The Other Side of the Culture War

The Other Side of the Culture War

What Motivates Cultural Progressives?: Understanding Opposition to the Political and Christian Right
Yancey, George and Williamson, David A.
Baylor University Press
August 1, 2012
280 pp., $27.72
Who is fighting the culture wars? Sociologists George Yancey and David A. Williamson have attempted to answer an important, but perhaps overlooked part of that question in What Motivates Cultural Progressives? Understanding Opposition to the Political and Christian Right (Baylor University Press). The book explores the characteristics, attitudes, and motivations of those people on the liberal side of the culture wars, whom they term "cultural progressives"—a group they say has received relatively little study. Bradley Wright, a sociologist at the University of Connecticut, spoke with George Yancey about what the authors found and why it matters.
What was your reason for writing this book?
I've read a lot about the cultural wars—both in the mainstream press and in scholarly research—but most of it focuses on only one side of the debate, usually the Christian Right. But I was curious: Who are the Christian Right fighting and why don't we understand their opponents better? The study reported in this book gives a more complete understanding of the culture war by highlighting cultural progressives.
How did you do your study?
We contacted several culturally progressive organizations who had it in their mission statements that they oppose the Christian Right. We contacted them and asked for permission to survey their members, which they kindly granted. We gave each organization a survey to distribute to their members and when all was said and done, we collected short-answer data from about 2,500 cultural progressives.
It was important for us to let these people speak for themselves, so we read through what they wrote several times, and we chose a number of quotations that illustrate the themes that emerged from the data. These quotations, which we present in the book, give a good sense for how cultural progressives think and act when it comes to the culture wars. By focusing on the words that they said, and not just numerical analysis of survey data, we hope that our book is accessible to a wide audience.
Who are the cultural progressives?
Most of the respondents in our study were not religious, most were political progressives, and all were cultural progressives. Also, by virtue of their involvement in the organizations that we selected, they were activists as well. To be clear, not all cultural progressives are also activists, but we chose those that are for our study.
This group has been studied so little that there isn't a readily identifiable name for them, such as there is for the Christian Right, so we settled on "cultural progressives." Generally speaking, we define cultural progressives as people with a modern or postmodern understanding of morality that minimizes the importance of traditional religious explanations.
By and large, the cultural progressives that we studied were a rather homogenous, privileged group. They were overwhelmingly white—about 95 percent white—highly educated males. In fact, I attended a meeting of one of the organizations, and of the 25 or so people in it, I was one of only two non-whites there. The other non-white person was a trainer who was brought in from out of town. All of the local members of the group at that meeting were white. There is some irony here, for cultural progressives decry the Christian Right as racist, but they themselves are overwhelmingly white.

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).












Comments
Displaying 13 of 14 comments
See all comments
Claire Guest
H. E. Baber, I take it you're not a Christian? You have an extremely limited and, yes, biased view of the issues you've mentioned here. For one thing, you assume that children, old people, and sick people are weak. In so doing, not only do you deliberately ignore a huge part of the population, but when you say you're for affirmative action, this contradicts that statement. If you really believe that all conservative women are good looking and well-dressed, or that women must meet this description to get into conservative politics, you haven't been to any meetings of political conservatives. They're just people like everyone else.
H. E. Baber
@Claire Guest, I am not denying the value of compassion and niceness. It just isn't for me, isn't my thing. Weakness disgusts me and I don't want to ahve anything to do with children, old people, sick people or anyone weak. As far as women on the right, well very nice that if they're good looking and well-dressed they can get into conservative politics. But that's beyond my pay grade. I'm interested in affirmative action so that women like me can get guy jobs--blue collar work.
Claire Guest
H. E. Baber, I may be missing something, but your post doesn't make sense to me as an American woman. For example, did you miss the dynamic women who spoke at the RNC? The governors of SC and NM, Condoleeza Rice, and others? Their conservatism has not restricted them in any way. Frankly, I see great value in being compassionate and nice, and avoiding roughness and crudity. To me, these are characteristics of mutual respect, regardless of one's gender or political views or anything else. Our society has lost a lot in the great increase of accepted crudity in virtually every area of life. This is reflected in the great increase of bullying among children and teens, sad to say.