France. Churches don’t have authority to conduct services. But church blessings after the civil ceremony are common. Some churches accept gay unions including the Reformed Church of France, the largest protestant denomination. There is also at least one independent Catholic church and several independent protestant fellowships which bless same-sex marriages in various places. The Evangelical churches and Pentecostals are all opposed, although there are movements within for reform. The Roman Catholic and the Orthodox Churches here both officially condemn same-sex unions but in practice seem to have a don’t-ask-don’t-tell policy in place. As to "evangelicals battling the progressive tide", no, it seems to be the opposite here in Europe. Those who truly believe Scripture is inspired by God and worthy of study are the ones pursuing a more Biblical inclusiveness. Maybe it depends on your definition of 'Evangelical', however. Blessings.

Simon P

May 22, 2011  12:11pm

One more point, Alan: Earlier this year, France's Constitutional Court upheld their country's ban on same-sex marriage, so, evidently, things are not as peachy for same-sex proponents in Europe (or the rest of the world, for that matter) as you would have naive people believe.

You must be a Christianity Today subscriber or have created a FREE registration to post comments
[Browse More Christianity Today]



War and Peace

War and Peace

Pastor Tullian Tchividjian survived a leadership coup by finding rest in the liberating power of the gospel.

Facing Fears

Facing Fears

Max Lucado employs preaching to overcome fear.

more | current issue

Christian Bible Studies

Unbalanced Blessings

Unbalanced Blessings

The balancing act of...

Books & Culture

Quiet

Quiet

Shhh! Introverts working...

Preaching Today

NFL Star Junior Seau Searched for Peace

Small Groups

Prepare with Prayer

Prepare with Prayer

Don't leave out this...

Search
Search
Search
Scripture Search
Go Deeper