Past Imperfect
Misreading the Magnificat

Misreading the Magnificat
When Mary came to visit, Elizabeth's child leaped in her womb. Mary's spirit, too, jumped to a higher plane. In the inspired exchange between the cousins, the pregnant virgin sang a prophetic hymn of praise for God's salvation. In that prophecy, Mary praised God for filling the hungry with good things and sending the rich away empty. We call her hymn the "Magnificat," and we Christians have been singing it as a regular part of worship since about the year 500.
For most of the 1,500 years since, congregations and cloistered monks and nuns chanted the straight, unadorned biblical text of Mary's song. In the latter half of the 20th century, however, musical paraphrases of the Magnificat flourished. One of my favorites is Timothy Dudley-Smith's bold four-square hymn, "Tell Out, My Soul." Others inhabited the folk idiom: Christopher Idle's "My Soul Proclaims the Greatness of the Lord," Rory Cooney's "Canticle of the Turning," and John Michael Talbot's "Holy Is His Name."
As a worship musician who tries to fine-tune what we sing with the Scriptures we read, I have felt frustrated by the way musicians blunt the Magnificat's protest against the 1 percent (to borrow Occupy language). Take Dudley-Smith's otherwise excellent "Tell Out, My Soul" as an example. Five years younger than his Cambridge friend John Stott, Dudley-Smith was part of the circle that renewed English evangelical hymnody midcentury. But in "Tell Out, My Soul," he focused on the first half of Mary's poetic parallelism that contrasted the powerful with the humble and neglected the second half that counterpoised God's treatment of the hungry with the rich. Talbot and Cooney commit the same sin of omission. Idle's text is the refreshing exception.
It is easy to spiritualize power and turn it into pride. Thus Dudley-Smith's rendering: "Proud hearts and stubborn wills are put to flight."
Now, we know that pride and stubbornness are not the exclusive province of the rich. If the Holy Spirit had wanted to talk about these vicious habits of the heart, he would have inspired Mary along those lines only. But he didn't, fingering the rich along with the powerful. As a Church of England bishop, Dudley-Smith may have thought wealth too delicate a matter for his Scripture song.
It is hard to find Christian hymns that embody Scripture's sharp critique of the rich and the dangers of wealth. There are positive songs about simplicity ("Simple Gifts") and exhortations not to cling to earthly goods (the German Lutheran chorales "A Mighty Fortress" and "Jesus, Priceless Treasure"), but not much on the actual dangers of wealth.
Scripture's sharp-edged message about the danger of wealth is not restricted to the Magnificat. One of my favorite gospel songs adapts Jesus' story of the rich man and Lazarus—"Rusty Old Halo" by Hoyt Axton. Unfortunately, Axton of "Joy to the World (Jeremiah Was a Bullfrog)" fame blunted the parable by reducing the fires of hell to "a rusty old halo, skinny white cloud, robe that's so wooly it scratches."
There's a refreshingly unusual folk ballad on Keith and Kristyn Getty's new album, Hymns for the Christian Life. Think of "Simple Living" as the musical equivalent of Shane Claiborne and Tony Campolo's Red Letter Revolution. Unlike Axton's soft-pedaling, the Getty-Stuart Townend songwriting team gives Jesus' dialogue with the rich young ruler a transparent treatment. They hone the sharp edge of Jesus' advice: "Sell all you have; give to the poor. / Then heaven's treasure shall be yours." Francis of Assisi couldn't have said it more pointedly.
Past Imperfect
- Jesus' Elevator Speech
- Who Defines Doctrine?
- Downton Abbey's Real Legacy
- The Hymns That Haunt Us
- Private Faith and Public Policy: Where Obama and Santorum Agree
The Latest in Movie News, May 20, 2013

Star Trek Into Darkness

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 28 comments
See all comments
David Van Lant
"Think of 'Simple Living' as the musical equivalent of Shane Claiborne and Tony Campolo's Red Letter Revolution." If "Simple Living" really is the musical equivalent of the so-called "Red-Letter Revolution," it might be better not to think of it all that much. The "Revolution" is a simplistic treatment of Jesus' sayings in light of His claims; namely that Moses wrote about Him and that He was the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets. This one falls somewhere below present imperfect.
Claire Guest
Welby Warner, I agree and disagree with your comments. First, I agree that I misspoke when I used the word "most". I should have said "some". Second, I did say "I think" - I did not relate my thoughts as fact. Third, I realize now that my comment was a leap because I did not address what I believe to be the foundation of the attitude I mentioned. The reason for that leap is that I was typing in a hurry, was in the midst of a very busy day. Thus, I deleted that comment in hopes that I can post more lucidly. I took your suggestion and looked up "class warfare" in my big dictionary copyrighted 2000. It is not listed. Obviously, it was not in common usage then, has only become so in recent years. So I looked up a definition at a couple of online dictionaries and got this: "conflict between social or economic classes". That, of course, is a bare-bones, rather cut-and-dried academic definition, but it does give a general idea, also without mentioning any clarifying foundational issues.
Claire Guest
(cont'd) Based on what I've observed in recent years, I believe that Obama's "spread the wealth around" ideology has stirred up sentiment promoting the idea that what rich(er) people have should be taken away from them and given to those who are poor(er). This is also a brief description, but I believe it is accurate because I've been hearing people who advocate this ideology cite Robin Hood as inspiration (I've wondered at times if they realize Robin Hood was a fictional character). The reason I mentioned earlier the idea that government should take the place of the church in providing for the poor (something Christ Jesus never taught nor endorsed) is partly because I have read numerous comments at this site promoting this idea. A number of people here have taken Jesus' teachings and applied them to the government instead of the church. I realize this ideology has been preached in churches for years (at least since the mid-1900s), particularly by those who preach a "social gospel".