Alternative Candidates Have Conservative Appeal

Conservative voters turned off by Republicans and Democrats have several other presidential choices this November, including Ross Perot’s Reform Party and the little-known U.S. Taxpayers Party.

“The GOP offers us the chance to go over the cliff at 70 miles per hour instead of 100 miles per hour,” Howard Phillips, the U.S. Taxpayers Party nominee and president of the Conservative Caucus, told CT. The Taxpayers Party goal is “to restore American jurisprudence to its biblical premises, to limit the federal government to its constitutional boundaries.” The party would eliminate the national debt and federal income tax, prohibit abortion, end aids-research funding, and dissolve the Department of Education.

But scholar William C. Martin says the party’s Christian Reconstructionist bent (convention speakers included theologian R. J. Rushdoony and Operation Rescue founder Randall Terry) make it an easy target to demonize. Conservative Patrick Buchanan declined an invitation to be the party’s presidential candidate, in part because the party is not on the ballot in all 50 states. Herb Titus, the former law school dean at Pat Roberston’s Regent University, will be Phillips’s running mate. Reconstructionism aims to have the United States follow what it claims are biblical directives in governing society.

ROSS REDUX: In looking at the Reform Party, political pollsters do not forecast that billionaire businessman Ross Perot will gain anywhere near the 19 percent of the vote he received in 1992. “Perot has a strong appeal as a smart, successful businessman who says he can solve problems effectively,” Martin says. “But there are enough doubts about his leadership qualities that a lot of people who voted for him in 1992 no longer have the same image of him.”

Researcher John C. Green says the recent Republican themes of balancing the budget, state rights, and the GOP’s Contract with America are in large part a response to Perot’s 1992 candidacy. And though Perot’s Reform Party is fiscally conservative, it is socially moderate and therefore unattractive to many evangelical Republicans. “Perot doesn’t do well among religious people,” Green says. “His followers tend to be people who are less committed to faith and who are disconnected from social organizations, including churches.”

Copyright © 1996 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Last Updated: October 4, 1996

Also in this issue

Why the Devil Takes Visa: A Christian response to the triumph of consumerism.

Our Latest

Blaming Women Harms Us All

Dorothy Littell Greco

When we fail to protect and honor women like Jesus, we all lose.

Synthetic Love Will Tear Us Apart

When we outsource intimacy to machines, we become what we practice. And we’re practicing the wrong things.

The Russell Moore Show

N.T. Wright on ‘The Vision of Ephesians’

The professor is in—and he’s talking about Ephesians.

Our Prayers Don’t Disappear into Thin Air

Bohye Kim

Why Scripture talks of our entreaties to God as rising like incense.

From Outer Space to Rome

In 1962, CT engaged friends and enemies in the Cold War and the Second Vatican Council.

May Cause a Spontaneous Outburst of Festive Joy

8 new Christmas albums for holiday parties, praise, and playlists.

Excerpt

Meet CT’s New President

The Bulletin with Nicole Martin and Walter Kim

Nicole Martin seeks to mend evangelical divides and uphold biblical truth.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube