Django Unchained

Leonardo DiCaprio as Calvin Candie
Where Django Unchained is at its most perceptive is in the recognition that violence blunts the moral sensitivities. Later, when a runaway slave is about to be torn apart by dogs, it is Schultz who blanches, offering to intercede and buy the slave and Django who insists that they let him be killed, hideously, so as not to threaten their cover (and, indirectly, his wife's chance for freedom). The ability to embed these sorts of moral conundrums into a somewhat conventional genre piece is what makes Tarantino excel as a writer. Later, when Candie insists that his legal ownership of Broomhilda allows him to do whatever he wants to her, Django's and Schultz's own use of the law to justify their own morally questionable actions make it harder for them to separate legal and moral claims without leaving themselves open to censure.
If there is a weakness to Django, and there is, it is the ending. Having assembled a compelling cast of characters and provided an emotionally clear conflict, Tarantino appears not to know how to deliver an emotional payoff commensurate with what the characters (and audience) have had to endure. As each potential ending proves big—but not big enough—he presses onward, long after the film has descended into bathos and bombast.
That flaw is not quite fatal, however. Even with the unsatisfying resolution, Django Unchained raises powerful and provocative questions. As hellish as its moral universe may be, those whose stomachs can handle the descent will find that even in Tarantino's world—perhaps especially in his world—those moral questions still matter.
Talk About It
1. Are Django's and Schultz's use of violence more justifiable than that of others in the film? What makes it so? The civil law? Some moral law?
2. Are there any places where Django or Schultz violate their own moral code(s) in pursuit of their desired ends? If so, where?
3. How do the conflicts between Django/Stephen and Schultz/Candie complicate the film's depiction of race and keep it from becoming simply a tale of white-on-black oppression?
The Family Corner
Django Unchained is rated R for strong graphic violence throughout, a vicious fight, language and some nudity. It is a brutal film that will make many viewers uncomfortable—typical of many Tarantino films. The sexual exploitation of female slaves is often referred to. A female slave, naked, is removed from a "hot box" as punishment and another is whipped while partially undressed. A male slave is torn apart by dogs and one character is hung from his ankles while nude. The use of racial slurs is pervasive and persistent. Several characters are shot at close range, with detailed blood spray, and others are shot at long range. Two slaves are forced to participate in a prolonged and brutal fight. Viewers are strongly cautioned.
The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).











Comments
Ed mac
With Jamie Foxx in it I won't go. He is one of the actors who calls Obama the Saviour and Lord.
DiverCity Jones
Okay, Morefield, I'll do your work for you: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/28/quentin-tarantinos-inglourious-bas terds-killer-crow_n_2375383.html Note that Tarantino is going to again wreak havoc on the personages of evil whites who obviously have it coming, and that right violently! Tarantino is nothing but a cartoon. He basically just throws out as many sensational things (weird sex, hip popular songs, drugs, violence, race, explosions, foul language etc.) and throws them at the screen and takes credit for whatever sticks. In a saner society he’d have been a nobody driven to suicide when Netflix came out and his precious indie films became readily available to soccer-moms. Because he chops up his films and there’s the rich soundtrack they’re like little more than music videos with A-list stars that the kids can (re)watch without needing to pay much attention. Yeah, Morefield, what a great filmmaker!