Are All Men Saved?

Universalism is nothing new. As a church the first Universalist congregation in America was founded in Gloucester in 1779. Eleven years later the Universalists meeting in Philadelphia prepared their first declaration of faith and plan of government.

As time progressed the liberalism of the Universalist church increased until in 1942 the charter was changed to read: “To promote harmony among adherents of all religious faiths, whether Christian or otherwise.”

Finally, in May of 1960, Universalists and Unitarians merged into the Unitarian Universalist Association.

At no time have the major evangelical denominations recognized these churches as a part of the Protestant tradition, nor has either of them been admitted to membership in cooperative church groups.

Evangelical Christianity is now confronted by a different form of Universalism, all the more dangerous because it insidiously distorts the Gospel and opens the door of salvation to all, not on the basis of faith in Christ but on the basis of inherited participation in God’s redemptive love. As the “perfect pedagogue” His salvation must be effective for all men, we are told.

That the Unitarian-Universalist concept has a deadening effect on its believers is easily demonstrated. After nearly two centuries there are only a few hundred congregations with a total membership of less than 200,000. Missionary purpose and evangelistic zeal are naturally lacking—why preach to a need which does not exist?

The Universalism which the major denominations find in their midst today may not involve crass Unitarianism, nor the frank syncretism of Universalism, but this increases its danger for there is, on the surface, an apparent attempt to magnify the redemptive work of Christ which is appealingly deceptive.

Strange to say, those who espouse this new Universalism avidly try to bolster their position by a method they only too often try to deny to others, the quoting of “proof texts.” At the same time they find it necessary to reject the total revelation to be found in the Scriptures and to pass over other statements in the Bible which completely refute their position.

True, some theologians admit the possibility that some people may be lost while they reject the biblical affirmation that some men are lost.

The argument frequently heard from laymen is that, “God is too good to condemn anyone.” Apparently they do not know that man is already condemned by his sins and that God’s love is evidenced by his provision for man’s redemption through the death of his Son.

Because of its importance to and effect on individuals and the Church, we should examine this matter carefully. Among the Bible verses quoted to support this new Universalism are John 12:22; 1 Cor. 15:22; 1 Tim. 2:4; and Phil. 2:10, 11.

Let us examine these verses.

In John 12:32 we read, “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.” Jesus was speaking to Jews and he was telling them that his crucifixion would draw “all men,” Gentiles as well as Jews. His was a universal offer of salvation and men from every tribe and nation would respond.

Again, 1 Corinthians 15:22 says: “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” All men are born dead “in Adam” but by the new birth we are “in Christ” so that the death inherent in the old man and his deeds is lost in the new life we have in Christ.

Paul, in 1 Timothy 2:4 says, “Who will have all men to be saved, and to come to the knowledge of the truth.” Unquestionably it is God’s will that all men should come to the knowledge of the truth. Unfortunately many reject that truth and God’s loving concern for them is defeated by their own willfulness.

In Philippians 2:10, 11 we read: “That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.” Here, as in all Scripture, we must take care not to interpret any one verse in a way which refutes Scripture as a whole. The logical interpretation would seem to be that some day every creature will acknowledge the sovereignty of God, some in his holy presence and some in the shades of eternal separation, between which there is “a great gulf fixed.”

The universalist position does violence to the total revelation of God, as found in the Scriptures, and to specific statements of our Lord and others.

In Matthew 25:46 our Lord says: “And they shall go away into everlasting punishment; but the righteous into life eternal.”

In John 3:36 we read: “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.”

In Malachi 3:18 God warns against confusing the righteous and the wicked in these prophetic words: “Then once more you shall distinguish between the righteous and the wicked, between one who serves God and one who does not serve him.”

And, to make even clearer this distinction He goes on to say: “For behold, the day comes, burning like an oven, when all the arrogant and all evildoers will be stubble; the day that comes shall burn them up, says the Lord of hosts, so that it will leave them neither root nor branch” (Mal. 4:1).

Paul describes the awful reckoning for unrepentant sinners in these words: “… when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power” (2 Thess. 1:7b–9).

How can we preach the love of God without the backdrop of his righteous anger against sin? How can we proclaim the mercy of the Cross without telling of that which made the Cross necessary?

Thank God for his love! It was this love which sent his Son into the world, and it was this love which made necessary his death. But Jesus tells us that the object was to change the destiny of man: “should not perish, but have everlasting life”: a universal offer to be received by faith. To proclaim the Love of God is the good news. To accept that love through faith in God’s Son is eternal life.

The universal offer, “whosoever believeth” does not mean universal salvation, but salvation to those who accept him by faith. To cry, “Peace, Peace,” when there is no peace for the wicked is a grievous distortion of the Gospel.

The watchword of the Reformation was, “The just shall live by his faith.” God forbid that we should subvert this to a new slogan, “All men are saved, our task is merely to tell them so.”

Also in this issue

The CT archives are a rich treasure of biblical wisdom and insight from our past. Some things we would say differently today, and some stances we've changed. But overall, we're amazed at how relevant so much of this content is. We trust that you'll find it a helpful resource.

Our Latest

Died: Christian Publishing Executive Robert Wolgemuth

As author, agent, and former Thomas Nelson president, Wolgemuth shaped the Christian book world for decades.

It’s Not ‘Christian Nationalism.’ It’s Conservative Identity Politics.

George Yancey

Academics and pundits critiquing evangelical voters have misdiagnosed their behavior.

Analysis

This Year, Protections for the Unborn Won’t Come from Washington

The White House and Congress seem uninterested in new pro-life measures. But crisis pregnancy centers will continue their mission, one life at a time.

Public Theology Project

How to Know If You’re Growing in Patience—or Just Giving Up

The right kind of waiting can save us. The wrong kind will destroy us.

News

Christians Provide Food, Medicine, and Spiritual Hope at Venezuela’s Border

After Maduro’s ouster, ministries in Cúcuta, Colombia, don’t know if Venezuelan migrants will return home or if more will flee.

Guerilla Art For Grit City

J.D. Peabody

Two friends are taking Tacoma by storm with paper and ink.

The Russell Moore Show

Chuck Klosterman on Football

 Cultural critic and essayist Chuck Klosterman about his new book and what the sport tells us about ourselves.

Protesting in Church Is Wrong. So Is Immigration Theater.

Demonstrators should not disrupt worship services. ICE should be competent, cool-headed, and constrained by the Constitution.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube