Review of ‘Fanny and Alexander’

Fanny And Alexander

An Ingmar Bergman film,

released by Embassy Pictures.

Most of the evidence that cinema can be art comes from outside the English-speaking world. Between films like Ingmar Bergman’s Fanny and Alexander and commercial offerings that keep one’s mind from serious thought or one’s head in the trough, there is a great gulf fixed. Deep seldom calls to deep in cinema. It does here.

The eye, that glutton for frontiers, finds a feast in the impeccably detailed, lavish world of the Swedish upper class, circa 1912. We meet the Ekdahl family: the matriarchal Helena, the philandering Adolf, the schizoid Carl, the tragic Oscar and his philandering wife Emilie. They, and others in the huge cast, supply a bit of everything: joy and angst, security and fear, beauty and ugliness, love and cruelty, life and death. We see it all through the eyes of Fanny and Alexander, especially the latter, who spins strange yarns to lantern slides late at night.

If Bergman’s Weltanschauung can be seen in theater-manager Oscar’s speeches, or Alexander’s cinematic proclivities, it is even clearer in the second half of the story, which is as cerebral and mystical as the first half is visual. After Oscar’s death, Emilie, for undeveloped reasons, marries Edvard, a bishop. He is a talented, handsome man, but also cruel and vengeful. His house is orderly and austere, and its windows barred; the servants are meddling hags. In this world, one is never sure what is real and what is not. Alexander sees visions of Oscar, like the ghost of Hamlet’s father. Intelligent Christians, who should see this film if they see any at all, will have no trouble decoding the symbolism. It is fascinating to watch a story revolve around the most profound “why?” questions, and to know that someone still asks them.

One can believe this is Bergman’s last film. (Bound copies of the screenplay are being sold.) Less credible is the claim that it is not autobiographical. The bishop, in a late apparition, reminds young Alexander that he cannot escape. Indeed, the film grapples with an omnipresent God who displays both goodness and severity. From this God no one can escape. Not even Ingmar Bergman.

Reviewed by Lloyd Billingsley, a writer living in Southern California.

Our Latest

The Rebellious Act of Rolling Back the Stone

Richard Mouw

From Jesus to angels to the apostles, Resurrection Day instructs us on earthly and heavenly authority.

Review

‘The Christ’ Audio Drama Testifies to Easter

You can’t ‘come and see’ this depiction of Jesus, but you can definitely come and hear.

The Bulletin

Therapists’ Free Speech, Grads’ Careers, and Hegseth’s Imprecatory Prayer

Clarissa Moll, Russell Moore

Supreme Court ruling on conversion therapy ban, high unemployment rates of college grads, and the theology of praying judgment on enemies.

Review

Manifest Destiny Was an Act of Volition

John Fea

Three books on early American history.

The Scandal and Grace of Christ’s Saturday in the Grave

Hardin Crowder

How Fyodor Dostoevsky saw the whole story of redemption in Holbein’s painting of the dead Jesus.

The Cross that Saves and Heals

Jeremy Treat

Good Friday’s message to a wounded world.

Wonderology

Cosmic Plinko

Are we here by chance?

News

Churches Try Drones and Skydiving Bunnies for Easter Outreach

“We want to make it about Jesus and getting people excited about the Easter season and going to church somewhere.”

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube