Why I Changed My Mind About Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream' Speech
AP ImagesWhy I Changed My Mind About Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream' Speech
Among other civil rights milestones, this year marks the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington, the historic rally that concluded with Martin Luther King Jr. unleashing his most legendary words on a watching nation. Today, "I Have a Dream" stands alongside the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address as possibly the most significant piece of American rhetoric known to the world. However, it's become pretty common over the past few decades for those of us who regularly opine on King's legacy to take a contrarian stance and push back against the notion that "I Have a Dream" was his defining statement to the world.
Scholars such as James Cone and Michael Eric Dyson have vehemently argued that the bright-eyed King of the dream rhetoric must make way for the more pessimistic and radical King that came later. As Vincent Harding, a personal friend of King's who is currently a professor of religion at Morehouse College, put it, "We Americans have insisted that King live forever in the unbroken sunlight of that historic August day on the Mall when hundreds of thousands of us stood in that place, and millions more gathered before television sets across the nation, to affirm our solidarity with his vision of racial harmony and triumphant freedom."
The problem with the "Dream language," says Howard Divinity School professor Cheryl Sanders, is that it draws attention away from the comprehensive message of King's life. "There's a danger of only seeing him as a dreamer," adds Sanders, who is also the pastor of Third Street Church of God in Washington, D.C. "If we only see him as a dreamer, we too easily let ourselves off the hook from dealing with the realities that he was dealing with." In addition to racism and segregation, those realities included poverty, militarism, and overall socioeconomic injustice.
I think all of these scholars have it right: King is far more than "I Have a Dream." In fact, over the last year I've worked on a book project that has required me to delve deeply into King's "Letter from Birmingham Jail," an equally profound piece of rhetoric that also marks its 50th anniversary this year. Written mostly from a jail cell following his arrest in Birmingham, Alabama, the letter was composed as a response to a public statement from eight white clergymen who supported the general aims of the civil rights movement but felt King's methods were too disruptive and extreme. More than any other writing or speech by King, "Letter from Birmingham Jail" captures the spiritual and social essence of the man and his mission. In it one can observe all the religious, philosophical, and political ideas and principles that shaped his Christian vision for justice and nonviolence. It's the one work from King that best represents his message in its entirety.
Over the past few weeks, however, I've been reconsidering the implications of King's "I Have a Dream." After a contemptuous presidential election year, a controversy leading to the withdrawal of evangelical pastor Louie Giglio from the program of President Obama's second inauguration, and increasingly heated national debates about issues such as healthcare, immigration reform, and the Second Amendment, it's possible to come away feeling that our nation is incapable of overcoming its deep social and ideological fissures. Will conservative evangelicals and some members of the gay-rights movement ever find common ground on which to engage? Will pro-lifers and pro-choice advocates ever move beyond viewing each other as subhuman? Will political conservatives and political liberals ever find the courage to rise above their acrimony and truly work for the common good of the nation? Humanly speaking, I'd have to say it's doubtful, so severe is our polarization. Yet, when I listen to America's most famous sermon and allow myself to strip away the familiarity of King's lyrical voice as he describes his dream "that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed," I'm struck by how at the heart of the dream is a vision rooted not just in "the American Dream," as King explained, but in the biblical "substance of things hoped for" and "evidence of things not seen."

The 'Handicap Icon' Gets New Life

Sidelining the Stigma of Mental Illness














Join the Conversation
Displaying 15 of 19 comments
See all comments
audrey ruth
Who are the guys in white hats behind MLK? Are they Muslims/Nation of Islam adherents? I've seen that pic many times, but just noticed them not long ago.
vic jones
MLK was not a saint or orthodox Christian, but he was influenced by the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth like Gandhi, William Wilberforce, and many other civil rights reformers of the past, and would be marginalized in today's society for this reason. What passes for civil rights these days is an attempt to normalize morally questionable behaviors, rather than the protection of society's most vulnerable members. MLK believed rights are given to all by God, as opposed to today's movements that advocate force or bribery to take rights from one group and give them to another. Public discourse has become a platform for demonizing and talking past each other, instead of reasoning and listening to opposing views. The current civil rights groups have left those who are most in need of protection - unborn children, human trafficking slaves, the religiously persecuted, and victims of many other injustices in the world.
S Griffin
Also as far as his views on the virgin birth and resurrection; I'm gonna ride with Jesus and his word on those points. As great a man as Dr. King was, he doesn't hold my salvation in his hands.
S Griffin
I don't think anyone just sees Dr. King as a dreamer, at least I never have.
audrey ruth
I've always agreed with King's declaration that he longed to see the day when men were judged by their character, not the color of their skin. Amen to that! I've also shared Rick Dalbey's and Charles Maglaughlin's concerns. And if a conservative Bible-believing preacher had extra-marital affairs as King did, his message would not even be considered; he would be summarily dismissed as not worthy of hearing. Such a speech in Washington would most likely be jeered, regardless of its content. Speaking of "severe polarization", what did Jesus the Christ say? Didn't He say He would rather that we be hot or cold, not lukewarm, that He would spew those who are lukewarm out of His mouth? I find it inexpressibly sad that Louie Giglio, who was initially chosen to pray at the Inauguration because of his ministry against human trafficking, was dis-invited because he had the audacity to preach the truth of God's Holy Word as it applies to human sexuality. Things are changing FAST, not for good.