A Call for Church Welfare Reform, Part 2
The church needs welfare reform every bit as much as the government did.
Amy L. Sherman | posted 10/06/1997 12:00AM
Part two of two parts; click here to read part one
Third, they are marked by regular, face-to-face, structured contact between
the volunteers and the participants. They do not rely on spontaneous interaction
but set defined meeting times and articulate specific goals and deadlines.
The friendship developed between the participant and the church volunteers
is purposeful, directed toward a specified end.
Fourth, effective programs demand individual responsibility. They challenge
participants to take small steps toward change and provide incentives for
taking those steps. New Focus, a Christian nonprofit that shows churches
how to transition from commodity-based ministry to relational, holistic ministry,
encourages congregations to establish a weekly "life skills" training class.
Individuals who have a history of repeatedly requesting financial help from
the church must attend the weekly class and meet regularly with a budget
counselor in order to receive further aid. They are also linked with a Compassion
Circle of six to eight church volunteers who provide practical help (such
as temporary babysitting, transportation, car repairs, or help with job
searching) as well as prayer and emotional support. Participants and church
volunteers draft a strategic plan for achieving independence from the public
(and private) welfare system. As participants complete aspects of that plan,
they receive groceries or household items in recognition of their progress.
Making the shift to relational ministry is difficult because it requires
that we give more of ourselves and our time, as well as our money. By
concentrating church resources on fewer families, though, we are able to
make a long-lasting impact. Through time-intensive, individually tailored
aid, we can address the root causes of persistent poverty and help people
become economically self-sufficient. As participants no longer require
assistance, our funds are freed up to help new families. As a deacon from
a New Focus-affiliated church in Grand Rapids, Michigan, noted, this is just
"better stewardship of God's money."
And there is another important benefit. As the Warrenton Baptist Church in
north-central Virginia discovered, relational ministry can invigorate greater
congregational participation in community outreach. When this 350-member,
middle-class church ran its Deacons' Family Ministry, it provided groceries
and cash aid to about 50 families each month. But only a few deacons and
church members volunteered in the initiative. Pastor Doug Harris admits that
no ongoing relationships with the assisted families materialized. "Follow-up,"
he recalls, "was basically zero." There was no ministry that addressed the
families' spiritual needs, and since the same families returned again and
again for assistance, the temporal help the church was providing accomplished
nothing.
Last year, Harris was approached by local officials of the Department of
Social Services. They wanted to know if Warrenton Baptist would "adopt" two
women and their families who wanted to get off welfare. Harris agreed—and
the congregation's response was overwhelming. A committee of several women
stepped forward to befriend the two families. The youth group began meeting
weekly with one of the families and raised money to purchase business attire
for the mother so she would look nice at job interviews. A group of senior
citizens wanted to know what they could do to "help our families" and ended
up sewing window treatments. Benevolence programs aimed at "the poor" rarely
excite concern. But when the poor become specific families with faces and
names, church members enthusiastically assume ownership of outreach efforts.
October 6 1997, Vol. 41, No. 11