Weblog: Judge OKs Creationism in Library Meeting Room
Also: Will worship ruin a Russian church and other religion news stories from around the world.
Compiled by Ted Olsen | posted 4/01/2000 12:00AM
Creationism group can use library meeting room, judge rules
The West Allis (Wisconsin) Public Library refused a patron's request to hold a meeting in its public meeting room because his creation science workshop might include religious discussion, and library policy did not allow use of the room for religious services. "It may be that the exclusion of partisan political meetings and religious services or instruction is based on the library's desire to avoid controversy," wrote U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman in a decision against the library. "However, the avoidance of controversy is not a valid ground for restricting speech in a public forum." (See more coverage at
The Freedom Forum.)
Russian architecture experts 'horrified' that church will be used for worship (gasp!) instead of museum
The Russian Orthodox Church has been trying for ten years to regain control of Moscow's 1693 Church of the Intercession, now a "carefully-tended museum" in the words of Ian Traynor. It's pretty easy to tell from his article in Britain's The Guardian which side Traynor favors. "Having coped with the barbarities visited on it over 300 years, the church now faces a new threat," he writes. "According to some of Russia's architecture experts, incense and overcrowding could succeed where despots failed and destroy a precious national heirloom." An interesting take on priorities comes from Gennady Popov, director of the museum: "This is our cultural heritage and that is paramount. That's what we should be thinking about." In a related Russia story, University of Chicago sociologist Andrew Greeley told a religion conference at Oxford University that
religious interest is skyrocketing in the country. "In a remarkably brief period of time, Russia has become one of the most God-believing countries in Europe," the Roman Catholic priest said. "Perhaps we were naïve … to expect that a thousand-year heritage would wither away in 70 years of inept socialist oppression."
Falwell disagrees with Robertson on death penalty
"Pat and I do not disagree on many things, but on this one we do," Jerry Falwell told the Richmond Times-Dispatch Tuesday. "I don't think a moratorium is needed. … While courts do make mistakes, I do not believe the mistake level is at the point where we need to rethink our whole system, and I personally believe that we need to reduce the time between conviction and execution." Robertson
said last week that a death penalty moratorium "would indeed be very appropriate." This apparent rift between the two religious leaders has received a moderate amount of
media coverage, including an Associated Press article titled "Falwell, Robertson At Odds for Once." Please. Falwell has increasingly identified himself with the Southern Baptists, Robertson a charismatic. They aren't clones. They may not "disagree on many things," but they do disagree from time to time.
Faith-based organizations discussion packs out Harvard
Once upon a time, Sojourners founder Jim Wallis was a voice crying in the wilderness. His message of social justice and evangelical theology separated him from potential allies on both the left and right (at times, it seemed he kind of liked it that way, as if isolation was the badge of integrity). Now he's packing out Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government in forums about what churches and synagogues
can do to stop poverty. "Some of us have been doing this work for a long time, and now it seems we've been discovered," he tells Religion News Service.