Viewing Ourselves As Statistics

How do you know whom to believe? Before our modern era, we used to judge people’s credibility by who they were—Parents? Mutual friends? Church, school, or club connections? But today, most of our information comes from people we have never met, so we rely on a discourse of numbers, precisely measured, to tell us whom to trust. Whether it’s the fat grams in the granola we buy or projections of violent crime rates in New York, we trust people we know nothing about because they give us numbers.

Curiously, we have become such numbers junkies that we enjoy viewing ourselves as statistics. Magazines poll their readers about their sex lives and then amuse them by reporting the numbers. And priest-sociologist Andrew Greeley is a constant source of amusement: 3 out of 10 Catholics have purchased erotic underwear, he reported in 1994, compared to just 2 out of 10 non-Catholics.

Here are the results of two surveys. Neither is for mere amusement. First, our totally nonscientific survey conducted on the CT Web site (www.ChristianityToday.com) following the debate over inclusive-language Bibles in our October 27 issue. Out of 904 respondents, 27 percent supported inclusive-language Bibles, while 68 percent opposed, and 5 percent had no opinion. Unfortunately, the percentage of respondents who had actually read the CT articles in the magazine was only about 2 percent. These numbers, then, are not necessarily about the typical CT reader but about evangelicals who use the Web. Visit our Letters column for a less statistical, but more richly textured picture of CT readers’ opinions.

Another survey recently caught our attention: Episcopalians United (EU), a theologically conservative group, surveyed about 25,000 active Episcopalians, selected randomly from a wide variety of mailing lists. They excluded their own members from the results and demonstrated that the bulk of Episcopalians (despite their leaders’ theological liberalism) continue to hold traditional Christian beliefs: 85 percent believe the Bible is the Word of God written; 83 percent believe that salvation can be obtained only through Jesus Christ; 91 percent believe the principal task of the church is to preach and teach the gospel; 86 percent oppose the ordination of practicing homosexuals; and 86 percent oppose blessing same-sex unions.

Todd Wetzel, EU’s executive director, gives the study credence because the responses reflected the age range, geographical diversity, and gender balance of the Episcopal Church.

Wetzel says it’s important “not to cave in to despair. A lot of conservative people are leaving the church, feeling they are alone. But the survey indicates they are not alone.” Those numbers are not simply to amuse us, but to give us hope for our churches.

Copyright © 1997 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Also in this issue

Mary Rejoicing, Rachel Weeping: How shall we reconcile the glorious birth of the Savior with the bloody deaths of the boys of Bethlehem?

Our Latest

SCOTUS Ruling on ‘Conversion Therapy’ Is a Win for Christians

This week’s Chiles v. Salazar ruling allows counselors freedom to serve their clients in the ways they see fit.

From Our Community

A Renewed Subscription and a Broadened Perspective

Hannah Glad

How one Texan lawyer found himself reading CT again and supporting the One Kingdom Campaign.

Public Theology Project

Easter Is Not a Zombie Story

Jesus joined us in death—and defeated it.

What $18 Would Get You

In 1979, CT investigated deceptive Christians, made the case for psychology, and watched Islam with concern.

News

Palestinian Christians Prepare for Easter amid War and Settler Violence

Heather M. Surls

Many in the community have moved abroad. Those who stay are barred from visiting holy sites.

The Eternal Meaning of the Cup

John Anthony Dunne

Across the church, our Communion practices reveal a broken world and anticipate the one to come.

The Russell Moore Show

Everything Depends on an Empty Tomb

 A reflection on how the resurrection reshapes science, suffering, joy, and the future of the world.

A Case for In-Person Voting

As a volunteer at a polling station, I saw what we lose when we choose convenience over communal participation.

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube