Evangelical Colleges Biola and Grace Sue Obama Administration Over Contraceptive Mandate

Evangelical Colleges Biola and Grace Sue Obama Administration Over Contraceptive Mandate
Two evangelical colleges, Biola University (California) and Grace College (Indiana), filed a lawsuit today against the Obama administration. The lawsuit is the most recent challenge to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandate that employers provide insurance coverage of contraceptives, including emergency contraceptives such as Plan B and ella, at no cost to employees.
The HHS announced in August 2011 that organizations would be required to provide contraception to their employees as part of the health care reform signed by President Obama.
Attorneys have filed a total of six lawsuits on behalf of evangelical colleges against the mandate: Biola and Grace join Wheaton College, Geneva College, Colorado Christian University, and Louisiana College.
Like Wheaton College, Biola previously covered Plan B and ella in its insurance plans. Biola's insurance plan covered FDA-approved contraceptives before April 1, the lawsuit states. "The prior inclusion of abortion-inducing drugs like ella and Plan B was neither knowing nor intentional."
Working with several insurance companies for faculty and student plans, Biola did not look into the details of its coverage until the Obama administration's mandate became an issue for the college, said Biola University President Barry H. Corey.
"Whether or not people were taking advantage of [ella or Plan B], that's something we weren't and couldn't track," Corey said. "We did realize at that point that our insurance companies should exclude those."
Leaders at the religious institutions assert that pills like ella and Plan B prevent pregnancy by blocking the implantation of a fertilized egg. As the scientific community debates how the pills work, institutions like Biola believe the pills should not be listed under FDA-approved contraception. The schools have joined a number of Catholic institutions suing the administration, though evangelicals vary widely in views on contraception.
"Unlike the Catholic Church concerns, this is not about ovulation prevention drugs," Corey said. "Both Plan B and ella are categorized as abortion-inducing drugs, and that seems to be a common understanding."
The colleges are responding in the middle of political tension as the Republican and Democratic parties head into their conventions in the next two weeks.
"The timing is in response to the White House; it's not in response to the election," Corey said. "We are reacting, we are not proacting." The lawsuit estimates the college could face $1.7 million in annual fines if it does not comply with the mandate.
Corey said he expects more Christian colleges to file lawsuits. Colleges provide student and faculty health insurance plans, and they are very connected with government policies due to accreditation and funding, said Gregory S. Baylor, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, the group filing the suit.
Triune Health Group, a family business run by a Catholic couple, also filed suit yesterday in U.S. District Court to battle the mandate. The group was recently named by Crain's Chicago Business as the best place to work for women in the Chicago area.
Challenges to the contraception insurance mandate have producedmixed results. In July, a Nebraska court ruled that religious institutions, individuals, and states lack standing to challenge the administration's rules. However, Colorado-based Hercules Industries and the Catholic family that owns and runs it won a federal injunction to suspend the mandate.
La complejidad hispana: Todo cambió en el 2012
The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 4 comments
See all comments
Welby Warner
J Thomas, from your comment it does not appear that you distinguish between contraception and abortion. Do you believe that there is no difference between what these two terms mean? Ambiguous writing creates misunderstanding and hampers clear communication of the christian message.
Welby Warner
The use of loose, unspecific or ambiguous language in our communications fosters many unnecessary disputes and disagreements. In the second paragraph of the article, saying that the law requires employers to provide contraception seems to be very imprecise and unworthy of christian journalists. The writer should say specifically what the law requires so that there is no misunderstanding. Additionally, commenters should refrain from making statements that they cannot logically justify. The idea by J Thomas that Obama is forcing him to sin is extremely difficult to imagine to have specific objective content. Can you explain by what means that this outrage could be occurring? Have you abandoned the idea of free will and the individual responsibility for ones's actions? Is salvation still by choice (unless you believe in certain predestination ideas)? Has the message of the Bible been changed to make other people accept liability for your actions? The devil made me do it excuse?
DiverCity Jones
Yeah, J Thomas, and I thought the Supreme Court would hold Obamacare unconstitutional as an impermissible extension of the Commerce Clause. Instead, the sophist Justice Roberts said it was a tax and thus permissible under Congress's authority to redistribute wealth. Maybe in this instance he'll again side with the ideological leftists and hold that the mandate to pay for abortion coverage in insurance policies is lawful under the Privileges and Immunities Clause or some other equally inapplicable provision in the Constitution. And with respect to Obama's lies, recall that he claimed Obamacare wasn't a tax, at least until the day after it was enacted.