More Fuel for Flaming Issues in Forthcoming Religious Books

The op art-flop art jackets and provocative titles of many new books almost make one believe he can judge a book by its cover these days. But the unpredictability of the content of religious books restrains us from making bold predictions about the value of the volumes scheduled for publication this spring. This list of new titles does suggest, however, the concerns that seem uppermost in the minds of Christians who use the printed word to advance the kingdom of God. Two topics that have generated much heat in the past year are destined to receive still more fuel in forthcoming volumes: the relationship of the Gospel to contemporary man and society, and the mission of the Church.

The churches’ growing concern with the social and political scene is shown in new titles dealing with Communism, the race question, poverty, the draft, the sex revolution, and the place of the Church in modern society. The debate on Christian ethics shows no sign of subsiding as James A. Pike, Joseph Fletcher, David Redding, Z. B. Green, T. B. Maston, and E. L. Long offer further contributions on moralities, new and old. Some ten new volumes address the problem of revitalizing the Church so that it will be capable of communicating the Gospel in our difficult day.

Readers who desire to keep up with Christendom’s leading thinkers will find new works or newly published titles by such luminaries as C. S. Lewis, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Gerhard Kittel, Joachim Jeremias, Kenneth Scott Latourette, J. B. Phillips, Frank C. Laubach, and Pope John XXIII. Since more and more important books are appearing in paperback editions, this forecast will list paperbacks (labeled P) along with hard-cover volumes in appropriate categories.

AESTHETICS, ARCHITECTURE, MUSIC:ABINGDON will publish Music Leadership in the Church by E. Routley. HELICON,Church Architecture and Liturgical Reform by T. Filthaut. MORROW,The Heritage of the Cathedral: A Study of the Influence of History and Thought upon Cathedral Architecture by S. Prentice. PRINCETON,Transformations in Late Eighteenth Century Art by R. Rosenblum. WORLD,The Historical Atlas of Music: A Comprehensive Study of the World’s Music by P. Collaer and A. V. Linden.

APOLOGETICS, PHILOSOPHY, SCIENCE: From BAKER will come In the Beginning by R. R. Ward. BRAZILLER,No Other God by G. Vahanian. BROADMAN,Integrity Therapy by J. W. Drakeford. EERDMANS,Service in Christ: Essays Presented to Karl Barth edited by T. H. L. Parker and Christian Reflections by C. S. Lewis. HARPER & ROW, The Anthropology of Sex by A. Jeanniere, The Vision of the Past by P. Teilhard de Chardin, and Philosophical Faith and Revelation by K. Jaspers. MCKAY,Between Knowing and Believing by P. L. du Nouy. REVELL,The Mind Magnificent by R. M. Foote. SCRIBNERS,Basic Modern Philosophy of Religion by F. Ferré and Questions of Religious Truth by W. C. Smith. WORLD,Christian Faith and the Space Age by J. G. Williams. YALE,The Fabric of Paul Tillich’s Theology by D. H. Kelsey and The Emergence of Philosophy of Religion by J. Collins.

ARCHAEOLOGY:BAKER will print The Nag Hammadi Gnostic Text and the Bible by A. Helmbold. OXFORD,Sinai by H. Skrobucha. WORLD,Persia II by V. G. Lukonin.

BIBLE COMMENTARIES AND DICTIONARIES:AUGSBURG will present The Sacred Sixty-Six by R. Aaseng. BAKER,Clarke’s One Volume Commentary abridged by R. Earle. EERDMANS,Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Volume IV, by G. Kittel. SEABURY,Exegetical Method: A Student’s Handbook by O. Kaiser and W. G. Kummel. STANDARD,Standard Bible Commentary: Acts edited by O. Root.

BIBLICAL STUDIES: From BACK TO THE BIBLE will come God and the Nations by G. C. Weiss. BAKER,Baker’s Pictorial Introduction to the Bible by W. S. Deal and Night Scenes in the Bible by F. E. Marsh. BROADMAN,The Holy Spirit: Believer’s Guide by H. H. Hobbs. EERDMANS,The Covenant by J. Jocz and Covenant and Community by W. Klassen. LOIZEAUX,The Gladness of His Return: A Closer Look at the Second Coming by N. M. Fraser and The First Person by L. Strauss. NELSON,The Apostolic Fathers, A New Translation, Volume V: Polycarp, Martyrdom of Polycarp, Fragments of Papias.OXFORD,The Acts by R. P. C. Hanson (in the “New Clarendon Bible Series”). ST. THOMAS,The Story of Heredity—A Biblical View by W. J. Tinkle. SCRIBNERS,Rediscovering the Parables by J. Jeremias. STANDARD,Daily Life in Bible Times by W. S. LaSor. WESTMINSTER,The Land of the Bible by Y. Aharoni and True Deceivers by W. and L. Pelz. WORLD,Prophetic Voices of the Bible by H. Staack. ZONDERVAN,The Instant Bible by F. M. Wood.

BIOGRAPHY:AUGSBURG will issue Missionary Pioneers of the American Lutheran Church by L. Hesterman. BAKER,I Talked with Paul by W. L. Pape. BROADMAN,Wimpy Harper of Africa by J. C. Fletcher. EERDMANS,Beyond the Ranges by K. Latourette (autobiography). HARPER & ROW, The Teilhard de Chardin Album edited by Mortier and Aboux. INTER-VARSITY,Karl Barth (P) by C. Brown. MACMILLAN,Nikolai: Biography of a Dilemma by W. C. Fletcher. MCGRAW-HILL,Another Hand on Mine by W. J. Petersen. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN,Joan of Arc by J. Michelet. WORLD,Jesus: Man and Master by M. C. Morrison.

CHURCH HISTORY:AUGSBURG will come out with Augsburg Historical Atlas of Christianity in the Middle Ages and the Reformation by C. S. Anderson. BIBLICAL RESEARCH PRESS,Church History, Early and Medieval by E. Ferguson. CONCORDIA,We Condemn by H.-W. Gensichen. EERDMANS,The Cross and the Flame by B. Shelley. HARPER & ROW, The Fellowship of Discontent by H. Hillerbrand. HERALD,Mennonites in the Confederacy by S. L. Horst. MACMILLAN,Popes and Jews in the Middle Ages by E. Synan, The Rush Hour of the Gods by N. McFarland, and The Condition of Jewish Belief, from Commentary magazine. SCRIBNERS,Christians in Contemporary Russia by N. Struve. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN,Religion and Regime: A Sociological Account of the Reformation by G. E. Swanson. WESTMINSTER,A History of the Ecumenical Movement by R. Rouse and S. C. Neill and The History and Philosophy of the Metaphysical Movements in America by J. S. Judah. YALE,Strasbourg and the Reform: A Study in the Process of Change by M. U. Chrisman.

DRAMA, FICTION, POETRY:AUGSBURG will be printing No Uncertain Sound by L. C. Proctor.EERDMANS,Reluctant Worker Priest (P) by E. Heideman and William Golding, J. D. Salinger, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Saul Bellow, World War I Poets, Pylon Poets, and Graham Greene from the “Contemporary Writers in Christian Perspective” series (P), edited by R. Jellema. HERALD,The Secret Church by L. A. Vernon. JUDSON,Yeshua’s Diary by W. Shrader. LIPPINCOTT,Code Name Sebastian by J. L. Johnson. PRINCETON,Matthew Arnold: The Poet as Humanist by R. Stange. SIMON AND SCHUSTER,The Chosen by C. Potok. ZONDERVAN,Valley of Desire by A. Pryor, To Make the Wounded Whole by M. Crawford, Jungle Fire by B. Porterfield, and The Secret Love by R. Borne.

ECUMENICS:AUGSBURG will be issuing Söderblom: Ecumenical Pioneer by C. J. Curtis, HARPER & ROW, The Seven Steeples by M. Hendrickson. HELICON,Dialogue with Israel by J. Danielou. MACMILLAN,Tradition and Traditions by Y. M.-J. Congar. MCGRAW-HILL,American Bishop at the Vatican Council by B. R. E. Tracy. SCRIBNERS,Christ in India: Essays Towards a Hindu-Christian Dialogue by D. B. Griffiths. SIMON AND SCHUSTER,An Invitation to Hope by Pope John XXIII. WORLD,The Vatican Council and the Jews by A. Gilbert.

Choice Evangelical Books of the Year

Bell, L. Nelson:Convictions to Live By (Eerdmans, 185 pp., $3.50). Practical and stirring essays that relate a distinguished layman’s faith in Christ.

Chafin, Kenneth L.:Help! I’m a Layman (Word, 131 pp., $3.50). A ringing appeal for every Christian to become personally involved in a creative ministry.

Elliot, Elisabeth:No Graven Image (Harper & Row, 244 pp., $3.95). A gripping novel that realistically depicts the strivings, compensations, and trials of a woman missionary.

Ford, Leighton:The Christian Persuader (Harper & Row, 159 pp., $3.95). The theology and methods of evangelism necessary for Christian response to the urgent demand for evangelism in our day.

Forsberg, Malcolm:Last Days on the Nile (Lippincott, 216 pp., $3.95). The story of the tumultuous conflict of the cross and the crescent in Sudanese history and the recent expulsion of foreign Christian workers.

Franzmann, Martin H.:Ha! Ha! Among the Trumpets (Concordia, 109 pp., $2.95). The Sword of the Spirit flashes in fifteen incisive sermons that call men to Christ.

Henry, Carl F. H.:The God Who Shows Himself (Word, 138 pp., $3.50). Vigorous essays that set forth the claims of evangelical Christianity in light of contemporary issues and competing theologies.

Henry, Carl F. H., editor: Jesus of Nazareth: Saviour and Lord (Eerdmans, 277 pp., $5.95). A symposium that assesses the riptides of modern Christology and shows that God’s revelation in Christ and the Bible is solidly anchored in history.

Hitt, Russell T., editor: Heroic Colonial Christians (Lippincott, 255 pp., $4.95). Biographical portraits of Jonathan Edwards, Gilbert Tennent, David Brainerd, and John Witherspoon showing their indelible imprint on colonial times.

Hughes, Philip Edgcumbe, editor: Creative Minds in Contemporary Theology (Eerdmans, 488 pp., $6.95). Informative introductions to Barth, Berkouwer, Brunner, Bultmann, Cullmann, Niebuhr, Teilhard de Chardin, Tillich, and five other twentieth-century thinkers.

Hughes, Philip Edgcumbe, editor and translator: The Register of the Company of Pastors of Geneva in the Time of Calvin (Eerdmans, 380 pp., $12.50). An unusual historical volume that shows the conflict between church and state in Calvin’s Geneva and sheds light on the Servetus controversy.

Jones, Howard O.:Shall We Overcome?: A Challenge to Negro and White Christians (Revell, 146 pp., $3.50). Straight talk from an associate Graham evangelist to white evangelical churches about failures in race relations and the unity of all believers in Christ.

Kallas, James:The Satanward View: A Study in Pauline Theology (Westminster, 152 pp., $4.50). A stinging indictment of those who demythologize Satan.

Kelso, James L.:Archaeology and Our Old Testament Contemporaries (Zondervan, 192 pp., $4.95). An outstanding work, well grounded in natural science and the history of technology and alert to parallels between the biblical and modern world.

Lindsell, Harold, editor: The Church’s Worldwide Mission (Word, 289 pp., $3.95). Evangelicals take a fresh look at missions in light of biblical imperatives and world needs and map strategy for future witness.

Little, Paul E.:How to Give Away Your Faith (Inter-Varsity, 131 pp., $3.50). An exceedingly helpful book on personal Christian witnessing.

Nichol, John Thomas:Pentecostalism (Harper & Row, 1966, 264 pp., $5.95). The best historical work so far on the turbulent history of this important movement within the Christian Church.

Pfeiffer, Charles F., editor: The Biblical World: A Dictionary of Biblical Archaeology (Baker, 612 pp., $8.95). An enlightening resource book on such archaeological subjects as geography, customs, literature, biblical personages, and significant excavations.

Pollock, John:Billy Graham: The Authorized Biography (McGraw-Hill, 277 pp., $4.95). A balanced biography that helps one understand why Graham’s life and ministry have been mightily used of God.

Scharpff, Paulus (translated by Helga Bender Henry): History of Evangelism (Eerdmans, 373 pp., $5.75). A substantial work that traces revival movements in Germany, Great Britain, and the United States during the past three hundred years.

Wenger, J. C.:God’s Word Written (Herald, 159 pp., $3.50). A Mennonite bishop-professor’s constructive work on the nature, inspiration, and authority of the Bible.

Wirt, Sherwood Eliot:Not Me, God (Harper & Row, 94 pp., $2.95). Fictionalized conversations between an ordinary American and God that reflect the human condition and relate God’s wisdom and love.

Noteworthy Advances in the New Testament Field

Lest publications covering the whole Bible be over-looked between two separate articles dealing with Old Testament and New Testament studies, first mention is given here this year to The Jerusalem Bible (Doubleday; Darton, Longman and Todd), a splendid production by British Roman Catholics. It is modeled on the French Dominican Bible de Jérusalem, but while the introductions and notes are for the most part straight translations from the French, the Bible version is rendered from the original texts. An important addition to “World Christian Books” is the Concise Dictionary of the Bible in two paperback volumes, edited by Stephen Neill and others (Lutterworth). Old and New in Interpretation, by James Barr (Harper & Row; SCM), is a study of the two Testaments that deals with such crucial questions as history and revelation, typology and allegory, and the work of salvation, and for good measure adds at the end “a note on fundamentalism.”

Volume III of Kittel’s Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Eerdmans) covers the letters theta to kappa. The second installment of the Theologisches Begriffslexikon zum Neuen Testament (edited by L. Coenen and others (Brockhaus [Wuppertal, Germany]), a work whose character was described in last year’s survey (Feb. 4, 1966, p. 13), confirms the good impression made by the first installment; its entries, which follow the alphabetical order of German words, run from Bewachen to Elias. Nigel Turner has given us a feast of good things in Grammatical Insights into the New Testament (T. and T. Clark); here the fruits of his technical mastery of Greek grammar are made available to the Bible student. If he is right about Luke 2:2, he has solved the historical problem of this verse once for all. The Language of the New Testament, by E. V. N. Goetchius (Scribners), is a Greek beginners’ workbook.

A number of New Testament introductions call for mention. Most impressive of them is W. G. Kümmel’s Introduction to the New Testament, translated from the German by A. J. Mattill (Abingdon; SCM). This work, known to an earlier generation of students as Feine-Behm, has long been a standard handbook in German; it is good that it is now available in English. Even more massive in format is the Introduction to the New Testament by A. Robert and A. Feuillet, two French Catholic scholars, translated by P. W. Skehan and others (Desclée). R. H. Fuller’s Critical Introduction to the New Testament (Duckworth) replaces the identically entitled volume by A. S. Peake in the “Studies in Theology” series. But the work in this field that most readers of CHRISTIANITY TODAY will find especially congenial is B. M. Metzger’s The New Testament: Its Background, Growth and Content (Abingdon). Understanding the New Testament, by H. C. Kee, F. W. Young, and K. Froehlich (Prentice-Hall), is a well-illustrated work prepared for the Society for Religion in Higher Education; it combines literary and theological perspectives in a historical setting so as to provide a unifying approach. New Testament Illustrations, compiled and introduced by C. M. Jones (Cambridge), is a volume in the “Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible.” New Testament Essays, by R. E. Brown (Bruce), is a selection of papers written by the author over a number of years, including some particularly important ones on the Fourth Gospel. Historicity and Chronology in the New Testament, by D. E. Nineham and others (SPCK), is a volume in the paperback series of “Theological Collections”; Nineham writes on the present position regarding the Jesus of history, and another article that may be mentioned is the Archbishop of Canterbury’s “What was the Ascension?”

Two monumental volumes have been added to the series “New Testament Tools and Studies”—Index to Periodical Literature on Christ and the Gospels, by B. M. Metzger, editor of the series, and A Classified Bibliography of Literature on the Acts of the Apostles, by A. J. Mattill and M. B. Mattill (Brill; both will also be published by Eerdmans).

Two slim contributions to the mounting literature on the Scrolls and the New Testament are M. Black, The Dead Sea Scrolls and Christian Doctrine (University of London Athlone Press), and F. F. Bruce, The Dead Sea Scrolls and Early Christianity (Rylands Library, Manchester).

When we come to the central issue of the New Testament, Jesus of Nazareth, Saviour and Lord, a symposium in the series “Contemporary Evangelical Thought,” edited by C. F. H. Henry (Eerdmans), demands our attention. Here eight evangelical scholars have dealt with various historical and theological aspects of the New Testament doctrine of Christ. Another symposium on a similar theme is The Finality of Christ, edited by Dow Kirkpatrick (Abingdon). This is a Methodist production, although one chapter presents three non-Christian views of Christ, by a Buddhist, a Sikh, and a Jew. One excellent chapter is Morna Hooker’s “The Christology of the New Testament: Jesus and the Son of Man,” which may serve as an appetizer for a full-length book on this subject due to appear in 1967. R. H. Fuller’s Foundations of New Testament Chistology (Scribners; Lutterworth) shows how further reflection on the interpretation of the Bultmann school has persuaded him to change the position he took some years ago in The Mission and Achievement of Jesus. In Christ, Lord, Son of God (Allenson; SCM), Werner Kramer endeavors to establish pre-Pauline precedent for the characteristic Christological affirmations of Paul.

A. R. C. Leaney has given us The Christ of the Gospels (New Zealand Theological Review), while Sherman Johnson’s The Theology of the Gospels (Duckworth) supersedes the earlier volume with this title contributed to “Studies in Theology” by James Moffatt. Vindications, edited by A. T. Hanson (Morehouse-Barlow; SCM), is an outspoken rejoinder to the excessively skeptical evaluation of the New Testament documents as historical documents of which we have had a surfeit of late.

THE DEACON HAS A WIFE

With a cool, cool smile

On her sneer-bent lips

She greeted them,

Gave them two lime-green dips

Of conversation.

That was this morning.

Tonight they think

They’ll skip the sermon and have a drink

Or two with their neighbors.

She has frosted their beer

With her glacial ice.

They like it chilled

But they won’t risk such a freezing twice

In any narthex

For any price.

ELVA McALLASTER

William Barclay’s The First Three Gospels (SCM) is a popular introduction written with his characteristic lucidity and charm. The Parables of Jesus, by Eta Linneman (SPCK), is a scholarly “introduction and exposition” sponsored by Ernst Fuchs. Rediscovering the Parables, by Joachim Jeremias (Scribners; SCM), is a shorter edition of the author’s major work on The Parables of Jesus. Another of Jeremias’s major works, The Eucharistic Words of Jesus, has appeared in a new English translation by Norman Perrin (Scribners; SCM).

The Gospel According to St. Matthew, by Alexander Jones, translator of The Jerusalem Bible (Sheed and Ward; Geoffrey Chapman), is a Catholic commentary based on the Revised Standard Version. The Sermon on the Mount, by W. D. Davies (Cambridge), is an abridged edition in paperback of the author’s great work on The Setting of the Sermon on the Mount. Vincent Taylor’s magisterial commentary on the Greek text of The Gospel According to St. Mark (Macmillan) has appeared in a second edition. The Gospel of Luke, by Bo Reicke (John Knox; SPCK), is an essay that undertakes to rebut the “de-eschatologizing” of the Third Evangelist familiar from the works of Hans Conzelmann. While Luke’s work is early (before A.D. 65), Reicke maintains, it can at that date envisage the world-mission of Christianity, because this is in line with Jesus’ own intention. The first New Testament volume in a new series of paperback “Bible Study Books” is St. Luke, by E. M. Blaiklock (Scripture Union). The editors of a volume of essays in honor of Paul Schubert (L. E. Keck and J. L. Martyn) have decided to devote it to Studies in Luke-Acts (Abingdon); here are nineteen important essays written from divergent viewpoints. The first of two volumes on The Gospel According to John in the Anchor Bible (Doubleday), by Raymond E. Brown, covers chapters 1–12 but includes a valuable introduction to the whole Gospel of more than 120 pages. The Gospel According to St. John, by Owen E. Evans (Epworth), is a distinguished addition to the publishers’ “Preacher’s Commentaries.”

The Acts of the Apostles in the “Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible” is expounded by J. W. Packer, one of the editors of the series (Cambridge). The volume on Acts 14–28 has been published in the new translations of Calvin’s New Testament commentaries (Eerdmans; Oliver and Boyd). For the scholar, Eldon J. Epp has contributed The Theological Tendency of Codex Bezae Cantabrigiensis in Acts to the monograph series of the Society for New Testament Studies (Cambridge); he finds an anti-Judaic tendency in the manuscript.

Pauline studies have not flagged during the year. Two issues in “Studies in Biblical Theology” (Allenson; SCM) deal respectively with The Collection: A Study in Paul’s Strategy (by Keith F. Nickle) and Christianity According to Paul (by Michel Bouttier). The latter work bears almost the same title as C. A. Anderson Scott’s Christianity According to St. Paul, a standard work for nearly forty years, which has now made a welcome reappearance in paperback (Cambridge). The Gospel According to Paul, by A. M. Hunter (SCM), is a new edition of part of an earlier work and bids fair to fulfill the author’s hope that readers will find in it “a short, reliable and up-to-date sketch of St. Paul’s theology plus … a suggestion that Paul still has something to say to us.” That Paul has less to say to us than Hunter thinks is the opinion of A. Q. Morton and J. McLeman, whose Paul: The Man and the Myth (Harper & Row; Hodder and Stoughton) is described as “a study in the authorship of Greek prose” but is less dispassionate than essays in statistical analysis normally are.

The eager impatience of those who waited for the second volume of John Murray’s commentary on Romans in the “New International Commentary” series (Eerdmans) has been more than rewarded by its appearance. In this volume, covering chapters 9–16, Professor Murray has excelled himself, giving proof not only of his well-known qualities as theological exegete but also of his sound judgment as an exponent of Christian ethics. Another volume in the series of new translations of Calvin’s commentaries contains the Reformer’s work on Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians (Eerdmans; Oliver and Boyd). A welcome reprint of a much appreciated classic has been issued by Baker Book House in its “Limited Editions Library”: W. M. Ramsay’s Historical Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians. Where Ramsay has least to give—in the study of the theological content of the epistle—a major contribution has been offered to us in the doctoral dissertation by A. J. Bandstra entitled The Law and the Elements of the World (Kok [Kampen, the Netherlands]). Bandstra takes issue with the common view that the “elements of the world” in Galatians and Colossians are the lords of the planetary spheres and concludes that the “elements” envisaged by Paul are two in number—the law and the flesh—and do not need to be demythologized for twentieth-century application as the astral powers do.

ST. MATTHEW 25:42

Waterswollen bellies of the unfed

Mock most of the hymnody pieties

Of those of us who gnaw our daily bread

(Moaning meanwhile about all the inflation

In a martini-thirsty nation,

And the inconvenience of our lot).…

And yet, beyond some reredos,

Some gilded morning, Deity

Chargingly emerging may

Have a discommoding say:

I was hungry and you fed me not.

HENRY HUTTO

The volume on The Pastoral Letters in the “Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible” has been written by A. T. Hanson (Cambridge); he finds many puzzling features in these three letters, particularly the miscellaneous character of their contents. The author, urging his readers to remain true to the teaching they had received, takes his theological language “from the prayer book and hymn book of his day” and includes in his work genuine fragments of Paul, which belong to the period following Paul’s release from his first Roman imprisonment.

Volume VI of The Wesleyan Bible Commentary, edited by C. W. Carter (Eerdmans), covers the New Testament books from Hebrews to Revelation; this is a conservative production, with strong devotional emphasis, based on the American Standard Version. Two excellent works on James appeared in 1966. One is The Epistle of James by C. L. Mitton, the latest volume in the “Evangelical Bible Commentary” (Eerdmans). It is a verse-by-verse commentary by a well-known scholar that reveals the relevance of James’s teaching for today and insists throughout that “faith is not true faith unless it is the motive power that produces Christian living.” The same essential emphasis is found in James Speaks for Today, by H. F. Stevenson (Marshall, Morgan and Scott), a collection of twenty studies in the epistle in which its heavenly wisdom is applied to earthly practice.

B. F. Westcott’s commentary on the Greek text of The Epistles of St. John has been reprinted by the Marcham Manor Press, with a preliminary essay in which the present writer surveys the progress of Johannine studies since Westcott’s day. A modern approach to the problem of the first epistle is presented by J. C. O’Neil in The Puzzle of First John (SPCK).

Our survey of commentaries ends with one of the best to appear in 1966—G. B. Caird’s The Revelation of St. John the Divine in “Harper’s New Testament Commentaries” (Harper & Row). When so much has been said about the Revelation as a reaction to pre-Christian Jewish eschatology, or as a putrid backwater in relation to the mainstream of Christian thought, it is refreshing to read a work by a scholar who sees it so clearly for the thoroughly Christian book it is. And when so much literature on the Revelation gives way to unrestrained fantasy, it is refreshing to turn to the product of such a disciplined mind as Dr. Caird’s.

The New Testament literature is related to the Christian literature of the period immediately following in the new edition of Edgar J. Goodspeed’s History of Early Christian Literature (first published in 1942), revised and enlarged by Robert M. Grant (University of Chicago Press). Its scope ranges from Paul to Eusebius.

New Commentaries Highlight Old Testament Publications

Has 1966 been a good year for Old Testament publications in English? Quantitatively, yes. But qualitatively, particularly from an evangelical viewpoint, the answer must be a guarded no.

Certain areas have been solidly productive during the past year. One is commentaries: of the eleven Old Testament releases that can be identified as the year’s most important for evangelicals, five are in this category. Yet only one of these, and that the least intensive, can be called conservative. The level of such top-notch 1965 volumes as M. Woudstra’s The Ark of the Covenant or E. J. Young’s Isaiah 1–18 (“New International Commentary”) just was not attained during 1966. Still, liberal sets such as Allenson’s “Studies in Biblical Theology,” Doubleday’s Anchor Bible, and Westminster’s “Old Testament Library,” along with a few conservative sets such as Baker’s “Studies in Biblical Archaeology,” “Shield Bible Study Series,” and “Old Testament History Series,” continued to produce on schedule. The following survey seeks to point out, by area, some of the leading books of 1966, plus a few from 1965 that appeared too late to be listed last year.

Concerning the biblical text itself, Father Alexander Jones’s edition of The Jerusalem Bible (Doubleday) ranks as one of the year’s top eleven volumes in Old Testament. Although its headings and notes generally render the 1956 French Bible de Jérusalem, its text is in splendid English. But when its Roman Catholic sponsors bill it as “unbiased” and as “acceptable to all faiths,” one wonders what conservatives—whether Catholic, Protestant, or Jewish—are supposed to make of its third-century date for Chronicles or its “figurative Yahwistic narrative” in Genesis 2:4b ff.

Then there were the two Catholic Bibles in the Revised Standard version. The New Testament part of the Holy Bible, RSV: Catholic Edition (Nelson), produced by the Catholic Biblical Association of Great Britain, had appeared in 1965 with sixty-seven textual changes; in 1966 came the Old Testament, with the Apocrypha inserted throughout and with notes at the ends of both testaments. The Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha (1966 imprimatur edition) is really just the 1965 Protestant publication with the addition of fourteen minor notes. A defense of the Jewish Torah version, especially in its freedom as opposed to the “LXX-type” word-for-word translation, came from H. M. Orlinsky (ed.): Genesis: The New Jerusalem Version Translation (Harper Torchbooks); this is the 1962 edition revised on the basis of the Torah’s actual reception. A comparative exhibit of the sort of Genesis text that Orlinsky attacked appeared in L. A. Weigle (ed.): The Genesis Octapla: Eight English Versions of Genesis in the Tyndale-King James Tradition (Nelson).

To get back to the original languages, 1966 brought Part XII:2, Ecclesiasticus, of the Septuaginta, edited by J. Ziegler (Göttingen, Germany); A. A. DiLella, The Hebrew Text of Sirach (The Hague); Y. Yadin, The Ben Sira Scroll from Masada (Israel Exploration Society, 1965); J. A. Sanders, The Psalms Scroll of Qumran Cave II (Oxford, 1965; “Discoveries in the Judean Desert,” IV); J. A. Fitzmyer, The Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave I (Pontifical Biblical Institute); and J. Reider, An Index to Aquila (Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands; “Supplements to Vetus Testamentum,” XII).

Volumes on textual criticism ranged from D. R. Ap-Thomas, A Primer of Old Testament Textual Criticism (Fortress); through S. Talmon’s editing of the fifth volume of Textus: Annual of the Hebrew University Bible Project, with various Qumranic notes and a recovered photograph of a page out of the lost Pentateuchal part of the Aleppo Hebrew Codex; to J. de Waard, A Comparative Study of the Old Testament Text in the Dead Sea Scrolls and in the New Testament (Brill and Eerdmans, “Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah,” IV), our first such really comprehensive analysis.

Next to commentaries, books on historical background seem to have been 1966’s best Old Testament contribution. A Short History of the Ancient Near East, by the conservative (indicated through the rest of this survey by an asterisk) Seventh-day Adventist S. F. Schwantes,* won Baker’s twenty-fifth anniversary manuscript contest. The book sweeps through the political history of Shinar, Egypt (in one-third of the book’s 175 pp.), Babylonia, Medo-Persia, Aram, and Israel. It has helpful maps, charts, and illustrations. A translation of M. Noth’s The Old Testament World (Fortress) likewise travels through geographical, cultural, and archaeological settings to end up with a discussion of the text itself.

J. Van Seters in The Hyksos: A New Investigation (Yale) identifies the Hyksos with urbanized Amorites and places their capital city of Avaris near Qantir rather than Tanis. J. L. McKenzie provided a useful manual in The World of the Judges (Prentice-Hall), while C. Gordon continued his Mediterranean studies with Ugarit and Minoan Crete (Norton) and Evidence for the Minoan Language (Ventnor). Gordon’s views on early contacts between the Aegean and the Near East are projected in E. M. Yamauchi’s* paperback, Greece and Babylon (Baker, “Studies in Biblical Archaeology”). K. Stenring in The Enclosed Garden (Stockholm) outlines the chronology of the Old Testament, with diagrams; and K. M. Kenyon surveys Amorites and Canaanites (Oxford) and how Israel adopted their culture after the conquest. Another book in the Prentice-Hall background series is E. H. Maly’s The World of David and Solomon. C. F. Pfeiffer* continued his survey books on Hebrew history with Israel and Judah (Baker) during the divided kingdom, while for the period from 538 B.C. onward there is M. Avi-Yonah’s The Holy Land from the Persian to the Arab Conquest: A Historical Geography (Baker).

Concerning archaeology, a useful tool that is suggested as another of 1966’s eleven most important Old Testament books for conservatives is C. F. Pfeiffer* (ed.): The Biblical World, a Dictionary of Biblical Archaeology (Baker). It presents an excellent check list of digs under “Archaeology”; but in its striving for objectivity it comes up with a few conclusions that have made both conservatives and liberals lift an eyebrow, e.g., that Jericho was “presumably” destroyed by Joshua in 1325 B.C. Critical problems about the Moabite Stone, for example, or Moses’ relation to Hammurabi, are often bypassed. Its bibliographies though brief, are helpful.

Similarly broad in scope is R. W. Ehrich’s Chronologies of Old World Archaeology (University of Chicago). More specialized studies ranged from the technical report of B. Mazar, T. Dothan, and I. Dunayevsky, En-Gedi: The First and Second Season of Excavation, 1961–62 (Israel Exploration Society) to J. C. Trever’s autobiographical The Untold Story of Qumran (Revell), which clears up some of the uncertainties, nineteen years after the discovery.

Turning to biblical content, we first find the one-volume Dictionary of the Bible (Bruce, 1965) by the outstanding Catholic Old Testament scholar J. L. McKenzie. It claims to be “a synthesis of the common [i.e., liberal] conclusions of scholarship” and is a large (954 pp.) but well done one-man job. Sister Laurentia Digges gives popular sketches of Old Testament characters from Adam to David in Adam’s Haunted Sons (Macmillan)—haunted by visions of God, that is. Similarly biographical is J. Kelso’s* Archaeology and Our Old Testament Contemporaries (Zondervan). While it popularizes a few critical conclusions, such as Abraham’s being a merchant prince, and the name Yahweh’s having a “Creator” meaning (hiphil), it still maintains an evangelical position, with a Mosaic Deuteronomy and a miracle-working Christ. Selected as third on the list of eleven most important is a work by V. Moller-Christensen and K. E. J. Jorgensen, Encyclopedia of Bible Creatures (Fortress, 1965), which contains scientific footnotes on all the animals of the Bible.

Studies in Old Testament introduction do not have to be skeptical. In 1966 some were, like W. Beyerlin’s Origins and History of the Oldest Sinaitic Traditions (Blackwell) or G. von Rad’s sixteen essays that span the last thirty years, The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays (McGraw-Hill). Yet others were not, like W. F. Albright’s New Horizons in Biblical Research (the Whidden lectures for 1960, published by Oxford), which traces the positive effect of archaeology from Abraham to Judges, and E. M. Yamauchi’s* Composition and Corroboration in Classical and Biblical Studies (Baker, paperback), which compares the use of literary criticism in these two disciplines.

A. Altmann edited nine essays that were first presented in colloquia at Brandeis University on Biblical Motifs: Origins and Transformations (Harvard), e.g., Cyrus Gordon’s definition of Leviathan as an eternal (uncreated) monster, symbolic of evil. C. Barth has furnished students and laymen with a critical survey of poetic forms and meanings in his Introduction to the Psalms (Scribners, paperback); cf. W. M. W. Roth’s Numerical Sayings in the Old Testament, a Form-Critical Study (Brill, 1965, “Supplements to Vetus Testamentum,” XIII). Yet of a more conservative bent are the papers read at the seventh and eighth meetings of Die OT Werkgemeenskap in Suid Afrika,* Studies on the Books of Hosea and Amos (Potchefstroom). Small but important—fourth of the year’s best eleven—is D. J. Wiseman* et al., Notes on Some Problems in the Book of Daniel (Tyndale, 1965); forty-eight of the seventy-nine pages are a defense by K. A. Kitchen * of a date in the sixth century B.C. for the Aramaic of Daniel’s prophecy.

Commentaries were 1966’s richest Old Testament contribution. There appeared in English nine “heavy” commentaries on specific Old Testament books, all of them negatively critical. G. von Rad understood Deuteronomy (Westminster, “Old Testament Library Series”) as a covenant form for office-bearers in Israel. J. W. Myers continued his previous Anchor Bible efforts on Chronicles with Ezra-Nehemiah (Doubleday), ably stressing an essential historicity, even though he finds Ezra insertions in Nehemiah, and dating the former in 428 B.C. R. Gordis produced a fine translation in The Book of God and Man: A Study of Job (University of Chicago), holding generally to the book’s literary integrity. From the Pontifical Biblical Institute, M. Dahood’s Anchor Bible, Psalms I (chapters 1–50; Doubleday) is the first serious incorporation of present-day knowledge of Canaanitish literary forms (Ugaritic) into a study of the Psalter.

Both G. A. F. Knight’s Deutero-Isaiah: A Theological Commentary on Isaiah 40–55 (Abingdon, 1965) and J. D. Smart’s History and Theology in Second Isaiah: A Commentary on Isaiah 35, 40–66 (Westminster) stress consistency of thought. Smart’s work, in fact, treats all twenty-eight chapters as a unity, though of 550 B.C., and locates the writing of Judah, with its hopes not focused on a return from Babylon. J. Bright was criticized for treating Jeremiah (Anchor Bible, Doubleday) as mostly authentic; no one could accuse N. Porteous of doing that in his Daniel: A Commentary (Westminster, 1965, “Old Testament Library”), though he does concede that the “stories” of Daniel 1–6 might have been based on pre-Maccabean materials. Like all three of the Westminster commentaries mentioned above, J. M. Ward’s Hosea: A Theological Commentary (Harper & Row) is more interested in theological synthesis than in detailed textual and literary criticism. But it was still our first full-length Hosea commentary in fifty years, and it and the Gordis, Dahood, and Bright volumes may be listed as numbers five to eight in our eleven of top importance.

Among the more popular expositions (M. F.) Unger’s* Bible Handbook (Moody) is more than 90 percent commentary notes. The Wesleyan Bible Commentary,* Volume I (Eerdmans), edited by C. W. Carter and released late in December, became the first Old Testament part of a work already available in the New. R. L. Honeycutt, in These Ten Words (Broadman), operates from critical presuppositions to make practical applications of the Decalogue; C. T. Francisco outlines words of later editors who regarded themselves as extensions of Moses in The Book of Deuteronomy (Baker, paperback). I. L. Jensen* added two helpful paperbacks to the Moody Colportage Library, Joshua: Restland Won, and Jeremiah: Prophet of Judgment, both with maps and charts.

Two double-volume studies that cover both major and minor prophets are E. Kraeling’s Commentary on the Prophets (Nelson) and the Beacon Bible Commentary,* Volumes V–VI (Beacon Hill). The Nelson commentary, which consists of considerably more Bible text (RSV) than notes, follows the critical spirit of the RSV on such passages as Daniel 9:27; Micah 5:2, and Zechariah 6:13. The Beacon work, however, rates a rave as number nine of the year’s best eleven. Here eight Nazarene and holiness scholars have succeeded in putting together a careful evangelical study, well abreast of current thinking and especially good in citing conservative sources. The Aldersgate Biblical Series* (Light and Life Press) reached completion in 1966 with the release of Books 13 and 14 Isaiah, and 20, Esther, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Malachi. The Leader’s Guides contain the ninety-sixe-page Study Guides plus helpful analyses; in Book 14, however, the intrusion of a deutero- and even trito-Isaiah seemed incongruous after the stress on the Virgin Mary and Jesus in Isaiah 7:14.

THE FOOL HATH SAID …

They jeered God from their pinnacles of knowledge

And hooted him from tome and tabloid sheet.

They danced him out beneath a noose suspended

Then tried to drop the trap beneath his feet.

As Haman found a long, long time before,

A gallows can be used by either … or.

MARIE J. POST

A. W. Blackwood, Jr.,* applied The Other Son of Man, Ezekiel/Jesus (Baker) to contemporary problems; and J. P. Lewis* uses 105 pages to bring us adequately The Minor Prophets (Baker), a volume available also in paperback. This was unquestionably Amos’ year for study helps, with choices open between D. Garland,* Amos: A Study Guide (Zondervan, paperback), good on content though weak on biblical analogy for predictions; P. Kelley,* The Book of Amos (Baker); R. L. Murray, Plumb Lines and Fruit Baskets (Broadman), practical; and J. D. W. Watts, Studying the Book of Amos (Broadman), with background, content, and meanings for today. Two other “briefies” were W. L. Banks’s* Jonah: Reluctant Prophet (Moody), and P. Kelley’s Malachi (Baker).

During 1966, the study of Old Testament religion bordered on a comeback after years of eclipse by a neo-orthodox biblical theology. Five releases attempted to crash the textbook market, hopefully appealing to liberal-minded professors with combinations of Old Testament survey, history, and religion: G. W. Anderson, The History and Religion of Israel (Oxford, a redoing of Wardle’s “Clarendon Old Testament,” Volume I); H. M. Buck, People of the Lord (Macmillan); A. S. Hopkinson, Modern Man Reads the Old Testament (Association); J. W. Myers, Invitation to the Old Testament (Doubleday); and H. C. Snell, Ancient Israel: Its Story and Meaning (University of Utah). H. Ringgren’s 1963 German work appeared in English as Israelite Religion (Fortress), stressing the period of the monarchy with a characteristic Uppsala interest in the cult, kingship, and traditions. Also translated were five of A. Alt’s studies, Essays on Old Testament History and Religion (Blackwell).

In a restricted area was J. Morgenstern’s Rites of Birth, Marriage, Death, and Kindred Occasions Among the Semites (Hebrew Union College; Quadrangle). Essential for an appreciation of current trends, and number ten of 1966’s top eleven, were the papers read at the one-hundredth meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature, The Bible and Modern Scholarship (Abingdon), so edited by J. P. Hyatt as to sweep from early history and cult, through prophecy, and into later apocalyptic and “theology”—actually only a history of Israel’s ideas.

For valid Old Testament theology there was J. W. Watts’s* Old Testament Teaching (Broadman), but also, paradoxically, what H. Renckens entitled The Religion of Israel (Sheed and Ward); for, if one takes this Roman Catholic writer’s theories of what J, E, D, and P said was early Israel’s thought as being what really was its thought, then the result becomes a useful biblical theology, for Renckens believes in divinely revealed doctrines. On specific subjects were C. J. Labuschagne, The Incomparability of Yahweh in the Old Testament (Brill) and P. Scharper (ed.), Torah and Gospel (Sheed and Ward), an interesting colloquium between Jews and Roman Catholics in which agreement was reached on the inspiration of Scripture—namely, that both groups could afford to adopt negative biblical criticism since both had an independent basis for authority in their extra-biblical traditions anyway (but they couldn’t agree on who really constituted Israel!). Surveying ten positions that the Church has taken toward the older Scripture was another translation, A. A. Van Ruler’s The Christian Church and the Old Testament (Eerdmans).

Inspiration in the light of modern science was the subject of such diverse volumes of biblical apologetic as A. Hulsbosch, God in Creation and Evolution (Sheed and Ward), the liberal Roman Catholic canonization of evolution, and H. M. Morris,* Studies in the Bible and Science (Baker), or D. W. Patten,* The Biblical Flood and the Ice Epoch (Pacific Meridian), a conservative Protestant scientist opposes uniformitarianism.

On the subject of Old Testament ceremonial, H.-J. Kraus’s Worship in Israel (John Knox), originally in German, M. Thierry’s A Feast in Honor of Yahweh (Notre Dame), from the French, and W. Harrelson’s The Worship of Ancient Israel (Doubleday), in original English, agree on an evolutionary transformation within Israel on what were originally pagan Canaanitish rites. Similarly, the liberal Catholic P. Drijvers, in The Psalms: Their Structure and Meaning (Herder and Herder) and the neo-orthodox Protestant Harvey H. Guthrie, Jr., in Israel’s Sacred Songs (Seabury), see eye to eye on a God of encounter in worship rather than a God of truth. On the other hand, C. Westermann’s analysis of Gunkel’s psalm types, The Praise of God in the Psalms (John Knox, 1965), offers excellent insights on the true quality of praise. A description, then, of wisdom as non-Yahwistic, at least in pre-exilic days, was the burden of R. N. Whybray, Wisdom in Proverbs (Allenson, “Studies in Biblical Theology,” 45). An indepth contribution was G. von Rad, Old Testament Theology, Volume II: The Theology of Israel’s Prophetic Traditions (Harper & Row). Weakness appeared in Von Rad’s concluding attempt to relate the Old Testament to the New; but his stress on the prophets as called of God and as building upon the prior entity of the law merits the selection of this volume as a final, eleventh, Old Testament book of the year for evangelicals.

Among important new editions—later 1965 and 1966—of former publications were J. M. Adams,* Biblical Backgrounds (Broadman), extensively revised by J. A. Callaway; J. Gray, The Legacy of Canaan (Brill), adding one hundred pages to The Ras-Shamra Texts and Their Relevance to the Old Testament (“Supplements to Vetus Testamentum,” V); A. S. Rappoport, Myth and Legend of Ancient Israel (Ktav), with an introduction and additions by R. Patai; and E. R. Thiele, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings (Eerdmans). (Thiele has now come to an explicit disavowal of original inerrancy in First and Second Kings: “This work was done by men, not God.”)

Newly appearing in paperback were such basic works as H. F. Hahn, The Old Testament in Modern Research (Fortress), H. Lansdell,* The Tithe in Scripture (Baker); J. B. Phillips, Four Prophets (Macmillan); I. M. Price et al., The Monuments and the Old Testament (Judson); E. Sauer’s* trilogy on the history of salvation (Eerdmans); G. A. Smith, The Historical Geography of the Holy Land (Harper & Row); and G. Vos,* Biblical Theology (Eerdmans). Finally, coming in new form were a set of eight classroom-size, five-color maps, The Abingdon Maps of Bible Lands—from the Oxford Bible Atlas of 1962—and the Tyndale Bulletin,* the voice of British evangelicalism, enlarged into an annual volume. Over half of the seven articles in this first release (#17, 1966) were devoted to the Old Testament; special praise is due to K. A. Kitchen’s* “Historical Method and Early Hebrew Tradition.”

A Year of Mixed Blessings in Church History and Theology

The pace of literary production was well maintained in this area during the past year. By any standards, however, much of it is ephemeral stuff, which at most will merely help to swell the bibliographies of doctoral dissertations and next year’s works. One wishes sometimes that the mind could be given a little more of the time devoted to the pen.

This is not to say that we do not have some solid work. In encyclopedias, for example, the Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church (Augsburg) and the Catholic Dictionary of Theology, Volume II, are both valuable reference works. The Luther translation has also advanced with the Lectures on Genesis (Concordia), and T. H. L. Parker has given us a useful selection of English Reformers in “The Library of Christian Classics” (Westminster). The republication of the Works of Jonathan Edwards, Volume III (Yale), is another worthy project. Edwards will undoubtedly survive C. Cherry on The Theology of Jonathan Edwards (Doubleday). Another series to be noted is the new edition of apostolic fathers, to which Volume IV on Ignatius of Antioch (edited by R. M. Grant, Nelson) has now been added. J. Stevenson has also finished his sequel to the New Eusebius in Creeds, Councils and Controversies (SPCK), an invaluable collection of early Christian documents.

Early church history is by no means irrelevant to the present, and some of the finest studies are in this field. One might begin with a new and enlarged edition of Goodspeed’s History of Early Christian Literature (edited by R. M. Grant, University of Chicago). Henry Chadwick raises again some important issues in Early Christian Thought and the Classical Tradition (Oxford), and with H. von Campenhausen he also takes up the problems of succession and primacy in Jerusalem and Rome (Facet Books, Fortress). From L. W. Barnard we have both the general Studies in the Apostolic Fathers and Their Background and the more specific Justin Martyr: His Life and Thought (Abingdon). A general account of the first centuries is attempted by S. Laeuchli in The Serpent and the Dove (Abingdon), although one wonders whether the title was aptly chosen for this disentanglement of good and evil in the story.

The late medieval and early Protestant period can always be relied on for interesting and useful studies. Here pride of place goes to M. Spinka, who in the last two years has given us both John Hus at the Council of Constance (Columbia University) and the definitive John Hus’ Concept of the Church (Princeton). To the same general area belongs G. H. W. Parker’s more popular The Morning Star in “The Advance of Christianity” series (Eerdmans). P. E. Hughes, whose translation of the Register of the Company of Pastors of Geneva in the Time of Calvin has now been brought out by Eerdmans, also writes with authority on The Theology of the English Reformers (Eerdmans). Luther, of course, commands a book or two, including In the Footsteps of Luther, by M. A. Kleeberg and G. Lemme (Concordia).

Some good historical writing is devoted to Anglican matters. Owen Chadwick has opened what promises to be an important work with Volume I of The Victorian Church (Oxford). G. V. Bennett and J. D. Walsh have also edited some interesting Essays in Modern English Church History (Oxford). Wesley exacts his annual tribute in R. C. Monk’s John Wesley and His Puritan Heritage (Abingdon), which analyzes one of the elements in this complex and forceful character.

On the American side we find a particular interest in heroes and heretics. The American Religious Heretics of Abingdon (edited by G. F. Shriver) are counterbalanced by the Heroic Colonial Christians of Lippincott (edited by R. T. Hitt). The history of the Plymouth Colony in the seventeenth century is retold by G. D. Langdon, Jr., in Pilgrim Colony (Yale), and L. C. Rudolph gives us a fresh picture of that founding father of American Methodism, Francis Asbury (Abingdon). Too much should not be expected of so short a work as The Religious History of America, by E. S. Gaustadt (Harper & Row), although it will be appreciated by those who share its emphases. More generally satisfying is D. E. Trueblood’s The People Called Quakers (Harper & Row).

The year has produced some good studies, including a whole series on church growth by Eerdmans. More generally, S. Neill makes an acute analysis of the significant if ambiguous relation between Colonialism and Christian Missions (McGraw-Hill), while J. Edwin Orr’s The Light of the Nations (Eerdmans) might very well be regarded as a history of mission by revival. We also have a voice from Scandinavia, that of A. Sundkler on The World of Mission (Eerdmans). Three biographies may be put under the heading of world evangelism. Lois Carlson tells again the story of her husband in Monganga Paul (Harper & Row). R. K. Curtis takes up again a familiar theme in They Called Him Mr. Moody (Eerdmans). Finally, J. Pollock writes an official biography of the world’s leading evangelist today, Billy Graham (McGraw-Hill).

It may be doubted whether any of the new devotional works listed can compare with the great classic, William Law’s Serious Call (reprinted by Eerdmans). Selected Sermons of St. Augustine, edited by Q. Howe (Holt, Rinehart and Winston), should also promote spiritual nurture as well as patristic knowledge. The riches of hymnology are explored by E. Routley in Hymns and Human Life (Eerdmans). Those who seek a better understanding of worship may profitably consult F. W. Schroeder’s Worship in the Reformed Tradition (United Church Press) and also The Liturgy of the Church of England Before and After the Reformation, by S. A. Hurlbut (Eerdmans).

Some of the most interesting books come from leading Roman Catholic authors, especially on the reforming side. The ecumenical bearing of the recent council is discussed by B. Leeming in The Vatican Council and Christian Unity (Harper & Row). Hans Küng tackles a question of peculiar difficulty to Roman Catholics in Freedom Today (Sheed and Ward). From Karl Rahner we have Volume V of his interesting Theological Investigations. Behind the enlightened chorus, however, a more sinister note is sounded by Pope Paul in his encyclical Christi matri rosarii, whose mariology is less commendable than its plea for peace. Here is a salutary reminder that for all the changes, Roman Catholicism still has an active element that is incompatible with evangelical truth.

Ethics has gone increasingly theological. This is good, but it is no panacea. Everything depends on the theology. G. F. Woods gives us a Defence of Theological Ethics (Cambridge) that raises the question whether, if defense be needed, it should not itself be a theological defense. J. Sellers has a Theological Ethics (Macmillan) that does at least illustrate the need for a sound theology if we are to have a sound ethics. In a class of its own is the monumental Theological Ethics of H. Thielicke (Volume I: Foundations, Fortress), which from a Lutheran standpoint gets to grips with the real dogmatic issues behind ethics and is one of the great books of the century. It demands serious scrutiny and shows up only too vividly the shallowness of so much that passes for ethical discussion in our day.

From theological ethics it is but a step to theology in the narrow sense. In How I Changed My Mind, essays by Barth have been collected and published with some interesting photographs and chatty introductory material by J. D. Godsey (John Knox). H. A. Meynell in Grace Versus Nature attempts an evaluation of one of Barth’s main emphases from a Roman Catholic standpoint (Sheed and Ward). I Knew Dietrich Bonhoeffer, edited by W.-D. Zimmerman (Collins), presents Bonhoeffer through the eyes of some of those who knew him. Existentialism finds a persuasive advocate in J. Macquarrie’s Principles of Christian Theology (Scribners) and Studies in Christian Existentialism (Westminster), but the future of real theology is obviously not to be found here. Georgia Harkness has a good theme in The Fellowship of the Holy Spirit (Abingdon), but there is more solid meat in the reprint of Swete’s The Holy Spirit in the Ancient Church (Baker). W. Hordern writes the Introduction (Volume I) to the series “New Directions in Theology Today” (Westminster); it is more helpful descriptively than materially. A. H. Leitch uses the similar but more biblical Winds of Doctrine (Revell) for a survey from a more orthodox standpoint. C. F. H. Henry also has a fine review of the modern theological scene in Frontiers in Modern Theology (Moody). Another useful survey is the Guide to the Modern Debate about God, by D. E. Jenkins (Westminster), which rightly perceives that the knowledge and doctrine of God are basic to all else.

This leads us to the great theological fad of the year, the so-called death-of-god theology—a nice contradiction in terms! It is ironical that God’s supposed death has been needed to focus attention again on the living God as the proper theme of theology. Also ironical is the way in which most of the titles, even in refutation, ring the changes on the death-of-God theme. Is advertising our theological criterion? T. J. J. Altizer himself is, of course, justified when he tries to state what he has in view under the titles The Gospel of Christian Atheism (Westminster) and (with W. Hamilton) Radical Theology and the Death of God (Bobbs-Merrill). The only problem is to find the Gospel and the theology. But then a Roman Catholic response comes under the query Is God Dead? (edited by J. Metz; Paulist Press). The same (rhetorical) question is asked in the title of a Zondervan symposium. K. M. Hamilton has the bold title God Is Dead (Eerdmans), though in fact he writes one of the best rejoinders. J. W. Montgomery has another refutation under the more general The Is God Dead Controversy (Zondervan), and under the similar The Death of God Controversy (Abingdon) T. W. Ogletree attempts a rather different evaluation. G. H. Girod assures us in his title that God Is Not Dead (Baker), and G. MacGregor, though on substantially liberal ground, feels bold to speak of God Beyond Doubt (Lippincott). It is surely odd that in none of the titles is clear reference made to the great biblical doctrine of the living God.

Is it right, in any case, that theology should dance thus to the piping of atheism, however Christian? One might argue with some justice that the truth must be stated in opposition to every form of error. One might also point out that stupid ideas about the value of death-of-God teaching need to be averted and exploded by proper analysis and refutation. It should be remembered, however, that even the negative task will not be done unless the movement is not taken too seriously as theology but is rather unmasked as the empty, speculative mythologizing it really is. Nor can the positive task be fulfilled unless it is clearly seen and shown that, first and last, to know God is to know him as he has revealed himself to be in Holy Scripture. The death-of-God theology is another attempt to fill the vacuum left by the failure of so much modern theology faithfully and forcefully to present the biblical God, who is not only the God of the living but also the living God.

Editor’s Note from February 03, 1967

The mailman recently delivered a blurb sheet for a new book on writing for money. It promised to show me how to turn out 10,000 words a week for as much as 30¢ a word. Editors will buy this stuff by the ton, I learned, even if it isn’t grammatically correct and lacks any “unusual inspiration.” For a moment or two I was tempted to switch rather than struggle. Then I recalled advice by a former fiction editor of Collier’s, Thomas Uzzell, who taught narrative techniques to a small group of us in the thirties. The very first night he said: “If you want to write for the public, turn out a million words of your best and toss them into the wastebasket; then you’re ready to begin.”

Somewhere between these extremes there’s probably a happy hunting ground for success in the word business. But if as a beginner I had to choose between these two lines of approach, I’d buy the giant wastebasket before opening the bank account. At CHRISTIANITY TODAY we receive hundreds of manuscripts a month, and we get both kinds of copy daily.

There’s a difference between literary hacks and literary artists. The essayists who are out in front with our editorial readers are almost always those who search patiently for words to fit the theme. Some of the losers, however, think that if a religion editor doesn’t accept material on a “first come” basis, he forfeits his right to survival in this age of equality, tolerance, and bloody murder of the king’s English.

Character in the Classroom

“Our objective in the school should not be to stock the minds of our pupils but to strengthen them; we should be concerned not only with their intellectual development but with their attitudes, their values, their relationships one to another, their courage, their tolerance, their initiative, their imagination, above all their compassion.”

So spoke an English educator to the 1966 convention of the Canadian Education Association in Vancouver, reminding the delegates that character rather than knowledge should be the primary goal of the schools. Although this was not exactly a new idea, somehow it made a greater impression than any other in those address-filled three days during which the educators conferred on the future course Canadian schools should follow.

When the country’s leading economist appealed for an expanded program of technological education to meet growing industrial needs, he was asked for his opinion on this idea that character must be education’s first goal. The economist replied at once that he agreed; his point was only, he said, that technological education could be made a part of the kind of curriculum that had been advocated.

Indeed, delegates were so ready to agree with the visiting Yorkshireman’s point of view that no one seemed aware of the great problem involved: How can the schools develop character in a society that no longer has common beliefs and values on which character development can be based?

Canada is becoming this kind of society. Its schools are being asked to do more and more things for the personality of the student but with fewer and fewer resources. Advocates of everything from safe driving to sex education blandly urge that these things be added to the curriculum; but they fail to suggest what source the schools are to draw on for the values and goals they are to teach.

It was not always so. In the mid-nineteenth century, for example, when the educational system of the province of Ontario was devised, the teaching of Christian morality was made an explicit responsibility of the teacher. Canada, it should be remembered, has never had a constitutional separation of church and state; and in the dominantly Protestant and rural society of the time, Christian morality was almost universally accepted, if not so widely practiced. The biblical beliefs that provide the foundation for that morality were just as widely accepted, and they too were included in the school curriculum.

But the social situation is changing. The center of population and power in Canada is shifting from the countryside to the city and suburb, with all their pluralism and secularism. This change is bringing with it an alteration in the values that govern the way an increasing number of people live. Many of the absolutes of past times are gone or rapidly going. Church attendance, alcoholic beverages, sexual relations, and divorce—these are just some of the areas in which a significant number of people now have attitudes radically different from those that their grandparents had, and that some of their neighbors still have.

So the question arises: Just how are the schools to do the job so many think is their main job?

This question was not faced by the delegates to the Canadian Education Association, but it must be faced if the ideal of that convention is to be realized.

To answer it, educators will find it necessary to do more than plumb the depths of the obvious. They will have to discount, for example, the old assumption that if religious knowledge is imparted, moral character is bound to result. Long years of religious instruction in some of Canada’s provinces have shown there is no necessary correlation between religious knowledge and moral living.

On the other hand, they should reject the opposite belief of the humanist that morality should be taught without any religious reference. Educators should see that this approach demands as much commitment as an out-and-out Christian one and has no place in schools that claim they do not indoctrinate their students.

What educators may find worthwhile is a method of teaching moral values that avoids humanism and yet is appropriate to public education in today’s society. This approach would begin with the actual experiences of children and young people that show their need for moral values. It would then go on to show how that need can be met from various sources, one of them being the biblical tradition.

The problem of alienation, for example, is one that every human being suffers at almost every age. It clearly demands that the individual have beliefs and values that enable him to deal with it, and it is a problem to which the Bible speaks very clearly.

Admittedly, this approach is no panacea, and it is far less than the ideal that the Christian could wish for his schools. But it has great potential for helping the schools provide some of the inner resources their students need to receive from their education.

This method can enjoy maximum effectiveness, however, only if it is practiced by people committed in their own lives to the message they are trying to teach. This makes it all the more imperative that the churches consider the work of teaching as a lay ministry. If they do, they will make a much greater effort than many now do to help Christian teachers realize the great opportunity and responsibility they have.

By such means and through such people, there is hope that the schools can carry out the great obligation that today’s society seems determined to put upon them.

Reginald Stackhouse is professor of philosophy of religion at Wycliffe College (Anglican), University of Toronto. He holds the B.A. and M.A. degrees from the University of Toronto, the L.Th. and B.D. from Wycliffe College, and the Ph.D. from Yale University. He was ordained by the Anglican Church of Canada. This year is the Canadian centennial year, and CHRISTIANITY TODAY will devote its March 31 issue to that important dominion. During the year Professor Stackhouse will contribute two more reviews of Current Religious Thought, to the April 14 and July 7 issues. The regular contributors to the feature are Addison H. Leitch, distinguished professor of philosophy and religion at Tarkio College, Tarkio, Missouri; J. D. Douglas, editor of The Christian and Christianity Today and British editorial representative of CHRISTIANITY TODAY; John Warwick Montgomery, professor of church history at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, Deerfield, Illinois; Harold B. Kuhn, professor of the philosophy of religion at Asbury Theological Seminary, Wilmore, Kentucky; and G. C. Berkouwer, professor of systematic theology at the Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Waning Surpluses Curb Church Relief

Church relief efforts around the world are feeling the pinch of America’s dwindling food supply. For years religious groups have relied on government surplus food to carry out welfare programs overseas. Now most surpluses are disappearing, and church-related relief agencies are getting less than half their previous allotments. People overseas who had been getting food through churches are going hungry.

A spokesman for the Jewish relief agency in New York says the cutback has already caused “considerable suffering.” He reports “a very serious situation” in Morocco, Tunisia, Israel, and Yugoslavia. In Morocco alone, the Jewish agency has 10,000 children to feed.

A representative for Church World Service, relief arm of the National Council of Churches, calls the situation “absolutely tragic.” An official of Catholic Relief Services terms it “a revolting development,” partly because of its suddenness. The head of the World Relief Commission of the National Association of Evangelicals says shipments of food supplies are six months behind the previous flow.

The United States can produce much more food than present government controls allow, and church distribution programs overseas form only a small part of American foreign aid. Yet the current shortage is cited by food experts as a possible forerunner of what some call “the impending world famine.” U. S. reserves of feed grains are said to be below the prudent level of a three-month supply. Less than a year’s supply of wheat is reported, which means that a single big crop failure could bring hunger to millions.

One consoling factor for church relief agencies is that they had already begun phasing out direct food giveaways in favor of self-help programs. The 1966 revisions in Public Law 480—the basic enabling legislation for distribution of government surplus commodities through private agencies—were designed to encourage self-help.

The shrinking surplus spurs such programs. Instead of merely doling out food for immediate consumption, relief agencies now aim to provide raw materials from which the needy in other countries can look out for their own future. This means giving wheat seed as well as flour, chicks in addition to chickens, and sewing machines along with clothes, and also such things as fertilizer, irrigation equipment, and agricultural training.

Some experts think mass distribution of birth-control devices and information is the only ultimate solution, and they are trying to step up this aspect. But it is a morally sensitive point.

Hunger-plagued India is at the top of virtually everyone’s priority list. Yet there has been some doubt whether India is doing all she can to meet her food crisis domestically (see April 1, 1966 issue). For one thing, Hindus refuse to butcher their many “sacred” cows, which siphon off thousands of tons of scarce grain every year.

Another factor: a number of countries are in a position to help India but tend to let the United States carry much of the load of supplying grain. Thus, the United States held off announcing an allocation of 900,000 tons of wheat for India (and 500,000 for Pakistan) until the Soviet Union agreed to ship 200,000 tons immediately to drought-stricken areas. A U. S. official said these shipments, coupled with other supplies assured from Canada and Australia, “should prevent any starvation” into March. India is now entering its third year of food crisis, and some areas have been on the brink of famine, particularly during 1966.

Miscellany

Pope Paul VI has called the first meeting of the Synod of Bishops that is to assist him in governing the Roman Catholic Church. The meeting will open September 29 and continue a month or more. Last month, the Pope approved regulations for the synod, including his own primacy in calling meetings, setting the agenda, approving delegates, and deciding on its recommendations.

Pope Paul this month underscored two new documents from Vatican agencies outlawing the use of “jazz” and other experiments in the Mass.

The controversial Child Development Group of Mississippi, whose cause was championed by top U. S. churchmen, won a new lease on life with the promise of more money from the Office of Economic Opportunity. CDGM acceded to demands for administrative and program changes after being cut off from federal funds for a period of nearly three months.

Responding to reports on Bible shortages in Eastern Europe, the British and Foreign Bible Society reports that about 20,000 Bibles are shipped into Rumania each year and that 50,000 New Testaments went to Poland in October. Also, paper from the West is being used to print 13,000 New Testaments and 20,000 Bibles in Czechoslovakia, and 20,000 Bibles in Hungary. Information on distribution, however, is sketchy.

South African churchmen fear clergymen from other nations may face increasing difficulty in entering the country. The government is expected to tighten issuance of residence permits and make visas valid for only one year instead of three.

A symposium on the “new morality” highlighted the Evangelical Theological Society meeting at The King’s College, which drew 112 scholars from thirty states. The new ETS president is Stephen W. Paine, president of Houghton College.

Bellwether Litigation

A non-Presbyterian jury decided last month in favor of two Savannah Presbyterian congregations that seek to retain their properties after withdrawing from the Presbyterian Church in the United States. The Savannah Presbytery is appealing the decision, and the case is being watched closely by many congregations around the country that are alarmed at trends in their denominations.

The two Savannah churches, Eastern Heights and Hull Memorial, are pastored by two young men who gave up their denominational credentials when their congregations withdrew last April. They charged that there have been “substantial deviations” in the faith and order of the Southern Presbyterian Church. In particular, they protested the approval of ordination of women in the denomination, endorsement of civil disobedience, and involvement in political, civil, and economic affairs.

Two buses carrying Epiphany pilgrims plunged into a ravine south of Manila. Initial reports said at least 85 were killed, making it the worst road disaster on record.

Following up a racial pact formed by Martin Luther King last summer (Sept. 16, 1966, issue, page 44), Chicago’s Roman Catholics this month began a large-scale voluntary campaign for non-discrimination in housing, employment, and other areas. United Presbyterians and other Protestant groups are fielding similar programs.

All Protestant and Roman Catholic clergymen in Amesbury, Massachusetts, united to urge the school board to ban the holding of school activities, on Wednesday nights, to encourage attendance at religious programs.

International Students Inc. hopes this month to finish raising a $50,000 down-payment toward a new student service center and training base adjacent to State Department offices in Washington.

A prayer leaflet published jointly by the National Council of Churches and the Roman Catholic Graymoor Friars accompanies the campaign for the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, January 18–25. The National Association of Evangelicals is offering free Bible materials for churches joining its World Day of Prayer on February 10.

Personalia

Michigan’s former governor G. Mennen (Soapy) Williams, 55, who just lost a Senate race, said he has thought “casually” of becoming a priest in the Episcopal Church, of which he is a lifelong member.

Following three politicians (Johnson, Eisenhower, Robert Kennedy), Billy Graham again came out fourth in the Gallup Poll’s annual list of the men in the world Americans admire most. Pope Paul ranks fifth again, but last year’s sixth-place personality, the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., did not make the list.

Robert G. Wesselmann, 38, former chancellor of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Belleville, Illinois, revealed he married Frances H. Burton, 36, a divorcee, on October 23. The couple will move to Kansas City.

A federal jury in Phoenix, Arizona, convicted Joseph D. Jeffers, 67, and his wife Connie, 27, with thirteen counts of mail fraud by his “Kingdom of Yahweh,” which was chartered in Texas as a non-profit religious organization. Complaints said the couple pocketed or spent at racetracks the money the cult’s believers paid to make connections with “spirit guides” and “guardian angels.”

A federal district judge in Maine dismissed a $25 million libel suit against the U. S. government by John T. Holman, 70, a former minister of the Advent Christian Church. He said Internal Revenue had defamed him by refusing to recognize his ordination.

Reginald H. Fuller, a native of England who is on the faculty of Seabury-Western Theological School (Episcopal) in Evanston, Illinois, has been named to the New Testament professorship at Union Theological Seminary, New York.

H. Elmer Bartsch, Missouri Synod Lutheran pastor, was appointed interim deputy chief of the Christian Pavilion for Montreal’s upcoming Expo ’67.

K. H. Dahlan, a leading Muslim in Indonesia, charged Communist China’s zealot Red Guards with mass murder of Muslims in the current cultural purge.

Stanley W. Olson, former dean of the Baylor University School of Medicine and contributing editor of CHRISTIANITY TODAY, this month became director of the new Midsouth Regional Medical Center in Nashville and a medical professor at Vanderbilt University.

Arland Christ-Janer, president of Cornell College in Iowa, has been named president of Boston University. Both schools are Methodist-related.

Former priest Anthony Girandola, who was excommunicated for marrying in 1965 (May 13, 1966, issue, page 50), said he was refused Roman Catholic burial for his stillborn daughter.

Dom Aurelio Maria Escarre, abbot of a Benedictine monastery in Spain, has resigned his post on orders from the Vatican, Reuters reports. An exile in Italy, he had been critical of oppression by Spain’s Franco government.

Deaths

WILLIAM L. NORTHRIDGE, 80, former principal of Edgehill Theological College, Belfast, and former president of the Methodist Church in Ireland; in Belfast, Northern Ireland.

HENRY WILLIAMSON, overseas secretary of the British Baptist Missionary Society and president of the Baptist Union of Great Britain and Ireland.

Key Theologian’s Exit Jars Roman Church

For Roman Catholics everywhere, the thundering departure of British theologian Charles Davis last month was one of the rudest shocks of the Vatican II era.

Geoffrey Moorhouse, Catholic writer for the Guardian, said it was as important as John Henry Newman’s conversion from Anglicanism to Rome a century ago, and perhaps even more important. Ann Kimmel wrote in America’s National Catholic Reporter, “British Catholics are shattered by the decision of their best known and most respected theologian to leave the Church. For many who lived for and worked toward the renewal of Catholicism in Britain, Father Charles Davis was their last hope.”

Davis, 43, decided to make the break on the Sunday three weeks before Christmas, while working on a paper for the next ecumenical meeting between Roman Catholics and Anglicans. In a subsequent press conference and article, he lambasted the Roman church, and in particular the papacy, more severely than most Protestants have during the ecumenical era.

The situation was complicated by Davis’ December 14 engagement to Miss Florence Henderson, 36, an American who is studying theology at Bristol University. But Davis said that if he had just wanted to get married, he would have left the priesthood and stayed in the church. It was reported that Miss Henderson plans to leave the church also.

Davis’ two main gripes were what he called Rome’s “concern for authority at the expense of truth” and “impersonal system that often crushes people.”

In an article for the London Observer, he said, “The more I have studied the Bible, the less likely the Roman claims have become.… There is simply no firm enough biblical basis on which to erect so massive a structure as the Roman Catholic claim requires … political and social factors of its historical development are much more to the point than any biblical data.”

On the doctrines of papal primacy and infallibility as set forth by Vatican I and repeated by Vatican II, Davis says they are more likely explained as not “the unfolding of a revealed dogma, but the misguided absolutizing of a transitory historical structure.”

“Morever,” he went on, “the two papal dogmas concerning Mary, the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption, have rendered the notion of development suspect.” The Marian dogmas are further discredited, he said, by “the new thinking on original sin, death, and Resurrection,” and Rome’s “institutional faith is, in truth, incompatible with biblical criticism and modern theology.”

John Courtney Murray, a key thinker among Catholic reformers, said Davis’ decision has “significance” only to Davis himself. But Davis, like Murray, was a theological expert at Vatican II, and his criticisms of the council’s work may be of particular importance.

Davis believes the council concentrated on “internal problems of the Church” rather than such central problems of humanity as race, the disparity between rich and poor nations, and birth control. On the latter, Davis virtually calls Pope Paul a liar for saying in October that the teaching of the church on contraception is not in doubt. And Vatican intransigence on the issue, to Davis, shows “bureaucratic insensitivity to people and their suffering.”

Davis said the third chapter of the council’s Constitution on the Church is “remote from the New Testament, dominated by an excessive stress on institutional arrangements of relative value, and spoilt even at that level by an obsessive concern to preserve Papal power intact. That world of juridical functions owes, I suggest, more to fossilized feudalism than to the Gospel message.”

He then asks, “When, in fact, has the Church ever entered into conflict with established authority to bear witness, even at the cost of its institutional position?”

Besides his work at Vatican II, Davis had since 1960 edited Clergy Review, an intellectual monthly for priests. In 1965 he became a theology professor at Heythrop College, the noted Jesuit center at Oxford.

Now that the break has been made, Davis says he feels “mentally and spiritually cleansed and free, with a peace and joy I have not known for years.” Besides marriage, his plans are indefinite. He said he is still a Christian but is not joining any other church. “No church seems to present to me the answer to my present problem,” he said. “I see Christians working together, expressing their Christian commitment.… But the actual churches do not seem to be relevant to this.”

‘Creative Misuse’ Of Bonhoeffer

The biographer of Dietrich Bonhoeffer says the martyred German theologian was a revolutionary Protestant thinker, but was not responsible for the death-of-God theology sometimes attributed to him.

According to Dr. Eberhard Bethge, most of the death-of-God theologians realize they are not heirs of Bonhoeffer, although some admit they make “creative misuse” of his theology.

It was to Bethge that Bonhoeffer wrote from prison the famous letters that are having an unusual influence upon Protestant thinking more than twenty years after he was executed by the Nazis for his part in a plot on Hitler. The biographer told an audience in St. Paul, Minnesota, last month that the rare combination of being a martyr, a great theologian with a great vision, and a precise writer made Bonhoeffer famous.

He is popular today both in this country and in Communist-controlled countries because he gives people “a kind of courage to try anew when present structures are breaking down,” Bethge said.

Bonhoeffer advocated a “religionless Christianity” and attacked the privileged structure of the churches. But according to Bethge, one sentence in Bonhoeffer’s writings, “Before God, we have to live today without God,” has been distorted by some theologians to say, “We have to live today without God.”

The original sentence is consciously paradoxical, Bethge explains. Bonhoeffer meant a particular human concept of God must disappear, not God. He believes Bonhoeffer’s thought has been “distorted” in popular discussions of death-of-God theology over the past year. Some modern theologians were “pushed forward by some of Bonhoeffer’s sentences, but then went their own way. I want to keep the heritage of Bonhoeffer,” he said.

In Europe, Bonhoeffer is seen as “another variation of Bultmann,” but Bethge believes the “anti-church atmosphere in colleges” has accounted for his image in the United States, where he is “taken too easily as anti-church.”

Bonhoeffer rejected the Church as “the guardian of man. Christ was not a guardian—he freed man, by joining humanity totally. The proof for this is the cross,” Bethge said.

The Bonhoeffer letters were “hidden” in Bethge’s desk and unknown to the world until he edited them and they were published in the early 1950s. Since then, there has been considerable interest in them, fed in part by other books, such as Honest to God by Bishop John Robinson of England. Bethge, who married a niece of Bonhoeffer, has completed a biography of Bonhoeffer that is to be published early this year in Germany and later in England and the United States.

Bethge said he is sometimes asked why he gives all his energy “to a man who has never matured.” Bonhoeffer died on April 9, 1945, at the age of 39 in a prison at Flossenburg, in northern Bavaria, a few days before American troops arrived there.

Bethge was himself arrested by the Nazis in 1944 and was the only one of five imprisoned members of his family to escape execution. He is now director of the Pastor’s Institute of the Church of the Rhineland in Westphalia, West Germany. He has been teaching at Chicago Theological Seminary and this year will be visiting professor at Union Theological Seminary, New York.

Signing And Resigning

Because the board of Mississippi College in Clinton voted to reject all federal aid, President R. A. McLemore announced at the last student chapel before Christmas vacation he would resign as of August 31.

At issue is the aid requirement that the college sign compliance with the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Although official application requirements make no mention of race, the college has always been all-white.

In November, the Mississippi Baptist Convention, which owns and operates the college, passed a resolution that said in part: “We suggest that our institutions not make applications for, or accept, federal money.”

William Carey College, a Baptist school in Hattiesburg, signed the civil-rights pledge and enrolled a few Negroes this year. But the president of Mississippi College’s board, millionaire poultryman B. C. Rogers, said his school will not sign as long as the state convention opposes federal aid.

McLemore, 63, admits he resigned to “dramatize” the problem and will reconsider if the board takes the steps he considers essential for the college’s future. He thinks the board will change its mind this year. If not, he’s already gotten five other job offers, although the lifelong Mississippian drawled, “I’m pretty well grounded in this ol’ state.” McLemore, who gets fringe benefits from the college as well as a $19,000 salary, draws outside income from several high school history texts he has written. He holds a Ph.D. in history from Vanderbilt.

Before passage of the civil-rights bill, the college had drawn $600,000 in federal student loans, which are now being repaid. If reinstated, the school would stand to get about $500,000 for loans in 1967–68. Race policies could cut off 300 students with G.I. Bill loans. McLemore would also like to permit federal money for faculty research, although he thinks construction needs can be met by private donors. He said 9 per cent of the college’s $2.4 million operating budget comes from churches. After the college board rejected federal aid, it switched $100,000 from operating funds to a student-loan fund and rejected McLemore’s plea to spend a similar amount to renovate buildings.

McLemore was raised a segregationist, and is no racial radical. But he favors a “gradual transition” and believes Negroes should attend his college if they meet academic requirements and can pay the fees, which are three times those at a nearby all-Negro state college. He would like to keep promising Negroes in Mississippi, rather than have them migrate to northern universities.

Population Outpaces Church Growth

Church growth is not quite keeping up with population growth, according to figures in the 1967 Yearbook of American Churches, published this month by the National Council of Churches.

The data covers mainly calendar 1965, or denominations’ fiscal years that ended in 1965. In this period 124,682,422 Americans belonged to some religious group, an increase of 1.4 million over the previous year. But in roughly the same period, the U. S. population grew by 2.5 million, to nearly 195 million. Church membership increased by 1.1 per cent, while the general population grew by 1.3 per cent.

The rankings of major religious groupings were similar to those in the previous count:

The ranking of the largest non-Catholic communions also contained few surprises. The biggest numerical gains were posted by two conservative congregational groups, the Southern Baptist Convention and the Churches of Christ (the latter’s figure, however, is a rough estimate at best). Large denominations losing membership over the year were, in order of losses: the American Baptist Convention, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The American Lutheran Church, and the Christian Churches (Disciples of Christ).

More startling is the fact that three of the top fifteen groups have actually lost members since 1956, despite the huge population increase: the ABC, the Disciples, and the United Church of Christ.

In 1956, the National Baptist Convention of America reported the same figure it gives in the 1967 Yearbook, highlighting again the fact that the volume is no more reliable than the 251 denominations that supply the data. Another problem with figures is that Roman Catholics and other groups tally baptized infants, while the rest count only confirmed or adult members.

The Yearbook also reports a poll shows regular churchgoers have dropped slowly but steadily, from 47 per cent of the population in 1961 to 44 per cent in 1965.

Last month, the U. S. government added another Baptist school, Anderson College in South Carolina, to the list of those denied federal student-loan funds. Its board refused to sign the civil-rights form. At another Carolina school, independent Bob Jones University, officials last month asserted the segregated, fundamentalist school will not sign, is getting no U. S. aid now, and will seek none in the future.

Evangelical Methodist Forum

A journalist-turned-preacher plans to publish next week a pilot issue of a magazine to rally evangelicals in The Methodist Church. Editor Charles W. Keysor says in his opening editorial, “We have dared to dream that evangelical Methodists might be united in fellowship across the church.”

If support develops, Good News will come out quarterly, but Keysor has no plans yet for any organization. The magazine will be “strongly Methodist-centered,” not schismatic.

In the lead article of the first issue, Bishop Gerald Kennedy of Los Angeles, who favors an inclusive church, says it is “shocking” to see that “some of those who have been most outspoken in favor of the ecumenical movement seem to be most unsympathetic with anybody disagreeing with them in The Methodist Church.” He says Methodism “cannot afford to lose the evangelicals. It would be a sad day indeed if they should feel unwelcome and go somewhere else.”

Keysor, who is 42, earned a B.S. in journalism from Northwestern. He became a Chicago adman and first managing editor of Together, largest of Methodism’s seven national magazines. While he was managing editor of the David C. Cook Publishing Company, he says, he was converted to Christ and decided to enter Garrett Theological Seminary. He is now pastor of the 300-member Grace Methodist Church in Elgin, Illinois.

Keysor registered his complaints on behalf of the evangelical “silent minority” in Christian Advocate last summer and got about 100 letters of support. This was the stimulus for Good News. Keysor wrote that evangelicals are “not represented in the higher councils of the church” and that their traditionalist theology is “often abhorrent to Methodist officialdom.” As an index of conservative strength, he noted that 10,000 congregations shun denominational education material. Keysor said conservatives believe in the virgin birth, substitutionary atonement, Christ’s physical resurrection and coming return, and the inspiration of the “whole Bible.”

Besides the Kennedy piece and fourteen other articles, the forty-eight page first edition (2,000 copies will be printed free in offset by a layman) will include two new hymns and several book reviews.

Football: Faith And $400,000

The Heisman Trophy winner had just finished one of his “worst” games in three years as quarterback for the University of Florida Gators. He had completed only fourteen of thirty passes for 160 yards and had run another fifteen yards. And he hadn’t scored a point.

But Steve Spurrier had called enough right plays to upset favored Georgia Tech in the Orange Bowl, 27–12.

The outspoken son of a Presbyterian minister immediately began talking about demanding $400,000 or more to sign for the New York Giants professional football team. Such a contract figure would be the highest ever offered an athlete.

Just a few months ago, while watching his son hobble around the spring practice field at Gainesville, the Rev. J. Graham Spurrier commented: “He is coming upon a stage of life when money and the will of God will determine his future.”

The Rev. Mr. Spurrier moved his family from Johnson City, Tennessee, to High Springs, Florida, to be near Steve during his senior year on the gridiron, which brought him All-America recognition and the trophy designating him as the nation’s outstanding college football player.

“Steve has talent and ability that will bring him before the public eye,” his father had said. “I’ve told him he’s not to usurp that talent and take it for his own honors.”

Indications are that the 21-year-old blond athlete has heeded his father’s advice. Although he is not at all reticent about his accomplishments, Steve doesn’t let his fame change his personality. He’s still a team man, well-liked by other members of the squad, and likely to make funny quips about almost anything except the price he asks for playing pro ball and his personal faith.

Spurrier doesn’t talk much about his faith on a personal, individual level. But on Christmas night, as a Christmas present to his mother-in-law, Mrs. Nellie Starr, he took time out from the busy schedule of the Orange Bowl team to go to Fort Lauderdale’s First Presbyterian Church and speak to sixty junior and senior high school kids of the Westminster Fellowship.

He told them that accomplishments in life don’t “just happen” but come as the result of determination and concentration. He explained that while he was a three-letter man in high school, he was best at football so he decided to concentrate on that sport in college.

In fact, Spurrier said he feels that football is his calling and vocation, so “I must do the job the best that I can.” To that end, he said, “I don’t pray that I will make this touchdown or field goal—I don’t think that’s making the best use of my faith. I pray that I might have the strength to do and play the best I know how.”

Jerri, his bride of four months, adds: “I think Steve’s father also wants him to feel the religious attachment of playing for God.”

That feeling is heightened by Steve’s role in the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. He’s secretary of the Gainesville chapter, whose president is Bill Carr, the All-America center who snaps the ball to Steve. Carr is a preacher’s son also; his father is a Baptist minister in Pensacola.

Spurrier never has considered the ministry. “I don’t think he’s cut out for that kind of life,” observed Jerri. “He’s a very good speaker, but as a life work, that’s just not for him.”

Jerri, also a Presbyterian, said that their faith “is a big part of our lives” but that “it is for ourselves.” Still, they’re willing to share it in the way they feel Steve should—as a successful athlete giving his testimony whenever he can.

ADON TAFT

In Defense Of ‘Christian Homes’

Harold George Martin, president of the Quebec-based Christian Homes for Children, charges that an adverse report made by Canada’s Income Tax Appeal Board has been “taken out of context” (see Dec. 9, 1966, issue). Martin was recently denied an appeal by the board, which is claiming taxes on $350,402 on the basis of a report that accused him of “sumptuous living and sustained tax evasion.” Martin called this “misleading, slanderous, and irresponsible.” He said that the federal government was using the tax board as an instrument of punishment because of pressure by the Province of Quebec, which is predominantly French Roman Catholic.

As a result of a 1961 article entitled “How to Make a Million in the Charity Game,” Martin says he is suing Maclean’s magazine for $850,000.

To mark Canada’s centennial in 1967, Martin says he will “travel coast to coast … thundering the same Gospel.”

Soviet Chief To Visit Pope

President Nikolai Podgorny of the Soviet Union has scheduled a private audience January 29 with Pope Paul VI in Vatican City. The historic confrontation will be the first meeting between a pontiff and a Soviet head of state since the Russian Revolution.

Last April, Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko talked for forty-five minutes with the Pope, with world peace as the announced topic. Just a year ago, Podgorny sent the Pope a New Year’s message that affirmed Soviet support for North Viet Nam’s terms for settling the Vietnamese war. These include withdrawal of all U. S. troops before negotiations can begin.

Graham Preaches Peace in Viet Nam

Billy Graham made his first trip to Viet Nam over Christmas, preaching to the drone of airplanes, presenting the Gospel to mud-soaked GIs fresh from battle, and taking a first-hand look at America’s most perplexing problem, the bloody undeclared war there.

It was a quick-paced visit that started at the Saigon airport December 19, when U. S. Commander William Westmoreland drove up to welcome Graham, whom he had invited to come. It ended the day after Christmas with the last of ten services, on the carrier “Kitty Hawk” in the North China Sea, and an encounter with Bob Hope.

In his opening press conference, Graham said he had come not only to survey Christian work and humanitarian efforts generally, and to preach the Christian message of peace, but to study the U. S. military commitment, which he is asked about everywhere he goes in the world.

Asked about the “morality” of the war, Graham deferred comment until the end of the trip. When it was over, he said he didn’t want to be an “eight-day wonder” in analyzing the complex issue. Was he a “dove” or a “hawk”? Graham preferred “lamb,” a biblical symbol.

Though far less militant and outspoken than Cardinal Spellman, who was on tour the same week (see following story), Graham’s lamb had asserted itself clearly. He said that Americans should back their President in his decision to make a stand in Viet Nam and that the “pacification” program, which attempts to win the loyalty of South Vietnamese villagers, is essential.

After returning to America, the evangelist said the “stakes are extremely high for the Western world” in Viet Nam. “I hope for peace, but I don’t see any early possibilities of peace.” Expansionist China and North Viet Nam want the resources of the South, he said. He doesn’t believe that U. S. bombing raids in the North have been aimed at civilians. But he thinks the bombing question might become academic, because of the increasing effectiveness of Communist anti-aircraft weapons.

Graham said the death of civilians from U. S. bombing is only part of the story: “The atrocities of the Viet Cong would equal anything in history.”

While in Viet Nam, Graham and his four-man team got as much of a red-carpet treatment as could be expected in a combat zone. But the evangelist sometimes slept on a sagging Army cot and ate from tables hastily knocked together from ammunition boxes. He traveled the length of the An Khe Valley in a “Caribou” aircraft designed to land troops and supplies for battle.

An Khe, with weather wavering from bright sun to pouring rain, was Graham’s locale on Christmas Eve and perhaps the high spot of the tour. The day’s first service was held next to a helicopter landing strip. A brass plate on a cement block near the makeshift stage noted that Martha Raye had been there two months before. After some jokes and carol-singing, Graham preached that any man can enjoy personal, inner peace, even in the midst of war, by putting his faith in Christ. As usual, he ended with a call for decisions, and several dozen lifted their hands in response.

That night, a shining star easily visible to Viet Cong in the surrounding jungles stood on the radar-rimmed hill above a candlelight service for the crack First Cavalry. Thousands of sky troopers plodded through mud and rain to spread their ponchos on the meeting ground. While guards watched for any Communist violations of the Christmas cease-fire, rifle-clutching troops sat through intermittent rain, listened to a specially organized chorus of troopers, and at one point held thousands of individual candles aloft as the searchlights were turned off. Graham again spoke on the peace theme, from Luke 2:14, and many hands were raised in response to his invitation.

As the troopers quietly left the service, many to attend Protestant and Roman Catholic communion services, a chaplain remarked, “This was the greatest Christmas I’ve ever celebrated.”

Through the night, mortars were fired and flares dropped over the camp at hour intervals, and there were continual reports of VC activity. The evangelist slept little and was jolted awake by the noise. Shortly after midnight a young soldier went berserk in front of the chapel. He shot and killed two comrades and wounded a third, who was inside the chapel.

In another Christmas Eve tragedy, a Flying Tiger plane crashed short of the runway at Da Nang, killing the four crew members and nearly 100 Vietnamese on the ground. Graham heard the news while en route to Da Nang on Christmas Day and decided to make one of his many hospital trips to visit the survivors.

An estimated 7,000 men attended the major service on Christmas Day in an amphitheater near the base. This and several other sermons were beamed afar by Armed Forces Radio.

After the shipboard service on the 26th, Graham flew to the coastal city of Quinhon at the invitation of Bob Hope, who was also on tour that week. Graham spent an hour in private with the famous comedian. He sat on the stage for Hope’s show, brought greetings, and led the audience in reciting John 3:16. Although obviously embarrassed by some of the seamier parts of the show, Graham later spoke highly of the singing of Anita Bryant, who has been outspoken in her Christian conviction.

Graham was often wet and weary but was always ready to speak a “hello” or a “God bless you” to as many soldiers as he could. The first major service was held at Tan Son Nhut airbase in Saigon, the world’s second-busiest airport. Giant jets often drowned out Graham’s voice. The next day at Long Binh, some thirty miles from Saigon, 6,000 troops sat in the hot sun to hear his message. Meanwhile, hundreds of special troops guarded a nearby ammunition dump, and helicopters scurried around the perimeter of the base like hens trying to protect baby chicks. Hundreds of troopers responded to Graham’s invitation.

Other major services were held at Cam Ranh Bay, home of the 12th Tactical Fighter Wing and a huge new port facility, and landing zones “Oasis” and “Hammond,” with the First Cavalry.

Graham and the team were obviously affected by their visit. Veteran gospel singer George Beverly Shea remarked, “They think it’s their pleasure to have us, but it’s been our pleasure to be with them.” Graham said that if the war continues, he will certainly go back for another preaching tour of Viet Nam.

The emphasis this time was on U. S. soldiers, but President Doan Van Mieng of the Evangelical Church (Christian and Missionary Alliance) urged Graham to return in the near future to minister to the Vietnamese. Besides holding services, Graham spoke at an International Christian Leadership breakfast and a luncheon for missionaries. He met many chaplains and had high praise for them. He also noted the tremendous humanitarian efforts in Viet Nam.

Doves, Hawks, And A Cardinal

Old cardinals don’t even fade away, it seems, and New York’s Francis Cardinal Spellman, 77, stirred up dust from Vatican City to Viet Nam last month. Like Greek Orthodox Primate Iakovos (see January 6 issue, page 39), Spellman voiced firm support of U. S. policies during a trip to the combat zone:

“This war in Viet Nam is, I believe, a war for civilization. Certainly it is not a war of our seeking. It is a war thrust upon us, and we cannot yield to tyranny.… We do hope and pray, through the valor, the dedication, the service of our men and women of our armed forces, we shall soon have the victory for which all of us in Viet Nam and all over the world are praying and hoping; for less than victory is inconceivable.”

These reported remarks during a Christmas Eve Mass for 5,000 troops at Cam Ranh Bay did not appear in the text released from the cardinal’s New York office. But he later stood by the hawk-like words attributed to him.

Response was swift and biting, not only from Communist capitals, but also from the Vatican, where a “high source” told Religious News Service that Spellman “did not speak for the Pope or the church. The Pope, who sees the conflict as an impartial observer, feels that a negotiated peace rather than a military victory by either side is the way to end the war.” Another unnamed Vatican aide told Newsweek that the Pope was upset by Spellman’s reported identification of U. S. troops as “soldiers of Christ.” “He cannot say that Christ is all on one side or the other. This is not a holy war.”

Anti-Spellman speculation was heightened by an editorial in the Vatican daily urging support for Pope Paul’s peace drive “without preference or reservation.” Yet another confidential source told United Press International that the editorial was not meant as a rebuke of Spellman.

On Formosa, the cardinal said he is obeying the Pope’s appeal to pray for peace. In Spellman’s terms, this means prayer “that light might come to the minds of the Communists, that some time they will be moved by pity, moved by compassion, and will come to the peace table so that all involved in this terrible and useless war will have peace again.”

If Spellman’s views were strong, so were those of the doves at the Catholic weekly Commonweal, published in New York: “The United States should get out of Viet Nam,” began its Christmas week editorial. “It should seek whatever safety it can for our allies; it should arrange whatever international face-saving is possible; and, even at the cost of a Communist victory, the United States should withdraw.” The article then went on to agonize over the ambiguities of the war, arguing more from pragmatism than from pacifism.

Among Protestant voices was that of Soviet Baptist executive Alexander Karev. In a Radio Moscow program beamed at the United States, he urged “an immediate cessation of U. S. A. bombing and the beginning of a clearly stated and swiftly phased withdrawal of all American troops and weapons.”

The World Council of Churches’ Christmas message urged “all parties” to seek negotiations, and General Secretary Eugene Carson Blake, an American, said in a CBS-TV interview that “the suspicion comes” that the United States isn’t trying as hard as it should to bring about peace talks. Leaders of the National Council of Churches sent telegrams to member denominations urging support for President Johnson’s call for United Nations help in settling the war.

Two For Fordham

After some communications snafus between New York and Toronto, Fordham University (Jesuit) this month handed Canadian communicologist Marshall McLuhan a $100,000 state-backed chair in humanities. McLuhan, a convert to Catholicism, has rippled academia with outlandish analyses of media.

Fordham also named Robert L. Wilken of Lutheran Theological Seminary (LCA), Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, to teach patristic theology. He is one of the first Protestants to win permanent appointment to a Catholic theological faculty. Fordham already pools faculty, credits, and library with Union Theological Seminary.

Union and Yale Divinity School are also negotiating for another Catholic neighbor. The Jesuits are giving “serious consideration” to moving their noted rural Maryland seminary, Wood-stock College, to an urban locale and establishing Protestant contacts.

Spare A Hallowed Landmark?

Presbyterian leaders in southwestern Pennsylvania meet this week to weigh the fate of historic Tent Church. A move is on to disband the fifty-six-member congregation founded during Revolutionary War days by merging it with several nearby Presbyterian churches. The building itself is in reasonably good repair and might be preserved as a historical site. Some are afraid, however, that it might merely be abandoned and left to rot away. A commission is being named by Redstone Presbytery to come up with merger plans on which the churches can agree.

“I guess they feel we’re just too small to bother with,” says Mrs. Gladys Hixon, clerk of session for Tent Church. “The coal mines have closed, and people have gone.”

Last fall the congregation voted by a narrow margin to explore merger. It acted after the presbytery had voted down a move to close the church.

Although the church pays its own bills and its dues to the presbytery, some contend that the attendance, which averages twenty-five or thirty each Sunday, is too small to warrant continuation of services. The Rev. W. H. Strohm, general presbyter, says the church is not progressing. The main problem seems to be that it cannot meet the minimum annual expense of $5,000 needed to maintain a regular minister. At present, the church is served by seminary students from Pittsburgh for a fee of $20 per sermon.

Thought by many to be the first rural sanctuary west of the Alleghenies, Tent Church was founded in 1773 or 1774 by a missionary from the East. A large tent of bear skin, made in Indian form, was provided for the minister; hence the name Tent Church.

The tent arrangement lasted for eighteen years. Not until 1792 was a 35-foot-square structure hewn from logs. Finally in 1832 a brick building 60 feet by 40 feet was erected at the same site, just west of what is now Uniontown, Pennsylvania.

Through the years the church has faced numerous threats to its existence. Because church trustees failed to obtain a lease for the land, it was sold at a sheriff’s sale and had to be repurchased. In 1878 a disastrous fire left only blackened walls standing, but within four months the church was rebuilt. In 1905 the church survived the explosion of a nearby powder mill.

In the latter years of the nineteenth century, the attic of the church reportedly served as a refuge for a notorious band of outlaws.

There is now a manse on the church property and a cemetery nearby. Trust funds provide for the care of the grounds.

B. J. CATON

addApple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseellipseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squarefolderGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastprintremoveRSSRSSSaveSavesaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube