News

Prominent Filipino Pastor Accused of False Teaching 

Ed Lapiz, who popularized a more accessible preaching style, is courting controversy by rejecting the God of the Old Testament.

Ed Lapiz surrounded by message bubbles
Christianity Today January 14, 2025
Illustration by Christianity Today / Source Images: Youtube, Getty

In late June, controversy erupted in the Filipino evangelical corner of the internet.

The subject: a sermon posted on YouTube by influential megachurch pastor Ed Lapiz, in which he claimed that the God of the Old Testament (Yahweh) is distinct from—and in opposition with—the God of the New Testament (El Elyon), the father of Jesus.

News of the teaching spread after The Bereans Apologetics Research Ministry posted an article titled “Ed Lapiz and His ‘Jesusness’ Teaching: The Making of a Cult” on June 25. In it, the author, who goes by the pen name Justyn, claimed that the 69-year-old pastor misread John 8:44 and goes so far as to infer that Yahweh is Satan.

The post received more than 12,000 views that week, causing the site to crash, said Justyn. CT agreed to not use his real name out of concern for retribution from the subjects of his articles on various cults. From there, Christians began analyzing Lapiz’s sermons and Facebook posts, debating in the comment sections and filming critiques of Lapiz’s theology.

“I don’t have anything against [Lapiz],” Justyn said. “[Christians] are free to disagree in terms of nonessential doctrines, but since he’s already attacking a major doctrine … then I don’t think that is something we can ignore.”

In response to the controversy, the country’s major evangelical body, the Philippine Council of Evangelical Churches (PCEC), decided to investigate Lapiz’s teaching. While his church, Day By Day Jesus Ministries, is not a member of the PCEC, Lapiz has a huge influence in the Filipino evangelical community, as he is a pioneer in contextualizing Christianity to Filipino culture and has a large following through his radio show and online videos.

In November, PCEC’s theological commission produced an eight-page position paper pointing out what they saw as errors in Lapiz’s teaching. The paper used Scripture to explain God’s consistency throughout the whole Bible and to clarify the relationship between Jesus and the Law.

Rather than quelling concerns, the paper riled up new controversy: Some Christians, like Justyn, called out the commission for calling Lapiz’s teaching “erroneous” rather than “heretical” and not directly naming Lapiz in the body of the paper, only referring to him in the footnotes. Aldrin Peñamora, executive director of the commission, noted that the PCEC carefully chose the wording to keep the door open for future conversations with the pastor, as Lapiz had said he was still studying the topic and had not settled on a conclusion yet.

At the time of publication, Lapiz and Day By Day had not responded to Christianity Today’s inquiries.

The controversy has raised questions for the Filipino church about how to safeguard doctrine in an age when independent churches shun authority, pastors are “canceled” by an online jury, and Christians are shaping their theology based on online preaching. Peñamora and Timoteo Gener, chairman of the commission, hope their response can both clarify doctrine and show fellow Christians a better way to resolve conflicts.

Peñamora noted that for some Christians, it may be easy to call Lapiz a heretic. However, once that’s done, “do you still have a play left for him to be transformed?”

Creating an Indigenous Filipino Christianity

In the realm of Filipino evangelicalism, Lapiz is a figurehead. Originally from Bulacan province near Metro Manila, Lapiz became a Christian through a college fellowship and later served as a youth-camp director and radio announcer for Youth for Christ Philippines.

In the ’80s, Lapiz moved to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for work. In 1985, he and two colleagues started a Bible study group, and within two years, it had multiplied into 37 groups that collectively held seven worship services a week. In 1991, he brought Day By Day to the Philippines, opening a church in Quezon City. To fit the church’s growing numbers, it moved to a large auditorium in Pasay City, where an estimated 6,000 people attended each week as of 2017. Day By Day also has branches around the world, including the Middle East and North America.

Lapiz is known for indigenizing or “Filipinizing” Christianity. (Evangelicalism came to the Philippines through American colonialism and is still deeply influenced by the West.) By using kakanin (sticky rice) for communion, folk dances and native instruments for worship, and Taglish—a mix of English and Tagalog—for preaching, Lapiz hoped to “make the Christian faith more Filipino,” noted Gener, who is friends with the pastor. “He’s a proponent of redeeming culture.”

When Gener was the president of Asia Theological Seminary, Lapiz spoke to his students several times about contextualized theology. Lapiz has a doctorate in Filipino studies yet has never studied theology, which Gener noted may be his “weakness.”

Justyn noted that one reason for Lapiz’s popularity is his ability to preach on relatable topics. “Whenever he preaches, you can easily apply the Scripture to a day-to-day practice,” the blogger said.

Lapiz’s advice on relationships, finances, and positive thinking often goes viral for its in-your-face approach, combining sarcasm, sass, and Scripture references. He speaks in the lingua franca, which only broadens his appeal, as he sounds more like a concerned friend than a preacher.

“A piece of advice to those head over heels for someone: If the person really doesn’t like you, there’s nothing you can do to make that person fall for you,” Lapiz said in one sermon that went viral on TikTok. “By pushing yourself to the person, you risk being disliked and disavowed.”

Pitting Yahweh against El Elyon

Lapiz’s influence and storied history in Filipino evangelicalism, as well as his insistence on keeping his church independent from groups like PCEC, have made it difficult for Christian leaders to determine what to do when his teachings stray from orthodox belief.

Starting 2023, members of PCEC churches approached Peñamora to report that Lapiz’s teaching had begun to focus on Jesus filter, a term that calls believers to follow the “spirit, essence, example, and teaching of Jesus” and rejects teachings in the Old Testament that Lapiz said do not conform with this vision of Jesus. Yet initially Peñamora didn’t have solid evidence that the teaching had strayed outside of the large theological tent of the PCEC.

Then the Bereans post on Lapiz’s March 22 sermon led to a flurry of online activity, with netizens calling on the PCEC to make a statement. In the sermon, titled “Of Legal Age Na Sya” (He is of legal age), Lapiz taught on John 9:1–39, where Jesus heals a man born blind. “The God of those who are in the Law is different from the God Jesus was referring to, since if it was the same God, they should be in agreement,” preached Lapiz.  “But why were [the people in the Law] the ones who are primarily against Jesus and caused him to be crucified?”

Quoting Amos 5:18, Zephaniah 1:14–15, and Psalm 97:1–2, he argued that “Jesus comes as light, and the day of Yahweh is darkness.”

The Bereans post pointed out the similarities of his teaching with the heresy of Marcionism, named after the second-century theologian Marcion. The son of the bishop of Sinope, Marcion rejected the authority of the Old Testament, as he believed the God depicted in those books was legalistic and wrathful and fundamentally different from the gracious and loving God of the New Testament. He was excommunicated from the church of Rome around AD 144 for his heretical beliefs.

Justyn and other Christians critical of Lapiz’s teachings noted that they didn’t fall completely into the category of Marcionism, as Lapiz appears to still believe in God the Father and the Pauline Epistles.

In August, Far East Broadcasting Company, the radio station that hosted Lapiz’s show for the past 45 years, stated that it had ended its partnership with Day By Day Christian Ministries, but it didn’t explain why. 

Investigation into Lapiz’s teaching

As accusations swirled online, Peñamora felt the theological commission needed to settle the doctrinal confusion. This wasn’t the first time the PCEC investigated an influential nonmember. In 2021, the group published a statement about an independent church in Manila, Faith in Jesus, as its leaders were preaching universalism, the idea that hell does not exist. The church had a wide reach due to the popularity of its worship team.

In August, PCEC national director Noel Pantoja released an open letter stating that the commission was examining the teaching of a “very well-known and influential pastor” and asking Christians to pray for the group and “demonstrate restraint in your discussions.”

Later that month, Peñamora and other theologians met informally with Lapiz to discuss his teaching. For ten and a half hours, the group talked about their lives, about their ministries, and about doctrine. Peñamora noted they didn’t want to be seen as interrogators but as fellow ministers.

In that conversation, Lapiz stated he wasn’t fixed to his perspective but felt it was important for him to personally explore the nature of Yahweh and El Elyon, Peñamora said. He remembered Lapiz saying, “I need to understand it very deeply; I don’t want to parrot what I learned from others.”

The theological commission explained how God is constant throughout the Scriptures and that Jesus came to fulfill the Law rather than abolish it. “He was not committed to saying, ‘Well, I’m a Marcionite’ or ‘I don’t believe in the Old Testament,’” Peñamora recalled. “He was saying that he’s still in the journey and that evangelicals were already crucifying him for being in this journey of seeking the truth.”

Yet the consequences of Lapiz’s exploration are concrete: One of his mentees, Rolando Garcia of Awakening Church, had since taken Lapiz’s teaching one step further by saying that the God of the Old Testament was the Devil, Peñamora said. In the theologians’ meeting with Lapiz, he distanced himself from Garcia’s teaching.

After the meeting, Peñamora noticed that Lapiz stopped publicly posting his analysis of his sermons on his Facebook page. The commission hoped to have a formal meeting with Lapiz to see if he had come to any conclusions, but Day By Day stopped responding to the commission’s requests. Once Peñamora started to realize that a second meeting wouldn’t happen, PCEC decided to publish the position paper.

“We should tolerate theological differences [in the PCEC], but on the other hand, part of the call of the church is to ward off false teachings and to keep the deposit of faith,” Gener said.

Heresy versus erroneous teaching

The position paper states that its purpose is to respond to “an erroneous teaching about the nature of God the Father, Jesus Christ, and Law and Gospel that recently surfaced online.” A footnote linked to a Facebook post by Lapiz as well as the YouTube video of his sermon.

It stressed the need to judge the church’s teaching with “utmost concern and care” but also to address errors and heresies in the spirit of love. They differentiated error, a misconception or mistake in understanding and practice, from heresy, a teaching that negates the gospel of Jesus.

The document uses verses to explain that the gospel comes from the whole Bible rather than only centering on the New Testament. “The story of the Scriptures determines the shape and content of the gospel, not a presupposed doctrinal system based on mere proof-texting of Bible references disengaged from the gospel story.” It then goes on to state that God is the same from Genesis to Revelation, that Yahweh and El Elyon are names for the same God, and that both the Law and Jesus’ salvation plan reveal the love of God. 

The response to the paper was mixed. Some commenters on PCEC’s Facebook page thanked the commission for its clarity, while others claimed the paper was “watered down” for not calling the pastor a heretic. Justyn of The Bereans noted that it seemed “very soft.”

“If they acknowledge that his teaching is not faithful to Scripture, then why bother to say it’s just erroneous?” Justyn noted that if Lapiz is indeed still studying the topic and has not yet finalized his position, “then how come he … made public this preaching?”

Justyn argued that, with that sermon, Lapiz was trying to separate himself from the evangelical world, claiming that he had discovered the truth while calling the rest of Christians “Yahwistic.”

Justyn said he understands that the PCEC has to “walk on eggshells” to have a good relationship with Lapiz and that it wants to reach out to him pastorally. However, “they really have to be bold enough to call out Ed Lapiz and label the teaching as heresy, not just an erroneous teaching, so that the body of Christ will be warned.”

Peñamora noted that the commission made that call because, unlike the Faith in Jesus pastors, Lapiz wasn’t defending his position. Instead, he was asking for space to think through the issue and come to his own conclusion, Peñamora said.

Peñamora hoped that by being gracious, PCEC can keep the communication channel open and that Lapiz would be willing to speak to the commission or other theologians on the topic.

Many of the Christians “screaming for blood” online are younger believers, Peñamora noted. “Just saying the truth itself—that it is erroneous, it’s wrong doctrine—and to be in the posture of still hoping and praying for the person, I think that is the more Christlike way to handle a conflict.”

Local church reaction

The effects of Lapiz’s teaching have trickled into local churches. Derick Parfan, the pastor of Baliwag Bible Christian Church, noted that when he critiqued Lapiz’s posts on Facebook, some of his church members pushed back in the comment section, claiming that Parfan was misinterpreting what Lapiz was saying or arguing that Lapiz knew what he was talking about, as he’s been pastoring for decades.

“That’s the reason why I really have to address this issue to our church,” Parfan said. As the pastor of a 150-member church, “I’m responsible for the flock God entrusted to me. When they hear teaching that’s novel—although not novel to those rooted in early church history—we pastors felt we really have to protect our flock from this teaching.”

It encouraged Parfan to teach church history during his church’s adult Sunday school class, covering early church fathers as well as heretics such as Marcion. He is also currently preaching through Exodus, and in his sermons, he emphasizes why the Old Testament is just as important as the New Testament.

God, he teaches, is the God of both justice and love and is consistent throughout all time. While Parfan hasn’t mentioned Lapiz in his preaching, he said he believes God has used this experience to build up his church and to get people talking about theology.

“We need to preach from the Old and the New Testaments for [believers] to see that we have one book—not one book for Israel and one book for the church,” Parfan said. “No, the whole Scripture is Christian Scripture.”

Additional reporting by Caleb Maglaya Galaraga

News

Free from Prison, Ancient Church Floor Comes to US

Mosaic inscriptions reveal faith and practice of early Christians.

Man points at detail on Megiddo Mosaic, a church floor excavated by archaeologists

The Megiddo Mosaic is from the oldest known building constructed for Christian worship.

Christianity Today January 14, 2025
Courtesy of the Museum of the Bible

A church floor was discovered in Israel in 2004 in the ancient city of Megiddo. It was found a few miles down the road from Tel Megiddo, one of the most famous archaeological sites in the Holy Land, inside a prison. 

“It was in fact directly inside the walls,” said Jeffrey Kloha, former head of curation at the Museum of the Bible.

Archaeology is hard enough under normal conditions. Megiddo Prison, which holds more than 1,000 Palestinians believed to be security threats and has been a source of serious controversy in Israel, made things a lot more complicated.  

But in 2024, the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA) finally excavated the 580-square-foot mosaic, conserved it, and offered it to the Museum of the Bible for its first public appearance in a temporary display in Washington, DC.

IAA experts cut the mosaic into ten pieces. They packed them up and shipped them to America, where the pieces were reassembled at the Bible museum. 

The mosaic is being touted by the museum as “one of the most groundbreaking archaeological discoveries since the Dead Sea Scrolls.”

Courtesy of the Museum of the Bible.

Christopher Rollston, George Washington University professor of biblical and Near Eastern languages and civilizations, said the display is “stunning.” 

Rollston is an expert in ancient inscriptions and internationally renowned as a skeptical voice, frequently raising questions and concerns about bold archeological claims. But he has no hesitation endorsing the significance of the Megiddo Mosaic. 

“From my perspective,” Rollston said, “there’s not a whole lot to quibble with here.”

Israeli archaeologists say the church floor was built around AD 230. They were able to give a precise date based on coins found during excavation, as well as from the style of mosaic and the type of pottery uncovered at the site.

This is, to date, one of the oldest-known church buildings and the first to be constructed specifically for the purpose of worship. A century later, after the Roman emperor Constantine legalized Christianity, churches began to proliferate throughout the Mediterranean. Only three churches from before that time have been discovered by archaeologists: a house church in Capernaum, a house church in eastern Syria, and now this structure in Megiddo.

The mosaic floor appears to have been built for a Roman soldier named Gaianus. A perfectly preserved inscription reads, “Gaianus, also called Porphyrius, centurion, our brother, has made the mosaic at his own expense as an act of generosity. Brutius has carried out the work.”

Gaianus was previously unknown to historians but now joins Cornelius (Acts 10) and the unnamed centurion of Capernaum (Matt. 8; Luke 7) as one of the first converts to the Christian faith in the Roman army.

A second inscription in the mosaic is even more exciting to scholars of early Christianity. It reads, “Akeptous, the friend of God, has offered the table to God Jesus Christ [for] remembrance.” 

This is the earliest archaeological mention of Jesus Christ and is evidence early Christians thought Jesus was not just a good teacher, but actually God. Some historians had previously argued that the first followers of Christ didn’t believe in the Incarnation and only later came to see Jesus as divine. The inscription shows this early community affirmed Jesus was God.

The reference to the table also offers additional evidence of the early Christian practice of gathering around Communion. 

“It doesn’t change the way we look at things,” Rollston said, “but it certainly corroborates some of the things we know from other sources.”

Near the center of the mosaic is a large stone block. The archaeologist’ report on the discovery does not say that it is a Communion table, but Rollston thinks it is probably the one mentioned in the inscription. 

“It’s hard for me to believe it’s not,” he said. 

The floor also has an octagonal medallion with a depiction of two fish. Fish were common Christian symbols. The Greek word for fish, ichthys, was used as an acronym for the phrase Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior, and served to remind Jesus’ followers of his instructions to “fish for people” (Matt. 4:19).

The church floor has a third inscription that says, “Remember Primilla and Cyriaca and Dorothea, and moreover also Chreste.” No indication is given why they should be remembered. Perhaps these four—all women—were killed for their faith during a period of persecution. At the very least, the inscription testifies to the prominent role of women in the early church.

The whole mosaic is so well preserved that when people see it, many initially think it’s a replica, said Robert Duke, the new chief curator at the Museum of the Bible. 

“They are stunned when they realize it’s the actual mosaic floor from back in the third century,” said Duke, who previously taught Old Testament at Azusa Pacific University. “People were celebrating the Eucharist in this room.”

Archaeologists believe Christians worshiped in the church in Megiddo for about 70 years. Sometime around the year 300, the floor was covered in pottery shards, which helped protect it for the next 1,700 years. 

It is not clear why the church stopped being used. The Roman army base at Megiddo was decommissioned at about that time, so maybe everyone just left. There was also a wave of Roman persecution, so perhaps the believers were no longer able to meet openly in a dedicated worship space. 

When Israel built a prison in the same spot in the 1970s, no one had any idea that it had once been a church with an amazing floor paid for by a Roman soldier who loved “God Jesus Christ.”

The Megiddo Mosaic will be on display at the Museum of the Bible through July. After that, the IAA may loan it to other institutions, allowing it to be seen by more people in other parts of the US. It will ultimately return to Israel. Officials are working to move the prison and establish a tourist site for the ancient church.

Gordon Govier writes about biblical archaeology for Christianity Today, hosts the archaeology radio program The Book and The Spade, and is the editor of Artifax

Inkwell

Near Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Inkwell January 13, 2025
Photography by Amy J. Lewis

There are no silences or stars.
I hear the pickup trucks and cars,

and choppers too, which soon become
like summer mowers with their hum,

as all throughout each evening hour
they land upon the concrete tower.

I find it easy to ignore
what those incoming come here for

and everything their flying brings
when time begins to shear our wings.

A.M. Juster’s original and translated poetry has appeared in eleven books as well as Poetry, The Paris Review, and The Hudson Review. In 2025 Paul Dry Books will publish his first children’s book, Girlatee, and W.W. Norton will publish his translation of Petrarch’s Canzoniere.

Inkwell

In the Presence of Mine Enemies

On Holy Enmity and the Life of Beauty

Inkwell January 13, 2025
Belshazzar’s Feast by John Martin

Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies.
— Psalm 23:5, KJV

Charity itself is full of war.
— Charles P.guy

I. A brief family anecdote of war.

My grandfather Paul, whom his grandchildren and great-grandchildren would one day affectionately call Gum, was the youngest of three children, born in 1925 in Canton, Ohio, to Pásztor Janos and Pásztorne Sitka Gizella, new immigrants from Hungary. 

Paul was 16 years old when America entered the Second World War in 1941. When he was 18, he was drafted into the war in Europe and assigned as a private to a specialized rifle squad, mounted on “half-tracks,” as a point man for General Patton’s armor. His older brother John was 25—an officer, he went in on Omaha Beach, at the very center of the D-Day invasion of Normandy. 

From the Normandy beachhead, John’s unit moved deeper into France before encountering a particularly well-planned German ambush in a particularly cursed rural hedgerow. Caught in the fire of heavy machine guns, small arms, a tank, and mortars, John left the momentary safety of the ditch, pulled a bazooka off a dead man, incapacitated the Panzer blocking their exit route with a well-placed shot, and was promptly shot and torn by shrapnel from the explosion of a nearby shell. Being a Pastor, he survived. 

For his bravery in that single action, Uncle Johnny was awarded a promotion, two Purple Hearts, and the French Legion of Honor. He went home, where his barrel-chested body had a long recovery. For the remainder of his life, flecks of German steel would work their way out of his back while he slept. In the sunny light of early morning, his wife, Cozette, would pick them off the sheets and plink them into their trash can in Burbank, California. He had seen, if my memory is correct, only about 20 days of combat.

My grandfather Paul was assigned to General Patton’s Sixth Armored Division (the “Super Sixth”). He would serve in all of Patton’s five major campaigns, including the Battle of the Bulge. His were the first Allied boots into village after village held and hotly defended by the Germans. Casualties to his unit were enormous. He was hardened for many months by extreme conditions of stress, against an organized and determined enemy with a defender’s considerable advantage. He refused multiple promotions, having had time to notice the relative rate at which officers tended to die. He fought a very different war than that of his brother. It was long. It was exhausting. It made him quiet.

He could not then have known, as the European summer reddened to autumn and went corpse-blue with winter, that he would survive. Many decades later, he would tell me, one of the four men in our family named after him, that he had fully expected to die, and that all the rest of his life that followed he considered to be “extra,” a sheer gift. 

He could not have known then, his thumbnail bruised blue by the bolt of his Garand, that he would marry his high school sweetheart, Irene, who would become my feisty, dark-eyed grandmother. Nor that he would graduate from college, earn a master’s degree, and complete his PhD. He could not have known the respected teaching career, nor the children, nor the grandchildren, nor the great-grandchildren, who would all, always, speak of him with reverence and affection, like one speaks of a chieftain or a wise man.

II. An unsettling aside.

I will venture that I know something about you. Perhaps things are going very well for you, or perhaps they are going very poorly, but in either case, I expect that you may be “losing heart.” What a cliché that phrase can be in the wrong mouth! But I mean it in the deepest sense of the term—you are becoming discouraged. The cœur (French for “heart”) of your courage draining away. 

Perhaps, in spite of your belief, in spite of your best efforts, there is a sense of meaninglessness washing at your roots like the waves lap at a tree beside a swamp. It comes from everywhere and from nowhere, it seems. There is a wrongness in the world, difficult to name, and it is growing. 

Only you know where the contours of this discouragement fall in your own life, but are they not there? It is in the fabric of our times. It drifts down to us with the changing of the years. You think it is politics, but politics are only the skin of the thing. So it is with culture, watching people on every side of you make fools of themselves because of fear, or ignorance, or one of the fashionable follies of our day. You would even chalk it to “human nature,” but it feels neither natural nor human. Perhaps, remembering some old preacher, you might blame it on a “fallen world,” but it does not feel that it is quite in the world at all.  

Whatever it is, you feel it nosing itself against your heart. 

III. The culture of Pretend.

Contemporary life in the developed world is characterized nearly everywhere by the quality of Pretend.  

Our politics, business practices, relationships, social media feeds, and more are all defined by pretense—having the appearance of depth, competence, quality, or beauty, but the actuality of shallowness, incompetence, cheapness, and the tawdry or ugly. Pretending (which is not Imagination) has infected nearly every aspect of our lives. 

This is not uniquely an American phenomenon, but America has perfected it through the irresponsibly used power of stories. I am not only referring to the stories that we think are stories (novels, blockbuster films), but also to things we do not automatically recognize as such. Consider advertising, for example—which uses the tools of story (plot, character, setting) to influence you in favor of a product, perhaps, or away from the other party’s political candidate. Or consider the carefully curated algorithms which tunnel through all of your digital life, working sleeplessly to understand your tracks in order to craft the story of you—your demographic, your interests, the likely trajectory of your short- and long-term life—in the hope of delivering just the right thing at just the right time to get you to ______ (buy, vote, share). Your life narrative is being used to shape the future of that narrative, becoming a trajectory aimed at money. Like the devil on your shoulder in old Looney Tunes cartoons, something is always whispering in your ear. 

This culture of Pretend exists because contemporary life has become exceptionally insulated from reality. Never before in human history has such a small percentage of people had to deal with the beautiful and horrid essentials of human life—directly touching birth, illness, death, food production, war, peacemaking. There are now mercenaries to serve in every human struggle (usually on the other side of a screen), from buying our groceries to burying our dead. When the Real intrudes (and it always must intrude), there are experts to help control it or minimize its inconveniences to the majority of the population. 

Polite society goes to great lengths to pretend away its enemies. Conflict, like other inconveniences, is outsourced for someone else to handle: the police, the lawyers, the military, a drone operator sitting in an air-conditioned office park while killing people in a foreign war zone. Enmity, as most of us experience it, is often either performative or superficial.

But what do we lose when we lose our enemies? In fact, to be a person without enemies would be a pitiable state. Would it not mean that one stood for nothing, or that one was nothing? Pasta may be free from enemies, I suppose. Who could hate a lump of warm, damp noodles? You might prefer something else, but hatred is the wrong category. A person, however peaceable, cannot be free of enemies, not without being of about the same spiritual depth as pasta. Jesus, after all, did not tell us either to ignore our enemies or to destroy them. He said to love them. 

And how can you love your enemies if you have none?

IV. Of the holy enmity between the Children of Life and the Children of Wrong.

The central story of the entirety of the Christian Scriptures is of enmity. This conflict is between the offspring of Eve and the offspring of the Snake. The symbolism is clear here—Eve’s name is directly related to the Hebrew word for “life” and breathing; the name of the Snake (נָחָשׁ, or nāḥāš) carries a sense of being crooked, wrong, or twisted. Serpentine. This enmity, symbolically, is between Life and the Children of Life, and the Children of Wrong.

By Wrong, I do not mean an arbitrary moral wrong. At least not at first. I mean a Wrong that is infinitely more basic and more horrible than what we commonly think of as sin. The Snake’s twistedness was not about breaking a rule. It was about erasing Rule. It was not a temptation to disobey God. It was about trying to pretend into existence a world without Obedience or without a Real God at all. 

This is the Wrong of our true and only original Enemy. It is a Wrong that would, if it could, un-nature every bit of nature and un-good every speck of the “very good.” It is a Wrong so total and sad and infantile and absolutely pointless that it would rejoice to make the bedrock soft, and all the water hard as flint, to make fire cold, and cause the wind to clot and fall to the ground in useless gobs. It is a Wrong that would make light dark, just for the hell of it, and which would turn every book to gibberish, and defecate on every sacred image. It is a Wrong that would make the fathers and mothers abandon their children and embitter children against their parents, that would make male nothing and female nothing, and turn every child into a self-important, lascivious adult and make the adults babble and tantrum like brats. A Wrong that would empty every pleasure of all joy and every life of all love. 

This is the cosmic war that forms the black-and-scarlet backdrop to every human life. It is the one holy enmity. It is good to have the Wrong as enemy, to hate it with all your being. This is what love looks like when it meets what would undo it. This is why, in the Psalms, we ought to rejoice when we are told that the Messiah will break the raging nations with the Creator’s rod of iron, and why we ought to cheer with St. Paul when he tells us that Christ, through his resurrection, has led all the fallen Powers in triumphant procession, like a conqueror. It is why we should be out of our seats and shouting when the “great dragon” seen by St. John—who tried to swallow the Woman Clothed with the Sun—is cast down forever into the sea and the great pit. We are at war, and every soul you have ever met is a piece in that great game, becoming, one day at a time, either more a Child of Life or more a Child of Wrong. It is an honor to have such enemies. It is an honor to be such an enemy. It means that we are who we have been told we are. 

At this point, you may be thinking I am going to make this political. You may think I am now ready to tell you which category of person you now have permission to hate, and who I would like you to vote against, or despise, or fight. But I will not do any of that. You may hate no one except Hatred itself. You may kill no one but Killing. Our weapons are not of this world, and our trust is not in princes nor their chariots.

IV. Danger! Danger!

There are four typical human responses to danger. Freeze, flight, fawn, or fight. 

To freeze is to lock up. You do nothing. You just stand there. Bang. This is the deer in the headlights. This is the response of those who, unprepared for the confusion and adrenaline and surreality of true danger, just stop. It is the worst possible response. 

Slightly better, from the perspective of basic survival, is flight. This, of course, is getting yourself the hell out of there. This is not usually a permanent fix, but it buys you some time, I guess. 

Fawning is the most pathetic option. One tries to ingratiate oneself with the danger. One flatters the bully or licks the hand that holds the billy club. One offers the bully little treats, and laughs at all the bully’s jokes, and tells the bully how glad you are that he’s your friend as he’s shaking out your wallet and cussing you. 

Then, of course, there is the option to fight. Here is what is glorified in all the big American stories. This fighting does not always mean resorting to outright violence, but, of course, violence is always on the table. Once begun, this will never end. Like flight, fighting may buy you some time. Perhaps it will buy you a few generations of time, and sometimes this must reluctantly be done. But it will never be permanent. It will always halfway serve the Wrong even as it pushes it back. It will always cost part of you. Even the best soldiers will carry within them some “spot in France.” 

With a little thought, I am sure that you can think of examples of Christian responses to culture that would fall under each of these categories—perhaps even people or public figures who might typify each one. So which of the four will it be? 

Well, there is a fifth option. To feast

V. Of that blessed table which is prepared for us.

The twenty-third Psalm is a song of trust. It is perhaps the most beautifully articulated statement of confidence in God other than Job’s (“Though he slay me, yet will I trust him”). The psalmist poetically paints God as a shepherd—a good shepherd—who, the careful reader will note, is not leading his sheep away from danger. He is leading the flock through it. Our path for grazing, for some reason we cannot fathom, leads “through the valley of the shadow of death.” When the table is laid for the psalmist, it is not among friends, but in the presence of enemies. 

This is a way of saying that God leads us in the Real world. This is not an insulated Pretend. Yes, the pastures are green, and the waters are fresh and full of peace. Nonetheless, death and darkness surround. Through them, God leads us to the table he has prepared and to the feast laid upon it.

What does it mean to feast? More than just eating, a feast holds the dimensions of the sacred.

At the core of Christian tradition sits the table. Only the pool of baptism is as indispensable. The table becomes  an altar. In the Anglican tradition, which has become my own, we speak St. Paul’s words from 1 Corinthians 5:8 at the culmination of the Eucharistic preparation when we celebrate the sacrifice of Jesus: Therefore, let us keep the feast.

But what is the feast? It is certainly our provision, our “daily bread.” And without question, it is the Eucharist, a sign and sacrament of Christ’s presence among his people. But the true dimensions of the feast prepared for us are even larger than they first appear. What is the table that God spreads for us in the presence of our enemies? It is as large as the world and limited only by our ability to receive it. 

The Greek word from which we draw Eucharist is well translated as “Great Thanksgiving.” From the Presence of Jesus, Host at the Table of Life, the entire creation is being caught up and changed—becoming that endless and holy feast for which it is our joy and duty to give eternal thanks.

VI. The whole world, turned to table and to weapon.

To feast means to partake with joy, to celebrate abundance. Not every large meal is a feast. In fact, there are ways to feast without eating a thing. I have feasted richly in New York’s Met museum, have feasted to the point of sobs as the Oregon Symphony presented the music of Vaughn Williams. I feast upon the roses and lilacs in the spring. Each morning I am able, I feast as I rise at dawn and walk a mile to a nearby creek to plunge into a cold basalt pool, my “Pool of Wonders.” The trout rise, and the American Dipper birds dive around me, and I wash myself like Naaman of whatever leprosy has clung to me, and it is like eating

As the whole world has been sanctified as an altar for Christ’s gift, so the whole world has become a table. And how it has been prepared! Witness the continents, spread like a cloth, draped with sand and snow, rising stark and blue to the boreal seas of ice, relaxing toward the luxury of the lush equator. Apples and pineapples, the brittle butterscotch scent of ponderosas, the shaggy mane of palms, the birds, the iridescent beetles, the bugling elk who tramp the chilly marshes. The voice of neon frogs who chorus in hot jungles, the clack of stone in the high Cascades as an aging marmot stumbles. Every fish. Every monstrous wonder of the deep, which science has not yet even discovered. The table holds the plasma breath of nebulae and of your own lungs with equal affection; the table is laid with all, every kind bearing fruit after its kind, each thing learning to speak its own name before God. 

And to this table we come. This, through no virtue of our own. We come as children, receiving gifts so large we cannot see the end of them. And we eat, and play, and dance, and peck our runes in stone, and graffiti our secret names on freeway walls, and birth out laughing babies and play peekaboo, and tell one another why the tortoise has his shell, and what the wind is singing in the storm. We compose symphonies and crank tunes upon the hurdy-gurdy, and stomp in clogs, and fling ourselves off pommel horses in clouds of dusty chalk, and blast clay pigeons from the sky, and live

And because it is all done in the presence of our enemies, it is all fighting. In all of it, most powerful when it is most unconscious, we, as Children of Life, fight the Children of Wrong. Every joy a spear against the dark, every love a shield, every thank you holding in itself more of reality than the massed deaths of all of history. This is what it means for the Creator to spite his enemies. 

Which is why I must convince you to believe me. You must take heart, must resist the Wrong that presses you, no matter the form it takes. Your life, your life is part of this. You are at the table before your one true Enemy. Delight is incendiary. Beauty is a weapon. Not a weapon as the world would fashion it, nor as our baser instincts of hatred or vengeance would determine, but the only kind of weapon that can touch the Wrong. Against the unmaker, making. Against chaos, order. Against decomposition, form. Against confusion, clarity. Against the cramped and shrunken, magnitude and right proportion. Against the cheap, the sublime. Against death, eternal life

For as it is written, 

We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. (Eph. 6:12, KJV)

And as it says in another place, 

Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings hast thou ordained strength because of thine enemies, that thou mightest still the enemy and the avenger. (Ps. 8:2)

Understand this and tremble; no true joy in your entire life was small. No love that you have ever loved was wasted. The lost moments, the beauties you could barely grasp, were each a blade forged in heaven. You cannot see your dimensions in this war. You cannot see your importance. If you could, it would unhinge you. 

The Christian writer and artist is participating in the work of beauty under conditions of spiritual war. This is not a war of a quick invasion or single drastic acts of heroism. Rather, it is a war of a similar kind to that which my beloved grandfather fought, though I blush to make the comparison. A long war. A war that makes one quiet. But in this war, it is the childlike who lead the way to battle; it is the poets who strike. This is not mere foolishness or religious fluff. It is, in the clean logic of heaven, the only way to fight our enemy. 

VII. Pawns and bean patches.

Once, while walking beside Gum toward a small diner in a stand of trees near Vernonia, Oregon, when I was a teenager, some angle of the light hit wrong. His arm instinctively shot out (still extremely strong), and he shoved me forcibly back and down behind him, out of what would have been the line of fire. “I’m sorry,” he said gently as he pulled me up a second later. “It reminds me of a spot in France.” 

We carry our wars with us, no matter how well-fought or how well-laid the table. To discard the Pretend and to live is a work of difficulty, danger, and discouragement. Of course, you feel this in your own way. It means that you are fighting

I work with writers, which means I often work with the discouraged. All true art contains an element of loneliness, but creative writing makes a craft of it. So it is natural to lose heart, to wonder if what you are doing is making any sort of difference at all. Is anyone reading? How can words, from people like ourselves, really do anything? 

In chess, the pawn is the most easily discarded piece. There are so many of them, after all, and they can’t do much. Their movement is constrained; they attack awkwardly. It is for the knights and bishops to make grand forays, to inflict losses. I am not much of a chess player, but I have lost the game enough to tell you that this is not the pawns’ whole story. Sure, they’re slow and unimpressive. Alone, they are extremely vulnerable. But in a diagonal line, they form one of the strongest shapes in the entire game. They hold their ground. Like Shammah, son of Agee the Hararite (2 Sam. 23:11), who fought in a bean patch as his nation fled around him. He held that bean patch so well, that stupid plot of lentils,  that the battle turned, and we still say his name thousands of years later in a language that was not yet born when he lived. We are holding ground. What pawn could see their true importance in the game? And yet the whole game may well hinge on one pawn. 

And this is where I must turn to you, dear friend. For though I do not know you, I know that you have a part to play in this war. I know that you are made for goodness, truth, and beauty, made to “dwell in the house of the Lord forever.” I know there has been prepared for you a table in the presence of our enemies. I know that it requires considerable faith to rest at that table. To trust the shepherd with the rod of iron, who seems so slow to strike the wicked that are seeking whom they may devour. I know that it is difficult, almost beyond description, to participate in the work of beauty, and to resist the temptation to strike the various puppets that the old Snake bobs to distract us. 

I know that you likely look about you, at whatever bean patch you are standing in, and you may be discouraged. You may see a cheap and unimpressive pawn when you look in the mirror. But no one else stands on your square. You do not know what pieces fall if you are taken. So hold the bean patch, friend. Strengthen the weak hands. Make firm the feeble knees. Be strong. Do not be afraid. For our God has set for us a table. In this—in us—he is crushing the head of all Wrong. 

So let us keep the feast.

Paul Pastor is a Contributing Editor for Ekstasis & Executive Editor for Nelson Books, an essayist, critic, author of the forthcoming book The Locust Years and Other Poems.

Culture

Wired for Jesus

I’m always praying and worshipping under the influence of caffeine. Is that cause for concern?

A painting of the disciples with Jesus holding a coffee cup.
Christianity Today January 13, 2025
Wikimedia Commons / Edits by CT

Most weeks I share a carafe of coffee with all the Sunday schoolers. I approach the kitchen counter and hope for doughnuts. Selecting a mug—the one that says “Shalom, y’all” is a hot commodity—I fill it to the brim with splashing caffeine. Classes meet all over the church building, but everyone makes a pilgrimage to the coffeepot. Like ants to a picnic.

We stand around talking, weathering awkward silences with sips. Doors swing open again and again, letting in cold air. Once again, the warm mugs are there for us. Eventually, we find chairs; we talk about the gospel reading and a couple of poems. I’m thoroughly caffeinated by the time class ends. I lap up the last drops and head upstairs for worship.

Coffee dominates church life. The consumption of caffeine, as one writer quipped, is “Christians’ acceptable vice,” seeing us “through a Reformation, modernity and postmodernity, through boring Sunday sermons and lively evening rituals. Now it takes its place on the kitchen table, next to the Bible—close enough to be in the same frame.” We get out of bed and begin our days with, as John Mark Comer puts it, “the ancient Christian spiritual discipline of really good coffee.” Only after arming ourselves against drowsiness do we set about praying.

Last year, my body couldn’t take it anymore. I started experiencing chest pain, and coffee sharpened it. Eventually, I visited a doctor, who told me to cut back.

It’s forced me to wonder, Can I live a happy life without coffee? Sounds extreme. But it’s tough to go without. Coffee transforms boring work into creative contribution and absorbs my attention with friends’ voices. Vocation, friendship, worship—all crucial to flourishing, all reliant on caffeine. I find myself craving its effects. If I had this sort of relationship with something else, say alcohol or social media, my pastor would certainly have concerns.

Maybe happiness isn’t the goal here. But can I live a Christian life without coffee? It’s as intertwined with the practice of my faith as hymns and potluck chili. When I struggle to engage with practices of faith, coffee keeps me alert to the work of God.

I imagine if I were in Gethsemane waiting for Jesus to finish praying, I’d try a few things to keep me awake—some conversation, food, maybe singing. But when all those failed, there’s one thing that would undoubtedly do the job.

I really do wonder whether coffee is my “acceptable vice.” Can I keep watch without it?


According to legend, coffee originated in a religious context. The story goes that a goat herder named Kaldi noticed his sheep were acting differently after eating berries from a particular plant. They weren’t falling asleep at night. Kaldi, I imagine, thought to himself, I wonder if I could get in on that. He shared his observation with the abbot of the local monastery, who made a drink from the berries. Soon the abbot was able to stay “alert through the long hours of evening prayer.” Centuries later, here we are.

Caffeine isn’t the only intervention that has kept Christians awake while praying. In the 12th and 13th centuries, Saint Francis and his followers used rigging. A biographer at the time, Thomas of Celano, explains that the contemplatives believed they should always be praying and praising God: “They thought themselves abandoned by God if in their worship they did not find themselves constantly visited by their accustomed fervor.”

But sometimes they got tired.

When they wanted to throw themselves into prayer, they developed certain techniques to keep from being snatched off by sleep. Some held themselves up by suspended ropes in order to make sure their worship would not be disturbed by sleep creeping up on them. Others encased their bodies in iron instruments. Still others encased themselves in wooden girdles.

To them, metal and wood were the antidotes to drooping eyelids and nodding heads. The body’s needs were considered obstacles to prayer that needed to be overcome. Fatigue was a problem to solve rather than a sign to sleep.

The Franciscans not only ignored their bodies’ needs; they actively subverted them. They stripped naked in the cold and pierced themselves with thorns. These expressions of faith may be foreign to us. But consider the reasons we deny ourselves sleep—the prospect of gain and notoriety, for instance—that cause some of us to overwork.

Saint Francis and his followers harmed their bodies because they believed it would bring them closer to the crucified Christ. Many of us, on the other hand, harm our bodies because we think it will bring us closer to worldly success.

Of course, lacking sleep is not the same as stripping in the cold or piercing one’s own skin. But it does denigrate the body. This modern denigration creates the caffeine craving, and rampant addiction arises from this refusal to rest.

I go to church with a biology professor who has the spiritual gift of explaining science in a way that I understand. He taught me that the plants that produce caffeine use it as a natural pesticide. Caffeine kills hungry bugs. It’s also a psychoactive substance, like marijuana and cocaine, meaning that it affects humans’ mental processes.

Caffeine interferes with adenosine, the chemical that tells our brains when we’re tired. That means caffeine’s main job is to lie to us. Adenosine, any time we are tired, tries to stage an intervention. But caffeine steps in front and tells adenosine that there’s no problem, it’s making a big deal out of nothing, and we’re doing just fine. It slams the door on adenosine’s intervention. Caffeine doesn’t give us energy. It enables us to pretend we have it.

Whether using caffeine or wooden rigging, some treat their bodies as inconvenient at best and an obstruction to devotion at worst. If communion with God happens in spite of physical bodies, then they keep the coffee coming. If prayer is meant to transcend the physical, then rigging can only help.

In this view, flesh and blood are hurdles between us and God’s vision for salvific reconciliation. We don’t need to take heed of our bodies’ needs. We need to get past them.


But bodies don’t have to obstruct communion with God. In fact, it is through bodies that communion with God is made possible. Consider the Eucharist.

Historical theologian Gisela Kreglinger writes that “we receive spiritual sustenance through our physical and communal sharing in the Eucharist, by walking to the altar to stand or kneel, by opening our hands and our mouths to receive the physical matter of bread and wine. We chew, we taste, we listen, and we swallow. We digest.” It makes sense that Jesus taught us to remember his flesh and blood by eating and drinking. You can’t get much more bodily than digestion.

In eating the bread, our bodies tangibly interact with the body of Christ. And we enact our identity as the church, the body of Christ.

Bread is different from caffeine. It gives energy by providing calories that our bodies need. And while the Lord’s Supper doesn’t typically involve eating enough bread to sustain the body’s literal needs—just a wafer, just a crumb—bread’s physical effects reflect a spiritual reality: that prayer might have less to do with transcending our bodies and more to do with nourishing them.

Wine, on the other hand, is more like caffeine than bread. In larger quantities, it’s a psychoactive substance that affects mental processes. What, then, should we make of its place in the Communion ritual?

In her essay “Prayer and Incarnation: A Homiletical Reflection,” the religious philosopher Lissa McCullough writes that absolute good transcends us, “lying beyond or outside the limits of our desire.” Humans are limited by our bodies—tired, hungry, suffering from headaches or sore backs—and that limitation can keep us from the absolute good of God. I might believe that I need to give my undivided attention to a hurting friend, but if I am exhausted, my conviction is limited by my body. I want to pray with loving attention toward God, but my drooping eyelids limit that desire.

Part of prayer, McCullough argues, is a “sacred petition” that takes us beyond ourselves and to an absolute good that “can reconcile us to the incarnational will of God as that will is actually unfurled providentially in events.” Humans are broken. So communion with God requires a spiritual elevation above human nature, above the limits of our bodies and minds—above tiredness.

Notice the ultimate purpose that McCullough outlines: Transcendence is intended to “reconcile us to the incarnational will of God.” Jesus came down to live an earthly life with a bodily existence. God’s will is incarnational. It doesn’t ignore our earthly bodies but works through them, even when ultimate goodness requires transcending our bodies’ limits.

Communion wine acts as an agent of transcendence, at least figuratively. But it does so not to denigrate the body (as with self-flagellation and overwork) or ignore it (as with wooden girdles and a double shot of espresso). Instead, both the bread and wine enter the body for the sake of the body. In McCullough’s words, prayer should “be directed not toward the transcendent disincarnationally, but into the world, toward the body and the earth, giving rise to a fully incarnate saintliness or holiness.”

We’re humans that need sanctification, and this sanctification is accomplished not in spite of our bodies but through them. Kreglinger draws out how God sanctifies us through our bodily existence:

As we bring ourselves, including our bodies, and as we bring the fruits of the earth in bread and wine (which includes our participation in labor and creativity in its production), God sanctifies them and meets us in bread and wine. The fact that we bring ourselves together with bread and wine to God in the Lord’s Supper and that we receive Christ in bread and wine solidifies our close kinship with creation in the world of salvation.

God meets us during Communion. A couple in my church is beloved by everyone because they have loved everyone. She led the children’s choir for years and greets every person with the truest of smiles. He makes a point to greet newcomers any chance he gets, with a soft handshake and curious questions. Christ’s love sparkles in their eyes. Recently they’ve had some health problems, and she uses a walker and oxygen tank.

During an evening Eucharist service, while everyone else walks up the aisle to receive bread and juice, they remain seated. The servers walk to them. They eat, drink, and receive God’s grace. Watching them raise their hands as we sing our final hymn, I become more aware of God’s will for incarnational salvation. The limits of their bodies do not keep God from communing with them. If anything, the beauty of the Eucharist is made more beautiful by the limits they face.

To enact incarnate holiness, prayer does not avoid the world but goes into it. The Eucharistic prayer gives us the food and drink of this reality, building a closer kinship to creation with each swallow.


Saint Francis didn’t think bodies were all bad. One day, he came across some birds and began to preach to them: “My brothers the birds, you should love your creator deeply and praise him always. He has given you feathers to wear, wings to fly with, and whatever else you need.”

Being thankful for our own feathers and wings means taking good care of them. This requires eating good food that gives good energy. It means getting rest and not using caffeine as a crutch. If we are exhausted, glorifying God might mean taking a nap or going to bed early.

It could also mean making a cup of coffee to comfort a friend. It might mean going through a drive-through for that hot, bitter drink that will get you through the third stretch of a long day. Sometimes, tiredness is worth the tradeoff. Sometimes, we need coffee.

But just because something is good doesn’t mean it’s always good. Gisela Kreglinger was raised in a family that has been making wine for generations, but she recognizes the substance’s potential for abuse. In The Spirituality of Wine, she writes,

When we use wine or food or any other substance as an anesthetic to cope with the stress, suffering, pain, and perhaps boredom of our lives, we not only abuse God’s gifts but also close ourselves off from the possibility of receiving comfort and healing that comes from being in a relationship with God and one another.

Kreglinger calls for us to enjoy the gifts of God’s creation yet to be wary of using them in a way that keeps us from loving relationships with God and each other.

I’ve started drinking coffee again. (Not every day, and I sometimes have to adjust my diet to accommodate.) I have reasons that might hold water, but at the end of the day, it’s mostly because I enjoy it. I’ll leave it to someone with more fortitude or hypocrisy to call Christians to stop. But I’ve started insisting on one thing—I pray before having coffee.

Sometimes I practice morning prayer with friends. Sheer embarrassment, at the very least, keeps me from giving in to any sleepiness. Speaking aloud, standing, and kneeling allow me to focus myself even when my mind wants to wander. Once we finish, we flock to the church kitchen for several cups of coffee together. It’s a perfect start to my day.

There are all sorts of ways to engage in prayer without caffeine in our systems. It might be a worthwhile practice to abide in God’s loving presence in a mental state unaltered by psychoactive substances.

The question the church needs to ask is how caffeine is affecting our communal lives—whether it’s enabling us to mistreat our bodies and the bodies of others.

Are we giving in to the temptation of caffeine that promises productivity without rest? Are we practicing sabbath, or are we fueling a hustle culture that values success over well-being? Are we tangibly caring for brothers, sisters, and neighbors overworked by financial strain? Are we letting prayer nourish us as the Eucharist teaches?


Let’s go back to coffee on Sunday mornings. The brew I hold was made by a good friend who just asked me how I’m doing, audaciously expecting an honest answer. In the circle of chairs, parents, teachers, and technicians discuss the difficult drudgery of the everyday. University students tell of adventures and philosophies and aspirations. Retired-aged gardeners and hikers share their joys, hopes, regrets, and hard-earned wisdom. Hospital workers speak hopefully about their work. These words encourage and instruct, comfort and enliven me.

In this time, I am sustained by the body of Christ—the church that gives the gift of communion with God by communing with one another.

After the benediction, a middle-aged father empties the dishwasher so we can fill it with mugs again. Some caring hands might put away the chairs so they’re out of the way of the next gathering. And we will ascend the stairs to the sanctuary where our bodies will, once again, receive the nourishment of the body of Christ. And in that moment, through that gift, our bodies will be fulfilled in the transcendent love of God.

Whatever it looks like, honoring our bodies allows us to worship as the birds do: Saint Francis’s birds “exulted marvelously in their own fashion, stretching their necks, extending their wings, opening their mouths, and gazing at him.” Let us remember our needs and tend to them. And we will glorify God with our arms and legs, our skin and neurons.

Isaac Wood is a NextGen Accelerator Fellow for Christianity Today, and produces local history podcasts in East Tennessee.

Culture

Evangelical Fantasy Is on a Quest

Christian speculative fiction struggles to get onto bookstore shelves. So the genre is opening other portals to readers.

A robot arm reaching for books floating in space.
Christianity Today January 13, 2025
Illustration by Elizabeth Kaye / Source Images: Getty, Pexels

The annual Realm Makers gathering—held in 2024 at a Sheraton in St. Louis—has all the typical markings of a cosplay-encouraged conference: a preponderance of elf ears and dragon earrings; bustling vendor tables featuring all things fairies, robots, unicorns, and armor.

What’s perhaps unusual, however, is all the smiles. A palpable joy radiates from the authors, publishers, and fans of faith-based speculative fiction who come to this growing convention, now entering its 12th year. These are people who feel they have finally found a home.

In a welcome letter, Realm Makers CEO Becky Minor told 2024 conference goers: “I pray the time you spend at Realm Makers allows you the space to revel in all the quirky appreciations you have of the magical, impossible, or even the creepy corners of your imagination.”

Those “quirky appreciations” have always been part of Christian speculative (“spec”) fiction, the broad literature category encompassing faith-based science fiction, fantasy, and horror novels. But the genre’s quirks have also isolated it in the marketplace: Christian spec fiction is not shelved with general-market fantasy and sci-fi, nor is it grouped with mainstream Christian fiction like Amish love stories, historical romances, and more contemporary titles.

That lack of a home has long been viewed as a problem for Christian spec fiction. Now, however, the category is coming into its own like an ancient spore drifting in from space. Or a sentient robot intent on becoming human. Or a dragon freed from its treasure cave. Or an elf, a dwarf, or a wizard on a quest.

It’s happening in large part because writers and readers of the genre are building a home for themselves.

“We were percolating on events for Christian creators of speculative fiction who didn’t have a space they could call their own,” said Scott Minor, who with his wife, Becky, owns Realm Makers.

They held the first Realm Makers conference in 2013, with 85 in attendance including presenters and staff. The demand for the community was obvious: By 2024, the conference had grown to 475 attendees. Realm Makers also offers a dedicated social media network, webinars, an online bookstore, and the annual Realm Awards for novels.

Natalea Waller and Emily McKeehan, schoolteachers in Knoxville, Tennessee, who are cowriting a fantasy series, attended the conference for the first time in 2024. They heard about it only two weeks in advance. “We didn’t know there was a community for Christian fantasy writers. They are our people. It’s what we do and love,” the pair said, nearly in unison.

Lelia Foreman, a 72-year-old sci-fi author, echoed that sentiment. She loves “Realmies,” as they are called, because they are “not aghast at what you’re doing.”

The Minors attribute the community’s growth in part to the fact that “spec fiction is the genre of young people in the Christian world.” Half of conference attendees are under the age of 35, they said. And about 30 percent of people in the Realm Makers community are male—challenging the stereotype that readers and writers of Christian fiction are almost entirely female. “A greater proportion of male authors makes for a greater proportion of male readers,” Scott Minor said.

Christian spec fiction headliners include Nadine Brandes, who offers a magical retelling of the 16th-century British Gunpowder Plot in Fawkes; Clint Hall, whose Steal Fire from the Gods includes android overlords, cyborg clans, and one man bent on saving the world; S. D. Grimm, whose orphaned Phoenix must unlock her powers to save her race in Phoenix Fire; and James R. Hannibal, whose Lightraider Academy series is full of battles, dragons, and young heroes.

Finding readers is the biggest hurdle most authors face, but in Christian spec fiction it is an especially uphill climb. “There is a very distinct difference in Christian reader habits for those who love science fiction and fantasy. Readers are buying online, mostly through Amazon and most as e-books,” Minor said. There isn’t a single destination for readers seeking distinctly Christian spec fiction (although the Realm Makers website has a bookstore). “Readers also go to where they’ll find the authors—at secular fan conferences, or cons.”

Those buying habits can make it even harder to get Christian spec fiction on mainstream bookstore shelves. Few Christian publishers take the chance in publishing the genre these days, so few books are available through traditional distribution channels.

“Fantasy seems to be going by the wayside since the aughts,” said a senior acquisitions editor at Bethany House, a division of Baker Publishing Group. “We used to publish it, but not anymore. It’s becoming extremely niche.”

Yet Steve Laube, former owner and current publisher for Enclave Publishing, has a different view: “Don’t tell me fantasy doesn’t sell, because that’s not true. Why isn’t a major publisher jumping in? I have no good answer.”

Enclave, an imprint of Oasis Family Media, calls itself “a leading publisher of Christian speculative fiction,” which includes science fiction, fantasy, time travel, steampunk, alternative history, spiritual warfare, superhero, and techno-thriller. Enclave released 16 books in 2023 and 20 in 2024, with 19 on the docket for this year. Enclave also launched its own online store to sell books directly to readers.

Laube, a lifelong lover of spec fiction, came into the industry in the 1980s as a bookseller when “there wasn’t much in the category: Stephen Lawhead and Frank Peretti, if you want to call his work speculative.” Laube joined Bethany House in 1992. He introduced spec fiction into the line with authors such as Karen Hancock, Randy Ingermanson, and Kathy Tyers. When he left Bethany in 2003 to become a literary agent—he owns The Steve Laube Agency—spec fiction fell off Bethany’s list.

“A house needs to have an editorial staff that understands the genre, and sales and marketing departments don’t know how to sell it,” Laube said. “Back then, Christian publishers were selling to Lifeway and Family Christian stores, but those readers were suspicious of spec fiction.”

Enter Marcher Lord Press around 2008, started by Jeff Gerke. It began publishing spec fiction across the spectrum. Laube purchased Marcher Lord in 2014, rebranding it as Enclave.

“Since then,” Laube said, “the bookstore industry has collapsed. But that also means the gatekeepers are gone. We are now dealing directly with fans. It’s a different way of presenting books to the marketplace.”

That’s a lesson the Minors have learned. They attend several homeschool conventions each year, for example, finding parents and students who are eager for spec fiction. They also point to the growth of small publishers and self-publishing options as entry points into the speculative genres for new authors. “That has increased the number of people who feel they can get into the marketplace,” Becky Minor said.

In fact, the Realm Makers 2024 Book of the Year was Song of the Selkies, which author Sarah Pennington published independently through Amazon. It also won in Realm Makers’ fantasy category. Pennington calls the book “an epic fantasy retelling of The Little Mermaid set in the Celtic Isles.” She’s attended the Realm Makers conference for three years but has been in contact with the “Realmie” culture and groups for almost a decade.

“It’s the community through which I have found my writer friends and made connections,” said Pennington, who has self-published seven books. “I’ve gotten advice through those connections, found mentors, and discovered publishing options. I wouldn’t have gotten into self-publishing otherwise.”

Other groups are honoring Christian spec fiction as well. The Christy Awards, the premier Christian fiction award program, has included versions of the spec fiction genre since 2000. “Speculative category entries have risen 38 percent overall from 2018 to 2023,” said Cindy Carter, awards manager for the Evangelical Christian Publishers Association, which runs the Christies. In 2023, the group saw 53 percent growth in the number of spec books being submitted for awards.

Sharon Hinck, who publishes with Enclave, won three consecutive Christies for her spec fiction, beginning in 2020. She was inducted into the Christy Award Hall of Fame in November 2024. Hinck welcomes the revival of the genre, which owes its existence to early pioneers and legends C. S. Lewis and J. R. R. Tolkien. Why has Christian speculative fiction seemed to struggle when it stands on the shoulders of such giants?

“People thought it was full of magic and witches. Christians can get so tribal, where everything is dangerous and about fear,” Hinck said. “But my philosophy is that God is so multifaceted and creative that he needs every art form, every genre, to reflect every aspect of God.”

So what makes a work of speculative fiction Christian? It isn’t simply creating sanctified versions of old tropes, Scott Minor said. It’s “a returning to the forefront of those ideas but using the creativity God gave us to create a coherent world view with a focus on story, written for a Christian audience. This is fiction we believe Christians will want to read.”

The genre offers clear alternatives to the sexualized, male-dominated, and female-objectifying content of the 1960s, ’70s, and ’80s. And speculative fiction isn’t the inherently evil storytelling that the evangelical “satanic panic” deemed it during that era, as evangelicals were also condemning role-playing games such as Dungeons & Dragons.

Christian fantasy authors often use different names to represent God while spinning stories of God-followers living out their callings. In Pennington’s Song of the Selkies, for example, Déanadair guides Ceana, the seventh princess of the kingdom of Atìrse, as she tries to restore the relationship between her country and the selkie kingdom. Déanadair also guides the selkies, or seal people, and their king, Fionntan. In Hinck’s Dream of Kings, the Provider guides Jolan the Dream Teller.

“My books are pretty overtly Christian, unapologetically so,” Hinck said. “They are going to raise questions of faith. We’re all humans with spiritual questions and hungers, so exploring faith adds another element to the external conflicts. We are not ‘less than’ or limiting ourselves by being Christian authors. We’re expanding what we’re exploring in our stories.”

Scott Minor believes spec fiction “is having a really nice, long moment.” He says the corresponding renaissance of Dungeons & Dragons and similar games and the popularity of superhero movies are part of “legitimizing the genre.”

It helps, too, that Realm Makers is just one part of an expanding ecosystem of Christian nerd culture. That includes groups like Imladris, a home for Christians working in or adjacent to the gaming industry; Geeks Under Grace and Lorehaven, media outlets covering gaming and speculative genres from a faith-based perspective; the Christian Comic Arts Society; and Love Thy Nerd and the Nerd Culture Ministry Summit, an outreach to gamers, role players, “Whovians” (fans of Doctor Who), and the like.

If anything, the growth of the faith-based speculative fiction market has created a new discoverability problem, said Hinck and others: There is so much spec fiction published online that it’s hard to sort through.

Even so, leaders in the genre believe there is room for more growth. “There is still a lot of fear from the Christian reading community,” Hinck said. “I’m pretty old-fashioned [in my storytelling], but it still took a lot for readers to realize my books are orthodox, my books are safe.”

The Minors think readers, especially younger readers, are increasingly ready to get past that fear as they hunger for stories to reassure them that evil can be defeated, dawn will come again, and there is meaning and purpose even in our high-tech and isolating world.

“There is so much more we can explore, so many stories people will resonate with,” Becky Minor said. “Spec fiction writers can tell a story that isn’t set in my world and whose rules don’t apply, yet lets me look at this idea with fresh eyes.”

To Laube, the future looks good for spec fiction. He pointed to WaterBrook’s release of Andrew Peterson’s Wingfeather novels, Thomas Nelson’s young-adult line featuring spec fiction, and HarperCollins’s Blink imprint.

“We have a second generation post-Star Wars that has grown up on these types of stories. They love them and want to write them,” Laube said. “The creativity out there is breathtaking—there is so much good to choose from. Let’s double down. Let’s do more.”

Ann Byle is a writer living in West Michigan. She is the author of Chicken Scratch: Lessons on Living Creatively from a Flock of Hens.

Inkwell

Indigo Ink

Inkwell January 12, 2025
Photography by Diana D.S.

Meanwhile I am staining everything- the furniture, my frayed friendships with people I can’t reply back to on time, my schedules and lists- everything is stained by me. I want to shift the image. I want to be a bright, white cloth, folded precisely on the seams. I want to dip into the bowl of indigo ink that is God, to emerge dripping, so that when I stain things it will not be of myself but of God himself, and things will be left better than I found them.

Nicole Hunka is a mental health therapist in Denver, Colorado. She earned her B.A. in English Literature and Studio Art from Wheaton College (IL), and her M.A. in Clinical Mental Health Counseling from Denver Seminary. In addition to being a therapist, she is a poet, painter, and writer.

Inkwell

The State of Christian Literature

Smashing our small cosmos

Inkwell January 12, 2025
Mount Vesuvius at Midnight by Albert Bierstadt

How much happier you would be, how much more of you there would be, if the hammer of a higher God could smash your small cosmos. — G.K. Chesterton

WHERE ARE THE BRIAN DOYLES OF TODAY? I wrote in my notebook last month. And by that, I meant: Where are the literary Christian writers who aren’t overly cynical or overly sentimental? Where are the artful narratives born out of Christian belief?

I wrote this question while sitting in the lobby of a conference center that was hosting thousands of faith-interested writers for a weekend-long arts festival. I’d just returned from the conference’s exhibit hall—a room of booths staffed by editors and publishers and literary magazine representatives—where I’d gone looking for the heights of the Christian literary scene. I wanted to see what I might find there, if there might be a place for me in it.

I knew my work didn’t fit well with traditional Christian presses; they put out church ministry resources, religious self-help, devotionals—books that provide an encouraging Christian experience for a decisively Christian audience. I write essays that, though religiously informed, are too literary, too meandering, and too un-sanitized to deliver a tidy moral.

Mainstream publishers, on the other hand, wanted literary writing, and they were open to work that was spiritually conscious. But they wanted it slant. The subtitles on their display books helped me understand their angle. Lots of verbs like escaping and rejecting and shattering. Lots of breaking free and deconstructing. One editor, as he watched me scan his booth’s sample titles, announced that his press was “interested in the stories that Christianity wasn’t ready for.” At a different booth, I mentioned to an editor that I’d attended a Baptist college. She responded, “I’m so sorry,” with a tight-lipped grin meant to confer some sort of crooked empathy, or perhaps as a misguided gesture of solidarity.


MY INTERACTIONS WITH THESE EDITORS left me demoralized, but not merely because they were critical of religion. I believe in a sort of productive and generous critique, a Christianized version of what James Baldwin wrote in Notes of a Native Son: “I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.” These are the kinds of critiques that feel worthwhile to me. They have stakes. They abide with that which they criticize. They are full of love, which is why they criticize. The tone I’d encountered in the conference’s exhibit hall, however, was of a different sort. Its purpose was to declare the misery of traditional Christianity; it lacked love.

Staring blankly across the conference center lobby, I returned to my notebook: Of course there are dark stories in Christianity, I wrote. Massive, grave, ugly warts. But we can’t act like that’s all there is. That would be a lie of omission, a distortion.

I sat there, chewing on the cap of my pen. Then a Brian Doyle essay, “Fatherness: A Note,” popped into my head. It felt relevant all of a sudden. In the essay, Doyle considers how much the story of divine fatherhood holds: the bloody gift of the Passion, the wrath of discipline, unwavering self-sacrifice for a sin-stained people, transcendent love.

It was the tonal breadth of this essay that had initially captured me. Horror and beauty. Darkness and brilliance. Any writer worth their salt needed to be able to offer an account of both. It’s a matter of ethos, I determined, which helped me understand something—I didn’t trust the resentful “exvangelical” narratives for the same reason I didn’t trust the sanitized Christian ones: neither was telling the whole story.

I wrote a final blurb in my notebook: Cultivate balance. No saccharine accounts of faith. Too naive, unsatisfying, hollow, easy. And no bitter accounts either. Too dishonest, humorless, tired. Then I closed the cover and tried to source the angst that had seeped into my own entry.


I WAS ONCE A WRITER who told bitter stories about Christianity. When I applied to graduate writing programs during my senior year of college, I built my applications around a persona: the enlightened, progressive, “spiritual” girl trapped in an ocean of fanatics at a fundamentalist college. I purported a kind of private devotion that made me “interesting”—perhaps a bit more in-tune with the transcendent—but I distanced myself from the stripes of organized religion.

In my applications, I wrote that “my peers, more than most, [were] martyrs to a narrow and didactic definition of truth.” I wrote that I’d seen “bland, timid groupthink” prevail. I wrote plenty of other condescending things about Christians because that seemed to be the tonal strategy adopted by successful authors writing about religion, which was the group I wanted to be in.

To be fair, I didn’t outright manufacture my grievances. I also wrote those critiques because there was an element of truth in them. After four years of Christian college, my administration’s emphasis on theological purity in literature had started to feel like paranoia. I’d become an anxious and uncharitable reader, preoccupied with the moral acceptability of a text, so concerned with verdicts that I rarely took the time to discover and sit with a text’s ideas. “This environment,” I suggested to my application reviewers, “has stifled my literary work.” I knew these were loveless words. But then I clicked “upload” and “submit” in 11 university portals.


AROUND THE SAME TIME that I sent in my applications, I bought Doyle’s The Thorny Grace of It at the recommendation of a professor. It was my reward for having survived application season. I’d read some of Doyle’s nature writing and enjoyed his spiritual attentiveness, so I figured it’d be worth the $15 price tag.

When the book arrived, I spent a long time staring at the subtitle: And Other Essays for Imperfect Catholics. I couldn’t decide if I thought it was cheesy or earnest. I flipped the book open, determined to find out, and landed on an essay titled “Piléir” on page 61.

“Piléir” opens with Doyle and a friend—both Irish Catholics—discussing the long history of Catholic persecution in Ireland. They recall stories of starvation and stench and hiding and exile. Then they focus on a particular story, delivered to them by the generations who passed it down.

This story takes place in Donegal, near a remote hedge where a priest-in-hiding illegally leads a small congregation through the Mass liturgy. When it comes time for Communion, the priest lifts the host to bless it. And then a British bullet strikes him between the eyes. A bevy of soldiers rush toward the worshippers with chains. That’s how the Mass ends.

The Anglican soldier who shoots the priest has a son, about age ten at the time, and that son is a bright and sensitive boy, one who grows up and goes to university and studies theology and enters the ministry. But then, slowly, the boy becomes interested in Catholicism, and he nurtures this interest until, one day, he outright converts.

This displeases his father. He and the son fight. One night, the father loses his temper and howls something he has never told anyone: that back in his military days, he killed a priest, shot him clean in the forehead mid-Mass, and he had never once regretted that bullet because it was what the priest and his fellow conspirators deserved. Bloody story. Grieved story.

But here’s how that story ends. The son leaves his father’s house and heads straight to the annals. He finds a record of the incident. He travels to the village where it occurred, and he asks the locals if they can point him to the hedge where Masses took place in the dark days. The next morning, he calls the villagers there. He leads them through the liturgy and “finishes the Mass that was interrupted thirty years before by a bullet.” After the service, the group digs a hole and buries a bullet—a piléir—alongside an unconsecrated host. And then they tell the story of it to their children, who tell it to their children, who hope that “the more people who know it, the fewer bullets there will be, perhaps.”


WHAT SURPRISED ME AT THE END of “Piléir” was what I concluded the essay to be about. It didn’t strike me, ultimately, as a story of persecution or bullets, but rather, as a story about burying bullets, about a shocking act of grace in the face of evil. It left me in awe of the convert priest. It left me wondering how he’d been able to channel all his grief and rage into something restorative, something like love, which was far louder than his father’s murderous insistence.

I couldn’t recall an essay I’d read about faith and tragedy that took an angle like that. The essays I’d read were either angry or sentimental. This one was neither, but it had somehow tapped into the truest components of both: righteous grief, hard-fought hope.

I flipped ahead in Doyle’s collection and found more essays foregrounded by shocking moments of grace. Each essay had its route. Sometimes, like with “Piléir,” the stories were dramatic in their accounts of both violence and hope. Other times, like in “Sister Cook” and “Sister Anne”—two essays praising nuns for their service to schoolchildren—the stories were underwhelming, and the love came from Doyle’s dedication to exploring the “quiet corners” of his subjects. And sometimes, like in “Buying a Foot,” where Doyle’s war-maimed friend reviews different prosthetic materials (bamboo—terrible; tire rubber—pretty all right; wood—worthless; plastic—superior), humor was what carried us through the bleak details that might’ve otherwise consumed us.

The titular essay of The Thorny Grace of It provided more overt commentary on Doyle’s relationship with grief and grace. Structurally, the essay is a list of complaints. They start quippy—for example, the house is so musty “that slugs have their annual convention in the basement”—and with so much excess that we can laugh at the ways they reflect our own flair for the dramatic back to us. But as the essay goes on, the complaints become more serious. There really are “liars and charlatans in Congress,” and “the oceans are fouled,” and there are “millions of children in [our] country who will not eat tonight.” As these griefs compound, Doyle confesses that he sometimes looks around at all the suffering in the world and feels “naught but a great despair.”

And yet. One paragraph left. A turn. An appeal. Doyle remembers that “laughter and compassion, and creativity and wonder, and compassion and generosity” persist. So he arises from his bed, shuffles out into the bruised world, and “get[s] to work grinning.”

Usually, a sentiment like that would strike me as too easy. But not after Doyle has spent his book looking pain clean in the face. The word work—that we get to work grinning—implies a sort of productive struggle. I hear it with the same candor I imagine the Christ once spoke with when he told his troubled friends: Take heart! For I have overcome the world. A man of sorrows, foretelling tribulation and martyrdom and exile, still dead set on the bright message that Doyle whispers to himself in moments of despair.

The more I read The Thorny Grace of It, the more I thought about the failure of my grad school applications. I thought about my loveless, self-indulgent critiques. They had gotten me into an MFA program, sure, but they hadn’t helped my soul. I’d written pages criticizing my tribe, and I was still just as resentful; to call that sort of work “processing” would be a euphemism.

But reading Doyle’s essays helped me heal. I bought more of his books and let them teach me. I didn’t want to romanticize my resentment and call it “art” or “important.” I wanted to work, like Doyle had, to wrestle laughter and love out of seemingly barren places.


A COUPLE MONTHS LATER, I shared this epiphany with my sister over the phone. I realized that it wasn’t just me who needed stories of Christian delight. My sister and I were in another iteration of the same conversation we’d been returning to weekly via long phone calls for over half a year. The phone calls were about my sister’s spiritual weariness.

She was feeling wearied by the pet issues of her denomination’s loudest members: Quiverfull theology, “stay at home daughters,” exclusive homeschooling. She was gray-eyed, and underweight, and trying to fend off postpartum depression as the women around her wondered aloud when she’d be trying for her next.

And she was feeling wearied by the death of a nine-year-old girl in the church, whose transplanted heart gave out in the days leading up to Holy Week, whose silhouette the church thought of that Palm Sunday as all the other children bobbed up the sanctuary aisle with palm fronds.

And by two recent cases of church discipline—one man rebuked for conducting himself like a tyrant in his home, another for his racist posts on Twitter. “I’m grateful the elders will address this stuff,” my sister said, “but even just the presence of it is heavy.”

It seemed that each time my sister called, she had more grim stories. Sometimes she’d apologize for the bleakness. She’d tell me there were good things happening too, but then she’d pause, and I’d feel her throat lock across the line.

“I just keep asking myself how I got here,” she continued. “When I was a new Christian at 15, I cared about, like, reading my Bible and talking to the lonely kid at lunch. I prayed all the time. Now it seems all anyone talks about—I mean, bickers about, really—is Christian nationalism and homeschooling. How did that become our focus?”

We were silent for a few moments. Then I asked, “Can I read you something?” She mmhmm-ed, and I reached for the book on the top of my nightstand pile.

“It’s an essay from that Catholic writer I like,” I said. “I like him because he addresses hard things without polemics or spiritual aphorisms. He’s humble. And funny. He writes about Jesus and Christians a lot. He seems to genuinely love them. He says his favorite topic is ‘grace under duress.’ I kind of read his books devotionally.”

“That sounds nice,” my sister whispered.

“This one’s called ‘Jesus Christ: The Missing Years,’” I said. And then I read:

You know the story: we see Him at age twelve in the temple, giving his parents lip, and then we do not see Him again for eighteen years, until He goes on an extended speaking tour, seemingly finishing His run in Jerusalem, but then, stunningly, not.

My sister chuckled, sniffling and coughing the way you do when laughter cuts off tears.

“That’s good,” she said. “‘Extended speaking tour’ is good.”
“Keep going?” I asked, and she mm-hmm-ed.

So I read on. I covered each of Doyle’s theories about how the teenaged Jesus spent his time. I could barely get through a theory without my sister choking on her laughter, asking me to go back and reread a line. She especially liked the bit about Jesus’ dream of starting a falconry business with two friends. We went on like that for a bit. I read more essays, and her voice regained its warmth. I shipped her a copy of the collection right after getting off the phone.


A FEW WEEKS LATER, I sent my sister a picture of “Credo,” the titular essay of one of Doyle’s older essay collections. Since her copy of The Thorny Grace of It had arrived, we’d gotten into the habit of texting each other poignant or funny lines from the book. I wanted to expand our practice to include more of Doyle’s work.

This particular essay was short. Doyle wrote it after a friend asked him why he was Catholic. The friend had been satisfied with the first few reasons Doyle mumbled, but Doyle himself had not been, and so he took the task of apologetics to the page.

I sent my sister the essay because it put language to the questions she’d been asking herself: What is the substance, the core of my faith? Why is it worth fighting to preserve? I thought the essay might be a sort of balm for her, as I knew Doyle’s writing had been for me.

I didn’t write any of this when I texted the essay, though. I just sent it without context. When my phone buzzed a few hours later, I could see that her reply was longer than usual. She wrote—

This paragraph:

“Christianity is a house that needs cleaning, a house in which savagery and cowardice have thrived, where evil has a room with a view. But it is also a house where hope lives, and hope is the greatest of mercies, the most enduring of gifts, the most nutritious of foods. Hope is what we drink from the odd story of the carpenter’s odd son.”

is why I have not left the faith. I get depressed hearing stories of abuse within the church and living day in and day out in communities that bicker and seem to only grasp 1/10 of the Gospel, but this is what brings me back.”

Amen, sis, I texted. Everything else I thought of felt pithy in response.

And then I said a prayer of gratitude for Doyle. For that shepherd of words who’d cracked my sister’s grief and helped us find deep wells of hope alive in our chests—wells tended to eternally by the One in whom there is no darkness. Amen, I whispered to myself. Amen.

Heidie Senseman is an MFA Candidate at the University of Iowa’s Nonfiction Writing Program.

Inkwell

Instauration

Inkwell January 12, 2025
Photography by Reginald Van de Velde

My friend, I want to ask you: are you all at sea?
I feel I’m swimming bodiless through a drowned world.

You’re screened from me, busy fruitless days between us.
This home feels cavernous, the long table empty.

I want to ask: can we read aloud together
some ancient verse or prose—or maybe even sing?

You bring your yarn and needles; I’ll pour a good wine.
What are you reading these days to save your own soul?

Do you know a liturgy for chopping fresh herbs?
Will you pray it for me while we work together?

Is there one for withdrawing from the bits and bytes
that order our lives? For saying no to it all:

deleting accounts, materializing back
into the flesh of life—present and almost whole?

Or one for naming the chest’s weight, the brain’s vapor?
Is there a path that leads back to silence? A prayer

to surface ancestral memory, or coax neurons
back to life? And why am I homesick for highlands

I’ve never even seen? And tell me what to pray
when crying in the shower for a fading son

who’s receding from us like the tide. And why this
lament for seeding grass over the back garden?

What is this urge to bend and kneel? And why seasons—
how do I let them billow full, then fade away?

I’m trying to learn wintering: white, gray, muffled words,
the early dark, settling in, hunkering down.

Will you learn wintering with me—by the fireplace
or by the lake in the frozen dawn; in the door

of my son’s room, hunting a sign he’ll re-cohere?
Do words exist that might accomplish all of this?

Some days I find myself wishing I’d learned Latin,
or even Greek—those ancient, effectual tongues.

I remember the kyrie, and a little
Aramaic: Eloi, lama sabachthani?

Rachel E. Hicks’s poetry has appeared in PresenceAnglican Theological ReviewVita PoeticaThe Baltimore ReviewThe Windhover, Relief, and other journals. A two-time Pushcart Prize nominee, she also won the 2019 Briar Cliff Review Fiction Prize.

Inkwell

The Castle Inside the Prison

On Teaching Literature in a Jail Cell

Inkwell January 12, 2025
Painting by John Martin

IT MIGHT BE the ultimate cliché: “My students teach me.” It’s not a phrase I would have used until my experience as a college instructor at a Tennessee State correctional facility in 2023, teaching modern American literature and eventually a seminar in creative writing. As a writer, I’ve long practiced following my intuition, and it was this raw intuition that pulled me toward the job. Those who knew I’d taken the position expressed concern for my well-being and wondered whether I might have some self-destructive tendencies. I punted these emails and phone calls with the words, “I’m looking for a challenge,” which, in a way, was true. Yet I could not adequately explain why I chose to do it nor why I fell in love with the work. 

Those first few weeks, it was purely the educator in me who responded to the situation. Initially frustrated with the classroom conditions (tiny room, no Internet, miniature whiteboard, zoo-level ambient noise screaming through paper-thin walls), it wasn’t long before I forgot the room and the absence of technology. This, I quickly realized, was a different world from what I’d known over the course of 14 years of teaching. 

During my first lecture, I told my students, “You don’t need to take notes tonight; just listen.” They took arduous notes anyway. The first written assignment they submitted was supposed to be half a page long. They submitted two to three pages apiece. Nearly all of them wrote in calligraphy, not the sort of textbook cursive that grammar schools used to teach, but unique and personalized fonts they had developed through the years. They were ferocious self-editors from the get-go, visiting with me after class to explain where they thought they’d gone wrong in their analysis of a story we’d read. I showed samples of their work to friends, who immediately said with disbelief, “They did not write that.”

Typically, if I encounter perfectionism in my students, it is pathological, a matter of seeking order for order’s sake. But my students at the prison were determined to grasp the meaning of stories, not for any expedient reason but for the stories’ sake. They were working with both intellect and feeling; they were capable of pointed analysis but could also experience stories viscerally and attend to the responses of their inner voice. 

It was the latter that made the art personal and not some academic exercise. Nobody asked me to change a grade after he’d edited his work. In fact, the word points rarely surfaced, which was surprising in and of itself. I am long accustomed to a utilitarian outlook from students, who will ask, “How much is this worth?” and then do quick math to determine whether they ought to bother with the readings. That question is particularly crushing in a literature course. How does one address the worth of a T. S. Eliot poem or Steinbeck novel in terms of points? A course in the humanities ought to be a place of exploration and the savoring of art. Now, it is all too often a kind of convenience store, wherein one’s students will purchase nothing unless it is cheap and aligned with preconceived axiomatic conclusions about what is worth having. 

The very aloneness that was their curse as prisoners had also gifted them with capacities I rarely encounter in others. Isolation has a way of orphaning us from our personas. It strips us down just as pain does; it forces us to listen to ourselves and ask the sorts of questions we’d otherwise prefer to lose to the noise of a crowd. 

My students at the prison were entirely without access to cell phones, the Internet, or social media. It took time to register the full implications of this. Academically, it meant they could not cheat. No Wikipedia, no SparkNotes, no way to purchase an essay, and no Google to provide them with a lazy assessment of a labyrinthine story. No artificial intelligence spewing out faux papers. Put simply, they had to do their own thinking; they were accountable for every last word they put to paper. As a teacher, I was enthralled by the realization that any assertion they made was truly theirs and theirs alone, be it ingenious or obtuse. 

I was struck by how articulate, socially adept, and well-read they were. Free of the senseless addictions of Facebook and Twitter, forced to consult either books or their own minds instead of a phone glued to their palm, they could navigate conversation at a level I hadn’t experienced in years. They made eye contact when they spoke publicly, and their vocabulary levels were high. Some had taught themselves a second language; others had trained themselves in comparative religions. They picked up my phraseology quickly and then used it effectively in essays or homework assignments. It seemed they only needed to hear a word or concept once before they mortared it into a larger castle of ideas. 

I found myself humbled by their written work, amazed that they could spot daubs of color and flashes of light I had never noticed, even in texts I knew practically by heart. I also respected their willingness to go all-in, and began reevaluating myself as an artist in reaction to their total submission to the literature. Moreover, they expected me to hold them to the highest standards. It was implicitly understood from the start: They were here to improve themselves, not to be babysat or flattered. 

One night, I watched as one of the inmates reorganized the desks in perfect alignment with the floor tiles. I’d gibed him for this before—the chemistry in that room was always one of good-natured nitpicking—but this time when I harangued him, he turned and said, “It’s overcompensation, that’s why I do these things. My life was pure chaos for a long time. I know it looks like I’m going too far the other way, but it’s what I have to do for now until I hit that balance.”

This sort of self-assessment, delivered so casually, was the norm among these men. Put as simply as possible, they knew themselves. This emerged in both their writing and their speech. They located themselves in the dark sides of characters; they empathized with the guilty and the wounded; they evinced real joy in a character’s redemptive arc. 

Any persona I’d attempted to project my first few nights, mostly in an effort to win their respect and prevent any abuse, molted off me like an old skin. I realized that not a single one of them wore a costume. Their cards were on the table, the red and the black, and I lost interest in hiding mine.


NEAR THE END of that first semester, my students were required to choose a new story out of our anthology and do a presentation on that piece. I took a gamble on one student in particular, following an instinct to suggest a story outside of the text. It was Charles D’Ambrosio’s “The Point,” one of the most phenomenal pieces of short fiction ever composed, in my opinion, and a story I thought I knew down to the letter. 

The following week, the student told me it was the story of his own childhood. It had rattled him so deeply that he tried to retell the story to his sister during visitation. In class, he delivered one of the most riveting presentations I’d heard in my entire teaching career. At one point, we locked eyes, both of us tearing up in response to a devastating passage he’d just read aloud, and I thought, This is what art looks like when it is allowed to live. The room was completely silent as he spoke, and I left the prison that night feeling as though I’d met that story for the first time. 

I was also moved by their openness to me as both a teacher and a person. I’d anticipated disrespect, contempt, and rebellion; I am a 5-foot-2-inch-tall female, privileged and overeducated by most people’s standards. Yet here I was, strolling into a classroom to take charge of 11 grown men. But to these 11, I represented an opportunity to manifest their humanity. 

They became fiercely protective. My first week, I made a joke (in poor taste) about being “disabled” when it came to using modern technology; several of the inmates overheard this in the library and misunderstood. Apparently, there was a debate regarding what my disability might be, until one of them finally approached me and asked. I explained it had only been a joke and asked why it mattered so much. Deadly serious, he said, “We can’t step up and help if we don’t know what’s wrong.” 

It wasn’t the first time they’d assumed such a role. Previously, they’d worked with a professor who was suffering from burgeoning dementia. Instead of taking advantage of the situation, they discussed among themselves how to help him and divided up tasks—this one kept track of time, this one kept track of the syllabus, this one gently nudged the professor back on course when he began telling the same story for the third time. They took it upon themselves not just to maintain order but to protect the man’s dignity.

Viktor Frankl is famous for saying, “The last of one’s freedoms is to choose one’s attitude in any given circumstance.” There are plenty of people who respond to imprisonment with roaring resentment and a lust for vengeance. But some cease projecting and instead look inward, confronting their dragons instead of pretending away their existence. They do battle with themselves instead of making enemies of the Other. They peer into mirrors and hold their ground, even if what peers back is frightening and fragmented. It is what an artist must do also, and I am certain there are artists among those inmates. 

While several of my students had life sentences, most of the others were not due for parole for many years to come. When I tell people this, their usual response is, “Then what’s the point?” In other words: Why invest yourself in something that lacks all expedience? Why self-educate, why explore, why ask taxing questions when there is no career around the corner, no means of monetizing the experience or even advertising it to others? 

The answer is that these students were hunting for more than a job or an item on their resumé. They were after much bigger fish—and from what I was able to witness, they were hooking them. 


AS A WRITER, I rely heavily upon my own vivid, narrative dreaming. I understand dreams not merely as problem-solving mechanisms but as acts of exploration and compensation. They lend a visual life to the dark side of each private moon, unleash all that we try to subjugate during daylight hours—and they do this not to haunt or torment us, even in the case of nightmares, but to revivify us. We wither without access to our shadow side. We also need to confront that savagely creative life force that our careers and family duties often asphyxiate in the name of expedience, material comfort, or “keeping the peace.” 

Near the end of my first semester at the correctional facility, I had one of those dreams the shamans of old would have called a “big dream,” a message incarnate that belonged not just to me but to every person in my life. 

In my dream, I was on the prison campus for some kind of open visitation day. The atmosphere was that of a large family reunion—people milling about everywhere, picnic tables laid out, a pickup baseball game somewhere in the background. I wandered through the crowd and passed many of my inmates engaged with family or friends, and each encounter was deeply revealing. 

One of them was asked to carve a ham, but when he removed a knife from his pocket, his family collectively backed away, then accused him of “refusing to change.” They seemed almost gleeful at having this excuse to demonize him. The knife drooped in his hand; he said, “This is how I got here in the first place—I did what you asked. I was ten f—ing years old.”

A few yards away I spotted another, in military garb, sitting under a tree with two or three other men also in uniform. “Only with you guys, and here,” my student was saying, “only with you, and here, was it okay to admit we might die.” 

The most poignant encounter involved the same man who had done that presentation on “The Point” story. He passed me and was carrying a beautiful little boy on his shoulders, giving me the distinct impression that he’d been carrying the child for miles and miles. I stopped him and asked, “Is this your son?” He turned haunted eyes on me and responded, “He’s me,” before continuing his lonely trek through the crowd.

I wandered further. I began spotting people I knew from outside the prison—family members, old friends, colleagues. A dear friend from my hometown was at the perimeter fence, trailed by a crowd of people I recognized from our old high school. They were all clawing at him, pulling him back from the fence, though he’d found a breach and could have easily escaped had they let go of him. I suddenly understood: In real life, he was still living in our hometown where high school football games and house parties had been the pinnacle of everyone’s existence. They couldn’t let him go, nor could he shake himself free. 

Elsewhere, I spotted a line of my traditional students all holding iPhones over a huge open vat of boiling coffee. They were weeping, desperate to let the phones drop to their own deaths but unable to open their fingers. I glimpsed two of my closest friends hunched over on the grass, unable to rise because they were so weighted down with rosaries and icons; they were clad in white damask as though they’d stripped an altar and stepped into its clothing. For them, religious practice had been turned inside-out, becoming a refuge from self-analysis; their loyalty to doctrine had prevented them from determining their true vocations or sorting out their deepest needs. 

As I wandered on, I saw people hauling Radio Flyer wagons full of family members or material goods, people turning in literal circles as they read the same book again and again, people trying to set up offices at picnic tables with such urgency that you’d think an hour away from their jobs might put them in mortal danger. One person went about frantically with a magnifying glass, studying everything on hand but oblivious to the fact that a stunning exotic bird sat on his own head, radiant as a lighthouse beam. Another walked around with a big pack of nametag stickers and kept replacing the label on his shirt with a new name. I approached this man and asked what his original name was. “Don’t ask me,” he fairly screamed. “Can’t you see I don’t want to remember?”

We were all there—each personality type and demographic. We were all in a prison of our own making, appearing to resist the tyranny of our own minds but secretly in love with our captors. For no one tried very hard to leave, despite the fact that fences sagged everywhere and guards were few and far between. We loved our provisional identities, loved our meaningless responsibilities, loved the people and the practices that filled the silence so as to cancel out the inner voice. 

We loved our phones and televisions; we loved housework and errands and pointless committee meetings and empty chatter in hallways stalling us from the long solo drive home; we loved video games, news of bad weather, political dramas, tabloids. We loved the stories we had made up about ourselves and we loved our own refusal to revise them. We loved denying our own mortality. In real life, some of us had broken obvious laws, but serious moral questions pick up where the penal code leaves off, and who among us could say, “I am living in truth”? If the answer to that question determined whether one was incarcerated or not, the vast majority of us would be behind bars.

Upon waking from this dream, my first thought was that of all the people in that crowd, only the literal prisoners seemed to comprehend their own hell. Everyone else was engaged in an elaborate deception, smiling brightly, keeping busy with activities of no consequence. I recall someone cutting the same cake on repeat, another woman pouring sugar from one container into another and then back again. 

My visceral response each time I passed one of the inmates was relief, akin to the way I felt on a backcountry hike when I became briefly lost and then spotted a rock cairn. Here was something solid and real that marked a trail out of the thickets. These men had looked into the abyss. They were struggling, but this struggle was honest. While they were shuttered from what we all call “real life,” they knew the city within down to the darkest alley. The rest of us lacked the basic orientation skills necessary should life suddenly shove us off that familiar strip of carpet we’d elected to call home. 

There is no story without a shadow. The man who casts no darkness has no hero’s arc. And yet despite the fairy tales and movies that stirred us as children, too many of us grow up unconsciously hoping never to have a story—to be without shadow until the very end. Our cultural climate affirms that avoidance strategy, emphasizing via every possible medium that comfort is the ultimate end, that all forms of stress or suffering are intolerable and should either be banished via medication or else projected onto some enemy whose destruction will magically reinstate our peace. 

It was not just as an educator or even as a writer that I found myself so drawn to my work at the prison. Something in my spirit yearned for the personal quest embodied in these men. Their presence in my life continually begs the question: Where would we be, had we made early inmates of our shadow sides, lived in close quarters with them, listened to them, and integrated them into our larger understanding of ourselves and others? 

Do we want a flatline existence like an EKG gone dead, or do we want to rise and fall, rise and fall, crawling through tunnels like Gilgamesh or Tolkien’s heroes in hopes of emerging worthy of starlight and new harbors?

Elizabeth Genovise is a poet, literature instructor & author of Third Class Relics.

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube