Review of ‘Fanny and Alexander’

Fanny And Alexander

An Ingmar Bergman film,

released by Embassy Pictures.

Most of the evidence that cinema can be art comes from outside the English-speaking world. Between films like Ingmar Bergman’s Fanny and Alexander and commercial offerings that keep one’s mind from serious thought or one’s head in the trough, there is a great gulf fixed. Deep seldom calls to deep in cinema. It does here.

The eye, that glutton for frontiers, finds a feast in the impeccably detailed, lavish world of the Swedish upper class, circa 1912. We meet the Ekdahl family: the matriarchal Helena, the philandering Adolf, the schizoid Carl, the tragic Oscar and his philandering wife Emilie. They, and others in the huge cast, supply a bit of everything: joy and angst, security and fear, beauty and ugliness, love and cruelty, life and death. We see it all through the eyes of Fanny and Alexander, especially the latter, who spins strange yarns to lantern slides late at night.

If Bergman’s Weltanschauung can be seen in theater-manager Oscar’s speeches, or Alexander’s cinematic proclivities, it is even clearer in the second half of the story, which is as cerebral and mystical as the first half is visual. After Oscar’s death, Emilie, for undeveloped reasons, marries Edvard, a bishop. He is a talented, handsome man, but also cruel and vengeful. His house is orderly and austere, and its windows barred; the servants are meddling hags. In this world, one is never sure what is real and what is not. Alexander sees visions of Oscar, like the ghost of Hamlet’s father. Intelligent Christians, who should see this film if they see any at all, will have no trouble decoding the symbolism. It is fascinating to watch a story revolve around the most profound “why?” questions, and to know that someone still asks them.

One can believe this is Bergman’s last film. (Bound copies of the screenplay are being sold.) Less credible is the claim that it is not autobiographical. The bishop, in a late apparition, reminds young Alexander that he cannot escape. Indeed, the film grapples with an omnipresent God who displays both goodness and severity. From this God no one can escape. Not even Ingmar Bergman.

Reviewed by Lloyd Billingsley, a writer living in Southern California.

Our Latest

Indian Churches Encourage Couples to Leave and Cleave

For many couples, in-laws are a major source of marital strife.

The Bulletin

A Third Presidential Term, South American Boat Strikes, and ChatGPT Erotica

Trump hints at running in 2028, US strikes more alleged drug boats, ChatGPT produces erotica.

Review

Finding God on the Margins of American Universities

A new account of faith in higher education adds some neglected themes to more familiar story lines.

From Prohibition to Pornography

In 1958, CT pushed evangelicals to engage important moral issues even when they seemed old-fashioned.

Tackling Unemployment

The head of The T.D. Jakes foundation on job assistance and economic empowerment.

The Just Life with Benjamin Watson

Stephen Enada: Exposing a Silent Slaughter

Unpacking the crisis facing Nigeria’s persecuted Church

The Strangest Enemy I’ll Ever Meet

Scripture speaks of death as an enemy Christ conquers—and the door through which we see God face to face.

Review

First Comes Sex, Then Comes Gender

A new book acknowledges both categories as biblically valid—but insists on ordering them properly.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube