SoulWork
On Not Transforming the World
Hardly a day goes by that a book or an email doesn't arrive telling me how to "transform the culture" or "change the world."
In one recent email, a conference promised the attendance of many nationally recognized evangelical speakers. I went to the website and read that at this conference, among other things, I will "find out what it means to be inwardly strong and outwardly focused and to have a church body that desires to change the world from the inside-out!"
I have on my desk a book subtitled "The Passion and Practices of Missional Churches," and the subtitle for one chapter says that missional churches "expect to change the world." It leads with a quote from a well-known futurist, who says, "It is still God's policy to work through the embarrassingly insignificant to change his world and create his future." The book points to one Southern California church and says, "The ultimate criteria for determining its effectiveness is the transformation of Los Angeles."
Are they ever in for a big disappointment. On top of that, I'm now worried for Los Angeles.
I hesitate to cheer for cultural transformation, though not because I like the world just the way it is. Hardly. I read the paper this morning. I hesitate, though not because I don't believe that the church impacts the world. It has impacted the world and will continue to do so. I hesitate because I think the goal of transforming our city, our culture, or our world can lead to little good.
The church is rightly embarrassed by well-lit displays of the Crusades, the Inquisition, murderously Reformed Geneva, and the Salem witch trials in history's hall of shame. What do all these events have in common? They were motivated by a desire to transform the culture, if not the world, into a kingdom of God. When we get on that kick, history has repeatedly shown that even Christians will destroy a village to save it.
To be sure, Christians ought to care about the sad plight of the culture and the world. And we ought to recognize that we are at least partly responsible for the mess. Then we should recognize that God wants us to work against injustice and evil.
It's the next step that gets us into trouble. We recall verses like this: "Go and make disciples of all nations " and "You are to be my witnesses in all the world ." So we make the leap of faith and start preaching, "We've got to change the world!"
We are certainly responsible for going to the ends of the earth and making disciples from people of every nation. There is plenty in Scripture about doing justice and loving mercy and feeding the hungry and caring for the widow and orphan. But I find little or nothing about us having the task of transforming the culture.
We fall into this rhetoric because we know the problems we face are huge and we feel so small. We worry that if we don't boldly proclaim that we can "change the world," everybody will give up before we even begin. We all face the common temptation of Adam and Eve. We want to feel significant. We want to feel like we're players. We want to make a difference in the world. And only by imagining that we can change the world do we think our actions have any meaning.
This, of course, runs in the opposite direction of Jesus' ethic, which is about service. Servants aren't about world-changing initiatives as much as about washing the dirty feet of the travelers sitting at their kitchen table. Jesus never tells us to do anything because it will transform the culture. Surprisingly, he didn't seem interested in transforming the Roman Empire, one of the most oppressive and unjust cultures in history. He seemed rather to think that society would always have economic disparity, and that not only should changing Rome not be a priority, but also we should not even object to underwriting it with our taxes.
SoulWork
In "SoulWork," Mark Galli brings news, Christian theology, and spiritual direction together to explore what it means to be formed spiritually in the image of Jesus Christ.
- Christian Athletes Are Not Role Models
- On the Death—and Life—of Innocent Children
- Closer than Ever to the Breath of God
- Making Non-Sense of the Colorado Shootings
- Mastering the Golf Swing of Life

A Fractured and Beautiful Faith
Streaming This Weekend, May 24, 2013

(on articles open to the public, you must at least register for a free account).













Comments
Displaying 13 of 64 comments
See all comments
Jim A
Mark misses the point of transformation. It is not about YOU Mark. It IS the little and big things that come when we submit to the Spirit of God who is the Transformer. We have the fantastic privilege of seeing Him move, one life at a time, to change a family, city or nation. However this phenomenom ONLY occurs through HIM. The folks who miss the glorious activity of God have not yet yielded to the Spirit as Sons and Daughters, but rather are stuck in bondage to the flesh as servants. Ask the Father for the Spirit, to be fully immersed and endued. Receive the Spirit of adoption and then walk in your inheritance. This is not triumphalism. This is the Gospel: Father, Son & Holy Spirit.
Roberto Abril
What is understood as culture? If culture is all we do in the spheres of education, economics and politics then culture will be guided by Christian principles and virtues. If that is not trans-forming or shaping culture (the way we live and think), then what is? I find disturbing that Christians Cultural Transformation become a lead for fundamentalists with ideological aims. Overall, neither theocracy nor secularists agendas are better off in the history of disrespecting life. And the fact that Christians had failed (Inquisition, etc.) is not an argument that discard them to act in cultural affairs. Any collective enterprise might have dismal consequence when it becomes an ideology for greedy powers. I believe that Christians should engage the culture of consumerism and protect the environment (read, "Consumed" by Benjamin R. Barber) in order to become more coherent cultural shapers.
Rev. Austin Miles
This is the worst piece of trash I have ever had the displeasure to read, and espcially in a so-called "Christian" magazine. Liberal yes...Christian, no. This 'writer' could have made his point without painting Christianity as an evil force. It is too bad that an editor of CT is obviously anti-Christian. As a devoted chaplain and minister, I take great objection to this outrage. Again, the point the author wanted to make could have been done much differently, more responsibly and more helpful. Mr Editor, your liberal bias shows. You have no Chritian credibility. Rev. Austin Miles--California